Examination of cybersecurity in open and distance learning within the scope of technical support services

Abstract

Open and distance learning (ODL) activities aim to meet the expectations and needs of different individuals, societies, and systems by ensuring the continuation of learning with a lifelong learning philosophy and an egalitarian policy for everyone, regardless of time and place. Support services, which address the differentiated expectations and needs in all learning-related activities, serve the learning processes and the various stakeholders involved. Therefore, technical support services are included in support activities that require the use of technology as a tool, mediator, or technique in learning processes. In this study, ODL systems that are situated in digital space are examined within the scope of technical support services in line with the threats and dangers of the developing and expanding digital space. The aim is to create a technical support service model based on Herbert Simon's Bounded Rationality Theory and Otto Peters' Industrialization Theory, to ensure cybersecurity in ODL systems. In this study, which adopted a case study as one of the qualitative research methods, documents in the literature were examined first. Considering the literature, the opinions of eight field experts were gathered by ten interview questions. After the semi-structured interviews were transcribed, the data obtained were divided into codes and themes through thematic analysis. The findings stressed the importance of institutional culture, distribution of tasks and responsibilities, administrative support, institutional awareness, cybersecurity training, and the use of different technologies to ensure cybersecurity in ODL systems. Additionally, the experts emphasized a common view that smart systems should be used in the provision and maintenance of cybersecurity.

Keywords

• open and distance learning
• support services
• technical support services
• cybersecurity

References

1. Alexei, A. (2021). Cyber security strategies for higher education institutions. Journal of Engineering Science, 2021(4), 74-92. https://doi.org/10.52326/jes.utm.2021.28(4).07
2. Alexei, A., & Alexei, A. (2021). Cyber Security Threat Analysis In Higher Education Institutions As A Result Of Distance Learning. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 10, 128-133. ISSN 2277-8616. https://ibn.idsi.md/vizualizare_articol/163773
3. Alferidah, D. K., & Jhanjhi, N. Z. (2020, October). Cybersecurity impact over bigdata and iot growth. In 2020 International Conference on Computational Intelligence (ICCI) (pp. 103-108). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9247722
4. Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5261-5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
5. Alshammari, S. H. (2020). The Influence of Technical Support, Perceived Self-Efficacy, and Instructional Design on Students' Use of Learning Management Systems. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 112-141. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.762034
6. Alwi, N. H. M., & Fan, I. S. (2010). E-learning and information security management. International Journal of Digital Society (IJDS), 1(2), 148-156. https://infonomics-society.org/wp-content/uploads/ijds/published-papers/volume-1-2010/E-Learning-and-Information-Security-Management.pdf
7. Antwi-Boampong, A. (2021). An Investigation into Barriers Impacting Against Faculty Blended Learning Adoption. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.961849
8. Arko-Achemfuor, A. (2017). Student support gaps in an open distance learning context. Issues in Educational Research, 27(4), 658-676. 107 https://search.informit.org/doi/epdf/10.3316/informit.218315282267792

