A STEM Activity Focused on Chemistry: Smart Food Packaging

Çiğdem Karakaya; Nusret Kavak

doi:10.52911/itall.1596532

A STEM Activity Focused on Chemistry: Smart Food Packaging

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present a STEM activity designed to develop students' scientific process and entrepreneurship skills in accordance with the problem-based teaching method focused on chemistry courses and their implementation stages. The design of the activity is based on a real-life problem related to the learning outcomes in the chemistry curriculum. The use of smart packaging, which is widely used in some countries abroad, is not yet widespread in our country. Smart packages are systems that inform consumers about the freshness of food. In the STEM activity initiated with a story, students were asked to design and prototype a smart packaging that is harmless to human health with cheap and easily accessible materials given to them and to carry out the promotion and marketing of the product they created. STEM worksheet applications, which include questions and directions that will enable students to work in accordance with scientific research steps, include application stages aimed at providing students with 21st-century skills such as teamwork, problem-solving, communication, entrepreneurship, and design. The students who participated in the activity described it as interesting.

Keywords

STEM activity , Problem based learning , Entrepreneurship , Scientific process skills

References

Aprianty, H., Gani, A., & Pada, U. T. (2020). Implementation of project-based learning through STEM approach to improve students’ science process skills and learning outcomes. JTK: Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 5(2), 144-152. https://www.academia.edu/download/72490547/pdf.pdf
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
Bruce, M. R., Wilson, T. A., Bruce, A. E., Bessey, S. M., & Flood, V. J. (2016). A simple, student-built spectrometer to explore infrared radiation and greenhouse gases. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(11), 1908-1915.
Burrows, A. C., Breiner, J. M., Keiner, J., & Behm, C. (2014). Biodiesel and integrated STEM: Vertical alignment of high school biology/biochemistry and chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1379-1389.
Card, D. (2001). Estimating the return to schooling: Progress on some persistent problems. Econometrica, 69, 1137–1160.
Çevik, M. (2018). Impacts of the project based (PBL) science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education on academic achievement and career interests of vocational high school students. http://earsiv.kmu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11492/2092
Dugger, W. E. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. The Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 8–12.
Gabel, D. L., & Sherwood, R. D. (1983). Facilitating problem solving in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(2), 163-177.
Gabel, D. L. (1993). Introductory science skills. Waveland Press, Inc.
Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012, August). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

Gülteki̇n, M. (2020). Değişen toplumda eğitim ve öğretmen nitelikleri. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 10(1), 654-700.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Jewaru, A. A. L., Parno, P., Nasikhudin, N., Kusairi, S., & Latifah, E. (2022, November). The profile of students’ science process skill on thermodynamics topic through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2659, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-abstract/2659/1/120011/2832254
Khamhaengpol, A., Sriprom, M., & Chuamchaitrakool, P. (2021). Development of STEAM activity on nanotechnology to determine basic science process skills and engineering design process for high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100796. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187121000110
Kumbasar, T. (2019). Probleme dayalı öğretimin farklı öğrenme stilleri ve zekâ alanlarına sahip öğrencilerin asitler ve bazlar konusunu öğrenmeleri üzerine etkisi [The effect of problem-based instruction on the learning of acids and bases subject by students with different learning styles and intelligence areas]. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-13.
Marle, P. D., Decker, L., Taylor, V., Fitzpatrick, K., Khaliqi, D., Owens, J. E., & Henry, R. M. (2014). CSI–Chocolate science investigation and the case of the recipe rip-off: Using an extended problem-based scenario to enhance high school students’ science engagement. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(3), 345-350.
Martin, D. J. (2003). Constructivism in elementary science education, elementary science methods: A constructivist approach (with infotrac). Kennesaw State College Downloads & Links.
MEB. (2024). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli Ortaöğretim Kimya Dersi Programı. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/
Morrison, J. (2006). Attributes of STEM education: The student, the school, the classroom. Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM, 20, 2-7.
Öztürk, İ. (2008). The role of education in economic development: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Rural Development and Administration, 33(1), 39-47.
Popa, R. A., & Ciascai, L. (2017). Students' attitude towards STEM education. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(4), 55-62.
Ridwan, A., Rahmawati, Y., & Hadinugrahaningsih, T. (2017). STEAM integration in chemistry learning for developing 21st century skills. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends & Practices, 184-194.
Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 74(8), 1-5.
Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning: Exploring and Extending the Legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 9(2), 5-15.
Savran Gencer, A., Doğan, H., Bilen, K., & Can, B. (2019). Bütünleşik STEM eğitimi modelleri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(45), 38-55.
Sönmez, D., & Lee, H. (2003). Problem based learning in science ERIC clearinghouse for science mathematics and environmental education Columbus OH.
Şenocak, E. (2005). Probleme dayalı öğrenme yaklaşımı’nın maddenin gaz hâli konusunun öğretimine etkisi üzerine bir araştırma [A study on the effects of problem based learning approach on teaching the gases]. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
Tamburini, F., Kelly, T., Weerapana, E., & Byers, J. A. (2014). Paper to plastics: An interdisciplinary summer outreach project in sustainability. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(10), 1574-1579.
Tarkın-Çelikkıran, A., & Aydın-Günbatar, S. (2017). Kimya öğretmen adaylarının FeTeMM uygulamaları hakkındaki görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 1624-1656.
Tatar, E., Oktay, M., & Tüysüz, C. (2009). Kimya eğitiminde probleme dayalı öğrenmenin avantaj ve dezavantajları: Bir durum çalışması. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 95-110.
Tosun, C., & Taşkesenligil, Y. (2012). Probleme dayalı öğrenme yönteminin öğrencilerin kimya dersine karşı motivasyonlarına ve öğrenme stratejilerine etkisi. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(1), 104-125.
Tunkham, P., Donpudsa, S., & Dornbundit, P. (2016). Development of STEM activities in chemistry on “protein” to enhance 21st century learning skills for senior high school students. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 15(3), 217-234.
Tüysüz, C., Tatar, E., & Kuşdemir, M. (2010). Probleme dayalı öğrenmenin kimya dersinde öğrencilerin başarı ve tutumlarına etkisinin incelenmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(13), 48-55.
Tüysüz, C., & Demirel, O. E. (2020). Probleme ve argümantasyona dayalı öğrenme yöntemlerinin “karışımlar” konusundaki etkilerinin incelenmesi. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 43-61.
Xie, Y., & Killewald, A. A. (2012). Is American science in decline? Harvard University Press.
Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. (2015). STEM education. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 331-357.
Zengin, T. (2022). Eğitim 4.0: Eğitimin geleceği tartışmalarının neresindeyiz? Türkiye Eğitim Dergisi, 7(1), 330-334.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Development of Science, Technology and Engineering Education and Programs

Journal Section

Teaching Practice

Authors

Çiğdem Karakaya
0000-0002-7223-1997
Türkiye

Nusret Kavak ^*
0000-0001-6509-2653
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

June 28, 2025

Publication Date

June 30, 2025

Submission Date

December 5, 2024

Acceptance Date

January 20, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 6 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1596532

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA69GT64BH

APA

Karakaya, Ç., & Kavak, N. (2025). A STEM Activity Focused on Chemistry: Smart Food Packaging. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 6(1), 108-127. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1596532

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

A STEM Activity Focused on Chemistry: Smart Food Packaging

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Early Pub Date

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite