Obezite Vergisi Üzerine Teorik İnceleme

Öz

Obezite günümüzde sadece tıbbi değil, oluşturduğu maliyetleri düşüldüğünde aynı zamanda ekonomik bir sorun haline gelmiştir. Obezite ile mücadele için obezite vergisini uygulayan bazı ülkeler bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada obezite vergisi teorik olarak irdelenmiştir. Olası bir obezite vergisinin uygulamasından önce kullanılacak vergi tekniğinin tüm detayları dikkatlice belirlenmeli ve hükümetlerin vergi sonrası oluşabilecek sorunlara karşı hazırlıklı olması ve hızlı çözüm yöntemleri geliştirmesi gerekmektedir. Gıda piyasasında asimetrik bilgi, dışsal maliyetler, rasyonalite yoksunluğu gibi piyasa başarısızlıkları bulunmaktadır. Obezite vergisi bu başarısızlıkları gidermek için bir araç olarak kullanılabilir. Tüketim vergisi şeklinde alınabilen obezite vergisi spesifik matraha sahip olduğunda (advalorem matraha göre) tüketimi düşürmekte daha etkili olabilmektedir. Obezite vergisinin olumlu ve olumsuz yönleri bulunmaktadır. Vergi ile ilgili en önemli olumlu beklenti; tüketicilerin sağlıksız mallara olan talebini azaltarak obeziteyi düşürme etkisidir. Olumsuz görülen yönü ise regresif etkisi olabilmesi ve devletin özel hayata müdahalesi olarak görülebilmesi nedeniyle toplumsal kabul edilebilirlik düzeyidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Obezite Vergisi,Teori

Obezite Vergisi Üzerine Teorik İnceleme

Abstract

The problem of obesity is not only a medical issue but also economical one when we consider the costs of obesity. There are some countries which employ obesity taxes in order to fight obesity epidemic. This study examines obesity taxes in theoretical way. Before applying an obesity tax, governments should specify all the technical detail carefully, and be prepared to solve the problems rapidly which can be risen because of the tax. There are some market failures in the food markets such as asymmetrical information, external costs and irrationalities, obesity taxes can be used to fix these market failures. There are some advantages and disadvantages of the tax; the most important aspect of the tax is its ability to reduce obesity rate as reducing demand for unhealthy food and drinks, one negative side of the tax is that the effect can be regressive and people may perceive the tax as an intervention in the private lives and so public acceptability level could be low.

Keywords

• Obesity taxes,theory

References

1. ALEMANNO, A ve I. Carreno, (2011), Fat Taxes in the European Union between Fiscal Austerity and the Fight Against Obesity, European Journal of Risk Regulation, Issue 4, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1945804 (31.05.2015).
2. ANDREYEVA, T., F. J. Chaloupka ve K. D. Brownell, (2011), Estimaitng the Potential of Taxes on Sugar-Sweetenend Beverages to Reduce Consumption and Generate Revenue, Preventive Medicine, 52 (6),413-416
3. BARRY, C. L., J. Niederdeppe ve S. E. Gollust, (2013), Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Results From a 2011 National Public Opinion Survey, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44(2), 158-163.
4. BORZEKOWSKİ, D.L.G. ve T. N. Robinson, (2001), The 30-Second Effect: An Experiment Revealing the Impact of Television Commercials on Food Preferences of Preschoolers, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Volume 101, Issue 1, January, 42–46
5. CAWLEY, J., (2004), An Economic Framework for Understanding Physical Activity and Eating Behaviors, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27, (3S):117- 125
6. CAWLEY, J., (2011), The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Obesity, Oxford Universty Press, 198, New York.
7. CLARK, J.S. ve O.L. Dittrich, (2010), Alternative Fat Taxes to Control Obesity, Int. Adv. Econ Res., 16:388-394. doi 10.1007/s11294-010-9282-z
8. CHOUINARD H., D. Davis, J. LaFrance ve J. Perloff, (2007), Fat Taxes: Big Money for Small Change, Forum for Health Economics and Policy, Vol. 10, issue 2, article 2.

