The Relationship between Turkish Middle School Students’ 21st Century Skills and STEM Career Interest: Gender Effect

Abstract

Several conceptual and theoretical studies on the importance of science-technology-engineering-mathematics (STEM) careers and the 21st century skills required for these careers have been carried out; because they have been accepted as important for the improvement of society and maintenance of economic growth. However, there has not been research within the current educational literature examining the relationship between 21st century skills and STEM career interests of middle school students. Therefore, the main aim of this study is to examine the presence and level of the relationship between middle school students’ 21st century skills and their interest in pursuing a STEM career. In addition, the effect of gender on STEM career interest and 21st century skills was also investigated. The participants of the study were 282 middle school students. The research was completed via a quantitative study based on the relational survey model; data collection tools were STEM career interest survey and 21st century skills scale. A Pearson product-moment correlation method was used to explore the presence and level of the relationship between students’ 21st century skills and STEM career interest. In addition, an independent samples t-test was used to answer whether gender has a significant effect on students’ STEM career interest and/or 21st century skills. The findings showed that there is a statistically significant relationship between students’ 21st century skills and STEM career interest. In addition, there is not a significant difference between female and male students’ STEM career interest, while there is a significant difference between their 21st century skills.

Keywords

• Gender
• Middle school students
• STEM career interest
• 21st century skills level

References

1. Ahmed, K. A., Sharif, N., & Ahmad, N. (2017). Factors influencing students’ career choices: empirical evidence from business students. Journal of Southeast Asian Research, 2017, 1-15.
2. Agam, R, Tamir, S, & Golan, M. (2015). Gender differences in respect to self-esteem and body image as well as response to adolescent's school-based prevention programs. Journal of Psychol Clin Psychiatry, 2(5), 1-18.
3. Akgündüz, D., Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Çorlu, M. S., Öner, T., & Özdemir, S. (2015, January, 5). Türkiye’nin STEM eğitim raporu [STEM education report of Turkey]. Retrieved from http://www.aydin.edu.tr/belgeler/IAUSTEM-Egitimi-Turkiye-Raporu2015.pdf
4. Al-Abri, N., & Kooli, C. (2018). Factors affecting the career path choice of graduates: A case of Omani. International Journal of Youth Economy, 2(2), 105-117.
5. Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. France: OECD Publishing.
6. Arevalo, I. J. M., & Ignacio, M. M. (2018). Twenty first century skills and science achievement of grade 10 students: A causal – comparative study. Research Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 7-13.
7. Arslan, C. (2016, January, 8). Muş’ta okullaşma oranı [Schooling rate in Mus]. Retrieved from https://mus.meb.gov.tr/www/mus-ili-2015-2016-egitim-ogretim-yilinda-okullasma- oraninda-buyuk-bir-ivme-kazandi/icerik/3539
8. ASPIRES (2013, February, 2). Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10 –14. Retrieved from https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/research/aspires/ASPIRES-final-report-January-2019.pdf

9. Astin, H., & Sax, L. (1996). Developing scientific talent in undergraduate women. equity equation: fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. C. Davis, A. Ginorio, C.Hollenhead, B. Lazarus, P. Rayman, and Associates (Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Asunda, P. A. (2011). Open courseware and STEM initiatives in career and technical education. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(2), 6-37
11. Aydeniz, M. (2017, February, 3). Eğitim sistemimiz ve 21. Yüzyıl hayalimiz: 2045 hedeflerine ilerlerken, Türkiye için STEM odaklı ekonomik bir yol haritası [Our education system and 21st century dream: Moving to 2045 goals, STEM-oriented economic roadmap for Turkey]. Retrieved from https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=utk_theopubs
12. Aydın, G., Saka, M., & Guzey, S. (2017). İlkokul öğrencilerinin STEM'e ilişkin tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Science, technology, engineering, mathematic (STEM) attitude levels in grades 4th- 8th]. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(2), 787-802.
13. Babarović, T., Dević, I., & Burušić, J. (2018). Fitting the STEM interests of middle school children into RIASEC structural. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 19(2), 100-125.
14. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Baran, E., Canbazoğlu-Bilici, S., & Mesutoğlu, C. (2015). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik (FeTeMM) spotu geliştirme etkinliği [Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (FeTeMM) public service announcement development activity]. Journal of inquiry based activities, 5(2), 60-69.
16. BarNir, A., Watson, W. E., & Hutchins, H. M. (2011). Mediation and moderated mediation in the relationship among role models, self‐efficacy, entrepreneurial career intention, and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 270-297.
