THE EFFECT OF CHILD-TO-CHILD TEACHING APPROACH ON STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN SOCIAL STUDIES

Year 2022, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 90 - 108, 30.06.2022

Önder Eryılmaz , Handan Deveci

https://doi.org/10.55020/iojpe.1052448

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of the child-to-child teaching approach on students’ level of social responsibility in primary social studies courses. A mixed-method experimental intervention approach was adopted in this research. The study participants were 5th-grade students, students' parents, and a social studies teacher. The social responsibility scale, semi structured interviews, unstructured observation, control list, video records, student products, anecdotes, and researcher's diary were used as data collection tools. The results revealed that the child-to-child teaching approach (CtC) applied in social studies courses statistically impacted students' social responsibility levels. Moreover, it was determined that the CtC contributed to the students' social responsibility development according to the students', parents', and social studies teacher's views. It was also determined that participants had positive views regarding the CtC, and they thought that the approach was useful and enjoyable.

Keywords

social studies, social responsibility, child-to-child teaching approach

References

• Ahmad, L. A. (1997). Yemen: on course for a healthy future: Reflections on the implementation of the child-to-child approach in the Somali refugees primary school. P. Harman and C. Scotchmer (Eds.), in rebuilding young lives: using the child-to-child approach with children in difficult circumstances: six case studies (pp. 52-60). The Child to child trust institute of education.
• Akbulut, Y. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları: sık kullanılan istatistiksel analizler ve açıklamaları SPSS çözümlemeleri [SPSS applications in social sciences: Frequently used statistical analysis and SPSS interpretations]. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür Publishing.
• Alazab, R., Elsheikh, R., & Kamal, I. (2008). Child-to-child health as a model of community participation for combating avian influenza in selected slum and rural areas [Paper presentation]. 136th American Public Health Association, San Diego, USA.
• Alpar, R. (2016). Applied statistics and validity-reliability with examples from sports, health and educational sciences [Statistics and validty-reliability with examples from Sport, health and educational sciences]. Ankara: Detail Publishing.
• Ataman, U. (2009). Child-to-child education in preschool nutrition education (Unpublished Master Thesis). Selçuk University. Konya.
• Berman, S. (1990). Educating for social responsibility. Educational Leadership, 48(3), 75-80.
• Bhutta, S. M., & Sylva, K. (2015). Health education classroom practices in primary schools: An observational study from Pakistan. Global Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 16(2), 74-101.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum (2. Baskı) [Data analysis booklet for social sciences: Statistics research design (2nd ed.)]. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Chalker, P. (1997). Yemen: a common thread: radda barnen’s support for the development of child-to-child. P. Harman and C. Scotchmer (Eds.). In rebuilding young lives: using the child-to-child approach with children in difficult circumstances: six case studies (pp. 40-51).The Child to child trust institute of education.
• Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis (A. Aypay Trans. Ed.). Ankara: Anı Publishing.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd Edition). California: Sage Publications.
• Demir, C. E., Luca, N. D., Çobanoğlu, R., Akın, S., Çalık, B., Schaepkens, L., & Brodigan, B. (2009). Okuldan topluma: Toplumsal değişim aktörü olarak çocuklar ve öğrenciler [School to school: Children and students as actors of the social change] (Report No. TR2009/0136.01-02/469].
• Demirel, Z. M., & Sungur, S. (2018). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya yönelik tutum ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması [Adaptation of the Attitude toward Sustainable Development Scale to Turkish]. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 19(2), 1619-1633.
• Deveci, H. & Selanik Ay, T. (2014). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde çocuktan çocuğa öğretim yaklaşımına ilişkin öğretim uygulaması [An example of child to child teaching in social studies course]. Elementary Education Online, 13(1), 1-16.
• Eryılmaz, Ö. & Deveci, H. (2019). Ortaokul öğrencilerine yönelik sosyal sorumluluk ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Development of social responsibility scale for secondary school students]. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 20(2), 751-794.
• Faulkner, L. R., & McCurdy, L. (2000). Teaching medical students social responsibility: the right thing to do. Academic Medicine, 75(4), 346-350.
• Freeman, R., & Bunting, G. (2003). A child to child approach to promoting healthier snacking in primary school children: a randomised trial in Northern Ireland. Health Education, 103(1), 17-27.
• Gibbs, S., Mann, G., & Mathers, N. (2002). Child-to-child: A practical guide. Retrieved from http://www.savethechildren.org.fj/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Child-to-Child-apractical-guide.pdf.
• Gilkes, J. (1997). West bank and gaza: environmental health through the child-to-child approach. P. Harman & C. Scotchmer (Eds.) In rebuilding young lives: using the child-to-child approach with children in difficult circumstances: six case studies (pp. 26-39). The Child to child trust institute of education.
• Hanbury, C. (1997). Romania: the health messengers associaton. P. Harman, & C. Scotchmer (Eds.) In rebuilding young lives: using the child-to-child approach with children in difficult circumstances: six case studies (pp. 17-25). The Child to child trust institute of education.
• Hawes, H. (1988). Child-to-child: Another path to learning. Setzkasten elektronic volker stübing. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000080862.
• Hawes, H., Nicholson, J., & Bonati, G. (1991). Children, health and science: child-to-child activities and science and technology (Science and Technology Education Document Series No. 41). Retrieved from UNESCO. https://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/13/3c/0a.pdf.
• Karagöz, Y. (2017). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve yayın etiği [Research ethics and scientific research methods within the applications with SPSS and AMOS]. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
• Kattel, U., & Carnegie, R. (1997). Nepal: From health to children’s rights child-to-child in the bhutanese refugee camps. P. Harman, & C. Scotchmer (Eds.) In rebuilding young lives: using the child-to-child approach with children in difficult circumstances: six case studies (pp. 4-15). The Child to child trust institute of education.
• Kelly, M. A., & Salmon, M. E. (2008). Social responsibility: conceptualization and embodiment in a school of nursing. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5(1), 1-16.
• Kılıç, S. (2014). Etki büyüklüğü [Effect size]. Journal of Mood Disorders, 4(1), 44-46.
• Kirby, P., & Gibbs, S. (2008). Facilitating participation: Adults’ caring support roles within child-to-child projects in schools and after-school settings. Children & Society, 20, 209-222. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/CHI.872.
• Knight, J., Grantham-Mcgregor, S., Ismail, S. & Ashley, D. (1991). A child-to-child programme in rural Jamaica. Child: Care, Health and Development, 17, 49-58.
• Leena, K. C., & D'souza, J. (2014). Effectiveness of child to child approach to health education on prevention of worm infestation among children of selected primary schools in Mangalore. Nitte University Journal of Health Science, 4(1), 113-115.
• Mwebi, B. M. (2005). A narrative inquiry into the experiences of a teacher and eight students learning about HIV/AIDS through a child-to-child curriculum approach (Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation). University of Alberta, Alberta.
• Özsoy, S., & Özsoy, G. (2013). Reporting effect size in education research. Elementary Education Online, 12(2), 334-346.
• Özyürek, A., Yavuz, N. F., Bedge, Z., Gürleyik, S., Karadayı, N., Akça, F., & Atalay, D. (2016). Assesment of child-to-child dental health education. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), 46-59.
• Pradhan, U. (2007). The child-to-child approach to community and health development in South Asia. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(1), 257-268.
• Secchi, D., & Bui, H. T. M. (2018). Group effects on individual attitudes toward social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethic, 149, 725-746.
• Serpell, R. (2011). Social responsbility as a dimension of intelligence, and as an educational goal: insights from programmatic research in an African society. Child Development Perspectives, 5(2), 126-133.
• Serpell, R., Mumba, P., & Chansa-Kabali, T. (2011). Early educational foundations for the development of civic responsbility: An African experience. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 134, 77-93.
• Somerset, T. (1988). Case studies. H. Hawes (Ed.) In Child-to-child: another path to learning (pp. 51-74). Unesco Institute for Education.
• Sosik, J. J., Koul, R., & Cameron, J. C. (2017). Gender and contextual differences in social responsibility in Thai schools: a multi-study person versus situation analysis. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 38(1), 45-62.
• Sözer, E. (1998). Sosyal bilgiler kapsamında sosyal bilimlerin yeri ve önemi [The importance and place of social sciences in the cope of social studies]. G. Can, Ş. Yaşar & E. Sözer (Eds.) In Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi [Social studies education] (pp. 3-13). Eskişehir: Açıköğretim Fakültesi Publications.
• UNICEF (2012). Getting ready for the school: a child-to-child approach, programme evaluation for year one grade one outcomes. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund.
• Yaşar, M. (2014). Attitudes toward statistics scale: Validity and reliability study. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 36(2), 59-75.
• Yıldız, D., & Uzunsakal, E. (2018). A comparison of reliability tests in field researches and an application on agricultural data. Applied Social Sciences Journal of Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 2(1), 14-28.
• Yurdugül, H. (September, 2005). Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında kapsam geçerliği için kapsam geçerlik indekslerinin kullanılması [Using content validity indexes for content validity in scale development studies]. XIV. National Educational Sciences Congress, Pamukkale University, September 28-30, 2005, Denizli, Turkey.