Comparison of mathematics self-efficacy perceptions of gifted and normally developing primary school students

Abstract

This study aims to compare the mathematics self-efficacy perceptions of gifted and normally developing primary school students according to different variables (gender, grade, preferred course, being a gifted/normally developing student). For this purpose, the study was designed according to the survey design. The study group consisted of 63 gifted Science and Art Center students and 89 primary school students (3-4th grade). The study data were collected with the “Mathematics Self-Efficacy Perception Scale” and “Personal Information Form.” Before analyzing the obtained data, the normality condition of the data was checked. An Independent Sample t-test was used to analyze the data that met the normality condition. In contrast, the Man Whitney U test was used to analyze the data that did not meet the normality condition. As a result of the data analysis, according to the class variable, the mathematics self-efficacy of 3rd-grade normally developing students differed significantly in the attitude sub-dimension and the whole scale compared to 4th-grade students. 3rd grade gifted students showed a significant difference in mathematics self-efficacy only in the motivation sub-dimension compared to their peers with normal development. According to the gender variable, it was determined that the math self-efficacy of gifted male students differed significantly in the motivation sub-dimension compared to their normally developing male peers. According to the variable of favorite course, it was seen that gifted students who preferred mathematics courses in the first place differed significantly in the attitude sub-dimension of mathematics self-efficacy and the whole scale compared to gifted students who did not prefer mathematics courses in the first place. The mathematics self-efficacy of normally developing students who preferred the mathematics course in the first place differed significantly in all three sub-dimensions (attitude, motivation, and practice) and the whole scale compared to their peers who did not prefer the course in the first place. The mathematics self-efficacy of gifted students who chose other courses in the first place differed significantly in attitude and motivation sub-dimensions compared to normally developing students who preferred other courses in the first place. According to the variable of being a gifted/normally developing student, the mathematics self-efficacy perceptions of gifted primary school (3-4th grade) students differed significantly only in the motivation sub-dimension compared to their normally developing peers.

Keywords

• mathematics self-efficacy perception
• gifted student
• normally developing student

References

1. Adal, A., & Yavuz, I. (2017). The relationship between mathematics self efficacy and mathematics anxiety levels of middle school students. International Journal of Field Education, 3(1), 20-41.
2. Akbas, A., & Celikkaleli, Ö. (2006). Investigation of pre-service primary school teachers' science teaching self-efficacy beliefs according to gender, education type and university. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 2(1), 98-110.
3. Aksoy, O. (2014). Comparison of perceived academic self-efficacy of gifted and normal students. Journal of Giftedness and Creativity 1(1), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.18200/JGEDC.2014110880
4. Akyurek Tay, B., & Cakmak, M. A. (2020). The effect of case method designed with band caricatures on social studies lesson achievement levels of gifted students of bılsems and students in formal education. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 14(33), 146-172. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2020.272.7
5. Alakoc, Z. (2003). Technological modern teaching approaches in mathematics teaching. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 43-44.
6. Altun, M. (2005). Mathematics teaching (4th Ed.). Aktuel.
7. Altuntas, Z. (2021). İlkokul 3. ve 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik kaygısı ve matematik özyeterlik algılarının incelenmesi [Examination of the math anxiety and self-efficacy perception of the students attending the third and fourth grade students]. Master thesis. İstanbul-Cerrahpaşa University, İstanbul.
8. Ashcraft, M., & Faust, M. (1994). Mathematics anxiety and mental arithmetic performance: An exploratory investigation. Cognition and Emotion, 8(2), 97–125.

