Mathematically precocious children in early childhood: A systematic review

Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 3 , 161 - 178 , 30.09.2025

Elifnur Işgın , Hacer Elif Dağlıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1678066

https://izlik.org/JA65RM75KG

Abstract

The study examined 15 articles published in Turkish or English over the past 10 years, focusing on mathematically precocious children in early childhood in Türkiye and the international literature. The results revealed that most studies were conducted in Türkiye and were predominantly published in journals related to education and giftedness, frequently indexed in SSCI and Scopus. An analysis of the methodological aspects showed that quantitative methods were predominantly used, followed by qualitative methods. In terms of study groups, most research focused on primary school-aged children. Regarding the scope of mathematics, the studies generally addressed content and process standards in mathematics. Although the findings reflect efforts in both Türkiye and around the world to identify mathematically advanced children in early childhood and to provide appropriate educational support, it appears that the mathematical concepts addressed in the studies and the factors influencing mathematical ability are somewhat limited. In this regard, it is recommended that ministries of education and universities in various countries collaborate on projects and programs specifically designed for all children in early childhood. Such collaboration should adopt an inclusive approach, focusing on discovering children’s knowledge, skills, and abilities at an early stage, and ensure coherence between the goals of different levels of the education system. Based on these aligned goals, the education of mathematically gifted children can be more effectively planned.

Keywords

early childhood , mathematically precocious children , gifted children , systematic review , PRISMA

Ethical Statement

This article does not include any studies involving human or animal participants, and informed consent is not required.

