Research Article

The direct and indirect effects of workplace loneliness on FoMO: Nomophobia and general belongingness

Volume: 6 Number: 4 December 31, 2023
EN

The direct and indirect effects of workplace loneliness on FoMO: Nomophobia and general belongingness

Abstract

The fact that digital technologies have become an integral part of daily life and the widespread use of smartphones bring different problems with them. Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and No Mobile Phone Phobia (Nomophobia) are among these problems. It is noteworthy that these interrelated concepts are considered as digital diseases of the 21st century and in recent years, research on the variables explaining these concepts has increased. It should be noted, however, that these studies generally focus on adolescents known as Generation Z. However, Nomophobia and FoMO are important sources of risk not only for young people, but also for adults called Generation Y, who spend most of their lives at workplaces. For employees, factors such as workplace loneliness and the need to belong can influence the risk of FoMO as much as Nomophobia. However, these influences that lead employees to FoMO syndromes are still under-researched. For this reason, the current study aims to examine the direct effects of workplace loneliness on FoMO and its indirect effects through general belongingness (GB) and Nomofobia (NMP). For this purpose, 204 people working in different sectors were reached and the data obtained from the voluntary participants were analyzed by structural regression analysis. The results indicate that the independent variables GB and NMP have a statistically significant direct effect on the dependent variable FoMO, with coefficients of β=-0.207 (p<0.001) and β=0.578 (p<0.001), respectively." Additionally, the test model reveals that only the independent variable Loneliness at Work (LAW) has an indirect impact on the dependent variable FoMO, with a coefficient of β=0.160 (p>0.05). However, it is possible to say that while the direct effect of LAW is not significant on FoMO (p>0.05); there is an observed indirect effect of GA and NMP (B=0.16) on FoMO. Lastly, it was observed that workplace loneliness had an indirect effect on the acceptance (β=-0.138, p<0.001) sub-dimension of general belongingness and all components of nomophobia, including not being able to access information (β=0.103, p<0.001), giving up convenience (β=0.145, p<0.001), losing connectedness (β=0.132, p<0.001), and not being able to communicate (β=0.110, p<0.001). In conclusion, all indirect effects were statistically significant except for the "rejection sub-dimension of GB (β=0.344, p>0.05). These results indicate that a low level of general belongingness has a negative effect on employees' FoMO levels, while a high level of belongingness has a positive effect. Similarly, it has been observed that employees' levels of nomophobia have a direct and positive impact on their FoMO (Fear of Missing Out) levels. Lastly, the acceptance dimension of general belongingness and all sub-dimensions of nomophobia indirectly influence the relationship between workplace loneliness and FoMO.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Izmir Bakırçay University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval Number/ID: 1132.

References

  1. Alabri, A. (2022). Fear of missing out (FoMO): The effects of the need to belong, perceived centrality, and fear of social exclusion. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1-12, 4824256. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4824256
  2. Alinejad, V., Parizad, N., Yarmohammadi, M., & Radfar, M. (2022). Loneliness and academic performance mediates the relationship between fear of missing out and smartphone addiction among Iranian university students. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04186-6
  3. Alutaybi, A., McAlaney, J., Arden-Close, E., Stefanidis, A., Phalp, K., & Ali, R. (2019). Fear of missing out (FoMO) as really lived: Five classifications and one ecology. Proceedings of BESC 2019-6th International Conference on Behavioral, Economic and Socio-Cultural Computing, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/BESC48373.
  4. Anderson, S., Currie, C. L., & Copeland, J. L. (2016). Sedentary behavior among adults: The role of community belonging. Preventive Medicine Reports, 4, 238-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.06.014
  5. Arıbaş, A. N., & Özşahin, F. (2022). Investigation of the effect of loneliness in business life on social media addiction of employees. Journal of Aksaray University Faculty of Economics And Administrative Sciences 14(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.992255
  6. Aslan, M., Kalaman, S., & Özdemir, F. (2023). The impact of nomophobia and loneliness on life satisfaction in married couples. Journal of Erciyes Communication, 10(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1180829
  7. Aşık, N. A. (2018). Aidiyet duygusu ve nomofobi ilişkisi: Turizm öğrencileri üzerinde bir araştırma. Turar Turizm ve Araştırma Dergisi, 7(2), 24-42. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/turar/issue/39666/469369
  8. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Specialist Studies in Education (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2023

Submission Date

September 30, 2023

Acceptance Date

October 14, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 6 Number: 4

APA
Sapmaz, F. (2023). The direct and indirect effects of workplace loneliness on FoMO: Nomophobia and general belongingness. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(4), 947-965. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1369184

Cited By