John Anster’s Memorable Translation of a Couplet from Goethe’s Faust

Abstract

This paper seeks to describe and provide context for the translator John Anster’s rendering of a couplet from the Prelude in Goethe’s Faust. Anster’s translation of a portion of Goethe’s drama was published in 1820, making him the first English translator of a number of large extracts from the text. The couplet is of interest because it has become notable in English and is often used to inspire and motivate readers. Yet when we compare Anster’s version to the original German, we see a very free rendering, one that brings up intriguing questions about the nature of translating poetry. We also see that Anster has been frequently criticized for straying too far from Goethe’s lines.A close comparison of Anster’s translation to Goethe’s passage containing the couplet serves to illuminate how Anster’s rendering diverges from the original. Lawrence Venuti’s theoretical approach that describes a type of translation he calls “the poet’s version” (2011) provides a useful framework for understanding some of the issues raised by this particular translation. By delving into Anster’s rendering of this memorable quotation, we gain insight into the early history of translating Faust into English, the phenomenon of rendering poetry into another language, and the life of this particular couplet long after Anster’s time.

Keywords

• Translation
• poetry
• Goethe
• Faust
• John Anster
• Lawrence Venuti

Supporting Institution

N/A

Project Number

N/A

Thanks

N/A

References

1. Anster, J. (1820, June). The Faustus of Goethe. Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine, VII, 235-258. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015030603933&seq=324. google scholar
2. Anster, J. (1890). Preface. In J. Anster (Trans.), Goethe, J. W. von, Faust (pp. vii-xiv). Frederick A. Stokes Company. (Original works published 1808-1832). google scholar
3. Ashton, R. D. (1977). Coleridge and Faust. The Review of English Studies, 28 (10), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1093/res/XXVIII.110.156. google scholar
4. Ashton, R. D. (1980). The German idea. Four English writers and the reception of German thought 1800-1860. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
5. Baer, B. J. (2021). [Review of the book Contra Instrumentalism: A Translation Polemic, by L. Venuti]. Translation Studies, 14 (3), 369-72. http://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2020.1788631. google scholar
6. Baumann, L. (1907). Die englischen Übersetzungen von Goethes Faust. Verlag von Max Niemeyer. google scholar
7. Bub, D. F. (1969). The true prologue to Goethe’s Faust. Modern Language Notes, 84, 791-796. https://doi.org/10.2307/2908365. google scholar
8. Burwick, F. (2008). Romantic theories of translation. The Wordsworth Circle, 39 (3), 68-74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24045752. google scholar

9. Byatt, A. S. (2005). Preface. In J. W. von Goethe, Faust. The first part of the tragedy (D. Constantine, Trans., pp. vii-xix). Penguin Books.(Original work published 1808). google scholar
10. Casey, P. F. (1981). John Martin Anster: His contributions to Anglo-German studies, Modern Language Notes, 96 (3), pp. 654-65. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2905944. google scholar
11. Constantine, D. (2005). Translator’s note. In Goethe, J. W. von, Faust. The first part of the tragedy (D. Constantine, Trans., pp. xxxvii-xlii).Penguin Books. (Original work published 1808). google scholar
12. Constantine, D. (2006). German. In P. France & K. Haynes (Eds.), The Oxford history of literary translation in English (Vol. 4 1790-1900, pp. 211-229). Oxford University Press. google scholar
13. Flippo, H. (2020, August 27). A well known quote attributed to Goethe may not actually be his. ThoughtCo. http://thoughtco.com/goethe-quote-may-not-be-his-4070881. google scholar
14. Goethe, J. W. von. (1890). Faust (J. Anster, Trans.). Frederick A. Stokes Company. (Original works published 1808-1832). google scholar
15. Goethe, J. W. von. (1986) Faust. Der Tragödie erster und zweiter Teil. Urfaust (Erich Trunz, Ed., Hamburger Ausgabe). C. H. Beck. (Original works published 1808-1832). google scholar
16. Goethe, J. W. von. (1987). Faust. Part One (D. Luke, Trans.). The World’s Classics. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1808). google scholar
17. Goethe, J. W. von (1999). Faust. A tragedy in two parts & Urfaust (J. R. Williams, Trans.). Wordsworth Classics of World Literature. Wordsworth Editions. (Original works published 1808-1832). google scholar
18. Goethe, J. W. von. (2005). Faust. The first part of the tragedy (D. Constantine, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1808). google scholar
19. Hauhart, W. F. (1909). The reception of Goethe’s Faust in England in the first half of the nineteenth century. Columbia University Press. google scholar
20. Kim. W-D. (2018). The ‘creative’ English translation of The Vegetarian by Han Kang. Translation Review 100 (1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07374836.2018.1437098. google scholar
21. Le Bervet, C. (2021). [Review of the book Contra Instrumentalism: A Translation Polemic by L. Venuti]. Translation and Literature, 30 (1), 135-139. https://doi.org/10.3366/tal.2021.0457. google scholar
22. Lee, M. (1998, Spring). Goethe quotation identified. The Goethe Society of North America Newsletter, XIX (1), 1-9.
23. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ddbc3430b17da177ec3a35d/t/5de695d283bec649d3725646/1575392725579/gnnspring98.pdf. google scholar
24. Luke, D. (1987). Introduction. In J. W. von Goethe, Faust. Part One (D. Luke, Trans., pp. pp. ix-lv). Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1808). google scholar
25. Murray, W. H. (1951). The Scottish Himalayan Expedition. J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd. google scholar
26. O’Flanagan, J. R. (1867). The late John Anster, LL.D, M.R.I.A. The Dublin Saturday Magazine, 2 (99) 557-558. google scholar
27. O’Toole, G. (2016) What you can do, or dream you can, begin it; Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it. Quote Investigator. http://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/02/09/boldness/. google scholar
28. Ryan, M. J. (1927, Jan.-March) Coleridge and Anster. Marginalia to the ‘Lay Sermons.’ Dublin University Magazine, 2 (1) 39-44. google scholar
29. Venuti, L. (2011). The poet’s version; or, an ethics of translation. Translation Studies, 4 (2), 230-247.14781700.2011.560021_ google scholar
30. Venuti, L. (2019). Contra instrumentalism: A translation polemic. University of Nebraska Press. google scholar
31. Yoon, Sun Kyoung, (2023). Fidelity or infidelity? The mistranslation controversy over The Vegetarian. Target 35 (2) 242-261. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.21001.yoo. google scholar