EXPLORING PEDAGOGICAL CHANGE IN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ SCIENCE TEACHING ORIENTATIONS DURING ARGUMENTATION-BASED TEACHING

Year 2020, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 212 - 227, 31.12.2020

Kadriye Bayram , Salih Ates

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the change in the science teaching orientations of pre-service science teachers using argumentation-based teaching via multiple measurement tools. In this mixed-method research, to evaluate the change experimentally, firstly, argumentation-based teaching practices in socio-scientific issues (SSIs) were carried out. Card sorting activity and focus group discussion forms were applied with 29 pre-service science teachers pre- and post-teaching. Then, to detail the longitudinal effects of the teaching, six pre-service teachers who were selected purposively were asked to perform micro-teaching in different SSIs in the primary/secondary school science curriculum. In this process, data were obtained from the observation, interview and lesson plan. Descriptive statistics were used in the analysis of the quantitative data, whereas the constant comparative method was used with the NVivo program in the analysis of the qualitative data. Thanks to argumentation-based teaching, it was found that the pre-service science teachers' SSI-specific science orientations improved. It was also found that they related themselves to more than one reform-based SSI-teaching type. It was noteworthy that they reflected the change in science orientations on their teaching practices, and the goals of their teaching included SSI dimensions. In terms of other pedagogical content knowledge components, they made their orientations more compatible with their knowledge of teaching strategies.

Keywords

Science teaching orientations, socio-scientific issues (SSI), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), pre-service science teachers, and mixed-method research.

