An in-depth look into perceived technology proficiency of Turkish teachers of English and their technology practices

Abstract

Lots of innovations have been introduced into our lives with the 21st century. They offer great affordances and are benefited in every sphere of life. On the other hand, these innovations change our habits, including our teaching/learning habits. Therefore, actors in educational environments, especially teachers, have to keep pace with such changes, which requires being competent in the use of technological devices. Starting from this point of view, this study attempts to find out how Turkish teachers of English are doing in this process, and if such variables as their sex, age, what level they teach, whether they teach at a private or state institution, how long they have been teaching, and the duration of time they spend in technological environments affect their perceived technology proficiency. Survey research method was used, and data was collected via the Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment Questionnaire for 21st Century Learning (TPSA C-21) (Christensen & Knezek, 2017) from 273 participants. The results indicate that the participants’ gender, age, years of teaching experience and what level they teach do not affect their perceived technology proficiency while how much time they spend in technological environments and whether they teach at a public or private school do.

Keywords

• technology integration
• technology proficiency
• Technology competence
• Digital competence
• Second-order barriers
• Digital self-efficacy
• English language teaching

References

1. Abdallah, E. E., & Fayyoumi, E. (2016). Assistive technology for deaf people based on android platform. Procedia Computer Science, 94, 295-301.
2. Akcaoğlu, M. (2008). Exploring technology integration approaches and practices of preservice and in-service English language teachers (Middle East Technical University). Middle East Technical University, Ankara. Retrieved from https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12609579/index.pdf
3. Akturk, A. O., & Ozturk, H. S. (2019). Teachers’ TPACK Levels and Students’ Self-efficacy as Predictors of Students’ Academic Achievement. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 5(1), 283–294. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1197990.pdf
4. Anderson, S. E., & Maninger, R. M. (2007). Preservice teachers' abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(2), 151-172.
5. Ardıç, Ö., & Çiftçi, H. (2019). ICT competence and needs of Turkish EFL instructors: The role of gender, institution and experience. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.543791
6. Arslan, Y. (2015). Determination of technopedagogical content knowledge competencies of preservice physical education teachers: A Turkish sample. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(2), 225-241.
7. Atar, C., Aydın, S., & Bağcı, H. (2019). An investigation of pre-service English teachers’ level of technopedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 794–805. doi: 10.17263/jlls.631517
8. Aydin, M. K., Gürol, M., & Vanderlinde, R. (2016). Evaluating ICT Integration in Turkish K-12 Schools through Teachers’ Views. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology, 12(4), 747–766. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1227a