9. Arseven, A., Arseven, I., & Tepehan, T. (2015). Examining the self-efficacy perceptions of pre-service primary school teachers towards mathematics teaching. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education-CIJE, 4(2), 29-40.
10. Ataman, A. (2004). How can parents and teachers help gifted children? First Turkey congress of gifted children selected articles book. Child Foundation Publications.
11. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
12. Bas, M., Isik Tertemiz N., & Tay, B. (2021). The effects of integrated mathematics and life studies teaching on 3rd grade students' attitude levels. Türk Akademik Yayınlar Dergisi (TAY Journal), 5(2), 158-180.
13. Baypinar, K., & Tarim, K. (2019). Ortaokul matematik okuryazarlık öz-yeterlik ölçeği geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [The Development of Mathematical Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale for Middle School: A Reliability And Validity Study]. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 48(1), 878-909.
14. Caglar, D. (2004) Üstün zekâlı çocukların özellikleri [Characteristics of gifted children]. M. R. Şirin, A. Kulaksızoğlu & A. E. Bilgili. (Haz.), Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Seçilmiş Makaleler Kitabı [Gifted children selected papers] içinde (s.111–125). Çocuk Vakfı Yayınları.
15. Callahan, W. J. (1971). Adolescent attitudes toward mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher, 64(8), 751-755.
16. Can, A. (2019). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS]. Pegem Academy.
17. Cavdar, D. & Sahan, H. H. (2019). Analysis of relationship between academic success in maths, self-sufficiency and attitude to maths lesson. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 979-999.
18. Cotton, T. (2008). Mathematics teaching in the real World. In Issues in Mathematics Teaching (p. 23-37), P. Gates (Ed.). Routledge Falmer: Oxon.
19. Crezo, N. (2004). Problem based learning in the middle school: a research case study of the perceptions of at risk females. Research in Middle Level Education Online 27(1), 1-13.
20. Demir, G. (2017). Gerçekçi matematik eğitimi yaklaşımının meslek lisesi öğrencilerinin matematik kaygısına, matematik özyeterlik algısına ve başarısına etkisi [The effect of activity based algorithm education on the problem-solving skills of 5-6 years old children]. Master thesis. Adnan Menderes University, Aydın.
21. Doruk, M., Ozturk, M., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Investigation of the self-efficacy perceptions of middle school students towards mathematics: anxiety and attitude factors. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 2016, 6(2), 283-302.
22. Erdogan, F., & Erben, T. (2018). Investigation of gifted students’ problem posing abilities requiring arithmetical operations with natural numbers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(3), 531-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.486674
23. Ekiz, D. (2009). Scientific research methods. Anı Publication.
24. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). Mc Graw-hill.
25. Gedik, O., & Aykac, N. (2017). The effect of creative drama method on students’ different learning levels and self-efficacy in mathematics. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(1), 152-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.305785
26. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 261-273.
27. Haciomeroglu, G., & Elmali-Erdem, O. (2021). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin matematik öz yeterlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examining middle school students’ mathematics self efficacy levels]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(17), 353-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.18009/jcer.866760
28. Hall, J. M., & Ponton, M. K. (2005). Mathematics self-efficacy of college freshman. Journal of Developmental Education 28(3), 26.
29. Karali, Y., & Cosanay, G. (2022). Development of mathematics self-efficacy perception scale: Validity and reliability study. Turkish Studies, 17(4), 827-842. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.58065
30. Karasar, N. (2013). Scientific research method (25th ed.). Nobel Publication and Distrubition.
31. Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(4), 218-227.
32. Medikoglu, O. (2020). İlkokul öğrencilerinin matematik öz yeterlik kaynakları ile matematik kaygı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationship between primary school students’ mathematics self-efficacy sources and mathematics anxiety levels]. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, 6(1), 35-52.
33. Miller, R. C. (1990). Discovering mathematical talent. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED 321 487.
34. Mingus, T., & Grassl, R. (1999). What constitutes a nurturing environment for the growth of mathematically gifted students? School Science and Mathematics, 99(6), 286-293.
35. Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Mathematics curriculum (primary and secondary school grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8]. Retrieved from: https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=329
36. Nicolaidou, M., & Philippou, G. (2003). Attitudes towards mathematics, self-efficacy and achievement in problem solving. European Research in Mathematics III.
37. Ordonez-Feliciano, J. P. (2009). Self-Efficacy and instruction in mathematics. Student Theses, Dissertations, Portfolios and Projects, 165.
38. Ozturk, B., & Kurtulus, A. (2017). The analysis of the effect of metacognitive awareness and mathematics self-efficacy perceptions on mathematics achievement of middle school students. Dicle University Jornal of Ziya Gökalp, 31, 762-778. http://dx.doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.1840
39. Ozturk, A. Y., & Sahin, C. (2015). Determining the relationships between academic achievement, self-efficacy and attitude towards mathematics. International Journal of Social Science, 31, 343-366.
40. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.
41. Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: a path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193-203.
42. Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Adolescence and education: Self efficacy beliefs of adolescents [Adolescence and education: Adolescents' self-efficacy beliefs]. Vol. 5. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
43. Razzouk, R. (2011). The effects of case studies on individual learning outcomes, attitudes toward instruction, and team shared mental models in a teambased learning environment in an undergraduate educational psychology course. Florida State University.
44. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychological Review, 1, 173-200.
45. Sevgi, S., & Yakisikli, Z. (2020). Investigating mathematics self-efficacy and attitude towards mathematics of middle school students. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 16(2), 394-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.685426
46. Sevgi, S., & Zihar, M. (2020). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin yansıtıcı düşünme becerileri ile matematik öz yeterlik algılarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Analyzing the Reflective Thinking Skills and Mathematical Self-efficacy Perceptions of Middle School Students with Respect to Some Variables]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(6), 2331-2345. http://dx.doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.700428
47. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self Efficacy and Achievement Behaviors. Educational Psychological Review, 1, 173-200.
48. Spicer, Claire D. (2004). The written english self-efficacy of students with varying abilities. A Look at Gifted Students and Students with Learning Disabilities, Proceedings of the 3rd International Biennial SELF Research Conference.
49. Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics. The Journal of Secondary Education, 17(1), 20–36.
50. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
51. Stevens, T., Olivarez, A., Lan W., & Runnels, M. K. (2004). Role of mathematics self efficacy and motivation in mathematics performance across ethnicity. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 208-221.
52. Tanriseven Uredi, I., Sengul, S., & Gurdal, A. (2008). The effect of using animation as a problem solving strategy in mathematics teaching on student achievement and recall level. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 25(2), 21-33.
53. Tasdemir, C. (2012). Evaluating The mathematics self- efficacay levels of high school senior students ın terms of some variables (The Case of Bitlis). The Black Sea Journal of Science, 3(2), 39-50.
54. Tol, H. Y., & Cenberci, S. (2019). The effect of scenario-based learning method on students’ mathself efficacy, math attitude and anxiety. Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alparslan University, 7(4) 149–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.18506/anemon.523065
55. Unlu, M. (2021). Self-efficacy beliefs towards mathematics. In E. Ertekin, & B. Dilmaç, Affective Properties of Mathematics (pp. 45-60). Pegem Academy.
56. Ural, A. (2014). The effect of mathematics self-efficacy belief on mathematics teaching anxiety. Proceedings of INTCESS14- International Conference on Education and Social Sciences Proceedings. 3-5 February 2014- İstanbul, Turkiye.
57. Ural, A., Umay, A., & Argun, Z. (2008). The effect of student teams achievement episodes technique based education on academic achievement and self-efficacy in mathematics. Hacettepe University Journal of Education (35), 307-318.
58. Utanir, S. (2008). İlköğretim 1. kademe 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin öğrenme stilleri tercihleri ile matematik dersindeki akademik başarı ve derse yönelik tutumları arasındaki ilişki [The relationship of the fifth grade students in the first echelon of elementary education between students’ learning style preferences with mathematics academic achievement and attitudes towards this class]. Master thesis. Pamukkale University, Denizli.
59. Uzar, F. M. (2010). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin matematik dersine yönelik öz yeterliğini besleyen kaynakların farklı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [Exploring sources of middle school students mathematics self efficacy with respect to different variables] Master thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara. Wieczerkowski, W., Cropley, A. J., & Prado, T. M. (2000). Nurturing talents/gifts in mathematics. In K. A. Heller, F. J.
60. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent education (pp. 413- 425). Pergamon.
61. Yenilmez, K., & Uygan, C. (2010). The effect of creative drama method on elementary school 7th grade students' self-efficacy beliefs towards geometry. Kastamonu Education Journal, 18(3), 931-942.
62. Yildiz, M. S. (2019). Özel yetenekli ve normal gelişim gösteren ilkokul (2-4. sınıf) öğrencilerinin duygusal zekâ düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması [A comparison of the levels of emotional intelligence of the primary school students with special skills and normal development (2nd- 4th grade)]. Master thesis. Marmara University, İstanbul.
63. Young, A. E., & Worrell, F. C. (2018). Comparing metacognition assessments of mathematics in academically talented students. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(2), 259-275.
64. Yurt, E., & Kurnaz, A. (2015). An investigation of the effects of the mathematics sources of self-efficacy on talented students’ mathematics anxiety. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 5(4), 347-360, http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2015.019
65. Zulkosky, K. (2009). Self‐efficacy: A concept analysis. In Nursing Forum, 44(2), 93-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2009.00132.x