Action research in science education: a systematic review

Year 2024, Volume: 12 Issue: 4, 193 - 202

Gökhan Ilgaz , Levent Vural , Buse Bağışlayan

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1554538

Abstract

This study aims to systematically examine the importance and use of action research in science education. 30 articles in the Web of Science (WoS) database were analyzed according to the research, problem status, distribution by years, study groups and findings. It was determined that the most studied problem status was students' skills and emotions; there was a noticeable change between 2013 and 2023; most of the study groups of the articles were high school students, student candidates and teachers, and the findings were in the areas of "scientific thinking and skill development", "design of educational environments and use of technology", "understanding of concepts", "intercultural and inclusive education", "new student-centered educational approaches", "teacher education and professional development". According to this article, it was observed that action research has positive effects on science education, and it is expected that providing support to teachers and researchers will increase the conduct of action research and increase the quality of science education.

Keywords

Action research, science education, systematic review

Ethical Statement

No conflict of interest was involved in the preparation of this article, including data collection, result analysis, and report writing.

Supporting Institution

No fund

Thanks

We would like to extend our gratitude to the journal reviewers and the editorial board for their professional and detailed attention at every stage of this study.

References

• Ayas, A. (1995). Fen Bilimlerinde Program Geliştirme ve Uygulama Teknikleri Üzerine Bir Çalışma: İki Çağdaş Yaklaşımın Değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 149-155.
• Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research method for the social science (4. Ed) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Bolton, G. (2010). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Burnaford, G. (2011). “Experienced Educators and Practitioner Research: The Challenge for University Graduate Programs,” in Practitioner Research in Teacher Education: Theory and Best Practices, edited by I. M. Saleh and M. S. Khine (Ed), Emirates College for Advanced Education. (pp. 307–324). United Arab Emirates & Frankfurt: Peter. Retrieved from https:// www.perlego.com/book/1994918/practitioner-research-in-teacher-education-theory- and-best-practices-pdf
• Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Doing-Action-Research-in-English-Language- Teaching-A-Guide-for-Practitioners/ Burns/p/book/9780415991452
• Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1996). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes. Falmer Press.
• Capone, R., D’Acunto, I., Del Sorbo, M. R., Del Regno, F., & Tortoriello, F. S. (2016). Action research: a new perspective in math and science education. In Conference Proceeding New Perspectives In Science Education (pp. 526-530).
• Coghlan, D., & Shani, A. B. (2014). Creating action research quality in organization development: Rigorous, reflective and relevant. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 27, 523-536.
• Dzerviniks, J. (2011). Students' emotions in the development of natural sciences and technology competence. Education Reform in Comprehensive School: Education Content Research & Implementations Problems.
• Eilks, I., & B. Ralle. (2002). Participatory Action Research in Chemical Education. In Research in Chemical Education- What Does This Mean?, 87–98. Aachen: Shaker.
• Eilks, I., Ralle, B., Markic, S., Pilot, A. & Valanides, N. (2006). Ways towards researchbased science teacher education. In I. Eilks & B. Ralle (Eds.), Towards research-based science teacher education (ss. 179–184). Aachen, Germany: Shaker.
• Escopete, R. L., & Garcia Jr, A. L. (2023). School Initiatives in Motivating Teachers to Conduct Action Research. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 4(4), ss. 85.
• Feldman, A. (1996). Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 513–540.
• Farrell, T. S. C. (2004). Reflective practice in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Retrieved from https://us.corwin.com/ en-us/nam/book/reflective-practice-action
• Ferrance, E. (2000). Action Research. Themes in Education
• Glanz, J. (1998). Action research: An educational leader’s guide to school improvement. Norwood, MAChristopher-Gordon.
• Gough, D., Oliver, S., Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews, Sage Publications Ltd.
• Grundy, S. (1998). Three modes of action research. In S. Kermin & R. McTaggert (Eds.), The action research reader (3. Baskı). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
• Jay, J. K. & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teacher and Teacher Education, 18, 73-85. Retrieved from https://teachsource.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/jay-and-johnson-onreflection.pdf
• Landicho, C.J.B. (2020). Research attitudes, motivations, and challenges of STEM education researchers. International Journal of Technology in Education, 3(1), 49-61.,
• Loughran, J. J. (2007). Science teacher as learner. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1043–1066). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research. London: Kogan Page.
• Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Poonputta, A. (2021). Emotional, attitude and classroom action research competency conduction of undergraduate students through STEM education. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(6), 38-43.
• Qindah, S. (2019). The influence of an In-Service Training Program on English Language Teachers’ Professional Development in Palestinian Upper Primary Public Schools. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 13, 124-135.
• Scott, P. H., & Driver, R. H. 2003. Learning about science teaching: perspectives from an action research project. B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Ed.), In International handbook of science education, (pp. 67–80). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Şeref, İ. & Karagöz, B. (2019). Türkçe eğitimi akademik alanına ı̇lişkin bir değerlendirme: Web of Science veri tabanına dayalı bibliyometrik ı̇nceleme. Journal of Language Education and Research, 5(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.578224
• University of York. (2024, May 09). Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. University of York. https://www.york.ac.uk/crd/research/
• Varsat, A. (2013). A Study of Pre-service English Teachers’ Reflectivity enhanced through a series of action research on their classroom performance. ELTQuarterly, 16 (2-3). Ss. 33.