Investigating the digital skills of undergraduate students in terms of various variables

Abstract

It is argued that, young people growing up surrounded by digital technologies intuitively acquire digital skills and therefore do not need digital education or training. For this reason, with the belief that students already have digital skills, digital literacy education courses are reduced or removed in educational institutions. Therefore, it is necessary to emphasize the importance of development of digital skills in the education. The purpose of this research is to examine the digital skills of students in terms of various variables. This research was conducted as a survey research. The participant group of the research consists of 423 undergraduate students who have just started to study at a university. According to the results of the research, the digital skill levels of the students who attend the IT courses are significantly higher than the students who do not. Digital skills were significantly higher for the male students than for the female students. In addition, the digital skills of the students who took the IT courses from the teacher trained in teaching digital skills were significantly higher than the students who took the course from teachers from other professions.

Keywords

• Digital literacy
• Digital skills
• Information technologies course
• Information technologies teachers
• Gender digital divide

References

1. About ECDL Foundation. (n.d.). Retrieved July 08, 2019 from http://ecdl.org/about
2. Abu-Shanab, E. & Al-Jamal, N. (2015). Exploring the gender digital divide in Jordan. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(1), 91-113.
3. Acilar, A. & Sæbø, Ø. (2021). Towards understanding the gender digital divide: A systematic literature review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-09-2021-0147
4. Aguar, K., Safaei, S., Arabnia, H. R., Gutierrez, J. B., Potter, W. D. ve Taha, T. R. (2017). Reviving Computer Science Education through Adaptive, Interest-Based Learning. In 2017 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), 1161-1166.
5. Ahmad, M., Badusah, J., Mansor, A. Z., Abdul Karim, A., Khalid, F., Daud, M. Y., ... & Zulkefle, D. F. (2016). The application of 21st century ICT literacy model among teacher trainees. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(3), 151-161.http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1106417.pdf
6. Akpınar, Y. (2003). Öğretmenlerin yeni bilgi teknolojileri kullanımında yükseköğretimin etkisi: İstanbul okulları örneği, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- TOJET, 2(2), 79-96.
7. Alexander, B., Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., & Giesinger, C. H. (2017). Digital literacy in higher education, Part II: An NMC Horizon project strategic brief. The New Media Consortium. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2017/8/2017nmcstrategicbriefdigitalliteracyheii.pdf
8. Alozie, N. O. & Akpan-Obong, P. (2017). The digital gender divide: Confronting obstacles to women’s development in Africa. Development Policy Review, 35(2), 137-160.

9. Ariu, D., Bosco, F., Ferraris, V., Perri, P., Spolti, G., Stirparo, P., Vaciago, G., & Zanero, S. (2014). Security of the digital natives. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2442037
10. Aslan, S. (2021). Analysis of digital literacy self-efficacy levels of pre-service teachers. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 4(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.47
11. Aşkar, P. & Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz-yeterlik algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(21).
12. Aydin, M. (2021). Does the digital divide matter? Factors and conditions that promote ICT literacy. Telematics and Informatics, 58, 101536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101536
13. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
14. Bayazıt, A. ve Seferoğlu, S. S. (2009). Türkiye’deki teknoloji politikalarında eğitimin yeri ve öğretmen yetiştirme politikaları. TBD 26. Ulusal Bilişim Kurultayı, 12. Bilişim Teknolojileri Işığında Eğitim Kongresi (BTIE’2009) Bildiriler Kitabı, 7-11. Ankara: Türkiye Bilişim Derneği.
15. Bayrakdar, S., & Guveli, A. (2020). Inequalities in home learning and schools' provision of distance teaching during school closure of COVID-19 lockdown in the UK (No. 2020-09). ISER Working Paper Series. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/227790/1/1703719352.pdf
16. Bichi, A. A. (2015). Item analysis using a derived science achievement test data. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4(5), 1656-1662.
