Implementation of integrated science curriculum: a critical review of the literature

Abstract

The current trend in science learning leans more towards interdisciplinary (integrated) learning. Before 1989, there were several studies that reviewed articles related to integrated science. However, research discussing articles on integrated science from 1996 until the present day is not yet available. The purpose of this study was to review 36 empirical research articles on integrated science published from 1996 to 2019. Most of these articles were taken from Scopus-indexed journals. The research approach used was a qualitative research design. The results of this study show that integrated science has been implemented in various countries. Nonetheless, the implementation of integrated science did not prove out as successful as expected. Students find this method of learning difficult, boring, uninteresting and abstract. There are several issues in the implementation of integrated science learning: the incongruity of teachers’ educational backgrounds with integrated science, as well as underdeveloped textbooks and curriculum. The integrated science learning is an effective method to improve students’ skills.

Keywords

• Integrated Science,Curriculum,Science Education,Systematic Review

References

1. Alake, E. M., & Ogunseemi, O. E. (2013). Effects of Scaffolding Strategy On Learners’academic Achievement In Integrated Science at The Junior Secondary School Level. European Scientific Journal, 9(19). 149-155. http://www.eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/1548
2. An, S. A. (2017). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of interdisciplinary pedagogy: the case of elementary mathematics–science integrated lessons. ZDM, 49(2), 237-248. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1138374
3. Agoro, A. A., & Akinsola, M. K. (2013). Effectiveness of Reflective-Reciprocal Teaching On Pre-Service Teachers’ Achievement And Science Process Skills In Integrated Science. International journal of education and research, 1(8), 1-20. https://ijern.com/journal/August-2013/36.pdf
4. Ardianto, D., & Rubini, B. (2016). Comparison of Students' Scientific Literacy in Integrated Science Learning through Model of Guided Discovery and Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5786
5. Beane, J. A. (1993). Problems and possibilities for an integrative curriculum. Middle School Journal, 25(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.1993.11495181
6. Beichner, R., Bernold, L., Burniston, E., Dail, P., Felder, R., Gastineau, J., ... & Risley, J. (1999). Case study of the physics component of an integrated curriculum. American Journal of Physics, 67(S1), S16-S24. https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.1119/1.19075
7. Brown, S. A. (1977). A review of the meanings of, and arguments for, integrated science. Studies in Science Education 4(1), 31-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267708559845
8. Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P. D., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of research in science teaching, 49(5), 631-658. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21015

