The culturally valued domains in talent studies in Iran: experts views

Year 2022, , 99 - 108, 30.03.2022

Saeed Akbari Zardkhaneh , Farnaz Mehdipour Maralani , Jalil Fathabadi , Majid Shahsavari

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1071484

Abstract

Talent and giftedness is one of the cultural concepts to identify a person who is eminent in one or numerous domains that society highly regards. So, finding the culturally valued domains in talent studies is a priority, and this has led to the development of measures used in gifted assessment and educational programs in each society. This study aimed to investigate the culturally valued domains in Iran. In this regard, fourteen interviews with educational and psychological experts were carried out. Purposive and snowballing samplings were used, and the participants took part in an unstructured interview. An unstructured interview is an interview with a comprehensive and open question in which the interviewee can lead the conversation. Usually, in an unstructured interview, the interviewer listens and reflects more than speaks. In this study, the experts were asked to describe their idea regards the culturally valued domains in Iran. For analysing data, open, axial, and selective codings of grounded theory were used. Finally, eleven culturally valued domains for identifying talented and gifted students were introduced by the experts. These domains included: Logical and Mathematical, Science(Academic), Artistic, Leadership, Literacy, Technology, Spatial, Athletic, Social Relationship, Existential, Spiritual and religious and Entrepreneur. This research suggests that these domains should be considered for use in Iran in talent and giftedness studies. Identifying talented students in Iran, which is an Islamic country and culturally different from westerns countries, also considering developmental and educational programs for the identified students could play a significant role in talented studies literature. Furthermore, researching culturally valued domains in other Islamic countries is highly recommended.

