Identification of biology students’ misconceptions in human anatomy and physiology course through three-tier diagnostic test

Abstract

University students’ misconceptions have become an important issue to discuss as prior concepts brought by the students into the classroom can affect the acquisition of new information. The current study attempted to identify Biology students’ misconceptions in Human Anatomy and Physiology courses through a three-tier diagnostic test. The participants of this study were 128 students from the Department of Biology Education who were currently enrolled in Human Anatomy and Physiology courses at the Institute of Teacher Training and Educational Sciences (STKIP) Pembangunan Indonesia in Makassar. A three-tier diagnostic test was used as the instrument to identify the number of participants who had developed misconceptions about the concepts introduced in the courses. The test contained 23 items of Certainty of Response Index (CRI) that, on average, achieved a validity score of 0.426 and a reliability score of 0.794. The results of the test analysis showed that the majority (61.51%) of the students developed misconceptions in Human Anatomy and Physiology courses. In detail, there were several misconceptions in 57.81% skeletal system, 52.34% muscular system, 55.47% integumentary system, 51.04% nervous system, 54.69% endocrine system, 66.02% hemolymphatic system, 62.89% cardiovascular system, 68.75% respiratory system, 70.31% digestive system, 70.70% urinary system, and 71.88% reproductive system. Misconceptions were mostly developed on reproductive system sub-materials and less likely found in nervous system sub-materials. Given this information, it can be concluded that the misconceptions of Biology students from the Institute of Teacher Training and Educational Sciences (STKIP) Pembangunan Indonesia in Human Anatomy and Physiology courses are categorized as high. Therefore, there should be an effort to deal with this issue.

Keywords

• students’ misconception
• biology
• diagnostic test

Supporting Institution

Announcement of thanks to the Republic of Indonesia Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education and Education Fund Management Institution (LPDP)

Thanks

Announcement of thanks to the Republic of Indonesia Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education and Education Fund Management Institution (LPDP) for facilitating this research.

References

1. Alkhawaldeh, SA., & Al Olaimat, AM. (2010). The contribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to eleventh-grade students understanding of cellular respiration concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9185-z
2. Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C., & Moseley, C. (2012). A Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Pre-Service Teachers’ Misconceptions about Global Warming, Greenhouse Effect, Ozone Layer Depletion, and Acid Rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667–1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.680618
3. Badenhorst, E., Hartman, N., & Mamede, S. (2016). How Biomedical Misconceptions May Arise and Affect Medical Students׳ Learning: A Review of Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence. Health Professions Education, 2(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.005
4. Badenhorst, E., Mamede, S., Hartman, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Exploring lecturers’ views of first-year health science students’ misconceptions in biomedical domains. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(2), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9535-3
5. Barrett, K, E., Barman, S, M., Brooks, H, L., & Yuan, J. (2016). Ganong's: Review of medical physiology (26th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
6. Birks, M., Cant, R., James, A., Chung, C., & Davis, J. (2013). The use of physical assessment skills by registered nurses in Australia: Issues for nursing education. Collegian, 20(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2012.02.004
7. Bowers, J. S. (2016). The practical and principled problems with educational neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123(5), 600-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000025
8. Brown, S., Bowmar, A., White, S., & Power, N. (2016). Evaluation of an instrument to measure undergraduate nursing student engagement in an introductory Human anatomy and physiology course. Collegian, 24(5), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2016.09.006

9. Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902890130
10. Cardak, O. (2015). Student science teachers’ ideas of the digestive system. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 127-133. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i5.912
11. Chang, C. Y., Yeh, T. K., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2010). The positive and negative effects of science concept tests on student conceptual understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802650055
12. Cheung, K. L., & Yang, D. C. (2018). Performance of sixth graders in Hong Kong on a number sense three-tier test. Educational Studies, 46(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1516631
13. Craft, J., Hudson, P., Plenderleith, M., Wirihana, L., Gordon, C., (2013). Commencing nursing students’ perceptions and anxiety of bioscience. Nurse Education Today, 33(11), 1399-1405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.10.020
14. Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1614813
15. Faisal & Martin, S. N. (2019). Science education in Indonesia: past, present, and future. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(4), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0032-0
16. Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9102-y
17. Gurcay, D., & Gulbas, E. (2015). Development of three-tier heat, temperature and internal energy diagnostic test. Research in Science and Technological Education, 33(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1018154
18. Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1316–1325. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18376
19. Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and the certainty of response index (CRI). Physics Education, 34(5), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304
20. Hebe, H. (2020). In-service teachers’ knowledge and misconceptions of global warming and ozone layer depletion: A case study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.618491
21. Heller, P. M., & Finley, F. N. (1992). Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study in current electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290306
22. Hestenes, D., and I. Halloun. 1995. “Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory. Physics Teacher, 33, 502–506.
23. Hidayati, N., Zubaidah, S., Suarsini, E., & Praherdhiono, H. (2019). The integrated PBL-DMM: A learning model to enhance student creativity. Pedagogika. 135(3). 163-184. https://10.15823/p.2019.135.9
24. Istikomayanti, Y., & Mitasari, Z. (2017). Student’s misconception of digestive system materials in mts eight grade of malang city and the role of teacher’s pedadogic competency in MTs. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 3(2), 103-113.
25. Jankvist, U. T., & Niss, M. (2018). Counteracting destructive student misconceptions of mathematics. Education Sciences, 8(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020053
26. Johnston, A. N. B., Hamill, J., Barton, M. J., Baldwin, S., Percival, J., Williams-Pritchard, G., Salvage-Jones, J., & Todorovic, M. (2015). Student learning styles in anatomy and physiology courses: Meeting the needs of nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(6), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.05.001
27. Kalas, P., O’Neill, A., Pollock, C., & Birol, G. (2013). Development of a meiosis concept inventory. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-10-0174
28. Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
29. Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2016). Identifying pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions and conceptual difficulties about geometrical optics. European Journal of Physics, 37(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/4/045705
30. Karpudewan, M., Roth, W. M., & Chandrakesan, K. (2014). Remediating misconception on climate change among secondary school students in Malaysia. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.891004
31. Kiray, S. A., Aktan, F., Kaynar, H., Kilinc, S., & Gorkemli, T. (2015). A descriptive study of pre-service science teachers’ misconceptions about sinking-floating. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(2).
32. Lewis, J., & Kattmann, U. (2014). Traits, genes, particles and information: Re-visiting students’ understandings of genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072782
33. Lin, Y. C., Yang, D. C., & Li, M. N. (2016). Diagnosing students’ misconceptions in number sense via a web-based two-tier test. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1420a
34. Lu, S., Bi, H., & Liu, X. (2018). The effects of explanation-driven inquiry on students’ conceptual understanding of redox. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1857–1873. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1513670
35. Matthew, S. M., Taylor, R. M., & Ellis, R. A. (2012). Relationships between students’ experiences of learning in an undergraduate internship programme and new graduates’ experiences of professional practice. Higher Education, 64(4), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9509-4
36. McVicar, A., Andrew, S., & Kemble, R. (2014). Biosciences within the pre-registration (pre-requisite) curriculum: An integrative literature review of curriculum interventions 1990-2012. Nurse Education Today, 34(4), 560-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.08.012
37. Monteiro, A., Nóbrega, C., Abrantes, I., & Gomes, C. (2012). Diagnosing Portuguese Students’ Misconceptions about the Mineral Concept. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2705–2726. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.731617
38. National Research Council. (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11625
39. Odom, A. L., & Barrow, L. H. (1995). Development and application of a two‐tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students’ understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320106
40. Özmen, H. (2004). Some Student Misconceptions in Chemistry: A Literature Review of Chemical Bonding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jost.0000031255.92943.6d
41. Pan, S. J. A., & Chou, C. (2015). Using a Two-Tier Test to Examine Taiwanese Graduate Students’ Misunderstanding of Responsible Conduct of Research. Ethics and Behavior, 25(6), 500–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2014.987921
42. Pascua, L., & Chang, C. H. (2015). Using intervention-oriented evaluation to diagnose and correct students’ persistent climate change misconceptions: A Singapore case study. Evaluation and Program Planning, 52, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.04.001
43. Peşman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002
44. Prodjosantoso, A. K., Hertina, A. M., & Irwanto. (2019). The misconception diagnosis on ionic and covalent bonds concepts with three tier diagnostic test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477–1488. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12194a
45. Putranta, H., & Supahar. (2019). Development of physics-tier tests (PysTT) to measure students’ conceptual understanding and creative thinking skills: A qualitative synthesis. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 747–775. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.587203
46. Ramadianti, W., Priatna, N., & Kusnandi. (2019). Misconception analysis of junior high school student in interpreting fraction. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1159–1173. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.631567
47. Romine, W. L., Schaffer, D. L., & Barrow, L. (2015). Development and application of a novel rasch-based methodology for evaluating multi-tiered assessment instruments: validation and utilization of an undergraduate diagnostic test of the water cycle. International Journal of Science Education, 37(16), 2740–2768. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1105398
48. San Pedro, M, O, Z., Baker, R, S., & Heffernan, N. T. (2017). An integrated look at middle school engagement and learning in digital environments as precursors to college attendance. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 22(3), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9318-z
49. Sesli, E., & Kara, Y. (2012). Development and application of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test for high school students’ understanding of cell division and reproduction. Journal of Biological Education, 46(4), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2012.688849
50. Silverthorn, D. U. (2010). Human Physiology: An Integrated Approach (5th ed.). New York: Pearson.
51. Sloane, E. (2016). Anatomi dan fisiologi: Untuk pemula. Jakarta: EGC Penerbit Buku Kedokteran.
52. Smales, K., (2010). Learning and applying biosciences to clinical practice in nursing. Nursing Standard, 24(33), 35-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2010.04.24.33.35.c7716
53. Standing, S. (2015). Gray's anatomy: The anatomical basis of clinical practice (41st ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
54. Tan Sisman, G., & Aksu, M. (2016). A Study on Sixth Grade Students’ Misconceptions and Errors in Spatial Measurement: Length, Area, and Volume. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(7), 1293–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9642-5
55. Taslidere, E. (2016). Development and use of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess high school students’ misconceptions about the photoelectric effect. Research in Science and Technological Education, 34(2), 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1124409
56. Taufiq, L., Sriyati, S., & Priyandonko, D. (2017). Students’ conceptual change on human reproduction concept using scientific approach. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16714
57. Teo, T. W., & Goh, W. P. J. (2019). Assessing lower track students’ learning in science inference skills in Singapore. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0033-z
58. The Role of Scientific Knowledge in Research & Peer Review. (2016, January 20). Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-role-of-scientific-knowledge-in-research-peer-review.html.
59. Tongchai, A., Sharma, M. D., Johnston, I. D., Arayathanitkul, K., & Soankwan, C. (2009). Developing, evaluating and demonstrating the use of a conceptual survey in mechanical waves. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2437–2457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802389605
60. Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204
61. Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention. Paper presented at the UniServe Science Symposium: Assessment in science teaching and learning, Universe Science, Sydney, Australia.
62. Yang, D. C., & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2020). Sixth Grade Students’ Performance, Misconception, and Confidence on a Three-Tier Number Sense Test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10051-3