Analysis according to Certain Variables of Scientific Literacy among Gifted Students that Participate in Scientific Activities at Science and Art Centers

Year 2015, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 1 - 12, 02.03.2015

Emre Komek , Dursun Yagız , Murat Kurt

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze scientific literacy levels relevant to science and technology classes among gifted students that participate in scientific activities at science and art centers. This study investigated whether there was a significant difference in scientific literacy levels among gifted students according to the areas of their giftedness (science, mathematics, and social sciences) and the extent to which they participated in enrichment activities. The study also compared scientific literacy levels among the gifted students who participated in scientific activities at science and art centers and the students who received formal education and were not identified as gifted. Seventy-seven students from Afyon Aydın Doğan, Bayburt, Elazığ and Konya Science and Art Centers (as called BILSEM in Turkish) SACs constituted the sample of the study. The Scientific Literacy Scale developed by Keskin (2008) was used to determine scientific literacy levels among students. The Enrichment Scale was developed by the researchers to specify to what extent the respondents profited from enrichment activities. Arithmetic averages were calculated to determine scientific literacy levels and levels of enrichment strategies. Standard deviation, t-test, and variance analysis were used to establish the relationship between scientific literacy levels, areas of giftedness, and enrichment strategies. The findings of the study concluded that scientific literacy levels did not vary according to areas of giftedness, but they varied according to levels of participation in enrichment activities. The study also found higher scientific literacy levels among the gifted students compared to the students that attended formal education and were not identified as gifted.

Keywords

scientific literacy, gifted and talented students, Science and Art Centers

References

• Aktepe, V., & Aktepe, L. (2009). Students’ views on teaching methods used in science and technology education: a case study on Kırşehir Science and Art Center (BILSEM). Ahi Evran University, Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 10(1), (69-80).
• Altun, A. (2008). Media literacy in Turkey. First Teacher Educator Journal, 16, 30-34.
• Azgun, S., & Sevinc, H. (2011). R&D expenses and economic growth: causality tests for the Turkish economy. 12th International Symposium on Econometrics Statistics and Operations Research. 26-29 May. Denizli: Pamukkale University, 216.
• Curebal, F. (2004). Gifted students’ attitudes towards science and classroom environment based on gender and grade level. Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara.
• Erbas, K.C. (2005). Factors effective in scientific literacy in turkey in the program for international student assessment (PISA). Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
• Ersoy, Y. (1997). Mathematics education in schools: mathematical literacy. Hacettepe University, Journal of Education Faculty, 13, 115-120.
• Gerek, S. & Kurt, A. A. (2011). A validity and reliability study on economic literacy scale. Uludağ University, Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 30(1), 59-73.
• Gurdal, A. (1991). Impact of laboratory activities on success in science education. Quality Development in Education, 1, 285-287.
• Karasar, N. (1991). Scientific Research Method, 4th Edition Ankara: Sanem Printing House.
• Keskin, H. (2008). Scientific literacy levels relevant to science and technology classes among 2nd stage primary school students. Master Thesis, Osmangazi University, Institute of Sciences, Eskişehir, Turkey.
• Kılınç, A., & Salman, S. (2006). Computer Literacy among Candidate Teachers in Science and Mathematics. Mersin University, Journal of Education Faculty, 2(2), 150-166.
• Kunt, K., & Tortop, H.S. (2013). The Metaphoric Perceptions of Gifted Students about Science and Art Centers in Turkey. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 1(2), Special Issue, 117-127.
• Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: a conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94. Lee, A. L., & Choi, S.H. (2003). Scientifically gifted students’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal Korean Earth Science Society, 24(2), 100-107.
• Liu, X. (2009). Beyond scientific literacy: science and the public. International Journal Of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 301-311.
• MoNE (Ministry of National Education). MEB (2010). PISA 2009 National Preliminary Report, Ankara. Neber, H., & Aikins, M.S. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: the role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13( 1), 59-74.
• Ogretme, M. (2001). The Effect of differentiated physics instruction on 9th grade gifted learners. Master’s Thesis. Bosphorus University, Institute of Sciences, İstanbul.
• Orbay, M., Gokdere, M., Tereci, H. & Aydın, M. (2010). Attitudes of gifted students towards science depending on some variables: A Turkish sample. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(7), 693-699.
• Sahin, C. & Say, Ö. (2010). Analysis of scientific literacy levels among primary school students. ZKÜ Social Sciences Journal 6(11), 223–240.
• Sahin, F. (1994). Development of the homeostasis concept among students. Book of papers from the 1st national primary school teaching symposium. Bursa: Uludağ University Publications, ss.11-118.
• Sahin, M. (2011). Education of the gifted in the way leading to superpower turkey and geostrategic analysis of Science and Art Centers, Retrieved from:www.fencebilim.com/Ustunyetenek/Murat_Sahin.Pdf
• Sak, U. (2010). Identifying the gifted educations (1st Edition). Ankara: Maya Academy.
• Simşek, C.L. (2011). Out-of-school Learning Environments and Science Education. (Edited by: Canan Laçin Şimşek). Out-of-school Learning Environments in Science Education. Ankara: PegemA Publishing.
• Suren, T. (2008). Scientific literacy levels among 1st stage primary school students. Afyon Kocatepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
• Teksoz, G, Sahin, E., & Ertepinar, H. (2010). Environmental Literacy, Candidate Teachers and a Sustainable Future. Hacettepe University, Journal of Education Faculty, 39, 307-320.
• Tereci, H, Aydın, M., & Orbay, M. (2011). Analysis of attitudes towards science of students that attend Science and Art Centers: a case study on Amasya Science and Art Center. Retrieved from: www.fencebilim.com
• Turgut, H. (2005).The Impact of constructivist design practice on the development of the “nature of science” and the “relationship between science, technology and society” as dimensions of scientific literacy among candidate science teachers. PhD Thesis, Yıldız Teknik University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
• Uzun, M. (2004). A Handbook on Gifted Children. İstanbul: Children’s Foundations Publications.
• Yakar, A. (2010). A statistical comparison of scientific literacy levels among 4th year science teaching (science and technology) students at education faculties of certain universities in turkey. Master’s Thesis, Muğla University, Institute of Sciences, Muğla.
• Yetisir, M.İ. (2007). Scientific and Technological Literacy Levels among 1st Year Candidate Teachers in Science Teaching and Primary School Teaching. PhD Thesis Gazi University, Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.