Keywords

Talent, Giftedness, culturally valued domains, experts, Grounded theory

References

• Abdolmaleki, H. (2014). Resistive economy: An introduction to fundamentals, policies and action plans. Tehran, Iran: Sadid.
• Akhondzadeh, S. (2013). Iranian science shows world's fastest growth: ranks 17th in science production in 2012. Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology, 5(3), 139.
• Alipour, M., Ayati, M., & Soorgi, F. (2019). Investigating the Correlation of Teachers' and Parents' Views on Students' Talent (Shahab Plan). Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ), 8(9), 189-198.
• Bernal, E. M. (2001). Three ways to achieve a more equitable representation of culturally and linguistically different students in GT programs. Roeper Review, 24(2), 82-88.
• Bitsch, V. (2005). Qualitative research: A grounded theory example and evaluation criteria. Journal of agribusiness, 23(345-2016-15096), 75-91.
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Supporting a grounded theory with an audit trail: An illustration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 305-316.
• Burgess, R. G. (2003). The unstructured interview as a conversation. In Field research (pp. 177-182). Routledge.
• Castellano, J. A., & Frazier, A. D. (Eds.). (2021). Special populations in gifted education: Understanding our most able students from diverse backgrounds. Routledge.
• Chan, D. W. (2018). Gifted education in Asia. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 71–84). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-005
• Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2007). Grounded theory In Ritzer G, editor. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. sage.
• Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2020). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1-23.
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
• Cross, T. L., & Cross, J. R. (2020). An enhanced school-based conception of giftedness. Conceptual Frameworks for Giftedness and Talent Development; Cross, TL, Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Eds, 265- 288.
• Davari, A. (2018). Iranian Leadership Ideals: A Culturally-based Leadership Approach.
• Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, V., Sangari, A. A., & Veldhuis, M. (2021). Teachers’ Use of Descriptive Assessment in Primary School
• Mathematics Education in Iran. Education Sciences, 11(3), 100.
• Fazeli, N. (2006). Politics of culture in Iran. Routledge.
• Gagné, F. (2000). A differentiated model of giftedness and talent (DMGT). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented, 2.
• Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High ability studies, 15(2), 119-147.
• Gardner, H. (1983). The theory of multiple intelligences. Heinemann.
• Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of management review, 10(4), 696-706.
• Gardner, H. (1999). Are there additional intelligences? The case for naturalist, spiritual, and existential intelligences. Education, information, and transformation, 111-131.
• Hassan Hemdan Mohamed, A., Mahdi Kazem, A., Pfeiffer, S., Alzubaidi, A. Q., Abu Elwan, R., Ambosaidi, A., ... & Al-Kharosi, T. (2017). Identification of gifted students in Oman: Gender and grade differences on the gifted rating scales–school form. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(3), 289-301.
• Heller, K. A., Perleth, C., & Lim, T. K. (2005). The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. Conceptions of giftedness, 2, 147-170.
• Heshmati, A., & Dibaji, S. M. (2019). Science, Technology, and Innovation Status in Iran: Main Challenges. Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 545-578.
• Kafashpoor, A., Shakoori, N., & Sadeghian, S. (2013). Linking organizational culture, structure, Leadership Style, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Advanced Research in Economic and Management Sciences (AREMS), 10(1), 158-167.
• Lee, D., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (2006). The reliability and validity of a Korean-translated version of the Gifted Rating Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(3), 210-224.
• Li, H., Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y., Kumtepe, A. T., & Mo, G. (2008). Validation of the Gifted Rating Scales–school form in China. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 160-169.
• MacKenzie, D. (2010). Iran showing fastest scientific growth of any country. New Scientist (Science in Society).
• Manoukian, S. (2012). City of knowledge in twentieth century Iran: Shiraz, history and poetry. Routledge.
• Marland Jr, S. P. (1971). Education of the Gifted and Talented-Volume 1: Report to the Congress of the United States by the US Commissioner of Education.
• McCallum, R. S., & Bracken, B. A. (2012). Examiner’s manual: Universal multiple abilities scale. Pro- Ed.
• McCann, T., & Polacsek, M. (2021). Understanding, choosing and applying grounded theory: part 1. Nurse Researcher, 29(1). Ministry of Education, Secretary of Special Education. (1994). Política Nacional de educação especial [National policies for special education]. Brasilia, Brazil: Author.
• Nicpon, M. F., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (2011). High-ability students: New ways to conceptualize giftedness and provide psychological services in the schools. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27(4), 293-305.
• Panahi, B. (2021). A Meta-Analysis of the Variables Effective on Organizational Transparency and the Variables Affected by it in the Studies Carried Out in Iran. Organizational Culture Management, 19(4), 683-706. doi: 10.22059/jomc.2021.310114.1008134
• Perleth, C., Sierwald, W., & Heller, K. A. (1993). Selected results of the Munich longitudinal study of giftedness: The multidimensional/typological giftedness model. Roeper Review, 15(3), 149-155.
• Phillipson, S. N. (2020). A framework for the study of sociocultural perspectives of giftedness. In Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 1-33). Routledge.
• Pishva, F., Nazarian, A., Monazami, A. H., & Rahimizadeh, M. (2021). Developing the Strategic Plan for Pahlevani and Zourkanei Federation. Journal of New Studies in Sport Management, 2(1), 68-81.
• Pfeiffer, S. I. (2002). Identifying gifted and talented students: Recurring issues and promising solutions. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(1), 31-50.
• Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted Rating Scales. The Psychological Corp.
• Pfeiffer, S. I., Kumtepe, A., & Rosado, J. (2006). Gifted identification: Measuring change in a student’s profile of abilities using the Gifted Rating Scales. The School Psychologist, 60(3), 106-111.
• Pfeiffer, S. I. (2012). Serving the gifted: Evidence-based clinical and psychoeducational practice. Routledge.
• Pfeiffer, S. I. (2015). Essentials of gifted assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
• Pfeiffer, S. I., Shaunessy-Dedrick, E. E., & Foley-Nicpon, M. E. (2018). APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. xxi-691). American Psychological Association.
• Renzulli, J. S. (1984). The triad/revolving door system: A research-based approach to identification and programming for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(4), 163-171.
• Renzulli, J. S. (2009). The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Eckert, & C. A. Little (Eds.), Systems and models for developing the gifted and talented (2nd ed., pp. 353–381). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
• Renzulli, J., Smith, L., White, A., Callahan, C., Hartman, R., Westberg, Gavin, M., Reis, S., Siegle, D. & Sytsma, R. (2010). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students: Technical and administration manual (3th ed). USA: Creative learning press, Inc.
• Smith, R. (2002). Inspirational tales: propagating the entrepreneurial narrative amongst children. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. CUP Archive.
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological science in the public interest, 12(1), 3-54.
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2021). A Conception of Giftedness as Domain-Specific Learning: A Dynamism Fueled by Persistence and Passion. In Conceptions of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 443-466). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
• White, K. E. (2019). Science and engineering publication output trends: 2017 shows US output level slightly below that of China but the United States maintains lead with highly cited publications. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.
• Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15 (1), 45-55.