17. Barth, J. M., Kim, H., Eno, C. A., & Guadagno, R. E. (2018). Matching abilities to careers for others and self: Do gender stereotypes matter to students in advanced math and science classes?. Sex Roles, 79(1-2), 83-97.
18. Beers, S. Z. (2013, February, 6). 21st century skills: Preparing students for their future. STEM: Science, technology, engineering, math. Retrieved from https://www.mheonline.com/mhmymath/pdf/21st_century_skills.pdf
19. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual encino. CA: Multivariate Software.
20. Beutel, A., & Marini, M. (1995). Gender and values. American Sociological Review, 60, 436- 448.
21. Bhamani, S., Jamil, S., & Mohsin, F. Z. (2014). Gender differences in self-esteem in young adolescents of Karachi. Pakistan Business Review, 15(4), 704-717.
22. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2010, February, 8). Draft white paper 1: Defining 21st century skills. Retrieved from http://cms. education. gov. il/NR/rdonlyres/19B97225-84B1-4259-B423-4698E1E8171A/115804/defining21stcenturyskills. pdf
23. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Hermna, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, E. Care, & B. McGaw (Ed.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17-66), Dordrecht: Springer.
24. Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?. Gender and Education, 17(4), 369-386.
25. Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(22), 1-15.
26. Bozkurt, Ş. B., & Çakır, H. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin 21. yüzyıl öğrenme beceri düzeylerinin cinsiyet ve sınıf seviyesine göre incelenmesi [21st century learner skills: An investigation of middle school students based on grade level and gender]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 39(39), 69-82.
27. Böyük, U., Tanık, N., & Saraçoğlu, S. (2011). İlköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin bilimsel süreç beceri düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Analysis of the scientific process skill levels of secondary school students based on different variables]. Tübav Bilim Dergisi, 4(1), 20-30.
28. Brown, D. (Ed.). (2002). Career choice and development. San fransisco: John Wiley & Sons.
29. Burrelli, J. (2008). Thirty-three years of women in Sande Faculty positions (NSF 08-308). Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
30. Buyruk, B., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2016). FeTeMM farkındalık ölçeği (FFÖ): Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [STEM awareness scale (SAS): Validity and reliability study]. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(2), 61-76.
31. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Sosyal bilimler için very analizi [Data analysis for social sciences] Ankara: PegemaYayıncılık.
32. Callahan, M. N. (2015). The right attitude: Gender, conservatism, and career choice. [Unpublished master thesis]. Iowa State University, USA.
33. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Relationship of middle school student STEM interest to career intent. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 3(1), 1-13.
34. Chyung, S.Y. (2007). Age and gender differences in online behavior, self-efficacy, and academic performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 213–222.
35. Chui, W. H., & Leung, E. W. (2014). Youth in a global world: Attitudes towards globalization and global citizenship among university students in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(1), 107-124.
36. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
37. Cohen, C., Patterson, D. G., Kovarik, D. N., & Chowning, J. T. (2013). Fostering STEM career awareness: emerging opportunities for teachers. WA State Kappan, 6, 1-17.
38. Cooper, R., & Heaverlo, C. (2013). Problem solving and creativity and design: What influence do they have on females' interest in STEM subject areas? American Journal of Engineering Education, 4(1), 27-38.
39. Croak, M. (2018). The effects of STEM education on economic growth. (Honors Theses). Retrieved from https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/1705
40. Dinç, E. (2008). Meslek seçiminde etkili faktörlerin incelenmesi: meslek yüksek okulu-muhasebe programı öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma [Investigation of the factors affecting career choice: A research on vocational school-Accounting programme students]. Kocaeli University Journal of Social Sciences Instutites, 16(2), 90-106
41. Duran, M. (2015). The effect of activities based on inquiry- based learning approach on students inquiry learning skills. International Journal of Social Science, 32, 399-420.
42. Eagly, A. H., & Wood. W. (2011). Social role theory. Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology, 2, 458-476.
43. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: the structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215-225.
44. Ekon, E. E., & Eni, E. I. (2015). Gender and acquisition of science process skills among junior secondary school students in Calabar Municipality: Implications for implementation of universal basic education objectives. Global Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 93-99.
45. Elmalı, Ş., & Kıyıcı, F. B. (2017). Türkiye’de yayınlanmış FeTeMM eğitimi ile ilgili çalışmaların incelenmesi [Review of STEM studies published in Turkey]. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 7(3), 684-696.