9. Bandara, I., Ioras, F. & Maher, K. (2014). Cyber Security Concerns in E-Learning Education. In: Proceedings of ICERI2014 Conference (728-734), IATED. https://library.iated.org/view/BANDARA2014CYB
10. Bone, J. (2016). Cognitive Risk Framework for Cybersecurity: Bounded Rationality: Executive Summary: Part I. EDPACS, 54(5), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2016.1247564
11. Brindley, J. E. (1987). Attrition and completion in distance education: The student's perspective (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia). https://open.library.ubc.ca/soa/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0054214
12. Chowdhury, N. H., Adam, M. T., & Teubner, T. (2020). Time pressure in human cybersecurity behavior: Theoretical framework and countermeasures. Computers & Security, 97, 101931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101963
13. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th Edition). London: Sage Publications.
14. Çiftçi, A., & Karakuş, Y. (2019). Dijitalleşen Zamanın İzdüşümünde: Kimliğin, Bedenin ve İletişimin Dönüşümü. AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi, 10(37), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.5824/1309-1581.2019.2.001.x
15. Dhillon, M. (2020). Challenges and Issues of E-Learning. In Emerging Trends in Big Data IoT, and Cybersecurity (182-184).
16. Durak, G. (2017). Uzaktan eğitimde destek hizmetlerine genel bakış: sorunlar ve eğilimler. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(4), 160-173. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/issue/34247/378493
17. El Turk, S. & Cherney, I. (2016). Perceived online education barriers of administrators and faculty at a U.S. university in Lebanon. Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership, 2(1), 5-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.17062/CJIL.v2i1.30
18. Fırat, M. (2016). 21. Yüzyılda Uzaktan Öğretimde Paradigma Değişimi. Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 6(2), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2016.151
19. Fırat, M. (2020). Öğrenci destek servislerinde doğal dil işleme: GPT-3 örneği. In International Conference of Strategic Research in Social Science and Education (pp. 532-536). 109 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mehmet-Firat-4/publication/347929179_Ogrenci_Destek_Servislerinde_Dogal_Dil_Isleme_GPT-3_Ornegi_Natural_Language_Processing_in_Student_Support_Services_Case_of_GPT-3/links/5fe7af9f45851553a0f5b455/Oegrenci-Destek-Servislerinde-Dogal-Dil-Isleme-GPT-3-Oernegi-Natural-Language-Processing-in-Student-Support-Services-Case-of-GPT-3.pdf
20. Fırat, M. (2021). Uygulamadan Kurama Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenme (2. Baskı). Nobel Yayınları.
21. Fischer, E. A. (2016). Cybersecurity issues and challenges: In brief. https://a51.nl/sites/default/files/pdf/R43831.pdf
22. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th Edition). New York: McGrae-Hill Companies.
23. Genç Kumtepe, E., Toprak, E., Öztürk, A., Tuna Büyükköse, G., Kılınç, H., & Aydın Menderis, İ. (2019). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenmede destek hizmetleri: Yerelden küresele bir model önerisi. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 41-80. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/issue/50201/645975
24. Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., Gámiz-Sánchez, V. M., & Gutiérrez-Pérez, J. (2015). MOOC & B-learning: Students' Barriers and Satisfaction in Formal and Non-formal Learning Environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(3). https://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/13.3.1.pdf
25. Gümüş, S. (2020). Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenme Destek Hizmetlerinde Teknolojinin Kullanımı. M. Kesim & T. V. Yüzer (Eds.). Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenmenin Teknoloji Boyutu (263-283). Ankara: Pegem Yayınları. 110
26. IBM (2021). Why Human Error is #1 Cyber Security Threat to Business in 2021. Erişim Adresi: https://thehackernews.com/2021/02/why-human-error-is-1-cyber-security.html#:~:text='Human%20error%20was%20a%20major,in%2095%25%20of%20all%20breaches.&text=Mitigation%20of%20human%20error%20must,cyber%20business%20security%20in%202021. (Son erişim tarihi: 30.01.2022)
27. Jang-Jaccard, J. & Nepal, S. (2014). A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 80(5), 973-993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2014.02.005
28. Keast, D. A. (1997). Toward an effective model for implementing distance education programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(2), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526960
29. Khanna, P. & Basak P. (2013). An OER architecture framework: Needs and design. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 66-83. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1355
30. Lee, J. Y. (2003). Current status of learner support in distance education: emerging issues and directions for future research. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(2), 181-188. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03025360
31. Li, J. H. (2018). Cyber security meets artificial intelligence: a survey. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 19(12), 1462-1474. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1631/FITEE.1800573