17. Bilişim Teknolojileri Eğitimcileri Derneği. (July, 2013). Türkiye’de ilk ve ortaokullarda (ilköğretim) okutulan bilişim teknolojileri derslerinin tarihi. https://bte.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/btderslerinin_tarihi_ilk-ortaokul_ilkogretim.pdf
18. Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), 487-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.005
19. Brown, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the ‘digital native’: beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 357-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00369.x
20. BTE. (2013). Türkiye’de ilk ve ortaokullarda (ilköğretim) okutulan bilişim teknolojileri derslerinin tarihi. http://bte.org.tr/bt-derslerinin-tarihcesi/ adresinden erişilmiştir.
21. Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy: What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(4), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-03
22. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2008). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (9. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
23. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2016). Towards a tool for assessing digital competence based on the European Digital Competence Framework for Citizens: a mapping of instruments for assessing digital competence. European Union. Unpublished report.
24. Certiport. (n.d). IC3 Digital Literacy Certification. https://certiport.pearsonvue.com/Certifications/IC3/Digital-Literacy-Certification/Overview
25. Chan, D. W. (2005). Teacher self-efficacy research and teacher education. Educational Research Journal, 20(2), 149-164.
26. Claro, M., Salinas, Á., Cabello-Hutt, T., San Martín, E., Preiss, D. D., Valenzuela, S., & Jara, I. (2018). Teaching in a Digital Environment (TIDE): Defining and measuring teachers' capacity to develop students' digital information and communication skills. Computers & Education, 121, 162-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.001
27. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition. Routledge
28. Corneliussen, H. G. & Seddighi, G. (2019), Må vi egentlig ha flere kvinner i IKT?. Tidsskrift for Kjønnsforskning, 43(4), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-1781-2019-04-03
29. Covello, S., & Lei, J. (2010). A review of digital literacy assessment instruments. Syracuse University, 1, 31.
30. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
31. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory: ERIC.
32. Csernoch, M., & Biró, P. (2019). Are digital natives spreadsheet natives?. Proceedings of the EuSpRIG 2019 Conference. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00865
33. Demir, O., Aslan, S. A., & Demir, M. (2022). Examining the relationship between teachers’ lifelong learning tendencies and digital literacy levels. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(2), 379-392. http://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1034697
34. Denholm, A. (2014, October 24). Great internet age divide is a myth. The Herald. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13186113.great-internet-age-divide-myth/
35. Deryakulu, D. & Olkun, S. (2007). Analysis of computer teachers' online discussion forum messages about their occupational problems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 131-142.
36. Design and Technology Teachers’ Association Australia (DATTA Australia) (2019). Technologies teacher shortage survey: National overview 2019. https://www.datta.wa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/TECHNOLOGY-TEACHER-SHORTAGE-SURVEY-REPORT-2019-DATTA-AUSTRALIA.pdf
37. Devier, B. H. (2019). Teacher shortage and alternative licensure solutions for technical educators. The Journal of Technology Studies, 45(2), 48-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48647045
38. Dursun, F. (2013). Bilişim teknolojileri öğretmen yeterliklerinin öğretim elemanı, öğretmen adayı ve öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
39. ECDL. (2015). Computing and digital literacy: call for a holistic approach. http://code.intef.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/position_paper_computing_and_digital_literacy.pdf
40. ECDL. (2018). Perception & reality: measuring digital skills gaps in Europe, India, and Singapore. https://www.icdleurope.org/policy-and-publications/perception-reality-measuring-digital-skills-gaps-in-europe-india-and-singapore/
41. ECDL (2019). ECDL profile. Retrieved July 08, 2019, from http://ecdl.org/about-ecdl/ecdl-profile
42. English, J. A. (2016). A Digital Literacy Initiative in Honors: Perceptions of Students and Instructors about its Impact on Learning and Pedagogy" (2016). Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council–Online Archive. 533. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal/533
43. Erdoğan, M., Kurşun, E., Şişman, G. T., Saltan, F., Gök, A., & Yıldız, İ. (2010). Sınıf yönetimi ve sınıf içi disiplin problemleri, nedenleri ve çözüm önerileri üzerine nitel bir araştırma: Bilişim teknolojileri dersi örneği. Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitim Bilimleri–Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(2), 853-891.