46. Eren, S., & Erkan, N. S. (2016). Öyküleştirme yöntemine dayalı eğitimin beş yaş çocuklarında farklılıklara saygı kazanımına etkisinin incelenmesi [A study on the effects of the storyline based on the education of five-year-old children to gaining respect for diversities]. Hacettepe University Graduate School of Educational Sciences The Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 152- 172.
47. Ersoy, E. (2009). Cinsiyet kültürü içerisinde kadın ve erkek kimliği (Malatya örneği) [Woman and man identity in gender culture (Example of Malatya). Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 209-230.
48. Fadli, A. (2019) Problem solving skills and scientific attitudes of prospective teachers based on gender and grades level. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 3595-3599.
49. Foskett, N. & Hemsley-Brown, J. (1999). Invisibility, perceptions and image: mapping the career choice landscape. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 4(3), 233-248.
50. Gök, A., & Tekin, N. (2015). Yabancılaşma ve özsaygı: Çoğulcu eleştiriler üzerinden bir değerlendirme [Alienation and self-respect: an evaluation through pluralistic critiques]. Marmara University Journal of Political Science, 3(2), 279-301.
51. Güldü, Ö., & Kart, M. E. (2009). Toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri ve siyasal tutumlar: Sosyal psikolojik bir değerlendirme [Gender roles and political attitudes: a social psychological evaluation]. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3, 97-116.
52. Gülhan, F., & Şahin, F. (2018). Niçin STEM eğitimi?: Ortaokul 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin STEM alanlarındaki kariyer tercihlerinin incelenmesi [Why STEM education?: Investigation of middle school 5th grade students' career choices in STEM felds]. Journal of TEAM Education, 1(1), 1-23.
53. Halim, L., Rahman, N. A., Ramli, N. A. M., & Mohtar, L. E. (2018). Influence of students’ STEM self-efficacy on STEM and physics career choice. AIP Publishing 1923(1), 020001.
54. Hall, C., Dickerson, J., Batts, D., Kauffmann, P., & Bosse, M. (2011). Are we missing opportunities to encourage interest in STEM fields?. Journal of Technology Education, 23(1), 32-46.
55. Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Phillips, A., Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). A study of STEM assessments in engineering, science, and mathematics for elementary and middle school students. School Science and Mathematics, 115(2), 66-74.
56. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women. Washington, DC: AAUW Research Report.
57. Hinton, K. R. (2019, May 1). Self responsibility and social responsibility. Retrieved from https://www.unce.unr.edu/publications/files/cy/other/fs9396.pdf
58. Inglehart, R., Norris, P., & Ronald, I. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Ismail, Z. (2018, February, 10). Benefits of STEM education. Retrieved from https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/ds2/stream/?#/documents/3681174/page/1
60. Jamaludin, A., & Hung, D. (2017). Problem-solving for STEM Learning: Navigating games as narrativized problem spaces for 21st century competencies. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1-14.
61. Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284-301.
62. Jena, P. C. (2014). Cognitive styles and problem solving ability of under graduate students. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 3(2), 71-16.
63. Jiang, S., Schenke, K., Eccles J. S., Xu, D,. & Warschauer, M. (2018). Cross-national comparison of gender differences in the enrollment in and completion of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics massive open online courses. PLoS ONE, 13(9), 1-15.
64. Kaing, S. (2016). How can STEM education help stimulate economic growth in Cambodia. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Toshiba/Downloads/HowcanSTEMEducationHelpStimulateEconomicGrowthinCambodia%20(2).pdf
65. Kan, A. Ü., & Murat, A. (2018). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının 21.yüzyıl becerileri yeterlik algıları ile STEM’e yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi [Investigation of prospective science teachers’ 21st century skill competence perceptions and attitudes toward STEM]. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(4), 251-272.
66. Kanan, A. F. (2018). The relationship between Jordanian students’ 21st century skills (Cs21) and academic achievement in science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(2), 82-94.
67. Kaneez, B. S., & Medha, K. (2018). Factors influencing grade 10 students’ career choice in Mauritius. Development, 7(2), 30-44.
68. Kang, M., Kim, M., Kim, B., & You, H. (2012). Developing an instrument to measure 21st century skills for elementary students. The Korean Journal of Eductional Methodology Studies, 25(2).
69. Karakaş, M. (2015). Ortaokul sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin fen bilimlerine yönelik 21. yüzyıl beceri düzeylerinin ölçülmesi [Investigation of the eight- grade secondary school students ' levels of 21st century skills in science education]. (Unpublished master thesis). Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir.
