Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT PROJECT-BASED TEACHING: IMPLICATIONS FORTEACHING OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING (CALL) FORHEARING IMPAIRED (HI) CHILDREN

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 31 - 39, 30.06.2016

Öz

This study investigatesspecial education teachers’ perceptions about project-based teaching methods, teacher roles, success and evaluation inProject-based teaching and traditional classroom instruction for HI Children. The analysis is based on qualitative data collected in public and private schools of Hearing Impaired Children. In-depth analysis ofinterviews and observations revealed the in-depth perceptions of special education teachers. These views were based on degree of experience and environment of school. In general, project-based methods were preferred among Special education teachers, who mostly perceived themselves as facilitators and considered motivation and transmission of values central to their work. Special education teachers appeared to capitalize on the use of CALL and project-based teaching in future for HI children.

Kaynakça

  • Abdulwahed, M., Nagy, Z. K., and Blanchard, R., (2008).Constructivist Project Based
  • Arnold C. M., (2005). Outcomes of Assigning Collaborative Project-Based Activities to Eighth-Grade Georgia History Students.Retrieved from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/vol4no2/PDF/ArnoldCAM_ARE.pdf
  • Buck Institute for Education, (2011). Buck Institute for Education: Project-Based learning for the 21st Century. Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/site/PBL/web_resources/
  • Buckley, C. &Waring, M.,(2005). The evolving nature of grounded theory: experiential reflections on the potential of the method for analysingchildren‟s attitudes towards physical activity. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Glamorgan, September 14-17, 2005
  • Bullard, J. Bullock, J.R. (2006). Modeling Collaboration, In-Depth Projects, and Cognitive Discourse: A Reggio Emilia and Project Approach Course. Montana. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu
  • Carroll, C. (2008). Assessing Project-Based Learning: A Case Study of an Undergraduate Selling and Sales Management Module. University of Limerick.Retrieved from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2361419/10
  • Chard, S.C. (1999).From Themes to Projects. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu
  • Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.)Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L., (2000).Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice Volume 39, Number 3,Summer 2000, College of Education, The Ohio State University
  • Creswell, J. W., (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W., (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design; Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications
  • David, J., (2008).What research say about project-based learning. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 80-82, 2008 (February)
  • Gersten, R. &Dimino, J. A., (2006). RTI (Response to Intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Instructional Research
  • Glaser, B. G. & J. Holton,(2004). Remodeling Grounded Theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Volume 5, No. 2, Art. 4- May 2004. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative research.net
  • Glaser, B. G. (1978) Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press Mill Valley, CA.
  • Government of Pakistan (GOP). 1988. Ministry of Education, Islamic Education Research Cell. Dini Madariske Jama Report. Islamabad: Printing Corporation o fPakistan Press.
  • Haider, G. (2012). "An Insight into Difficulties Faced By Pakistani Student Writers: Implications for Teaching of Writing, Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(3),17-28
