Reinterpreting human in the digital age: From anthropocentricism to posthumanism and transhumanism

Abstract

This paper builds its arguments on the (re)interpretation of ‘human’ and its entanglements with nonhumans in the digital age. Since the concept of humanness has prominently transformed into something innovative because of immense improvements in science and technology, and thereby society, terms such as human, nonhuman, posthuman, and transhuman including cyborgs, have emerged as concepts that require to be reinterpreted in the digital age. In a planet where cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence, 5G technology, autonomous vehicles, quantum computers, genetic engineering, edge computing, microchips, green tech, and hydrogen fuel cells are commonly regarded as innovative inventions of the 21st century, the positions of humans are decentralized and displaced from centralized to more peripheric spheres. Beginning from anthropocentrism, broadly defined as a thought process that makes humans the primary measure of everything, this paper exposes the (trans)formation of humans from anthropocentricism to posthumanism and paradoxically from posthumanism to transhumanism by drawing upon the philosophical discussions of Donna Haraway, Rosi Braidotti, Cary Wolfe, Francesca Ferrando. By interrogating the socio-cultural existence of humans through epistemological and ontological viewpoints, this paper attempts to (re)define the place of humans in the digital age with a focus on the relationship between human and nonhuman beings and their entanglements.

Keywords

• Digital age
• anthropocentricism
• posthumanism
• transhumanism
• entanglements

References

1. Ağın, B. (2020). Posthumanism versus transhumanism: James Tiptree, Jr.’s The Girl Who Was Plugged In. Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 22, 277-298. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1036489
2. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
3. Bart, S., Didur, J. & Heffernan, T. (2003). (Eds.) Cultural Critique, 53 (Special Issue on Posthumanism).
4. Bess, M. (2010). Enhanced humans versus ‘normal people’: Elusive definitions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35, 641-55.
5. Bostrom, N. (2005). Transhumanist values. Journal of Philosophical Research (Special Issue: Ethical Issues for the Twenty-First Century), 1-12. https://ildodopensiero.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/nick-bostrom-transhumanist-values.pdf
6. Bostrom, N. (2004). The Future of Human Evolution. [Consulted: 14/06/2023]. [Online publication] https://nickbostrom.com/fut/evolution
7. Bostrom, N. (2015, March). What happens when our computers get smarter than we are? [Video] TED Conferences.
8. www.ted.com/talks/nick_bostrom_what_happens_when_our_computers_get_smarter_than_we_are

9. Braidotti, R. (2012). Nomadic theory: The portable Rosi Braidotti. NY: Columbia University Press.
10. Braidotti, R. (2013a). The posthuman. Polity Press.
11. Braidotti, R. (2013b). Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1-19.
12. Brynjolfsson, E. & McAfee, A. (2016). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W.W. Norton & Company.
13. Castells, M. (2009). An Introduction to the information age. In Thornham, S., Bassett, C., Marris, P. (Eds.), Media Studies. (pp. 152-164). New York University Press.
14. Daigle, C. (2022). Environmental posthumanities. In Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., John Müller, C. Cham. (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. (pp. 1-20). Palgrave Macmillan.
15. Clough, P. (2008). The affective turn: Political economy, biomedia and bodies, Theory, Culture & Society, 25(1), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276407085156.
16. Colossal Laboratories and Biosciences. (2023, May 19). The mammoth: Earth’s old friend and new hero.
17. https://colossal.com/mammoth.
18. Devlin, H. (2023, 14 June). Synthetic human embryos created in groundbreaking advance. The Guardian.
19. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/jun/14/synthetic-human-embryos-created-in-groundbreaking-advance
20. Drake, M. (2018, February). Human beings on brink of achieving IMMORTALITY by year 2050, expert reveals. Express News.
21. https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/920735/Science-news-immortal-live-forever-2050-sex-robots-androids-virtual-reality-technology
22. Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d). Antropocentrism. In Britannica. Retrieved June 19, 2023, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/anthropocentrism
23. Fernández-Armesto, F. (2004). So you think you’re human? A brief history of humankind. Oxford University Press.
24. Ferrando, F. (2012). Towards a posthumanist methodology: A statement. Frame Journal for Literary Studies, 25(1), 9-18.
25. Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms: differences and relations. Existenz. An International Journal on Philosophy, Religion, Politics, and the Arts. 8(2), 26-32.
26. Ferrando, F. (2016). Humans have always been posthuman: A spiritual genealogy of posthumanism. In Banerji, D., & Paranjape, M. R. (Eds.), Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures (pp. 243-257). Springer.
27. Gleick, J. (2011). The Information: A history, a theory, a flood. Pantheon Books.
28. Güremen, R. (2018). In what sense exactly are human beings more political according to Aristotle?. Filozofija i društvo, 29(2), 170-181.
29. Haraway, D (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
30. Haraway, D. (2013). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
31. Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis. NY: Bloomsbury.
32. Kurzweil, R. (2014, March). Get ready for hybrid thinking. [Video] TED Conferences. www.ted.com/talks/ray_kurzweil_get_ready_for_hybrid_thinking .
33. Moulier-Boutang, Y. (2012). Cognitive capitalism. Polity Press.
34. Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
35. Oppermann, S. (2002). Are we really interconnected? Ecophilosophy and quantum theory from a postmodern perspective. Journal of American Studies of Turkey. 16, 51-64.
36. Roden, D. (2010, September, 07). A defence of precritical posthumanism [Conference session]. Psychoanalysis and the Posthuman Conference, Nottingham University, England.
37. https://www.academia.edu/1047274/A_DEFENCE_OF_PRE_CRITICAL_POSTHUMANIM
38. Smyth, H. W. (1926). Aeschylus, with an English translation by Herbert Weir Smyth, Ph. D. in two volumes. 1. Prometheus Bound. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0010%3Acard%3D46
39. Snaza, N., Appelbaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., & Weaver, J. A. (2014). Toward a posthuman education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 39-55.
40. Stalpaert, C., van Baarle, K., & Karreman, L. (2021). Performance and posthumanism: Co-creation, response-ability and epistemologies. In Stalpaert, C., van Baarle, K., & Karreman, L. (Eds.), Performance and Posthumanism: Staging Prototypes of Composite Bodies (pp. 1-47). Palgrave Macmillan https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74745-9.
41. Vetlesen, A. J. (2019). Cosmologies of the Anthropocene: Panpsychism, animism, and the limits of posthumanism. Routledge.
42. Wolfe, C. (2013). What is Posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.