44. Ernst, J. V., & Williams, T. O. (2015). The “who, what, and how conversation”: Characteristics and responsibilities of current in-service technology and engineering educators. Journal of Technology Studies, 41(1), 48-56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90003806
45. Ertl, B., Csanadi, A., & Tarnai, C. (2020). Getting closer to the digital divide: An analysis of impacts on digital competencies based on the German PIAAC sample. International journal of educational development, 78, 102259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102259
46. Eyidoğan, B. (2009). İlköğretim bilişim teknolojileri dersinin seçimlik olmasına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
47. Eynon, R. (2010). Supporting the 'Digital Natives': What is the Role of Schools? Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning, 851. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2206931
48. Fatih Projesi Çalıştay Raporu. (2012). http://fatih.inetd.org.tr/Calistay/Fatih-calistay-rapor.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
49. Feerrar, J. (2019). Development of a framework for digital literacy. Reference Services Review, 47(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-01-2019-0002
50. Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. https://ifap.ru/library/book522.pdf
51. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study international report. Springer Nature. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14222-7
52. Gargallo-Castel, A., Esteban-Salvador, L. and Pérez-Sanz, J. (2010). Impact of gender in adopting and using ICTs in Spain. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 5(3), 120-128.
53. Goebel, N., Knoch, J., Thomson, M. E., Willson, R., & Sharun, S. (2013). Making assessment less scary: Academic libraries collaborate on an information literacy assessment model. College & Research Libraries News, 74(1), 28-31.
54. Göktaş, Z. (2011). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğrencilerinin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerine yönelik özgüven algılamaları. Niğde Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 50-57.
55. Gültepe, A. A. (2018). Kodlama öğretimi yapan bilişim teknolojileri öğretmenleri gözüyle öğrenciler kodluyor. Uluslararası Liderlik Eğitimi Dergisi, 2(2), 50-60.
56. Hall, R., Atkins, L. & Fraser, J. (2014). Defining a self-evaluation digital literacy framework for secondary educators: The DigiLit leicester project. Research in Learning Technology, 22. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21440
57. Hargittai, E. (2008). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 371-379.
58. Hatlevik, O. E., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2013). An emerging digital divide in urban school children’s information literacy: Challenging equity in the Norwegian school system. First Monday, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i4.4232
59. Henkoglu, H. S. ve Yıldırım, S. (2012). Computer education in Turkish basic education schools: gaps between policy and practice. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(1), 23.
60. Hilbert, M. (2011). Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34(6), 479-489.
61. Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Barron, A. E., & Kemker, K. (2008). Examining the digital divide in K-12 public schools: Four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1648-1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.04.002
62. Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Wilson, M. L. (2017). An examination of seven years of technology integration in Florida schools: Through the lens of the Levels of Digital Divide in Schools. Computers & Education, 113, 135-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.017
63. ICDL. (2018). Perception & Reality - Measuring Digital Skills Gaps in Europe, India and Singapore. https://www.icdleurope.org/policy-and-publications/perception-reality-measuring-digital-skills-gaps-in-europe-india-and-singapore/
64. ICDL. (2019). E-skills at school. https://www.icdleurope.org/policy-and-publications/e-skills-at-school/
65. ICDL (2020). ICDL for candidates, schools and companies. Retrieved March 09, 2022, from https://www.ecdl.ch/en/icdl/what-is-icdl/
66. Ivanitskaya, L., Boyle, I. O., & Casey, A. M. (2006). Health information literacy and competencies of information age students: results from the interactive online Research Readiness Self-Assessment (RRSA). Journal of medical Internet research, 8(2), e504. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.2.e6
67. İpek, C. ve Acuner, H. (2011). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının bilgisayar öz-yeterlik inançları ve eğitim teknolojilerine yönelik tutumları. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 23-40.