References

• Adams, A. M., Soto-Calvo, E., Francis, H. N., Patel, H., Hartley, C., Giofrè, D., & Simmons, F. R. (2021). Characteristics of the preschool home literacy environment which predict writing skills at school. Reading and Writing, 34, 2203-2225.
• Adedoyin, O. O., & Chisiyanwa, L. A. (2018). Predictors of numeracy skills giftedness in young children: Perceptions of Botswana early childhood practitioners. African Educational Research Journal, 6(4), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.64.18.080
• Akman, B., Yükselen, A. İ., & Uyanık, G. (2000). Okul öncesi dönemde matematik etkinlikleri. Epsilon.
• Asan, A. (2017). International journal indexes, importance and status of Türkiye journals: Part 1: Scientific journal indexes Turkish. Acta Med. Alanya, 1(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.30565/medalanya.303599
• Assmus, D., & Fritzlar, T. (2022). Mathematical creativity and mathematical giftedness in the primary school age range: An interview study on creating figural patterns. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 54(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01328-8
• Barnes, M. A., & Raghubar, K. P. (2017). Neurodevelopmental disorders as model systems for understanding typical and atypical mathematical development. In Acquisition of complex arithmetic skills and higher-order mathematics concepts (pp. 67-97). Academic Press.
• Benbow, C. P. (1986). Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia, 24(5), 719–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(86)90011-4
• Bettany-Saltikov, J., & McSherry, R. (2024). How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: A step-by-step guide. Open University Press.
• Bicknell, B. (2008). Who are the mathematically gifted? Student, parent, and teacher perspectives. In Proceedings of ICME11. TG6: Activities and Programs for Gifted Students.
• Bilgic, S., & Baloğlu, M. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of research on giftedness and mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2236611
• Bulut, A. S., Yıldız, A., & Baltacı, S. (2020). A comparison of mathematics learning approaches of gifted and non- gifted students. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 11(2), 461–491. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.682111
• Charlesworth, R., & Lind, K. K. (2013). Math and science for young children (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105–117).
• Civil, M., & Andrade, R. (2003). Collaborative practice with parents: The role of the researcher as mediator. In A. Peter-Koop, V. Santos-Wagner, C. Breen, & A. Begg (Eds.), Collaboration in teacher education: Examples from the context of mathematics education (pp. 153–168). Kluwer.
• Claessens, A., & Engel, M. (2013). How important is where you start? Early mathematics knowledge and later school success. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500603
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning trajectories in early mathematics–sequences of acquisition and teaching. Encyclopedia of Language and Literacy Development, 7, 1–6.
• Copley, J. V. (2000). The young child and mathematics. National Association for the Education of Young Children, 1509 16th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036-1426.
• Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2013). Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490020
• David, H. (2012). Mathematical giftedness in early childhood. In J. A. Opera et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Technology Education (ICSTE2012) (pp. 43–50). Owerri, Nigeria, October 22–26.
• Dehalwar, K., & Sharma, S. N. (2024). Exploring the distinctions between quantitative and qualitative research methods. Think India Journal, 27(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10553000
• Deretarla Gül, E. (2018). Türkiye’deki okul öncesi eğitim. In G. Haktanır (Ed.), Erken çocukluk eğitimine giriş (pp. 111– 174). Anı.
• Desmet, O. A., Pereira, N., & Peterson, J. S. (2020). Telling a tale: How underachievement develops in gifted girls. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219888633
• Er, Z., Dinç Artut, P. D., & Bal, A. P. (2023). Developing the mathematical thinking scale for gifted students. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(3), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.23
• Erdem, Z. Ç. (2023). Thematic analysis of studies on gifted students in the field of mathematics education. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 10(3), 235–258.
• Fiedler, A., Franke, A., Horacek, H., Moschner, M., Pollet, M., & Sorge, V. (2002). Ontological issues in the representation and presentation of mathematical concepts. In Workshop on Ontologies and Semantic Interoperability at ECAI-2002.
• Fraenkel, L., Peters, E., Charpentier, P., Olsen, B., Errante, L., Schoen, R. T., & Reyna, V. (2012). Decision tool to improve the quality of care in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 64(7), 977-985.
• Fryer Jr, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2004). Understanding the black-white test score gap in the first two years of school. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 447–464.
• Gavin, M. K., Casa, T. M., Adelson, J. L., Carroll, S. R., Sheffield, L. J., & Spinelli, A. M. (2007). Project M3: Mentoring mathematical minds: A research-based curriculum for talented elementary students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 566–585. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-55
• Gavin, M. K., Casa, T. M., Firmender, J. M., & Carroll, S. R. (2013). The impact of advanced geometry and measurement curriculum units on the mathematics achievement of first-grade students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213479564
• Geary, D. C., vanMarle, K., Chu, F. W., Rouder, J., Hoard, M. K., & Nugent, L. (2018). Early conceptual understanding of cardinality predicts superior school-entry number-system knowledge. Psychological Science, 29(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617729817
• Gerring, J. (2017). Qualitative methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-092415-024158
• Gündoğan, E., & Kaya, M. (2021). Bilimsel dergi tavsiyesi için içerik tabanlı bir yaklaşım [A content-based approach for scholarly journal recommendation]. Computer Science, (Special), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.990444
• Henniger, M. L. (1987). Learning mathematics and science through play. Childhood Education, 63(3), 167–171.
• Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712184.index
• Hu, Z., Tian, W., Xu, S., Zhang, C., & Wang, X. (2018). Four pitfalls in normalizing citation indicators: An investigation of ESI’s selection of highly cited papers. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1133–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.006
• İnan, E., & Uyangör, S. M. (2022). A Thematic analysis of theses prepared on mathematics education with gifted and talented students in Türkiye. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 19–40.
• Jarvis, J. M., & Henderson, L. (2015). Current practices in the education of gifted and advanced learners in South Australian schools. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 24(2), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2015.0018
• Karaçam, Z. (2013). Sistematik derleme metodolojisi: Sistematik derleme hazırlamak için bir rehber. E-Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Nursing Faculty, 6(1), 26–33.
• Kaya, N. G. (2020). Supporting of gifted children’s psychosocial developments in preschool period. Psychology Research on Education and Social Sciences, 1(1), 25–30.
• Lara-Cinisomo, S., Pebley, A. R., Vaiana, M. E., & Maggio, E. (2004). Are L.A.’s children ready for school? RAND Corporation.
• Leana-Tascilar, M. Z., Ozyaprak, M., & Yilmaz, O. (2016). An online training program for gifted children’s parents in Türkiye. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 65, 147–164. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.65.09
• Leikin, R. (2021). When practice needs more research: The nature and nurture of mathematical giftedness. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 53(7), 1579–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021- 01276-9
• Li, K., Rollins, J., & Yan, E. (2018). Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5
• Liu, W., Tang, L., & Hu, G. (2020). Funding information in Web of Science: An updated overview. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03362-3
