Using Technology in Hydrocarbon Topics: A Profile on Students’ Self-Regulated Learning

Abstract

This research aimed to analyse the use of chemistry-on-android (chemondro) game and blended learning as the implementation of technology on hydrocarbon topics toward students’ self-regulated learning. A comparative study has employed in this research. There were three groups of students with a total of 143 students represents from all of the eleventh graders in Purworejo Regency, Indonesia. These three groups of students applied different technology as the media on its learning process. A group which applying ‘chemondro’ game, a group with blended learning and the last group with the combination between the two. A Self-Regulated Learning Scale (SRLS) was administrated to obtain the data. These data of students’ self-regulated learning were classified into five categories, from excellent to very poor category according to analysis based on the criteria of mean ideal and ideal standard deviation. The results of the analysis showed that the profile of students’ self-regulated learning on the group that used the ‘chemondro’ game only as the media was better compared to the other two student groups. This research suggests that the used of educational game should be widely used in chemistry learning to promote students’ self-regulated learning.

Keywords

• chemistry-on-android,blended learning,self-regulated learning

References

1. Aiken, L. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0013164485451012
2. Candarli, D., & Yuksel, H. (2012). Students’ perceptions of video-conferencing in the classrooms in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 47, 357 – 361. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.663
3. Dasilva, B. E., Ardiyati, T. K., Suparno, Sukardiyono, Eveline, E., Utami, T., & Ferty Z. N. (2019). Development of Android-Based Interactive Physics Mobile Learning Media (IPMLM) with Scaffolding Learning Approach to Improve HOTS of High School Students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 659-681. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.610377
4. Doggett, A. M. (2007). The videoconferencing classroom: What do students think? Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 44(4), 29–41. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/arch_mfg_fac_pub/3
5. Effeney, G., Carroll, A., & Bahr, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Key strategies and their sources in a sample of adolascent males 1. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 13, 58-74. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/70168
6. Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting cronbachs' alpha reliability coefficient for likert type scales. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, 82-88. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/344/gliem+&+gliem.pdf?sequence=1
7. Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (2009). Measurement and evaluating in teaching. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
8. Jabbour, K. K. (2014). An analysis of the effect of mobile learning on Lebanese higher education. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 1-15. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1064345.pdf

9. Kitsantas, A. (2013). Fostering college students' self regulated learning with learning technologies. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 10, 48-59. Retrieved from http://www.pseve.org/journal/UPLOAD/Kitsantas10-3.pdf
10. Lawshe, C. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.460.9380&rep=rep1&type=pdf
11. Mooij, T., Stefens, K., & Andrade, M. (2014). Self-regulated and technology-enhanced learning: A European perspective. European Educational Research Journal, 13(5), 519-528. DOI: 10.2304/eerj.2014.13.5.519
12. Nietfeld, J. L., Shores, L. R., & Hoffmann, K. F. (2014). Self-regulation and gender within a game-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 961-973. DOI: 10.1037/a0037116
13. Ormrod, J. E. (2003). Educational psychology developing learners. New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
14. Puspita, I., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2017). Collaboration of chemistry instructional games and group investigation (GI) model to improve learning outcome in high school students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1847, 050004. doi: 10.1063/1.4983906
15. Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., Abdurrahman, & Syazali, M. (2019). The effect of flipped-problem based learning model integrated with LMS-google classroom for senior high school students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 137-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.548350
16. Sabourin, J. L., Shores, L. R., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2013) Understanding and predicting student self-regulated strategies in game-based learning environments. International Journal Artificial Intelligence in Education Society, 23, 94-114. doi: 10.1007/s40593-013-0004-6
17. Saputro, B., & Tri Susilowati, A. (2019). Effectiveness of Learning Management System (LMS) on In-Network Learning System (SPADA) Based on Scientific. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 481498. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.606029
18. Sugiyarto, K. H., Ikhsan, J., & Lukman, I. R. (2018). The use of an android–based-game in the team assisted individualization to improve students' creativity and cognitive achievement in chemistry. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 012037. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012037/meta
19. Tayebinik, M., & Puteh, M. (2012). Blended learning or e-learning? International Magazine on Advances in Computer Science and Telecommunications, 3(1), 103-110. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2282881
20. Tortop, H. S. (2013). Meaningful field trip in education of the renewable energy technologies. Journal for the Education of the Young Scientist and Giftedness, 1(1), 8-45.
21. Ulfa, A. M., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2017). The effect of the use of android-based application in learning together to improve students’ academic performance. AIP Conf. Proc., 050008. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983910.
22. Virtanen, P., Nevgi, A., & Niemi, H. (2013). Self regulation in higher education: students motivational, regulational and learning strategies, and their relationships to study success. Study of the Learning Society, 3, 20-36. DOI: 10.2478/sls-2013-0004
23. Wisetsat, C. & Nuangchalerm, P. (2019). Enhancing innovative thinking of Thai pre-service teachers through multi-educational innovations. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 409-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.570748
24. Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology. United States of America: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational
25. Research Journal, 45, 166-183. DOI: 10.3102/000283120731290 Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016