70. Karakaya, F., Avgın, S. S., & Yılmaz, M. (2018). Middle school students' interest in science-technology- engineering and mathematics (STEM) professions. Ihlara Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 36-53.
71. Kay, K. (2009). Middle schools preparing young people for 21st century life and work. Middle School Journal, 40(5), 41-45.
72. Kesar, S. (2018). Closing the STEM gap. Retrieved from https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binay/RE1UMWz
73. Kesici, A. (2018). Lise öğrencilerinin sorumluluk düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [An Examination of High School Students' Level of Responsibility According to Several Variables]. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 38(3), 965-985.
74. Keskin, F., & Ulusan, A. (2016). Kadının toplumsal inşasına yönelik kuramsal yaklaşımlara dair bir değerlendirme [The evaluation on the theoretical approaches related to social construction of women]. Akdeniz University Journal of Communication Faculty, 26, 47- 68.
75. Kier, M. W., Blanchard, M. R., Osborne, J. W., & Albert. J. L. (2014). The development of the STEM career interest survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461- 481.
76. Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 125(4), 470.
77. Korkut-Owen, F., & Mutlu, T. (2016). Türkiye’de fen bilimleri, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik alanlarının seçiminde cinsiyetler arası farklılıklar [Gender differences on selecting STEM areas in Turkey]. Journal of Education for Life, 30(2), 53-72.
78. Koyunlu-Ünlü, Z., & Dökme. I. (2018). Multivariate assessment of middle school students’ interest in STEM career: A profile from Turkey. Research in Science Education, 1-15.
79. Köksal, N., & Çöğman, S. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin eleştirel düşünme ve iletişim becerileri [Critical thinking and communication skills of secondary school students]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 44(44), 278-296.
80. Langen, A. V., & Dekkers, H. (2005). Cross‐national differences in participating in tertiary science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Comparative Education, 41(3), 329-350.
81. Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2017). Social cognitive career theory in a diverse world: Guest editors’ introduction. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1) 3-5.
82. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 45(1), 79-122.
83. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36-49.
84. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career choice and development, 4, 255-311.
85. Mahmoodi, M. H., Kalantari, B., & Ghaslani, R. (2014). Self-regulated learning (SRL), motivation and language achievement of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1062-1068.
86. Majid, A. H., Wesarat, P. O, & Sharif, M. Y. (2014). Role of cultural values in career choice: A conceptual framework. Conference: The 3rd International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management (ICEBM). Penang: Malaysia.
87. McCormick, W. (2019). Self-efficacy and STEM career interest in black and latino middle school students: A study on the Next Generation Science Standards. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Loyola Marymount University, USA.
88. McMullin, J. A., & Cairney, J. (2004). Self-esteem and the intersection of age, class, and gender. Journal of Aging Studies, 18(1), 75-90.
89. Ministry of National Education. (2013). Fen Bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve orta okul 3., 4., 5., 6., 7. ve 8. sınıflar) [Science lesson curriculum (primary and secondary schools 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades). Ankara: TalimTerbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
90. Ministry of National Education. (2018). Naitonal education statistics formal education. http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_09/06123056_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2017_2018.pdf
91. Milner, D. I., Horan, J. J., & Tracey, T. J. (2014). Development and evaluation of STEM interest and self-efficacy tests. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(4), 642-653.
92. Mishkin, H., Wangrowicz, N., Dori, D., & Dori, Y. J. (2016). Career choice of undergraduate engineering students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 222-228.
93. Myrdal, A., & Klein, V. (1956). Women's two roles: Home and work. London, Routledge.Ndinechi, M. C., & Okafor. K. C. (2016). STEM education: a tool for sustainable national capacity building in a digital economy. The 1st International Conference, “FUTO-CCE 2016”. Owerri: Nigeria.
94. Nupur, C., & Mahapatro, M. (2016). Gender differences in self esteem among young adults of Raipur, Uttar Pradesh, India. Austin Journal of Women’s Health, 3(1), 1-4.
95. Özkan, İ. (1994). Benlik saygısını etkileyen etkenler [Factors affecting self-esteem]. The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 7(3), 4-9.
96. Parlaktuna, İ. (2010). Türkiye'de cinsiyete dayali mesleki ayrimciligin analizi [Analysis of gender-based occupational discrimination in Turkey]. Ege Academic Review, 10(4), 1217-1230.
97. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2019). A network of battelle for kids. http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources
98. Perkmen, S. (2009). 21. yüzyilda kariyer seçimi [Career choice in the 21st century]. İstanbul: Profil Yayıncılık.
99. Rapoport, R., & Rapoport, R. N. (1969). The dual career family: A variant pattern and social change. Human Relations, 22(1), 3-30.
100. Reeve, E. M. (2016). 21st century skills needed by students in technical and vocational education and training (TVET). Asian International Journal of Social Sciences, 16(4), 65 - 82.
101. Rentzsch, K., Wenzler, M. P., & Schütz, A. (2016). The structure of multidimensional self-esteem across age and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 139-147..
102. Rotherman, A. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2010). 21st century skills” not new but a worthy challenge. American Educator, 34(1), 17-20.
103. Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13.
104. Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G. Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science education, 96(3), 411-427.
105. Salahshoor, N., & Rafiee, M. (2016). The relationship between critical thinking and gender: a case of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(2), 117-123.
106. Sanders, C., Welfare, L. E., & Culver, S. (2017). Career counseling in middle schools: A study of school counselor self-efficacy. Professional Counselor, 7(3), 238-250.
107. Sarseke, G. (2018). Under-representation of women in science: From educational, feminist and scientific views. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 11(1), 89-101.
108. Savickas, M. L. (1991). The meaning of work and love: Career issues and interventions. The Career Development Quarterly, 39(4), 315-324.
109. Sekścińska, K., Trzcińska, A., & Maison, D. A. (2016). The influence of different social roles activation on women’s financial and consumer choices. Frontiers in psychology, 7(365), 1-13.
110. Siswati, B. H., & Corebima, A. D. (2017). The effect of education level and gender on students’ metacognitive skills in Malang, Indonesia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(4), 163-169.
111. Su, R., & Rounds, J. (2015). All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(189), 1-20.
112. Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta- analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 859-884.
113. Theresa, L. D. (2015). Factors that inform students' choice of study and career. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(27), 43-49.
114. Turkish Industry and Business Association. (2017). 2023’e doğru Türkiye’nin STEM gereksinimi [2023 report on Turkey towards STEM requirements]. http://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/9735-2023-e-dog-ru-tu-rkiye-de-stem-gereksinimi.
115. Turkish Industry and Business Association. (2014). STEM alanında eğitim almış iş gücüne yönelik talep ve beklentiler araştırması [Demand and expectations research for the workforce trained in STEM]. http://www.tusiad.org.tr/__rsc/shared/file/STEM-ipsos-rapor.pdf
116. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Culturel Organisation. (2019). Exploring STEM Competences for the 21st Century. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368485
117. Quimby, J. L., & De Santis, A. M. (2006). The influence of role models on women's career choices. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(4), 297-306.
118. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy–value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33(4), 304-340.
119. Warren, F. L. (2000). The effects of gender and family structure on family functioning and problem-solving skills of African American college students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Tennessee State University, USA.Wiebe, E., Unfried, A., & Faber, M. (2018). The relationship of STEM attitudes and career interest. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10).1-17
120. Willemse, M. (2008). Exploring the relationship between self-efficacy and aggression in a group of adolescents in the peri-urban town of Worcester. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
121. Wiseman, R. L., Gonzales, S. M., & Salyer, K. (2004). A cross-cultural analysis of students' sense of community, degree of involvement, and educational benefits. Intercultural Communication Studies, 13, 173-189.
122. Woolley, M. E., Strutchens, M., Gilbert, M. C., & Martin, W. G. (2010). Mathematics success of Black middle school students: Direct and indirect effects of teacher expectations and reform practices. Negro Educational Review, 61(1-4), 41.
123. Wyss, V. L., Heulskamp, D., & Siebert, C. J. (2012). Increasing middle school student interest in STEM careers with videos of scientists. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(4), 501-522.
124. Vani, S. (2016). A study of creative thinking of secondary school teachers in West Godawari District. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), 2(8), 82-830.
125. Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Hanbook of self regulation. New York: Guilford Press.
126. Vurucu, F. (2010). Meslek lisesi öğrencilerinin meslek seçimi yeterliliği ve meslek seçimini etkileyen faktörler [Occupational choice capability of students in vocational schools and factors affecting occupational choice]. (Unpublished master thesis). Yeditepe University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
127. Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.
128. Zorlu, F., & Zorlu, Y. (2017). Comparison of science process skills with STEM career interests of middle school students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12), 2117-2124.