İnceleme Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

AN ANALYSIS OF THE WORK “THE MONK” THROUGH TZVETAN TODOROV’S AND ANN RADCLIFFE’S DEFINITON OF “FANTASTIC”

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 152 - 158, 25.12.2020

Öz

The Monk by Matthew G. Lewis epitomizes a true fantastic novel of the Gothic Era. The fantastic elements within the novel concord with Tzvetan Todorov’s definition of Fantastic. The balance between the “uncanny” and “marvelous” is prolonged, which evokes the sensations of the readers more as they confront with the events. Hence, the purpose of fantastic of Todorov is accomplished. Also, this study will analyze The Monk according to Ann Radcliffe’s assertations about the horror and terror in literature of fantasy. The explicit depictions of Ghosts and bewitchery elements drag The Monk to horror side rather than terror. Subsequently, it causes a moral deterioration on the readers’ minds according to the definition of Radcliffe. Because horror repels fostering ideas from the events within the work, which creates an opposite effect. Instead of taking lessons from the event, the readers indulge in the horror of the events. All in all, this study will shed light on the gothic features of The Monk by comparing Tzvetan Todorov’s and Ann Radcliffe’s ideas over the Fantastic literature.

Destekleyen Kurum

Istanbul Aydın University

Teşekkür

I am deeply grateful to editorial commitee for their labourious work

Kaynakça

  • Botting, F. (1996) Gothic Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005 ISBN 0-203-99376-4
  • Brooks, P. (1973). Virtue and Terror: The Monk. ELH, 40(2), 249-263. doi:10.2307/2872659
  • Philmus, R. (1980). Todorov's Theory of "The Fantastic": The Pitfalls of Genre Criticism. Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 13(3/4), 71-82. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/24780263
  • Sandner, D. (2006). Theorizing the Fantastic: Editing Fantastic Literature: A Critical Reader and the Six Stages of Fantasy Criticism. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 16(4 (64)), 277-301. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/43310263)
  • Todorov T. (1975) The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre Cornell University Press ISBN10: 0801491460
  • Watkins, D. (1986). SOCIAL HIERARCHY IN MATTHEW LEWIS'S "THE MONK". Studies in the Novel, 18(2), 115-124. Retrieved May 3, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/29532407
Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 152 - 158, 25.12.2020

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Botting, F. (1996) Gothic Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005 ISBN 0-203-99376-4
  • Brooks, P. (1973). Virtue and Terror: The Monk. ELH, 40(2), 249-263. doi:10.2307/2872659
  • Philmus, R. (1980). Todorov's Theory of "The Fantastic": The Pitfalls of Genre Criticism. Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 13(3/4), 71-82. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/24780263
  • Sandner, D. (2006). Theorizing the Fantastic: Editing Fantastic Literature: A Critical Reader and the Six Stages of Fantasy Criticism. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 16(4 (64)), 277-301. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/43310263)
  • Todorov T. (1975) The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre Cornell University Press ISBN10: 0801491460
  • Watkins, D. (1986). SOCIAL HIERARCHY IN MATTHEW LEWIS'S "THE MONK". Studies in the Novel, 18(2), 115-124. Retrieved May 3, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/29532407
Toplam 6 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sanat ve Edebiyat
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Halilcan Koçak

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Aralık 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Koçak, H. (2020). AN ANALYSIS OF THE WORK “THE MONK” THROUGH TZVETAN TODOROV’S AND ANN RADCLIFFE’S DEFINITON OF “FANTASTIC”. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 2(2), 152-158.