9. CHRIQUI J. F., F. J. Chaloupka, L. M. Powell ve S. S. Eidson, (2013), A Typology of Beverage Taxation: Multiple Approaches for Obesity Prevention and Obesity Prevention-Related Revenue Generation, Journal of Public Health Policy, Vol. 34, 3, 403–423.
10. ELSTON, J.A., K. R. Stanton, D.T. Levy ve J. A. Zoltan, (2009), Tax Solutions to The External Costs of Obesity, Obesity, Business and Public
11. Policy, Zoltan J. Acs ve Alan Lyles (Ed.), Edward Elgar Publising Limited, Cheltanham, UK.171-188.
12. ENGBER, D., (2009). Let Them Drink Water! What a Fat Tax Really Means for America,www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2009/09 /let_them_drink_water.html, (27.05.2014)
13. EPSTEIN, L. H., K. K. Dearing, R. A. Paluch, J. N. Roemmich ve D. Cho, (2007), Price and Maternal Obesity Influence Purchasing of Low- and High-energy-dense Foods, Am J Clin Nutr, Oct; 86(4): 914–922.
14. FINKELSTEIN E. ve L. Zukerman, (2008), The Fattening of America, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
15. FRANCK, C., S. M. Grandi ve M. J. Eisenberg, (2013), Taxing Junk Food to Counter Obesity, American Journal Public Health, November; 103(11): 1949–1953.
16. GRIFFITH, R. ve O’Connell M., (2010), Public Policy towards Food Consumption, Fiscal Studies, Vol. 1,31, No:4, 481-507
17. GOLDMAN, D., D. Lakdawalla, Y. Zheng, (2009), Food Prices and The Dynamics of Body Weight, National Bureau Of Economıc Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138.
18. HORGEN, K.B. ve K.D. Brownell, (2002), Comparison of Price Change and Health Message Interventions in Promoting Healthy Food Choices, Health Psychology,Sep;21(5):505-12. http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/259572/eib3_1_.pdf (03.04.2016). Institute of Economic Affairs, (2016),Sugar Tax: A Briefing, Jan, https://iea.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2016/07/IEA%20Sugar%20Taxes%20 Briefing%20Jan%202016.pdf (01.07.2017)
19. LOBSTEIN, T. ve S. Dibb, (2005), Evidence of a Possible Link between Obesogenic Food Advertising and Child Overweight, Obesity Reviews, 6, 203–208.
20. MAIO, Z., J.C. Beghin, ve H. Jensen, (2013), Taxing Sweets: Sweetener Input Tax or Final Consumption Tax?, Contemporary Economic Policy ,09/2010; 30(10- wp510). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1725988
21. MAIO, Z., (2012), Three Essays on Tax Policies Addressing the Obesity Epidemic and Associated Calorie Intake, Unpublished Dissertation, Iowa State University. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 12408. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3415&context=etd
22. MANIADAKIS, N., V. Kapaki, L. Damianidi ve G. Kourlaba, (2013), A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Taxes on Nonalcoholic Beverages and High-infat Foods as a Means to Prevent Obesity Trends, Clinicoecon Outcomes Research, 5: 519–543. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S49659
23. MARROW, M.W., (2011), Taxing Sugar Drinks: A Tool for Obesity Prevention, Cost Savings and Health Improvement, Public Health Law Center.http://publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/resources/ Taxing%20Sugar_Drinks_Public%20Health%20Law%20Center%20%20 May%202011.pdf (05.04.2016)
24. O’DONOGHOUE, T. and M. Rabin, (2006), ‘Optimal Sin Taxes’, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 90, 1825–49.
25. POWELL, L. M., J. F. Chriqui, T. Khan, R. Wada, ve F. J. Chaloupka, (2013), Assessing the Potential Effectiveness of Food and Beverage Taxes and Subsidies for Improving Public Health: A Systematic Review of Prices, Demand and Body Weight Outcomes, Obesity Reviews, 14(2), 110-128.
26. PETTIGER, T., (2012), Pros and Cons of Fat Tax http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/5056/economics/pros-and-cons-of-fat-tax/ (05.04.2016)
27. PETTIGER, T., (2015), Sugar Tax Debate, http://www.economicshelp. org/blog/14884/economics/sugar-tax-debate/ (03.03.2016)
28. RHEUBAN, J., (2009), Arguments for and against Junk Food and Soda Tax. http://jacobrheuban.com/2009/12/27/arguments-for-and-against-junk-food-andsoda-taxes/ (03.03.2016)
29. ROBERTO, C. A.,M. A. Bragg, M. B. Schwartz,M. J. Seamans, A. Musicus,N. Novak, K. D. Brownell, (2012), Facts Up Front Versus Traffic Light Food Labels, American Journal of Medicine, Volume 43, Issue 2, 134–141
30. ROLLS, B.J., L. Erin, E.L. Morris ve L.S. Row, (2002), Portion Size of Food Affects Energy Intake in Normal-weight and Overweight Men and Women, Am J Clin Nutr, 76,1207-13
31. SARUÇ, T., (2014), Obezite Ekonomisi ve Obezite ile Mücadelede Kamu Politikaları, Son çağ yayıncılık, İstanbul.
32. SHARMA, A., K. Hauck, B. Hollingsworth ve L. Sicilian, (2014), The Effects of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Across Different Income Groups, Health Economics, 23: 1159–1184.
33. SKINNER, T., H. Miller ve C. Bryant, (2005), The literature on the economic causes of and policy responses to obesity, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C — Food Economics, Volume 2, Issue 3-4, September, 128-137
34. SONNENBERG, L., E. Gelsomin, D. E. Levy, Jason Riis, S. Barraclough, ve Anne N. Thorndike. 2013. A Traffic Light Food Labeling Intervention Increases Consumer Awareness of Health and Healthy Choices at the Point-of-Purchase, Preventive Medicine, 57 (4): 253–57.
35. STRNAD J., (2005), Conceptualizing the “Fat Tax”: The Role of Food Taxes in Developed Economies, Stanford Law School John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper No. 286, http://ssrn.com/abstract=561321 (12.09.2015)
36. THOW, A. M., S. Jan, S. Leeder ve B. Swinburn, (2010), The Effect of Fiscal Policy on Diet, Obesity and Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review, Bulletin of the World Health Organization; 88: 609-614. doi: 10.2471/ BLT.09.070987
37. VEERMAN, J. L., E. F. Van Beeck, J. J. Barendregt ve J. P. Mackenbach, (2009), By How Much Would Limiting TV Food Advertising Reduce Childhood Obesity?, The European Journal of Public Health, Advance Access published March 26,1-5.
38. YANIV, G., O.Rosin ve Y. Tobol, (2009), Junk-Food, Home Cooking, Physical Activity and Obesity: The Effect of the Fat Tax Thin Subsidy, Journal of Public Economics,93, 823-830.