The Notion of ‘a Considerable Quantity’ of Narcotics in the Case Law of Polish Courts

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 65 - 85, 30.06.2021

Katarzyna Banasik

Öz

The subject matter of this paper is the notion of a considerable quantity of narcotics. ‘A considerable quantity’ of narcotics is a determining factor in many criminal narcotics offences. The term ‘a considerable quantity’ does not have a statutory definition. It is an evaluative term, and its interpretation creates many problems in the practice of the justice system. In this paper, the author attempts to illustrate the notion of ‘a considerable quantity’ as applied in case law in Poland by examining numerous court decisions. The author presents a variety of criteria used to determine whether a given quantity of narcotics is a considerable quantity and also presents sample court decisions in which these criteria were applied. This is used to demonstrate the disparity of interpretation between different courts. Drawing on the results of the analysis undertaken, the author identifies the notion of this quantity, which is currently dominant in Polish court case law. This notion conceives of ‘a considerable quantity’ of narcotics as an amount which can satisfy the needs of at least several dozen users on a single occasion, thus a quantity from which at least several dozen consumption portions can be made.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Narcotics, illicit drugs, psychotropic substances, considerable quantity of narcotics, case law of Polish courts, Polish criminal law

Destekleyen Kurum

The research was co-financed with funds earmarked for financing of the statutory activities of the Faculty of Law, Administration and International Relations at Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University (research task no.: WPAiSM/DS/19/2019-KON).

