Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

FEMINISM REDEFINING ECONOMICS OR FEMINISM AS A GOOD ACCOMPANY

Yıl 2013, Sayı: 12, 215 - 226, 09.07.2015

Öz

Feminism defined as an attempt to eliminate the inequality between women and men by engendering the analysis of the social construct has been and is being challenging for the contemporary economics. Feminist approach argues that without critical analysis, economics rationalizes and naturalizes existing social hierarchies based on gender, race, class and nation. Therefore feminist economics is a revolutionary attempt with a transformative theoretical approach and transformative methodologies for a fuller understanding of real life economics for real people.

Kaynakça

  • Beneria, L. (2003) “The study of Women and Gender in Economics” in L. Bene- ria, Gender, Development and Globalization, Routledge, Chapter 2 :31-6.
  • Benhabib, S. (1985). “The Generalized and the Concrete Other: The Kohlberg- Gilligan Controvers and Feminist Theory”. Praxis International, (4), 402-424.
  • Berik, Günseli (1997), “The Need for Crossing the Method Boundaries in Econo- mic Research” Feminist Economics 3 (2):121-125
  • Esim, Simel (1997), “Can Feminist Methodology Reduce Power Hierarchies in Research Settings? “ Feminist Economics 3 (2):137-139.
  • Ferber, Marienne A. and Julie A. Nelson, “Introduction:The Social Construction of Economics and the Social Construction of Gender”, in Beyond Econo- mic Man, ed. Mariene Ferber and Julie A. Nelson, The university of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1993.
  • Floro, M.S. (1995). “Women’s well-being, poverty, and work intensity”. Femi- nist Economics, 1(3):1-25.
  • Folbre, Nancy (1998) “Twenty questions about Gender and Economics” in New Perspectives in Gender Studies, Department of Gender Studies, Linkoping University, Sweden.
  • Fonow, Mary Margaret and Judith Cook (2005), “Feminist Methodology: New Applications in Academia and Public Policy” Signs, 30 (4): 2211-2236.
  • Harding, Sandra, and Kathryn Norberg (2005). “New feminist approaches to so- cial science methodologies: An introduction.” Signs 30 (4): 2009-2015.
  • Harding, S. (1995), “Can Feminist Thought Make Economics More Objective?“ Feminist Economics, Vol, 1, No, Spring.
  • Jacobsen, P. J., & Newman, A. E. (1997). “What data do economists use? The case of labor economics and industrial relations”. Feminist Economics, 3(2):127-130.
  • Kabeer, N. (1999) “Resources, Agency, Achievements: Measurement of Women’s Empowerment”, Development and Change, Vol. 30: 435-464.
  • Kim, Marlene (1997), “Poor women survey poor women: feminist perspectives in survey research”, Feminist Economics, 3, 2: 99-117.
  • Mac Donald, Martha (1995) “Feminist Economics from Theory to Research”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 28 (1): 159-176.
  • Nelson, Julie A. (1996), Feminism, Objectivity and Economics, Routledge, New York.
  • Nelson, Julie A. (1993), “The Study of Choice or the Study of Provisioning? Gender and the Definition of Economics” in Beyond Economic Man, ed. Mariene Ferber and Julie A. Nelson, The university of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
  • Nussbaum, Martha (2003) “Promoting Women’s Capabilities” in Lourdes Bene- ria and Savitri Bisnath, eds. Global Tensions: Challenges and Opportuniti- es in the World Economy, Routledge: 241-256.
  • Olmsted Jennifer C. (1997), “Telling Palestinian women’s economic stories”, Fe- minist Economics 3, 2:141-151.
  • Peterson, J., & Lewis, M. (Eds.). (1999). “Gender” The Elgar companion to feminist economics. Edward Elgar Pub.
  • Power, M. (2004). “Social provisioning as a starting point for feminist econo- mics” Feminist Economics, 10(3) : 3-19.
  • Sen, Amartya (1999). Development as freedom, Anchor Books, NY.
  • Van Staveren, Irene (1997), “Focus Groups: Contributing to a gender Aware Met- hodology”, Feminist Economics 3 (2):131-135.

FEMINISM REDEFINING ECONOMICS OR FEMINISM AS A GOOD ACCOMPANY

Yıl 2013, Sayı: 12, 215 - 226, 09.07.2015

Öz

Kadın ve erkek eşitliğini hedefleyen feminizm, sosyal inşanın cinsiyetli yapısını ele alırken, iktisat alanını da sarsmaya başlamıştır. Feminist yaklaşım, eleştirel analizden uzak haliyle iktisadın toplumsal cinsiyet, ırk, sınıf ve ulus temelinde oluşan sosyal hiyerarşileri doğallaştırdığını ve akılçılaştırdığını iddia eder. Dolayısıyla feminist iktisat, gerçek yaşamıdaha iyi kavramayı ve insanları gerçek yaşamdaki haliyle açıklayabilmeyi hedefleyen, bunun için iktisat alanını dönüştürücü teorik ve metodolojik bir yaklaşım geliştiren devrimci bir girişimdir. 