9. Çinar, S., Pirasa, N., Uzun, N., & Erenler, S. (2016). The Effect of Stem Education on Pre-Service Science Teachers' Perception of Interdisciplinary Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 13.(special issue), 118-142. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311639928_The_effect_of_STEM_education_on_preservice_science_teachers'_perception_of_interdisciplinary_education
10. Cohen, D. (1977). New Trends in Integrated Science Teaching: Evaluation of Integrated Science Education. UNIPUB, Incorporated. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED106106
11. Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication, Inc.
12. Ebersole, T. M., & Kelty-Stephen, D. G. (2017). Psychology as an evolving, interdisciplinary science: integrating science in sensation and perception from Fourier to fluid dynamics. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16(1), 115-124. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1475725716681266
13. Elvionita, S., & Fauzi, A. (2019, April). Evaluating the validity of integrated science textbook on the theme of tsunami using webbed model based on Polya problem solving to enhance students’ preparedness toward disaster. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1185, No. 1, p. 012062). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012062
14. Fazriyah, N., Supriyati, Y., & Rahayu, W. (2017, February). The effect of integrated learning model and critical thinking skill of science learning outcomes. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 812, No. 1, p. 012014). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012014
15. Fogarty, R. J., & Pete, B. M. (2009). How to integrate the curricula. Corwin Press. http://us.corwin.com/en-us/nam/how-to-integrate-the-curricula/book229128
16. Frey, K. (1989). Integrated science education: 20 years on. International Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110102
17. Gusnedi, G., Ratnawulan, R., Devialita, A. (2019, April). Effectiveness of using sequenced model student books for integrated science lessons with themes of the human body adaptation system at temperature on student learning outcomes. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1185, No. 1, p. 012138). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012138
18. Hacker, R. G., & Rowe, M. J. (1985). A study of teaching and learning processes in integrated science classrooms. The European Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528850070208
19. Haggis, S., & Adey, P. (1979). A review of integrated science education worldwide. Studies in Science Education. 6(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267908559869
20. Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2011). Fundamentals of Physics. V. 1, Part 2.
21. Harrell, P. E. (2010). Teaching an integrated science curriculum: Linking teacher knowledge and teaching assignments. Issues in teacher education, 19(1), 145-165. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ887301
22. Hewitt, P. G., Lyons, S. A., Suchocki, J. A., & Yeh, J. (2013). Conceptual Integrated Science: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Higher Ed.
23. Hsu, T. (2003). Foundations of physical science, with earth and space science: Teacher's guide. CPO Science.
24. Huntley, M. A. (1998). Design and implementation of a framework for defining integrated mathematics and science education. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 320- 327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17427.x
25. Lang, M., & Olson, J. (2000). Integrated science teaching as a challenge for teachers to develop new conceptual structures. Research in Science Education, 30(2), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461629
26. Malik, A. S., & Malik, R. H. (2011). Twelve tips for developing an integrated curriculum. Medical teacher, 33(2), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.507711
27. Mariyam, M., Kaniawati, I., & Sriyati, S. (2017, September). Shared or Integrated: Which Type of Integration is More Effective Improves Students’ Creativity?. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 895, No. 1, p. 012154). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012154
28. National Middle School Association. (2003). This we believe: Successful schools for young adolescents: A position paper of the National Middle School Association. National Middle School Association.
29. Nampota, D. C. (2008). Distribution of ‘science for all’ and ‘science for scientists’ in the documentation of the integrated science curriculum in Malawi. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2008.10740626.
30. Parmin, P., Sajidan, S., Ashadi, A., Sutikno, S., & Fibriana, F. (2017). Science integrated learning model to enhance the scientific work independence of student teacher in indigenous knowledge transformation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11276
31. Parmin, P., Nuangchalerm, P., & El Islami, R. A. Z. (2019). Exploring the Indigenous Knowledge of Java North Coast Community (Pantura) Using the Science Integrated Learning (SIL) Model for Science Content Development. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.466460
32. Oludipe, D. I. (2012). Developing Nigerian Integrated Science Curriculum. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 2(1). 134-135. http://www.academicjournals.org/app/webroot/article/article1379586209_Oludipe.pdf
33. Ogunkola, B. J., & Samuel, D. (2011). Science Teachers' and Students' Perceived Difficult Topics in the Integrated Science Curriculum of Lower Secondary Schools in Barbados. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p17
34. Olarewaju, A. O. (1994). New approaches to the teaching of integrated science. Ibadan. Alafas Publishing Company. Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 40th Annual Conference Proceedings. Ibadan: Heineman Educational Books (Nigeria) Plc.
35. Opitz, S. T., Neumann, K., Bernholt, S., & Harms, U. (2017). How do students understand energy in biology, chemistry, and physics? Development and validation of an assessment instrument. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3019-3042. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00703a
36. Otarigho, M. D., & Oruese, D. D. (2013). Problems and prospects of teaching Integrated Science in secondary schools in Warri, Delta State, Nigeria. Techno Learn, 3(1), 19-26. https://ndpublisher.in/admin/issues/tlv3n1c.pdf
37. Putica, K., & Trivić, D. (2017). Improving High-School Students' Conceptual Understanding and Functionalization of Knowledge About Digestion Through the Application of the Interdisciplinary Teaching Approach. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(1), 123-139. http://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1493050168.pdf