  • Haider, G. (2012). "Teaching of Writing in Pakistan: A Review of Major Pedagogical Trends and Issues in Teaching of Writing, Journal of Educational and Social Research,2,(3),215-226
  • Haider, G. (2012). “Process Approach in Writing: Issues and Implications for Teaching in Pakistan, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2 (2), 147-150
  • Haider, G. (2012).An investigation of problems faced by L1 (Urdu) 5th grade Hearing Impaired students in Urdu written expression: Implications for Teaching of L1 (Urdu)”, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 1, (02), 253-265
  • Haider, G. (2012)."An Investigation of Pakistani L2 HI Writers’ Perceptions of Previous Writing Experience in L2: Implications for Literacy Development in Pakistan for HIC”, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,3,(11), 221-234
  • Haider, G. (2012). What the Pakistani L2 Writers Do When They Write An Investigation of the Composing Processes of Pakistani L2 Writers” ,Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 1, (02), 171-180
  • Haider, G. (2013).Cognitive Discourse Analysis of L2Writer’s ‘Think-Aloud Protocol: A Case Study.Language In India, 13:11, 591-606.
  • Haider, G. (2013). The Effects of Peer (Group) Discussion on L2 Writing of Students with Learning difficulties due to HI (LD)and Students without Learning difficulties due to HI (LD Implications for Teaching of Writing in Pakistan. Turkish International Journal of Special education and Guidance & Counseling2, (02), 47-57
  • Haider, G. (2013)."Self-Accessed and Self Regulatory Practices in Teaching of Writing In Pakistan" European Journal of Educational Sciences,1,(1),53-61
  • Haider, G. (2013).Perceptions of ESL Teachers towards CALL:Implications for ELT(English Language Teaching) at the Intermediate Level-A Case Study from Pakistan. Language In India,13:8, 204-238.
  • Haider, G. (2014).A Brief Review of Writing Processes in the Light of the Holy Quran. International Journal of English and Education 3, (02), 447-461
  • Haider, G. (2014). A Comparison of English and Urdu Organizational Patterns in Argumentative Writing of Pakistani EFL Students International Journal of English and Education 3, (01), 200-212
  • Haider, G. (2014). Analysis of MalalaYousafZai’s Speech: Application of Aristotle’s Ethos, Pathos and Logos. International Journal of English and Education 3, (01), 115-119
  • Haider, G. (2014).An Exploratory Study of Organizational Problems Fcedby Student writers in Expository L2 Writing in Pakistan. International Journal of English and Education 3, (01), 127-145
  • Haider, G. (2014). Attribution Theory and L2 Writing Processes: Results and Implications. International Journal of English and Education3, (02), 436-446
  • Haider, G. (2014).Perception of Students with Learning difficulties due to HI towards English Composition Writing through Activities. Turkish International Journal of Special education and Guidance & Counseling volume 3, (1), 27-35
  • Hilliard, A. (1990). Restructuring to Promote Learning in America's Schools, Video Conference #9.North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/students/atrisk/
  • Jacobsen, D.A., Eggen, P. &Kauchak, D., (2002). Methods for teaching (6thed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
  • Neill, J. (2005). John Dewey, the Modern Father of Experiential Education. Wilderdom Outdoor Education. Retrieved from htpp://www.wilderdom.com/experiential
  • Ozman, H. A. & Craver, S. M.,(2008). Philosophical foundations of education, 8th ed. Merrill Prentice Hall
  • Pant, S.,(2008). Doing Research from the Grounded Theory Perspective. Research World, Vol.5,Report R5.15Online Version ISSN 0974-2379 Retrieved from http:/wwwl.ximb.ac.in/RW.
  • Vygotsky, L., (1978). Interaction between learning and development. From: Mind and society (pp.79 – 91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Yıl 2016, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 31 - 39, 30.06.2016

