Vortex breakdown in discharge cone of the Francis Turbine

Abstract

Hydraulic turbines are usually operating at high efficiencies around 90%. It is possible to increase the efficiency by preventing flow characteristics such as failure, cavitation and vortex rope in the draft tube. In some cases, such as partial loads or overloads, pressure pulsations and vortex rope would occur in the draft tube. These undesired events would damage the components of the turbine and that also causes the efficiency to decrease. To eliminate these artifacts, it is decided to design a new component. Vortex Preventing Element, which is designed to eliminate vortex structures and pressure fluctuations, is located at the inlet of draft tube. Computational Fluid Dynamics analyses are performed for different designs having several stage numbers of vortex preventing elements. The preliminary results showed that the one stage vortex preventing element design creates more uniform flow in the draft tube and also increases the efficiency about 3%. Since more studies about the vortex preventing element are in progress, it could be said that the vortex preventing element can handle vortex phenomena in the draft tube and effects the efficiency of the Francis turbines.

Keywords

• Computational fluid dynamics
• Francis turbine
• Turbulence
• Vortex preventing element
• Vortex rope

References

1. [1] Anup, KC, Young, Hoo, L, Bhola, T. CFD study on prediction of vortex shedding in draft tube of Francis turbine and vortex control technique. Renewable Energy 2016; 86:1406-1421.
2. [2] Choi, YD, Kurokawa, J, Imamura, H. Suppression of Cavitation in Inducers by J-Grooves. Journal of Fluids Engineering 2007; 129: 15-22.
3. [3] Wei, QS, Choi, YD, Zhu, BS. Application of J-Groove to the suppression of swirl flow in the draft tube of a Francis hydro turbine. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.2012; 15: 022017.
4. [4] Chen, Z, Choi, YD, Suppression of cavitation in the draft tube of Francis turbine model by J-Groove. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 2019; 233(9): 3100-3110. doi:10.1177/0954406218802310.
5. [5] Nishi, M, Matsunaga, S, Okamoto, M, Uno, M., Nishitani, K. Measurement of three-dimensional periodic flow on a conical draft tube at surging condition. Flows in Non-Rotating Turbomachinery Components FED 1988; 69: 81-88.
6. [6] Stuparu, A and Susan-Resiga, R. The origin of the plunging pressure fluctuations for a swirling flow with precessing vortex rope in a straight diffuser. In: 6th IAHR Int. Meeting of the Workgroup on Cavitation and Dynamic Problems in Hydraulic Machinery and Systems; 9-11 September 2015: Ljubljana/Slovenia, pp. 1-8.
7. [7] Muntean, S, Tanasa, C, Bosioc, AI, Moş, DC. Investigation of the Plunging Pressure Pulsation in a Swirling Flow with Precessing Vortex Rope in a Straight Diffuser. In: 28th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems; 4-8 July 2016: Grenoble, France, pp.1-10.
8. [8] Susan-Resiga, R, Vu, TC, Muntean, S, Ciocan, GD, Nennemann, B. Jet Control of the Draft Tube Vortex Rope in Francis Turbines at Partial Discharge. In: 23rd IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems;17– 21 October 2006: Yokohama, Japan, 14.

9. [9] Zhang, RK, Mao, F, Wu, JZ, Chen, SY, Wu, YL., Liu, SH. Characteristics and Control of the Draft-Tube Flow in Part-Load Francis Turbine. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 2009; 131(2): 021101.
10. [10] Foroutan, H, Yavuzkurt, S. Flow in the Simplified Draft Tube of a Francis Turbine Operating at Partial Load – Part II: Control of the Vortex Rope. Journal of Applied Mechanics 2014; 81:061011-1.
11. [11] Dias, I, Riethmuller, ML. Visualisation of the Forming Bubble and PIV Measurement of Surrounding Liquid Using Fluorescent Particles. In: Eight International Symposium of Flow Visualisation; 1 - 4 September 1998: Sorrento, Italy, pp 107–110.
12. [12] Iliescu, MS, Ciocan GD, Avellan F, Analysis of the Cavitating Draft Tube Vortex in a Francis Turbine Using Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements in Two-Phase Flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering 2008; 130: 021102-1.
13. [13] Juposthi, HJ, Maddahian, R, Cervantes, M. Optimization of axial water injection to mitigate the Rotating Vortex Rope in a Francis turbine, Renewable Energy 2021; 175; 214,231.
14. [14] Cheng, H, Zhou, L, Liang, Q, Guan, Z, Demin, L, Wang, Z, Kang, W. A method of evaluating the vortex rope strength in draft tube of Francis turbine; Renewable Energy 2020; 152, 770-780.
15. [15] Yu, A, Wang, Y, Tang, Q, Lv, R, Yang, Z. Investigation of the vortex evolution and hydraulic excitation in a pump-turbine operating at different conditions. Renewable Energy 2021; 171; 463-478.
16. [16] Laouari, A, Ghanaiet, A. Investigation of steady and unsteady cavitating flows through a small Francis turbine. Renewable Energy 2021; 172; 841-861.
17. [17] Semerci, DS, Yavuz, T. Controlling Flow in Draft Tube of Francis Turbine by Vortex Preventing Element. Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 2022; 6(1): 34-43.
18. [18] Siervo, J, Leva, F, Modern trends in selecting and designing Francis turbines. Water Power and Dam cont., Aug., 1976, 28-35.
19. [19] Akin, H, Çelebioğlu, K, Aradağ S, A CFD-Based Design Methodology for Hydraulic Turbines Applied to A Case Study in Turkey. In:10th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics; 14 – 16 July 2014: Orlando-Florida-USA, pp. 769-774.
20. [20] Semerci, DS, Yavuz, T. Increasing Efficiency of an Existing Francis Turbine by Rehabilitation Process. In: The 5th IEEE International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications; 20-23 November 2016: Birmingham, UK, pp. 107-111
21. [21] Semerci, DS., Yavuz, T. Optimization of a Model Francis Turbine Paramaters for the Most Efficient Case. In: International Conference on Clean Energy; 9-11 May 2018: Famagusta, N. Cyprus, TURB-02.