9. Bağcı, H., & Atar, C. (2019). An Investigation of Pre-Service English Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Web Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 9(3), 550–566. doi: 10.19126/suje.591804
10. Balta, N., & Duran, M. (2015). Attitudes of Students and Teachers towards the Use of Interactive Whiteboards in Elementary and Secondary School Classrooms. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 15–21. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1057345.pdf
11. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
12. Bas, G., & Senturk, C. (2018). An evaluation of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of in-service teachers: A study in Turkish public schools. International Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 46–58. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1201784.pdf
13. Basal, A. (2015a). Perceptions of Pre-service English Teachers towards the Integration of an LMS into English Language Teacher Education. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 23(4), 485–507.
14. Basal, A. (2015b). The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 28-37.
15. Başal, A., & Kaynak, N. E. (2020). Perceptions of pre-service English teachers towards the use of digital badges. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(2), 148–162. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2019.1649172
16. Basargekar, P., & Singhavi, C. (2017). Factors Affecting Teachers’ Perceived Proficiency in Using ICT in the Classroom. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(2), 67–84. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1156287.pdf
17. Benade, L. (2017). Is the classroom obsolete in the twenty-first century?. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 796-807.
18. Benitt, N., Schmidt, T., & Legutke, M. K. (2018). Teacher Learning and Technology-Enhanced Teacher Education. Second Handbook of English Language Teaching, 1-24.
19. Beşoluk, Ş., Kurbanoğlu, N. İ., & Önder, İ. (2010). Educational technology usage of pre-service and in-service science and technology teachers. Elementary Education Online, 9(1), 389–395.
20. Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163. doi: 10.1177/004912418101000205
21. Bildircin, M. M. (2018, March 21). FATİH Projesi de hüsranla sonuçlandı: Kamuya yükü 2 milyar. Birgün. Retrieved from https://www.birgun.net/haber/fatih-projesi-de-husranla-sonuclandi-kamuya-yuku-2-milyar-208817
22. Black, A. (2010). Gen Y: Who they are and how they learn. Educational Horizons, 88(2), 92-101.
23. Bozdoğan, D., & Özen, R. (2014). Use of ICT technologies and factors affecting pre-service ELT teachers’ perceived ICT self-efficacy. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 186–196. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1022943.pdf
24. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2019). Factors that Influence Teachers’ Pedagogical Use of ICT in Secondary Schools: A Case of Ghana. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(3), 272–288. doi: 10.30935/cet.590099
25. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for social sciences] (17. ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
26. Byrd, D. R., & Lansing, B. (2016). Electronic flashcards inside the classroom: Practical and effective. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1-13.
27. Çakır, R., & Oktay, S. (2013). Teachers’ use of technology as becoming information society. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (30), 35–54. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/296388
28. Çelik, H., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). Science Prospective Teachers’ Self-efficacy and Views on the Use of Information Technologies in the Teaching of Physics Concepts. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 182–208. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/224369
29. Çetin, O., & Güngör, B. (2014). İlköğretim Öğretmenlerinin Bilgisayar Öz-Yeterlik İnançları ve Bilgisayar Destekli Öğretime Yönelik Tutumları. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(1), 55–77. doi: 10.7822/egt206
30. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Validating the Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment Questionnaire for 21st Century Learning (TPSA C-21). Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 20–31. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2016.1242391
31. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2018). Measuring Teacher Attitudes, Competencies, and Pedagogical Practices in Support of Student Learning and Classroom Technology Integration. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.-W. Lai (Eds.), Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 357–374). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9
32. Cigdem, H., & Topcu, A. (2015). Predictors of instructors’ behavioral intention to use learning management system: A Turkish vocational college example. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.049
33. Çoklar, A. N., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2009). Eğitim teknolojisi standartları açısından öğretmen adaylarının ölçme ve değerlendirme öz-yeterliklerinin belirlenmesi [Determining the assessment and evaluation self-efficacies of teacher candidates regarding education technology standards]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 1-16.
34. Çubukçu, Z., & Çeliker, G. (2016). The relationship between attitude and perceived self-efficacy of pre-service English teachers on computer-assisted instruction. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2).
35. Cumhuriyet. (2018, July 3). Başarısız olduğu itiraf edilen FATİH projesinin faturası icralık. Retrieved from https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/amp/haber/basarisiz-oldugu-itiraf-edilen-fatih-projesinin-faturasi-icralik-1015905