Kaynakça

  • Beneria, L. (2003) “The study of Women and Gender in Economics” in L. Bene- ria, Gender, Development and Globalization, Routledge, Chapter 2 :31-6.
  • Benhabib, S. (1985). “The Generalized and the Concrete Other: The Kohlberg- Gilligan Controvers and Feminist Theory”. Praxis International, (4), 402-424.
  • Berik, Günseli (1997), “The Need for Crossing the Method Boundaries in Econo- mic Research” Feminist Economics 3 (2):121-125
  • Esim, Simel (1997), “Can Feminist Methodology Reduce Power Hierarchies in Research Settings? “ Feminist Economics 3 (2):137-139.
  • Ferber, Marienne A. and Julie A. Nelson, “Introduction:The Social Construction of Economics and the Social Construction of Gender”, in Beyond Econo- mic Man, ed. Mariene Ferber and Julie A. Nelson, The university of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1993.
  • Floro, M.S. (1995). “Women’s well-being, poverty, and work intensity”. Femi- nist Economics, 1(3):1-25.
  • Folbre, Nancy (1998) “Twenty questions about Gender and Economics” in New Perspectives in Gender Studies, Department of Gender Studies, Linkoping University, Sweden.
  • Fonow, Mary Margaret and Judith Cook (2005), “Feminist Methodology: New Applications in Academia and Public Policy” Signs, 30 (4): 2211-2236.
  • Harding, Sandra, and Kathryn Norberg (2005). “New feminist approaches to so- cial science methodologies: An introduction.” Signs 30 (4): 2009-2015.
  • Harding, S. (1995), “Can Feminist Thought Make Economics More Objective?“ Feminist Economics, Vol, 1, No, Spring.
  • Jacobsen, P. J., & Newman, A. E. (1997). “What data do economists use? The case of labor economics and industrial relations”. Feminist Economics, 3(2):127-130.
  • Kabeer, N. (1999) “Resources, Agency, Achievements: Measurement of Women’s Empowerment”, Development and Change, Vol. 30: 435-464.
  • Kim, Marlene (1997), “Poor women survey poor women: feminist perspectives in survey research”, Feminist Economics, 3, 2: 99-117.
  • Mac Donald, Martha (1995) “Feminist Economics from Theory to Research”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 28 (1): 159-176.
  • Nelson, Julie A. (1996), Feminism, Objectivity and Economics, Routledge, New York.
  • Nelson, Julie A. (1993), “The Study of Choice or the Study of Provisioning? Gender and the Definition of Economics” in Beyond Economic Man, ed. Mariene Ferber and Julie A. Nelson, The university of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
  • Nussbaum, Martha (2003) “Promoting Women’s Capabilities” in Lourdes Bene- ria and Savitri Bisnath, eds. Global Tensions: Challenges and Opportuniti- es in the World Economy, Routledge: 241-256.
  • Olmsted Jennifer C. (1997), “Telling Palestinian women’s economic stories”, Fe- minist Economics 3, 2:141-151.
  • Peterson, J., & Lewis, M. (Eds.). (1999). “Gender” The Elgar companion to feminist economics. Edward Elgar Pub.
  • Power, M. (2004). “Social provisioning as a starting point for feminist econo- mics” Feminist Economics, 10(3) : 3-19.
  • Sen, Amartya (1999). Development as freedom, Anchor Books, NY.
  • Van Staveren, Irene (1997), “Focus Groups: Contributing to a gender Aware Met- hodology”, Feminist Economics 3 (2):131-135.
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Özge İzdeş

Yayımlanma Tarihi 9 Temmuz 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Sayı: 12

Kaynak Göster

APA İzdeş, Ö. (2015). FEMINISM REDEFINING ECONOMICS OR FEMINISM AS A GOOD ACCOMPANY. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi(12), 215-226.
AMA İzdeş Ö. FEMINISM REDEFINING ECONOMICS OR FEMINISM AS A GOOD ACCOMPANY. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi. Temmuz 2015;(12):215-226.
Chicago İzdeş, Özge. “FEMINISM REDEFINING ECONOMICS OR FEMINISM AS A GOOD ACCOMPANY”. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, sy. 12 (Temmuz 2015): 215-26.
EndNote İzdeş Ö (01 Temmuz 2015) FEMINISM REDEFINING ECONOMICS OR FEMINISM AS A GOOD ACCOMPANY. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi 12 215–226.
IEEE Ö. İzdeş, “FEMINISM REDEFINING ECONOMICS OR FEMINISM AS A GOOD ACCOMPANY”, Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, sy. 12, ss. 215–226, Temmuz 2015.
ISNAD İzdeş, Özge. “FEMINISM REDEFINING ECONOMICS OR FEMINISM AS A GOOD ACCOMPANY”. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi 12 (Temmuz 2015), 215-226.
JAMA İzdeş Ö. FEMINISM REDEFINING ECONOMICS OR FEMINISM AS A GOOD ACCOMPANY. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2015;:215–226.
MLA İzdeş, Özge. “FEMINISM REDEFINING ECONOMICS OR FEMINISM AS A GOOD ACCOMPANY”. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, sy. 12, 2015, ss. 215-26.
Vancouver İzdeş Ö. FEMINISM REDEFINING ECONOMICS OR FEMINISM AS A GOOD ACCOMPANY. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2015(12):215-26.