32. Malyuk, A., & Miloslavskaya, N. (2016, July). Cybersecurity culture as an element of IT professional training. In 2016 Third International Conference on Digital Information Processing, Data Mining, and Wireless Communications (DIPDMWC) (pp. 205-210). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7529390
33. Miles, M. B & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publication.
34. Minh Hoang T. B., Dang-Pham, D., Hoang, A. P., Le Gia, B. & Nkhoma, M. (2020). Network Analytics for Improving Students’ Cybersecurity Awareness in Online Learning Systems. In 2020 RIVF International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies (RIVF) (1-7). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9140781
35. Muilenburg, Y. L. & Berge, Z. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269
36. Nespoli, P., Papamartzivanos, D., Mármol, F. G., & Kambourakis, G. (2018). Optimal countermeasures selection against cyber-attacks: A comprehensive survey on reaction frameworks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(2), 1361-1396. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8169023
37. Okur, R. (2012). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenmede öğretim elemanlarına yönelik çevrimiçi destek sistemi tasarımı (Doctoral Dissertation, Anadolu University).
38. Peters, O. (1993). Distance education in a postindustrial society. D. Keegan (Ed.). Theoretical principles of distance education (39-58). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203983065-5/distance-education-postindustrial-society-otto-peters
39. Peters, O. (2002). Distance education in transition: New trends and challenges (5th Ed.). BIS Verlag. https://oops.uni-oldenburg.de/550/2/petdis02.pdf
40. Peters, O. (2010). The theory of the „Most industrialized education‟. Distance education in transition: Developments and issues, 11-32.
41. Reegård, K., Blackett, C., & Katta, V. (2019). The concept of cybersecurity culture. In 29th European Safety and Reliability Conference (pp. 4036-4043). doi: 10.3850/978-981-11-2724-3_0761-cd
42. Rekkedal, T. (1981). Introducing the Personal Tutor/Counsellor in the System of Distance Education. Project Report 1: Experiment Description. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED235774
43. Roddy, C., Amiet, D. L., Chung, J., Holt, C., Shaw, L., McKenzie, S., Garicaldis, F., Lodge, J. M. & Mundy, M. E. (2017). Applying best practice online learning, teaching, and support to intensive online environments: an integrative review. Frontiers in Education 2(59). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00059
44. Sewart, D. (1980). Creating an information base for an individualized support system in distance education. Distance Education, 1(2), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791800010204
45. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The quarterly journal of economics, 69(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
46. Simon, H. A. (1972). Complexity and the representation of patterned sequences of symbols. Psychological review, 79(5), 369. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033118
47. Simon, H. A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. In 25 years of economic theory (65-86). Springer, Boston, MA. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4613-4367-7_6
48. Somayajulu, B. K., & Ramakrishna, T. (2008). Distance learners and support services: current trends and prospects. https://oasis.col.org/items/dc6c32c1-75ea-4873-b82f-4f4240ee37e8
49. Thomas, G. (2021). How to do your case study. London: Sage. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5018110
50. Tuquero, J. M. (2011). A meta-ethnographic synthesis of support services in distance learning programs. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 157-179. https://www.jite.informingscience.org/documents/Vol10/JITEv10IIPp157-179Tuquero974.pdf
51. Ulven, J. B., & Wangen, G. (2021). A systematic review of cybersecurity risks in higher education. Future Internet, 13(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13020039
52. Udroiu, A. M. (2017). The cybersecurity of elearning platforms. In Conference proceedings of» eLearning and Software for Education «(eLSE) (Vol. 13, No. 01, pp. 374-379). Carol I National Defence University Publishing House. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=540463
53. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (9. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin.
54. Yin, R. K. (2017). Applications of case study research (3th Ed.). London: Sage. https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/70532
55. Yumurtacı, O. (2020). Öğrenen, Öğreten ve Teknoloji. M. Kesim & T. V. Yüzer (Eds.). Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenmenin Teknoloji Boyutu (1-27). Ankara: Pegem Yayınları. 115
56. Zawacki-Richter, O. (2019). The Industrialization Theory of Distance Education Revisited. I. Jund (Ed.). Open and Distance Education Theory Revisited Implications fort the Digital Era (21-29). Springer: Singapore. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-13-7740-2_3
57. Zhang, Z., Ning, H., Shi, F., Farha, F., Xu, Y., Xu, J., ... & Choo, K. K. R. (2021). Artificial intelligence in cyber security: research advances, challenges, and opportunities. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09976-0