Pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Mathematical Reasoning Skills from Gender Perspectives: A Case Study

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 1107 - 1122, 15.12.2019

Rosdiana Rosdiana İ Ketut Budayasa Agung Lukito

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.620234

Cited By: 4

Öz

A
person's reasoning can be seen through his or her way in solving a problem. A
person's reasoning can be explored in systematic ways. This study aimed at
exploring student reasoning at the stage of understanding the problem and
looking back in terms of gender differences. The sample of this study were one male
and one female students at Halu Oleo University Kendari, Indonesia. This
research was a qualitative research. Student reasoning data were obtained using
the main instruments namely the researcher and supporting instruments namely
mathematics ability tests, problem solving tests, information form, and interview
guidelines. Subject selection was based on a gender questionnaire analysis. The
data obtained were analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that there were
differences in the reasoning of male and female student teachers, in which at
the stage of understanding the problem, the answers given by the male student
was more detailed than those by the female one. Whereas in looking back stage,
both male and female performed the steps in the same way both in terms of
checking the problem solving and calculation steps. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

mathematical reasoning skils, gender, pre-service primary school teacher

Destekleyen Kurum

University of Halu Oleo and State University of Surabaya

Proje Numarası

Research grant university

Teşekkür

The author would like thanks for giving research grant university (University of Halu Oleo),

Kaynakça

• Artzt, A., & Yaloz-Femia, S. (1999). Mathematical reasoning during small-group problem-solving. Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12, 61, 115.
• Clerkin, B., & Macrae, F. (2012). Men are more intelligent than women, claims new study. Situs http://www. Dailymail. co. uk/news/article-405056/Men-Intelligent-women-claims-new-study. html. Download: Diakses, 4 Oktober 2019.
• DeJarnette, A. F., & González, G. (2013). Building students' reasoning skills by promoting student-led discussions in an algebra II class. The Mathematics Educator, 23(1), 3-23.
• Fraenkle, J.R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGrow-Hill.
• Geary, D. C., Saults, S. J., Liu, F., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child psychology, 77(4), 337-353. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2594
• Halat, E. (2008). In-service middle and high school mathematics teachers: Geometric reasoning stages and gender. The Mathematics Educator, 18(1).
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.
• Huda, S., Sholikhakh, R. A., Bina, N. S., Lestari, F., Habibi, B., & Suharso, P. Effect of application smart circuit learning media to mathematics learning outcomes: a case study of islamic school students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 699-715. DOI: 10.17478/jegys.597053
• Holisin, I., & Budayasa, I. K. (2017). Comparison of male and female primary school student reasoning profiles in solving fractional problems. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(6), 1153-1565.
• Karaduman, G. B., & Erbaş, A. A. Investigation of primary school teacher candidates' metacognitive awareness level. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 5(4), 31-48. DOI: 10.17478/JEGYS.2017.68
• Keitel, C. 1988. An Introduction: social justice and mathematics education: gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling. In Christine Keitel (Ed). Social Justice and Mathematics Education.Berlin Freie Universitat Berlin.
• Kenney, P. A., & Lindquist, M. M. (2000). Students’ performance on thematically related NAEP Tasks. Results from the seventh mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress, 343-363.
• Krutet︠s︡kiĭ, V. A., Wirszup, I., & Kilpatrick, J. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. University of Chicago Press.
• Lahey, B. B., Schneider, S. A., Landrum, R. E., & Landrum, T. (1995). Psychology: An introduction. Brown & Benchmark Publishers.
• Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255-276. DOI : 10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
• Mahmud, M., & Nur, S. (2018). Exploring students'learning strategies and gender differences in english language teaching. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 51-64. DOI : 10.26858/ijole.v2i1.4346
• Mhlanga, M. T. (2017). Students’ critical ability in solving mathematics problem based on gender. International Journal of Science Arts and Commerce, 2(1), 67–74.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. USA: Arizona State University.
• Moleong, L. J. (2013). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif [Qualitative research methodology]. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
• Monto, M. A. (1993). An exercise in gender: the bem sex role inventory in the classroom. Clinical Sociology Review, 11(1), 13-16.
• Peter, S & Yani S. (2008). Kamus bahasa indonesia kontemporer [Contemporary Indonesian dictionary]. Jakarta; Balai Pustaka
• Piraksa, C., Srisawasdi, N., & Koul, R. (2014). Effect of gender on student's scientific reasoning ability: a case study in Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 486-491. DOI : 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.245
• Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. (2016). Exploration of mathematics problem solving process based on the thinking level of students in junior high school. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 7278-7285.
• Reynolds, M. R., Scheiber, C., Hajovsky, D. B., Schwartz, B., & Kaufman, A. S. (2015). Gender differences in academic achievement: is writing an exception to the gender similarities hypothesis?. The Journal of genetic psychology, 176(4), 211-234. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.2015.1036833
• Sagala, R., Umam, R., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. (2019). The effectiveness of STEM-Based on gender differences: the impact of physics concept understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753-761. DOI : 10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.753
• Samuelsson, M., & Samuelsson, J. (2016). Gender differences in boys’ and girls’ perception of teaching and learning mathematics. Open Review of Educational Research, 3(1), 18-34. DOI : 10.1080/23265507.2015.1127770
• Santrock, J. W.(2003). Perkembangan remaja [Youth Development]. Edisi Keenam. Alih Bahasa: Dra.Sinto B, Adelar, M.Sc. Jakarta :Elangga.
• Shadiq, F. (2004). Pemecahan masalah, penalaran dan komunikasi [Problem solving, reasoning and communication]. Yogyakarta: PPPG Matematika.
• Shadiq, F. (2008). Empat objek langsung matematika menurut gagne [Four mathematical direct objects according to gagne]. [online]. http://fadjar3g.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/.
• Sumpter, L. (2016). Investigating upper secondary school teachers’ conceptions: is mathematical reasoning considered gendered?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 347-362. DOI : 10.1007/s10763-015-9634-5
• Susanah. (2017). Proses Penalaran mahasiswa dalam membuktikan kesebangunan segitiga ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika dan gender. Dissertation Not Published. Surabaya: PPs Universitas Negeri Surabaya
• Soedjadi, R. (2000). Kiat pendidikan matematika di indonesia: konstatasi keadaan masa kini menuju harapan masa depan. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
• Solazzo, L. A. (2008). The role of gender, cognition, anxiety, and competence beliefs in predicting mathematics achievement. Fordham University.
• Umay, A. (2003). Mathematical reasoning ability. Hacettepe üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 234-243.
• Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational psychology review, 29(1), 119-140. DOI:10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
• Yildirim, S. (2000). Effects of an educational computing course on preservice and inservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 479–495. DOI:10.1080/08886504.2000.10782293
• Zhu, Z. (2007). Gender differences in mathematical problem-solving patterns: A review of the literature. International Education Journal, 8(2), 187-203.