68. James, J. (2019). Confronting the scarcity of digital skills among the poor in developing countries. Development Policy Review, 39, 324-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12479
69. Jisc. (2018). Building digital capabilities: The six elements defined. Building digital capability. https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6611/1/JFL0066F_DIGIGAP_MOD_IND_FRAME.PDF
70. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., Kampylis, P., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2014). Horizon Report Europe - 2014 Schools Edition. Office of the European Union and The New Media Consortium. http://dx.doi.org/10.2791/83704
71. Jones-Kavalier, B., & Flannigan, S. L. (2006). Connecting the digital dots: Literacy of the 21st century. Educause Quarterly, 29(2), 8-10.
72. Katz, I. R., Rijmen, F., & Attali, Y. (2018). Investigating the factor structure of the iSkills™ assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2018(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12211
73. Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of computer assisted learning, 26(5), 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
74. Kert, S. B., Kalelioglu, F. ve Gulbahar, Y. (2019). A Holistic Approach for Computer Science Education in Secondary Schools. Informatics in Education, 18(1), 131-150.
75. Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker, Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001
76. Klein, S., Benjamin, R., Shavelson, R., & Bolus, R. (2007). The Collegiate Learning Assessment: Facts and fantasies. Evaluation Review, 31(5), 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X07303318
77. Kubiatko, M. (2010). Czech university students’ attitudes towards ICT used in science education, Journal of Technology and Information Education, 2( 3), 20-25. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1118/a7d42d0458e3e2088e692bd6ff0bef442510.pdf
78. Laanperee, M. (2019). Recommendations on Assessment tools for monitoring digital literacy within UNESCO’s Digital Literacy Global Framework. Report number: UIS/2019/LO/IP/56. Affiliation: UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS).
79. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies: concepts, policies and practices. New York: Peter Lang.
80. Love, T., & Love, Z. J. (2022). The Teacher Recruitment Crisis: Examining Influential Recruitment Factors from a United States Technology and Engineering Teacher Preparation Program. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09727-4
81. Love, T. S., Love, Z. J., & Love, K. S. (2016). Better practices for recruiting T&E teachers. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 76(1), 10–15.
82. Madison Assessment. (2014). Information literacy test. https://www.madisonassessment.com/uploads/ILT%20Test%20Manual%202014%20-%20(updated2020).pdf
83. Markauskaite, L. (2007). Exploring the structure of trainee teachers’ ICT literacy: the main components of, and relationships between, general cognitive and technical capabilities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 547-572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9043-8
84. Martin, A. (2008). Digital Literacy and the “Digital Society”. In C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies, and Practices (pp. 151-176). New York: Peter Lang.
85. McCowan, R. J., & McCowan, S. C. (1999). Item analysis for criterion-referenced tests. Online Submission. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501716.pdf
86. McGarr, O., & McDonagh, A. (2021). Exploring the digital competence of pre-service teachers on entry onto an initial teacher education programme in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 40(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2020.1800501
87. MEB. (2005). 2575 sayılı tebliğler dergisi. Retrieved May 01, 2022, fromhttp://tebligler.meb.gov.tr/index.php/tuem-sayilar/finish/69-2005/195-2575-agustos-2005
88. Moye, J. J. (2009). Technology education teacher supply and demand-a critical situation. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 69(2), 30-36.
89. Mumporeze, N., & Prieler, M. (2017). Gender digital divide in Rwanda: A qualitative analysis of socioeconomic factors. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1285-1293.
90. Murray, M. C., & Pérez, J. (2014). Unraveling the digital literacy paradox:How higher education fails at the fourth literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 11, 85–100. http://iisit.org/Vol11/IISITv11p085-100Murray0507.pdf
91. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?. Computers & education, 59(3), 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
92. Noble-Rogers, J. (2020). The recruitment and retention of teachers in England. In Exploring Teacher Recruitment and Retention (pp. 22-33). Routledge.