38. Putica, K., & Trivić, D. (2017). Improving High-School Students' Conceptual Understanding and Functionalization of Knowledge About Digestion Through the Application of the Interdisciplinary Teaching Approach. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(1), 123-139. http://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1493050168.pdf
39. Putri, B. K., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2013). Pengembangan LKS IPA Terpadu berbasis inkuiri tema darah di SMP N 2 Tengaran. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(2).102-106. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i2.2709
40. Rahayu, P., Mulyani, S., & Miswadi, S. S. (2012). Pengembangan pembelajaran ipa terpadu Dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran problem base melalui lesson study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(1).63-70. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v1i1.2015
41. Rahmiwati, S. (2018, April). The Implementation of Integrated Natural Science Textbook of Junior High School be Charged on Character-based Shared Models to Improve the Competence of Learners' Knowledge. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 335, No. 1, p. 012076). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012076
42. Reay, J. (1979). New Trends in Integrated Science Teaching. Volume V. The Teaching of Basic Sciences, Integrated Science. Unipub, 345 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10010.
43. Richmond, P. E. (1971). New Trends in Integrated Science Teaching, Volume I, 1969-70
44. Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., Pursitasari, I. D., & Hidayat, A. (2018). Science Teachers’ Understanding on Science Literacy and Integrated Science Learning: Lesson from Teachers Training. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5794
45. Rustam, N. I., & Fauzi, A. (2019, April). Effectiveness of integrated science textbook theme earthquake using connected model SSCS problem-solving. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1185, No. 1, p. 012092). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012092/meta
46. Setiawan, B. (2015). Improving Cognitive And Pedagogical Of Undergraduate Science Education Students In Integrated Science Course Through Simulation Method. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(1), 97-100. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i1.3508
47. Sun, D., Wang, Z. H., Xie, W. T., & Boon, C. C. (2014). Status of integrated science instruction in junior secondary schools of China: An exploratory study. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 808-838. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.829254
48. Thang, F. K., & Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Deepening and transferring twenty-first century learning through a lower secondary Integrated Science module. Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1335426
49. Trefil, J. S., & Hazen, R. M. (2010). The sciences: An integrated approach. Wiley.
50. Taufiq, M., Dewi, N. R., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2014). Pengembangan media pembelajaran IPA terpadu berkarakter peduli lingkungan tema “konservasi” berpendekatan science- edutainment. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(2). 140-145. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i2.3113
51. UNESCO 1990. New Trends in Integrated Science Teaching, Volume VI (UNESCO, Paris)
52. Uyar, Y. M., Demirel, T., & Doganay, A. (2018). Development of Preservice Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Science through An interdisciplinary Curriculum: A Case Study. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(4). 728-741. http://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1533842524.pdf
53. Van Hecke, G. R., Karukstis, K. K., Haskell, R. C., McFadden, C. S., & Wettack, F. S. (2002). An integration of chemistry, biology, and physics: The interdisciplinary laboratory. Journal of chemical education, 79(7), 837-844. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed079p837
54. Venville, G. J., Wallace, J., Rennie, L. J., & Malone, J. A. (2002). Curriculum integration: Eroding the high ground of science as a school subject?. Studies in Science Education, 37(1), 43-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560177
55. Wall, A., & Leckie, A. (2017). Curriculum Integration: An Overview. Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 22(1), 36-40. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1151668.pdf
56. Wei, B. (2009). In search of meaningful integration: The experiences of developing integrated science curricula in junior secondary schools in China. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701687430
57. Wei, B. (2018). An Exploratory Study of Teacher Development in the Implementation of Integrated Science Curriculum. Research in Science Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9768-x
58. Weri, F. (2019, April). Analysis of student textbook in the development of integrated natural science student book with the theme sense of sight and optical devices using connected model for integrated 21st century learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1185, No. 1, p. 012113). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012113/meta
59. Widiyatmoko, A. (2013). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran IPA terpadu berkarakter menggunakan pendekatan humanistik berbantu alat peraga murah. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1).76-82. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2513
60. Whiteley, P. (1996). The ‘gender fairness’ of integrated science textbooks used in Jamaican high schools. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 969-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180808
61. Winarno, N., Widodo, A., Rusdiana, D., Rochintaniawati, D., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2019, April). Pre-service Science Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Integrated Science Subject: A Case Study. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1204, No. 1, p. 012104). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1204/1/012104
62. Yager, R. E., & Lutz, M. V. (1994). Integrated science: The importance of “how” versus “what”. School science and Mathematics, 94(7), 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949- 8594.1994.tb15690.x
63. Zhang, H., & He, H. (2012). Student perceptions of the integrated ‘science education’major in some Chinese universities. International Journal of Science Education, 34(13), 1991- 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.709332
64. Zhou, D., & Botha, M. M. (2008). The availability, suitability and use of instructional materials in integrated science classrooms in Zimbabwean schools. Africa Education Review, 4(2), 114-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146620701652739
65. Zhou, G., & Kim, J. (2010). Impact of an integrated methods course on preservice teachers’ perspectives of curriculum integration and faculty instructors’ professional growth. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926151003778266