Research Article

Critical Thinking Dispositions as a Predictor for High School Students’ Environmental Attitudes

Volume: 8 Number: 1 January 31, 2022
EN

Critical Thinking Dispositions as a Predictor for High School Students’ Environmental Attitudes

Abstract

This non-experimental quantitative study aimed to determine if high school students’ critical thinking (CT) dispositions and environmental attitudes differ by gender, father, and mother’s educational background and their CT dispositions are significant predictors of environmental attitudes. UF/EMI Critical Thinking Disposition Instrument and Environmental Attitude Scale were used to collect data in this study carried out with 139 high school students. It was found out that students’ CT dispositions did not differ by gender, father, and mother’s educational background. Also, while students’ environmental attitudes differed by gender in favor of females, they did not differ by mother and father’s educational background. Besides, engagement, maturity, and innovativeness were significant predictors of the students’ environmental attitudes. A positive relationship was found between students’ CT dispositions and environmental attitude scores and engagement, maturity, and innovativeness together explained 31% of the total variance on their environmental attitudes.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
  2. Amin, S., Utaya, S., Bachri, S., Sumarmi, & Susilo, S., (2020). Effect of problem-based learning on critical thinking skills and environmental attitude. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 743-755. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.650344.
  3. Arnocky, S. & M. Stroink. (2010). Gender differences in environmentalism: The mediating role of emotional empathy. Current Research in Social Psychology, 16(9), 1–14.
  4. Aybek, B. & Ekinci, Ö. (2010). Analysis of the empathy and the critical thinking disposition of the teacher candidates. Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 816-827.
  5. Ballantyne, R., Connell, S., & Fien, J. (1998). Students as catalysts of environmental change: A framework for researching intergenerational influence through environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 12(3-4), 1-11.
  6. Blocker, T. J. & Eckberg, D. L. (1989). Environmental issues as women’s issues: General concerns and local hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 586–593.
  7. Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., & Naeem, S. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486(7401), 59–67.
  8. Coertjens, L., Pauw, J. B., Maeyer, S., & Petegem, P. V. (2010). Do schools make a difference in their students’ environmental attitudes and awareness? Evidence from pisa 2006. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 497–522. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9200-0.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Special Education and Disabled Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 31, 2022

Submission Date

January 12, 2022

Acceptance Date

January 31, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 8 Number: 1

APA
Orhan, A. (2022). Critical Thinking Dispositions as a Predictor for High School Students’ Environmental Attitudes. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 8(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.1056832