93. OECD, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, CAF Development Bank of Latin America, & European Commission. (2020), Latin American economic outlook 2020: Digital transformation for building back better. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/e6e864fb-en
94. Özcan, M. (2022). Evaluation of prospective teachers’ digital literacy levels and mobile learning attitudes. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(2), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1020586
95. Özçelik, D. (2013). Test Hazırlama Kılavuzu. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları
96. Özkan, O., Sungur, C., & Özer, Ö. (2021). Investigation of cyberchondria level and digital literacy on women in Turkey. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2021.1962776
97. Özoğlu, C. & Kaya, E. (2021). Z kuşağı öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenmeleri ve dijital okuryazarlıkları arasındaki ilişki. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.824040
98. PIAAC. (2009), "PIAAC Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments: A Conceptual Framework", OECD Education Working Papers, No. 36, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/220262483674
99. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital ımmigrants part 1, On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
100. Ramalingam, A., & Kar, S. S. (2014). Is there a digital divide among school students? an exploratory study from Puducherry. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 3, 27-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2F2277-9531.131894
101. Reinsfield, E., & Lee, K. (2021). Exploring the technology teacher shortage in New Zealand: the implications for quality teaching and learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09668-4
102. Rizal, R., Rusdiana, D., Setiawan, W., & Siahaan, P. (2020). Digital literacy test: Development of multiple choice test for preservice physics teachers. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3), 7085-7095.
103. Sciumbata, F. (2020). Students of humanities and digital skills: a survey on Italian university students. Umanistica Digitale, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2532-8816/9877
104. Seferoğlu, S. S. (2007). İlköğretim bilgisayar dersi öğretim programı: Eleştirel bir bakış ve uygulamada yaşanan sorunlar. Eğitim Araştırmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 29, 99-111.
105. Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native - myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364 - 379. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910973776
106. Siddiq, F., Scherer, R., & Tondeur, J. (2016). Teachers' emphasis on developing students' digital information and communication skills (TEDDICS): A new construct in 21st century education. Computers & Education, 92, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.006
107. Smith, E. (2012). The digital native debate in higher education: A comparative analysis of recent literature. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2F302
108. Sparks, J. R., Katz, I. R., & Beile, P. M. (2016). Assessing digital information literacy in higher education: A review of existing frameworks and assessments with recommendations for next‐generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2016(2), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12118
109. Suwana, F., & Lily. (2017). Empowering Indonesian women through building digital media literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 212–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.10.004
110. Tarman, B. (2010). Global perspectives and challenges on teacher education in Turkey. International Journal of Arts & Sciences (IJAS), 3(17), 78-96.
111. The Project SAILS. (n.d.). The Individual Scores Test. https://www.projectsails.org/site/the-individual-scores-test/
112. Tuncer, M. ve Tanaş, R. (2011). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin bilgisayar öz-yeterlik algılarının değerlendirilmesi. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2011(6), 222-232.
113. UNICEF. (2021). International day of the girl 2021 digital generation. Our generation. www.unicef.org/gender-equality/international-day-girl-2021
114. Uzgur, B. Ç. ve Aykaç, N. (2016). Bilişim Teknolojileri ve Yazılım Dersi Öğretim Programının Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi (Ege Bölgesi Örneği). Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(34).
115. Üstündağ, A. (2021). COVID 19 pandemi sürecinde ortaokul öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (39), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.1009512
116. Valadez, J. R., & Duran, R. (2007). Redefining the digital divide: Beyond access to computers and the Internet. the high school journal, 90(3), 31-44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40364198
117. Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2009). Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.002
118. Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New media & society, 21(2), 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444818797082
119. Yeo, Y., & Lee, J. D. (2020). Revitalizing the race between technology and education: Investigating the growth strategy for the knowledge-based economy based on a CGE analysis. Technology in Society, 62, 101295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101295
120. Yeşiltepe, G. M., & Erdoğan, M. (2013). İlköğretim bilişim teknolojileri öğretmenlerinin mesleğe yönelik sorunları, bu sorunların nedenleri ve çözüm önerileri. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(3), 495-530.
121. Yucel, C., Acun, I., Tarman, B., & Mete, T. (2010). A Model to Explore Turkish Teachers' ICT Integration Stages. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(4), 1-9. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ908067.pdf