• Lubinski, D. (2016). From Terman to today: A century of findings on intellectual precocity. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 900–944. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675476
• Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math–science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316– 345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x
• Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness. Intelligence, 14(3), 327–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(90)90022-L
• Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., McCabe, K. O., & Bernstein, B. O. (2023). Composing meaningful lives: Exceptional women and men at age 50. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67, 278–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231175831
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
• Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. Commissioned paper– Committee on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision. National Academy of Sciences, 308, 1-21.
• Mingus, T., & Grassl, R. (1999). What constitutes a nurturing environment for the growth of mathematically gifted students? School Sciences and Mathematics, 99(6), 286–293.
• MoNE (2016). Bilim ve Sanat Merkezi Yönergesi . Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Tebliğler Dergisi. https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2016_10/07031350_bilsem_yonergesi.pdf
• MoNE (2024). Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri güçleniyor. https://www.meb.gov.tr/bilim-ve-sanat-merkezleri- gucleniyor/haber/21827/tr#
• Moses, R. P., & Cobb Jr, C. (2001). Organizing algebra: The need to voice a demand. Social Policy, 31(4), 4-4.
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://Timssandpirls.Bc.Edu/Timss2019/International- Results
• Myers, T., Carey, E., & Szűcs, D. (2017). Cognitive and neural correlates of mathematical giftedness in adults and children: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01646
• Nasir, N. I. S. (2016). Why should mathematics educators care about race and culture. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(1), 7-18.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Author.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2016). Providing opportunities for students with exceptional mathematical promise: A position of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• National Research Council, (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822
• National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2007). The timing and quality of early experiences combine to shape brain architecture: Working paper No. 5. www.developingchild.harvard.edu.
• Nolte, M. (2012). Mathematically gifted young children—Questions about the development of mathematical giftedness. In H. Stoeger, A. Aljughaiman, & B. Harder (Eds.), Talent development and excellence (Vol. 11, pp. 155– 176). LIT Verlag Münster.
• Onoshakpokaiye, O. (2023). Early childhood mathematics: An insight into strategies for developing young children mathematical skills. Mathematics Education Journal, 7(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v7i1.24534
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. OECD.
• Oruç, Ş., & Çağır, S. (2020). Üstün yetenekli çocukların eğitimsel beklentileri. Türkiye Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), 302–319.
• Özdemir, A., Sipahi, Y., & Bahar, A. K. (2024). The past, present, and future of research on mathematical giftedness: A bibliometric analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862241244717
• Paez, A. (2017). Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 10(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12266
• Pavlović, R., Nikolić, M., & Grandić, R. (2018). Support to early mathematical giftedness in preschool and in family: The suggestion of stimulative program. Giftedness, Education and Development, 135–152.
• Sak, U. (2017). Üstün zekalılar özellikleri tanılanmaları eğitimleri (7th ed.). Vize.
• Samuelsson, J. (2011). Development of self-regulated learning skills in mathematics in lower secondary school in Sweden. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 25–42.
• Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2008). Mathematics knowledge of low-income entering preschoolers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Skarbek, K. (2021). Children with an inclination for mathematical giftedness in early primary school education. Szkoła Specjalna, 82, 280-296.
• Sowell, E. J. (1993). Programs for mathematically gifted students: A review of empirical research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(3), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629303700305
• Sowell, E. J., Zeigler, A. J., Bergwall, L., & Cartwright, R. M. (1990). Identification and description of mathematically gifted students: A review of empirical research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(4), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400404
• Sözbilir, M., Kutu, H., & Yaşar, M. D. (2012). Science education research in Türkiye: A content analysis of selected features of papers published. In J. Dillon & D. Jorde (Eds.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in Europe (pp. 341–374). Sense.
• Sriraman, B. (2003). Mathematical giftedness, problem solving, and the ability to formulate generalizations: The problem-solving experiences of four gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(3), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2003-425
• Stanley, J. C. (1996). In the beginning: The study of mathematically precocious youth. In C. P. Benbow & D. J. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 225–235). Johns Hopkins University.
• Stanley, J. C., Keating, D. P., & Fox, L. H. (1974). Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development. Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre- kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99-120.
• Subotnik, R. F., Robinson, A., Callahan, C. M., & Gubbins, E. J. (2012). Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
• Swafford, J., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.). (2002). Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press.
• The PRISMA Statement. (2020). PRISMA Statement. http://www.prismastatement.org/PRISMAStatement/
• Ulutaş, F., & Ubuz, B. (2008). Matematik eğitiminde araştırmalar ve eğilimler: 2000 ile 2006 yılları arası [Research and trends in mathematics education: 2000 to 2006]. Elementary Education Online, 7(3), 614–626.
• Valero, P., Graven, M., Jurdak, M., Martin, D., Meaney, T., Penteado, M. (2015) Socioeconomic influence on mathematical achievement: What is visible and what is neglected. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 285-301). Springer, Cham.
• Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Siegler, R. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14553660
• Waxman, B., Robinson, N. M., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (1996). Teachers nurturing math-talented young children (Research Monograph No. 96228). The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
• Wu, X., Wu, R., Chang, H. H., Kong, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2020). International comparative study on PISA mathematics achievement test based on cognitive diagnostic models. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2230. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02230
• Yıldız Altan, R. Y., Genç, H., & Dağlıoğlu, H. E. (2021). Türkiye’de okul öncesi dönemde matematik alanında yapılan çalışmalara ilişkin bir içerik analizi [A content analysis on studies conducted on math education in preschool in Türkiye]. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 17(33), 619–653. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.778998
• Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H. L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763- 007-9089-4
• Young-Loveridge, J. M. (2004). Effects on early numeracy of a program using number books and games. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 82-98.
• Zhang, L., Gan, J. Q., & Wang, H. (2017). Neurocognitive mechanisms of mathematical giftedness: A literature review. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 6(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2015.1119692
• Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123, 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8