36. Dey, P., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2019). Blended learning to improve quality of primary education among underprivileged school children in India. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 1995-2016.
37. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Durak, H. Y. (2019). Interactive Learning Environments Modeling of relations between K-12 teachers’ TPACK levels and their technology integration self-efficacy, technology literacy levels, attitudes toward technology and usage objectives of social networks. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–27. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1619591
39. Durak, H. Y., & Sarıtepeci, M. (2017). Investigating the Effect of Technology Use in Education on Classroom Management within the Scope of the FATİH Project. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(2), 441–457. doi: 10.14812/cufej.303511
40. Ebrahimzadeh, M., & Alavi, S. (2017). Readers, Players, and Watchers: Short and Long-term Vocabulary Retention through Digital Video Games. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(4), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.4p.52
41. Eppard, J., Nasser, O., & Reddy, P. (2016). The Next Generation of Technology: Mobile Apps in the English Language Classroom. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4).
42. Erdamar, G., Demirkan, Ö., Saraçoğlu, G., & Alpan, G. (2017). Lise Öğretmenlerinin Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme Eğilimleri Ve Eğitsel İnternet Kullanma Öz-Yeterlik İnançları. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 636–657. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/321855
43. Ergen, S. (2019). Exploring the relationship between teachers’ mindset and their technology self-efficacy among the secondary school EFL teachers (Başkent University). Retrieved from http://dspace.baskent.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11727/4035/Seher_Ergen_Tez_2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
44. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: strategies for technology implementation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.
45. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
46. European Union. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union, L 394, 10–18. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF
47. Evrensel. (2019, September 11). MEB, başarısız olan FATİH projesinden vazgeçmiyor. Retrieved from https://www.evrensel.net/haber/386563/meb-basarisiz-olan-fatih-projesinden-vazgecmiyor
48. Evseeva, A., & Solozhenko, A. (2015). Use of flipped classroom technology in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 205-209.
49. Fai, F., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2001). Industry-specific competencies and converging technological systems: Evidence from patents. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 12, 141–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00035-7
50. Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers and Education, 130, 81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010
51. Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks. Luxembourg. doi: 10.2791/82116
52. Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N. E. (2006) How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
53. García-Martín, J., & García-Sánchez, J. N. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the competence dimensions of digital literacy and of psychological and educational measures. Computers and Education, 107, 54–67. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.010
54. Girmen, P., & Kaya, M. F. (2019). Using the Flipped Classroom Model in the Development of Basic Language Skills and Enriching Activities: Digital Stories and Games. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 555–572.
55. Gökçek, T., Güneş, G., & Gençtürk, E. (2013). Evaluation of primary school teachers’ technological self-efficacy. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 42–51.
56. Gravetter, F. J., Wallnau, L. B., Forzano, L.-A. B., & Witnauer, J. E. (2011). Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.
57. Guzman, A., & Nussbaum, M. (2009). Teaching competencies for technology integration in the classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 453–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00322.x
58. Hana, J. N. (2020). The perceptions of pre-service English teachers to technological pedagogical content knowledge in EFL classroom (State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel Surabaya). State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Retrieved from http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/43557/2/Jihan Nailal Hana_D75216097.pdf
59. Hinton, P. R., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS explained. Routledge.
60. How To Build a Student For the 21st Century. (2006). Time, Cover. Retrieved from http://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20061218,00.html
61. Howard, J. M., & Scott, A. (2017). Any Time, Any Place, Flexible Pace: Technology-Enhanced Language Learning in a Teacher Education Programme. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(6), 51-68.
62. Howlett, G., & Waemusa, Z. (2018). Digital native/digital immigrant divide: EFL teachers’ mobile device experiences and practice. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(4), 374–389. doi: 10.30935/cet.471007
63. Hsu, S., & Kuan, P.-Y. (2013). The impact of multilevel factors on technology integration: The case of Taiwanese grade 1-9 teachers and schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 25–50. doi: 10.1007/s11423-012-9269-y
64. Hung, H.-T. (2018). Gamifying the flipped classroom using game-based learning materials. ELT Journal, 72, 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx055
