A Freirean approach to breaking the spiral of silence in AI-mediated education

Abstract

AI systems trained on biased media datasets perpetuate cultural misrepresentation and stereotypes, marginalizing minority students. This study aims to develop a framework for understanding how AI-mediated education marginalizes minority voices and to propose pedagogical strategies for disrupting this cycle and promoting equitable and inclusive learning environments. The research involves a three-phase critical analysis based on Edward Said's Orientalism, Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann's Spiral of Silence, and Paulo Freire's Critical Pedagogy. The synthesis reveals that AI perpetuates systemic cultural biases—such as Orientalist misrepresentation—and embeds them into educational technologies and curricula, identifying this cyclical process as an automated Spiral of Silence. A novel framework integrating Noelle-Neumann’s Spiral of Silence with Freire’s Critical Pedagogy provides a diagnostic mechanism and emancipatory guide for remodeling AI—from a tool that amplifies dominant narratives to one that fosters emancipation. It positions educators as innovators and transformative facilitators who can leverage Critical Pedagogy to challenge oppressive structures and amplify silenced voices. Proposed strategies include AI-supported dialogical engagement, deconstructing embedded biases, utilizing diverse platforms for comparative analysis, adhering to ethical guidelines, and practicing critical reflexivity. This preliminary model is designed to empower educators in order to cultivate equitable and inclusive learning environments.

Keywords

• Spiral of Silence
• AI-mediated education
• Critical Pedagogy
• Orientalism
• global digitalization
• algorithmic bias
• Western hegemony
• biased media
• equity and inclusion.

References

1. Abror, M., & Dwi, M. (2024). AI in enhancing cultural sensitivity. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(2), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.29210/1202424847
2. Akabli, J., & Chahdi, C. (2022). Hollywood's (mis)construction of gender: The aesthetics and politics of stigmatising Arab/Muslim women. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5(8), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.8.3
3. Alshokhada, A. K. T. (2025). Beyond stereotype: A critical study of Arab representation in Western and American literary works. Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(1), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.60037/edu.v14i1.2692
4. Amanatullah, E. T., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women's fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017094
5. Carter, S. O., & Dale, J. G. (2025). Social bias in AI: Re-coding innovation through algorithmic political capitalism. AI & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02540-2
6. Cena, E., Burns, S., & Wilson, P. (2021). Sense of belonging, intercultural and academic experiences among international students at a university in Northern Ireland. Journal of International Students, 11(4), 812–831. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v11i4.2541
7. Chalaune, B. S. (2021). Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy in educational transformation. International Journal of Research, 9(4), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i4.2021.3813
8. Costa, C., & Li, H. (2025). Digital cultural knowledge and curriculum: The experiences of international students as they moved from on-campus to on-line education during the pandemic. Learning, Media and Technology, 50(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2218097

9. Door, V. M. (2014). Critical pedagogy and reflexivity: The issue of ethical consistency. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 5(2). https://janeway.uncpress.org/ijcp/article/id/699/
10. Drew, M. (2022). Expanding the scope of the spiral of silence theory to increase relevance in the digital age. Journal of Student Research at Indiana University East, 4(1), 104–124. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jsriue/article/view/34203
11. Eden, C. A., Chisom, O. N., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Integrating AI in education: Opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(2), 006–013. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.10.2.0039
12. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Books.
13. Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Willingness to self-censor: A construct and measurement tool for public opinion research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(3), 298–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh073
14. Howe, E. R., Ramirez, G., & Walton, P. (2023). Experiences of international students at a Canadian university: Barriers and supports. Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education, 15(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v15i2.4819
15. Huang, H. (2005). A cross-cultural test of the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(3), 324–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh065
16. Kizil, F. S., Ali, N., DeCuir, A., Lane, C. M., & Khawaja, S. (2025). Cross-sections of positionality and educational research: The experiences of Muslim women in academia. Journal of Education in Muslim Societies, 6(2), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.2979/jems.00028
17. Kobayashi, K., Jackson, S. J., & Sam, M. P. (2019). Globalization, creative alliance and self-Orientalism: Negotiating Japanese identity within Asics global advertising production. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(1), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877917733812
18. Lewis, A. A. (2025). Unpacking cultural bias in AI language learning tools: An analysis of impacts and strategies for inclusion in diverse educational settings. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(1), 1878–1892. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9010151
19. Liu, Z. (2025). Cultural bias in large language models: A comprehensive analysis and mitigation strategies. Journal of Transcultural Communication, 3(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtc-2023-0019
20. Lu, J. G., Song, L. L., & Zhang, L. D. (2025). Cultural tendencies in generative AI. Nature Human Behaviour. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02242-1
21. Mirrlees, T. (2013). Global entertainment media: Between cultural imperialism and cultural globalization. Routledge.
22. Mulinge, P. (2022). Cultural analysis of the media: The West media culture hegemony perspective. Kabarak Journal of Research & Innovation, 12(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.58216/kjri.v12i1.66
23. Nam, K. (2002). The effect of personality on the spiral of silence process [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee]. Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2176
24. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
25. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—Our social skin (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
26. Rivers, S. R. (2020). Expression of the oppressed: Using critical pedagogy in arts education to disrupt systems of oppression. Visions of Research in Music Education, 35(1), Article 9. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/vrme/vol35/iss1/9
27. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
28. Sarı, T., Nayir, F., & Bozkurt, A. (2024). Reimagining education: Bridging artificial intelligence, transhumanism, and critical pedagogy. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 7(1), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1308022
29. Sohn, D. (2022). Spiral of silence in the social media era: A simulation approach to the interplay between social networks and mass media. Communication Research, 49(1), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219856510
30. Ta, N., Zeng, J., & Li, Z. (2025). Governance of discriminatory content in conversational AIs: A cross-platform and cross-cultural analysis. Information, Communication & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2537803
31. Tao, Y., Viberg, O., Baker, R. S., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024). Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models. PNAS Nexus, 3(9), Article 346. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae346
32. Uddin, M. S. (2019). Critical pedagogy and its implication in the classroom. Journal of Underrepresented & Minority Progress, 3(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.32674/jump.v3i2.1788
33. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2018). Report of the independent international fact-finding mission on Myanmar (A/HRC/39/64). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/FFM-Myanmar/A_HRC_39_64.pdf
34. Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., Hodson, J., & Gosse, C. (2018). Women scholars' experiences with online harassment and abuse: Self-protection, resistance, acceptance, and self-blame. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4689–4708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818781324
35. Velander, J., Otero, N., & Milrad, M. (2024). What is critical (about) AI literacy? Exploring conceptualizations present in AI literacy discourse. In Framing futures in postdigital education: Critical concepts for data-driven practices (pp. 139–160). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58622-4_8
36. Yang, Y. (2025). Racial bias in AI-generated images. AI & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02282-1
37. Zhu, L., Mou, W., Lai, Y., Lin, J., & Luo, P. (2024). Language and cultural bias in AI: Comparing the performance of large language models developed in different countries on Traditional Chinese Medicine highlights the need for localized models. Journal of Translational Medicine, 22(1), Article 319. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-024-05128-4