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abdulwahed, M., Nagy, Z. K., and Blanchard, R., (2008).Constructivist Project Based
  • Arnold C. M., (2005). Outcomes of Assigning Collaborative Project-Based Activities to Eighth-Grade Georgia History Students.Retrieved from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/vol4no2/PDF/ArnoldCAM_ARE.pdf
  • Buck Institute for Education, (2011). Buck Institute for Education: Project-Based learning for the 21st Century. Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/site/PBL/web_resources/
  • Buckley, C. &Waring, M.,(2005). The evolving nature of grounded theory: experiential reflections on the potential of the method for analysingchildren‟s attitudes towards physical activity. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Glamorgan, September 14-17, 2005
  • Bullard, J. Bullock, J.R. (2006). Modeling Collaboration, In-Depth Projects, and Cognitive Discourse: A Reggio Emilia and Project Approach Course. Montana. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu
  • Carroll, C. (2008). Assessing Project-Based Learning: A Case Study of an Undergraduate Selling and Sales Management Module. University of Limerick.Retrieved from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2361419/10
  • Chard, S.C. (1999).From Themes to Projects. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu
  • Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.)Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L., (2000).Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice Volume 39, Number 3,Summer 2000, College of Education, The Ohio State University
  • Creswell, J. W., (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W., (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design; Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications
  • David, J., (2008).What research say about project-based learning. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 80-82, 2008 (February)
  • Gersten, R. &Dimino, J. A., (2006). RTI (Response to Intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Instructional Research
  • Glaser, B. G. & J. Holton,(2004). Remodeling Grounded Theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Volume 5, No. 2, Art. 4- May 2004. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative research.net
  • Glaser, B. G. (1978) Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press Mill Valley, CA.
  • Government of Pakistan (GOP). 1988. Ministry of Education, Islamic Education Research Cell. Dini Madariske Jama Report. Islamabad: Printing Corporation o fPakistan Press.
  • Haider, G. (2012). "An Insight into Difficulties Faced By Pakistani Student Writers: Implications for Teaching of Writing, Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(3),17-28
  • Haider, G. (2012). "Teaching of Writing in Pakistan: A Review of Major Pedagogical Trends and Issues in Teaching of Writing, Journal of Educational and Social Research,2,(3),215-226
  • Haider, G. (2012). “Process Approach in Writing: Issues and Implications for Teaching in Pakistan, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2 (2), 147-150
  • Haider, G. (2012).An investigation of problems faced by L1 (Urdu) 5th grade Hearing Impaired students in Urdu written expression: Implications for Teaching of L1 (Urdu)”, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 1, (02), 253-265
  • Haider, G. (2012)."An Investigation of Pakistani L2 HI Writers’ Perceptions of Previous Writing Experience in L2: Implications for Literacy Development in Pakistan for HIC”, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,3,(11), 221-234
  • Haider, G. (2012). What the Pakistani L2 Writers Do When They Write An Investigation of the Composing Processes of Pakistani L2 Writers” ,Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 1, (02), 171-180
  • Haider, G. (2013).Cognitive Discourse Analysis of L2Writer’s ‘Think-Aloud Protocol: A Case Study.Language In India, 13:11, 591-606.
  • Haider, G. (2013). The Effects of Peer (Group) Discussion on L2 Writing of Students with Learning difficulties due to HI (LD)and Students without Learning difficulties due to HI (LD Implications for Teaching of Writing in Pakistan. Turkish International Journal of Special education and Guidance & Counseling2, (02), 47-57
  • Haider, G. (2013)."Self-Accessed and Self Regulatory Practices in Teaching of Writing In Pakistan" European Journal of Educational Sciences,1,(1),53-61
  • Haider, G. (2013).Perceptions of ESL Teachers towards CALL:Implications for ELT(English Language Teaching) at the Intermediate Level-A Case Study from Pakistan. Language In India,13:8, 204-238.
  • Haider, G. (2014).A Brief Review of Writing Processes in the Light of the Holy Quran. International Journal of English and Education 3, (02), 447-461
  • Haider, G. (2014). A Comparison of English and Urdu Organizational Patterns in Argumentative Writing of Pakistani EFL Students International Journal of English and Education 3, (01), 200-212
  • Haider, G. (2014). Analysis of MalalaYousafZai’s Speech: Application of Aristotle’s Ethos, Pathos and Logos. International Journal of English and Education 3, (01), 115-119
  • Haider, G. (2014).An Exploratory Study of Organizational Problems Fcedby Student writers in Expository L2 Writing in Pakistan. International Journal of English and Education 3, (01), 127-145
  • Haider, G. (2014). Attribution Theory and L2 Writing Processes: Results and Implications. International Journal of English and Education3, (02), 436-446
  • Haider, G. (2014).Perception of Students with Learning difficulties due to HI towards English Composition Writing through Activities. Turkish International Journal of Special education and Guidance & Counseling volume 3, (1), 27-35
  • Hilliard, A. (1990). Restructuring to Promote Learning in America's Schools, Video Conference #9.North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/students/atrisk/
  • Jacobsen, D.A., Eggen, P. &Kauchak, D., (2002). Methods for teaching (6thed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
  • Neill, J. (2005). John Dewey, the Modern Father of Experiential Education. Wilderdom Outdoor Education. Retrieved from htpp://www.wilderdom.com/experiential
  • Ozman, H. A. & Craver, S. M.,(2008). Philosophical foundations of education, 8th ed. Merrill Prentice Hall
  • Pant, S.,(2008). Doing Research from the Grounded Theory Perspective. Research World, Vol.5,Report R5.15Online Version ISSN 0974-2379 Retrieved from http:/wwwl.ximb.ac.in/RW.
  • Vygotsky, L., (1978). Interaction between learning and development. From: Mind and society (pp.79 – 91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Toplam 40 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Alan Eğitimleri
Bölüm Research Articles
Yazarlar

Ghulam Haıder Bu kişi benim

Tariq Nadeem Khan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Haıder, G., & Khan, T. N. (2016). SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT PROJECT-BASED TEACHING: IMPLICATIONS FORTEACHING OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING (CALL) FORHEARING IMPAIRED (HI) CHILDREN. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 5(1), 31-39.

 Creative Commons Licenses

mceclip0-43bf150298f9613a4c817c567db8d92d.png


All articles published in International Online Journal of Primary Education's content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


mceclip1.png          mceclip2.png        mceclip3.png


Free counters!


(Counter start: February 28, 2021)