References

• Adibelli Şahin, E., Deniz, H., & Topçu, M. S. (2016). Predicting Turkish preservice elementary teachers' orientations to teaching science with epistemological beliefs, learning conceptions, and learning approaches in science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(5), 515-534. doi:10.12973/ijese.2016.333a
• Akın, F. N., & Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E. (2018). The nature of the interplay among components of pedagogical content knowledge in reaction rate and chemical equilibrium topics of novice and experienced chemistry teachers. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 80-105. doi:10.1039/C7RP00165G.
• Alkış Küçükaydın, M. (2017). Araştırma sorgulamaya dayalı öğretim yaklaşımı bağlamında sınıf öğretmenlerinin fen konularındaki pedagojik alan bilgilerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of pedagogical content knowledge of science teachers in the context of research inquiry based teaching approach]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Amasya University, Amasya.
• Aydeniz, M., & Gürçay, D. (2018). Assessing and enhancing pre-service physics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) through reflective CoRes construction. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(4), 957-974.
• Aydın, S. (2012). Examination of chemistry teachers’ topic-specifıc nature of pedagogical content knowledge in electrochemistry and radioactivity. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
• Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999) Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Series Ed.), Science and Technology Education Library: Vol. 6. Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 147-161). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Bayram‐Jacobs, D., Henze, I., Evagorou, M., Shwartz, Y., Aschim, E. L., Alcaraz‐Dominguez, S., & Dagan, E. (2019). Science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge development during enactment of socioscientific curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1207-1233. doi:10.1002/tea.21550.
• Bilican, K. (2017). Investigating pre-service primary teachers espoused pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science teaching. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(2), 1129-1145. doi:10.14687/jhs.v14i2.4496.
• Brown, P., Friedrichsen, P., & Abell, S. (2013). The development of prospective secondary biology teachers PCK. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 133-155. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9312-1.
• Campbell, T., Longhurst, M., Duffy, A. M., Wolf, P. G., & Shelton, B. E. (2013). Science teaching orientations and technology-enhanced tools for student learning. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2035-2057. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9342-x.
• Campbell, T., Zuwallack, R., Longhurst, M., Shelton, B. E., & Wolf, P. G. (2014). An examination of the changes in science teaching orientations and technology-enhanced tools for student learning in the context of professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1815-1848. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.879622.
• Canbazoğlu Bilici, S. (2012). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi ve özyeterlikleri [Science teacher candidates' technological pedagogical content knowledge and self-efficacy]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara.
• Canbazoğlu, S. (2008). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının maddenin tanecikli yapısı ünitesine ilişkin pedagojik alan bilgilerinin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of science teacher candidates' pedagogical content related to the granular structure of matter]. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
• Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Skjold, B. A., Muğaloğlu, E. Z., Bentz, A., & Sparks, K. (2014). Pedagogy of science teaching tests: Formative assessments of science teaching orientations. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2265-2288. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.918672.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Demirdöğen, B. (2016). Interaction between science teaching orientation and pedagogical content knowledge components. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 495-532. doi:10.1007/s10972-016-9472-5.
• Demirdöğen, B., & Uzuntiryaki-Kondakçı, E. (2016). Closing the gap between beliefs and practice: Change of pre-service chemistry teachers' orientations during a PCK-based NOS course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 818-841. doi:10.1039/C6RP00062B.
• Development Plan: The Presidency of the Republic of Turkey Presidency of Strategy and Budget. (2019). On-birinci kalkınma planı: 2019-2023. [Eleventh development plan: 2019-2023]. Retrieved from http://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/OnbirinciKalkinmaPlani.pdf
• Faikhamta, C., Coll, R. K., & Roadrangka, V. (2009). The development of Thai pre-service chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: From a methods course to field experience. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 32(1), 18-35.
• Friedrichsen, P., van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358-376. doi:10.1002/sce.20428.
• Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers' prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357-383. doi:10.1002/tea.20283.
• Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2003). Using a card-sorting task to elicit and clarify science-teaching orientations. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(4), 291-309. doi:10.1023/B:JSTE.0000009551.37237.b3.
• Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2005). Substantive‐level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers' science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 218-244. doi:10.1002/tea.20046.
• Gao, L., & Watkins, D. A. (2002). Conceptions of teaching held by school science teachers in PR China: Identification and cross-cultural comparisons. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 61-79. doi:10.1080/09500690110066926.
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015) A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. M. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Series Ed.), Teaching and Learning in Science Series. Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28-42). New York & London: Routledge-Taylor and Francis Group.
• Gökkurt Özdemir, B. & Soylu, Y. (2017). Examination of the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 6(1), 26-39.
• Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Güven, D., Muğaloğlu, E. Z., Doğança-Kücük, Z., & Cobern, W. W. (2019). Teaching orientations of freshman pre-service science teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(4), 508-520. doi:10.36681/tused.2020.4.
• Han-Tosunoğlu, Ç., & İrez, S. (2017). Biyoloji öğretmenlerinin sosyobilimsel konularla ile ilgili anlayışları [Biology teachers’ understanding of socioscientific issues]. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 30(2), 833-860. doi:10.19171/uefad.369244.
• Käpylä, M., Heikkinen, J. P., & Asunta, T. (2009). Influence of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching photosynthesis and plant growth. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1395-1415. doi:10.1080/09500690802082168.
• Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in science education, 45(2), 169-204. doi:10.1080/03057260903142285.
• Ladachart, L. (2019). Correlation between understanding about nature of science and orientation to teaching science: An exploratory study with Thai first-year preservice biology teachers. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 5(1), 134-145. doi:10.21891/jeseh.512428.
• Lee, H., & Witz, K. G. (2009). Science teachers' inspiration for teaching socio‐scientific issues: Disconnection with reform efforts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 931-960. doi:10.1080/09500690801898903.
• Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (1st ed.). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
• Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 11(2), 38-63.
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Ministry of National Education. (2006). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Elementary school science and technology course (6th, 7th and 8th grades) curriculum]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim.
• Ministry of National Education. (2013). İlköğretim kurumları fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Elementary education schools science course (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th grades) curriculum]. Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
• Ministry of National Education. (2017). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim program [Science course curriculum]. Ankara: Millî Eğitim.
• Monet, J. A. (2006). Examining topic-specific PCK as a conceptual framework for in-service teacher professional development in earth science. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.
• National Research Council. (2011). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
• Özcan, H. (2013). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının fen içeriği ile ilişkilendirilmiş bilimin doğası konusundaki pedagojik alan bilgilerinin gelişimi [The development of science teacher candidates' pedagogical content knowledge on the nature of science associated with science content]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara.
• Padilla, K., Ponce‐de‐León, A. M., Rembado, F. M., & Garritz, A. (2008). Undergraduate professors’ pedagogical content knowledge: The case of ‘amount of substance’. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1389-1404. doi:10.1080/09500690802187033.
• Park, S., Jang, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching?: Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 245-260. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9163-8.
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6.
• Pitpiorntapin, S., & Topcu, M. S. (2016). Teaching based on socioscientific issues in science classrooms: A review study. KKU International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 119-136.
• Ramnarain, U., Nampota, D., & Schuster, D. (2016). The spectrum of pedagogical orientations of Malawian and South African physical science teachers towards inquiry. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), 119-130. doi:10.1080/10288457.2016.1162467.
• Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
• Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. doi:10.1002/tea.20009.
• Sadler, T. D. (Ed.) (2011). Socioscientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and research. New York, NY: Springer.
• Sadler, T. D., Foulk, J. A., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2017). Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 75-87. doi:10.18404/ijemst.55999.
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4-27. doi:10.1002/sce.10101.
• Sahingoz, S., & Cobern, W. W. (2020). Science methods course influence on pedagogical orientations of pre-service science teachers. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(1), 114-136. doi:10.29329/epasr.2020.236.7.
• Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School science and mathematics, 102(6), 245-253. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17883.x.
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
• Shulman, L. S. (2015). PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In A. Berry, P. M. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Suh, J. K., & Park, S. (2017). Exploring the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and sustainability of an innovative science teaching approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 246-259. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.021.
• Şahingöz, S., & Cobern, W. W. (2018). Evaluating preferences of science teachers participating in applied science education course regarding inquiry-based teaching. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(4), 1371-1382. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.413586.
• Şen, A. Z., & Nakiboğlu, C. (2019). Exploring experienced chemistry teachers’ science-teaching orientations (STOs) via a card-sorting task: Physical-chemical change topic perspective. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section C: Chemical Education, 4(1), 15-26.
• Topçu, M. S. (2015). Sosyobilimsel konular ve öğretimi [Sociological issues and teaching]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Topçu, M. S. (2020). Sosyobilimsel konular ve covid-19 virüsünün eğitim hayatına etkileri. Öğretmen Mesleki Eğitimleri: Adana İl MEM Webinarı [Sociological issues and the effects of covid-19 virus on educational life. Teacher Vocational Trainings: Adana Provincial Directorate of National Education Webinar]. 4 May 2020 Retrieved from vk.meb.gov.tr/adanamem
• Yılmaz Ergül, D. & Taşar, M. F. (2020). Eliciting Prospective science teachers’ teaching orientations by using a card sorting activity. ARISE- Action Research and Innovation in Science Education, 3(2), 27-37. ISSN: 2626-9902.
• Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58. doi:10.1007/BF03173684.