Kaynakça

• Act dated 31 January 1985 on the Prevention of Drug Addiction, Journal of Laws 1985 no. 4 item 15 as amended. google scholar
• Act dated 29 July 2005 on Counteracting Drug Addiction, unified text, Journal of Laws 2019 item 852 as amended. google scholar
• Kanarek, J. (2019). Ocenny charakter znamienia „znacznej ilosci” srodkow odurzaj^cych. Proba reinterpretacji przyjmowanych w doktrynie i orzecznictwie pogladow [The evaluative character of the factor ‘a considerable quantity’ of illicit drugs. An attempt at reinterpretation of views accepted in doctrine and case law]. Przeglqd Sqdowy, 1, 55-63. google scholar
• Konarska-Wrzosek, V. (2014). Pozakodeksowe przestçpstwa przeciwko zdrowiu [Non-code crimes against health]. In M. Bojarski (Ed.), System Prawa Karnego. Tom XI. Szczegölne dziedziny prawa karnego. Prawo karne wojskowe, skarbowe i pozakodeksowe [The criminal law system. Volume 11. Particular areas of criminal law. Military criminal law, tax criminal law and non-code criminal law]. Warsaw: C.H. Beck. google scholar
• Koziol, T. (2010). Znaczna ilosc srodka odurzaj^cego [A considerable quantity of illicit drugs]. Prokuratura i Prawo, 11, 62-77. google scholar
• Kulik, M. (2017). Komentarz do niektorych przepisow ustawy o przeciwdzialaniu narkomanii [Commentary on some provisions of the Act on Counteracting Drug Addiction]. In M. Mozgawa (Ed.), Pozakodeksowe przestçpstwa przeciwko zdrowiu. Komentarz [Non-code crimes against health: Commentary]. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska. google scholar
• Kurzçpa, B. (2019). Komentarz do art. 53 [Commentary to Art. 53]. In A. Wazny (Ed.), Ustawa oprzeciwdzialaniu narkomanii. Komentarz [The Act on Counteracting Drug Addiction: Commentary]. (2nd ed.). Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer. google scholar
• Malasinska-Nagorny, A. (2013). Pojçcie „znacznej ilosci” srodkow odurzaj^cych [The notion of‘a considerable quantity’ of illicit drugs]. Prokuratura i Prawo, 11, 159-167. google scholar
• Marciniak, J., & Marciniak, M. (2011). „Znaczna ilosc srodkow odurzaj^cych” a wymog okreslonosci prawa karnego [A considerable quantity of illicit drugs and requirement to define in criminal law]. Wojskowy PrzeglqdPrawniczy, 1, 67-82. google scholar
• Muszynska, A., & Eucarz, K. (2008). Ustawa oprzeciwdzialaniu narkomanii. Komentarz[TheActon Counteracting Drug Addiction: Commentary]. (1st ed.). Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska. google scholar
• Srogosz, T. (2008). Ustawa oprzeciwdzialaniu narkomanii. Komentarz [The Act on Counteracting Drug Addiction: Commentary]. (2nd ed.). Warsaw: C.H. Beck. google scholar
• Stçpien, E. (2015). „Znaczna ilosc” srodkow odurzaj^cych, substancji psychotropowej i stomy makowej. Uwagi natle ustawy o przeciwdzialaniu narkomanii w swietle orzecznictwa Sadu Najwyzszego i sadow powszechnych [“A considerable quantity” of illicit drugs or psychotropic substance and poppy straw. Comments in relation to the Act on Counteracting Drug Addiction in view of the case law of the Supreme Court and common courts]. Kwartalnik SqdowyApelacji Gdahskiej, III, 57-71. google scholar
• United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances drawn up in Vienna on 20 December 1988, https://www.unodc.org/pdf/convention_1988_en.pdf. google scholar
• Cited court rulings google scholar Verdict of the Supreme Court dated 17 June 1999, IV KKN 813/98, LEX no. 38935. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Warsaw dated 18 April 2000, II AKa 22/00, LEX no. 45325. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Krakow dated 19 October 2000, II AKa 124/00, LEX no. 44955. google scholar
• Verdict of the Supreme Court dated 27 May 2002, V KKN 188/00, http://www.sn.pl/sites/orzecznictwo/ Orzeczenia1/V%20KKN%20188-00.pdf. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Lublin dated 17 December 2002, II AKa 282/02, LEX no. 80602. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Wroclaw dated 30 May 2003, II AKa 167/03, Legalis no. 59050. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Katowice dated 06 November 2003, II AKa 56/03, LEX no. 183333. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Krakow dated 31 August 2005, II AKa 167/05, LEX no. 163451. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Lublin dated 14 February 2006, II AKa 14/06, LEX no. 179040. google scholar
• Verdict of the Supreme Court dated 01 March 2006, II KK 47/05, LEX no. 182794. google scholar
• Decision of the Supreme Court dated 01 February 2007, III KK 257/06, LEX no. 323801. google scholar
• Verdict of Court of Appeals in Krakow dated 30 May 2007, II AKa 85/07, Legalis no. 89157. google scholar
• Decision of the Supreme Court dated 13 November 2007, V KK 287/07, LEX no. 332943. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Wroclaw dated 20 February 2008, II AKa 10/08, LEX no. 357147. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Krakow dated 15 May 2008, II AKa 70/08, LEX no. 466560. google scholar
• Verdict of the Supreme Court dated 10 June 2008, III KK 30/08, LEX no. 418629. google scholar
• Decision of the Supreme Court dated 25 February 2009, I KZP 31/08, LEX no. 486168. google scholar
• Verdict of Court of Appeals in Krakow dated 08 July 2009, II AKa 132/00, Legalis no. 218293. google scholar
• Decision of the Supreme Court dated 23 September 2009, I KZP 10/09, LEX no. 518123. google scholar
• Verdict of Court of Appeals in Krakow dated 01 February 2011, II AKa 142/10, Legalis no. 589101. google scholar
• Verdict of the Supreme Court dated 04 July 2011, IV KK 127/11, LEX no. 897769. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Wroclaw dated 02 February 2012, II AKa 413/11, Legalis no. 589102. google scholar
• Verdict of the Constitutional Tribunal dated 14 February 2012, P 20/10, LEX no. 1110344. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Wroclaw dated 08 March 2012, II AKa 45/12, Legalis no. 589103. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Bialystok dated 09 August 2012, II AKa 140/12, LEX no. 1220420. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Wroclaw dated 15 October 2012, II AKa 220/12, LEX no. 1238635. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Gdansk dated 19 December 2012, II AKa 430/12, LEX no. 1271815. google scholar
• Verdict of Court of Appeals in Krakow dated 05 April 2013, II AKa 47/13, Legalis no. 732951. google scholar
• Verdict of the Supreme Court dated 07 May 2013, II KK 25/13, http://www.sn.pl/sites/orzecznictwo/Orzeczenia3/III%20KK%2025-13.pdf. google scholar
• Verdict of the District Court in Kielce dated 24 September 2013, IX Ka 742/13, LEX no. 1717751. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Krakow dated 08 November 2013, II AKa 220/13, LEX no. 1466287. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Wroclaw dated 13 November 2013, II AKa 329/13, LEX no. 1400521. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in L6dz dated 21 January 2014, II AKa 255/13, Legalis no. 1024093. google scholar
• Decision of the Court of Appeals in Krakow dated 08 October 2014, II AKz 373/14, LEX no. 1616028. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Wroclaw dated 30 April 2015, II AKa 79/15, LEX no. 1711601. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Wroclaw dated 23 July 2015, II AKa 187/15, Legalis no. 1337321. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Poznan dated 03 November 2015, II AKa 115/15, LEX no. 2122468. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Wroclaw dated 23 March 2016, II AKa 63/16, LEX no. 2047161. google scholar
• Decision of the Supreme Court dated 23 February 2017, IV KK 19/17, LEX no. 2254800. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Lublin dated 02 March 2017, II AKa 279/16, LEX no. 2284893. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Krakow dated 06 June 2017, II AKa 71/17, Legalis no. 1807187. google scholar
• Verdict of the District Court in Warsaw dated 18 July 2017, VI Ka 1530/16, LEX no. 2361875. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Warsaw dated 04 August 2017, II AKa 168/17, Legalis no. 1658268. google scholar
• Verdict of the Supreme Court dated 11 October 2017, III KK 73/17, LEX no. 2389557. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Krakow dated 12 December 2017, II AKa 242/17, Legalis no. 1843591. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Wroclaw dated 14 November 2018, II AKa 251/18, LEX no. 2609639. google scholar
• Verdict of the Court of Appeals in Wroclaw dated 21 November 2018, II AKa 376/17, LEX no. 2613655. google scholar
• Verdict of the District Court in Sieradz dated 21 October 2019, II Ka 145/19, LEX no. 2761534. google scholar