65. Ibrahim, K. (2019). Foreign language practice in simulation video games : An analysis of game‐based FL use dynamics. Foreign Language Annals, 52, 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12388
66. İlgar, L. (2014). The point of views of classroom teachers who worked both at private and state schools on the differences in classroom management: a qualitative study. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(11), 259–285. Retrieved from https://hayefjournal.org/Content/files/sayilar/75/259.pdf
67. Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2823–2837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.007
68. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (n.d.). ISTE Standards. Retrieved January 9, 2021, from https://www.iste.org/standards
69. İşler, C., & Yıldırım, Ö. (2018). Perceptions of Turkish Pre-Service EFL Teachers on Their Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Education and Future, (13), 145–160.
70. Kabakci Yurdakul, I., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers and Education, 58, 964–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012
71. Kahraman, S., & Yılmaz, Z. A. (2018). In-service teachers’ internet self-efficacy: a re-examination of gender differences. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 72–85. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1175509.pdf
72. Kaarakainen, M.-T., Kivinen, O., & Vainio, T. (2018). Performance-based testing for ICT skills assessing: a case study of students and teachers’ ICT skills in Finnish schools. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0553-9
73. Kavanoz, S., Yüksel, H. G., & Özcan, E. (2015). Pre-service teachers' self-efficacy perceptions on Web Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Computers & Education, 85, 94-101.
74. Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating Strategies Used To Incorporate Technology Into Preservice Education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383–408. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2006.10782466
75. Kazu, I. Y., & Erten, P. (2014). Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Self-Efficacies. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 126–144. doi: 10.11114/jets.v2i2.261
76. Kessler, G., & Hubbard, P. (2017). Language teacher education and technology. The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning, 278-292.
77. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
78. Köse, N. K. (2016). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of English language instructors. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 6(2), 12-19.
79. Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 279–290. doi: 10.1007/s10639-008-9069-5
80. Kurt, G. (2017). Implementing the flipped classroom in teacher education: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 211-221.
81. Lai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers' influence on learners' self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 82, 74-83.
82. Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J. (2016). University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 703-723.
83. Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412963947
84. Lee, K. W., & James, C. C. (2018). Exploring a Transformative Teacher Professional Development Model to Engender Technology Integration in the 21st Century ESL Language Classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2018100102
85. Lee, S.-M. (2019). Her Story or their own stories? Digital game-based learning, student creativity, and creative writing. ReCALL, 31(3), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000028
86. Liza, K., & Andriyanti, E. (2020). Digital Literacy Scale of English Pre-Service Teachers and Their Perceived Readiness Toward the Application of Digital Technologies. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(1), 74–79. doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v14i1.13925
87. Lubelfeld, M., & Polyak, N. (2017). Philosophy of Change: Why Change? In The Unlearning Leader: Leading for Tomorrow’s Schools Today (pp. 18–20). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
88. Luik, P., Taimalu, M., & Suviste, R. (2018). Perceptions of technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) among pre-service teachers in Estonia. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 741–755. doi: 10.1007/s10639-017-9633-y
89. Martin, A. L., Reeves, T. D., Smith, T. J., & Walker, D. A. (2016). Computer Proficiency for Online Learning: Factorial Invariance of Scores among Teachers. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 28(3), 247–263.
90. Morales, C., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2008). Self-Efficacy Ratings of Technology Proficiency Among Teachers in Mexico and Texas. Computers in the Schools, 25(1–2), 126–144. doi: 10.1080/07380560802158004
91. Nair, P. (2011, July 29). The Classroom Is Obsolete: It’s Time for Something New. Retrieved January 8, 2021, from https://www.edweek.org/leadership/opinion-the-classroom-is-obsolete-its-time-for-something-new/2011/07
92. Ok, M. W., & Rao, K. (2017). Using a digital pen to support secondary students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(1), 36-43.
93. Onivehu, A. O., Ohawuiro, O. E., & Oyeniran, B. J. (2017). Teachers’ attitude and competence in the use of assistive technologies in special needs schools. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(4), 21–32. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1164985.pdf
94. Özel, A. G., & Arıkan, A. (2015). The Use of the Internet and Web 2.0 Tools among EFL Instructors. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 5(1), 313-325. Doi: 10.13114/MJH.2015111386
95. Özer, Z. (2018). An investigation of prospective ELT teachers’ attitudes towards using computer technologies in foreign language teaching. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 328-341.
96. Pace, B. G., Rodesiler, L. B., & Tripp, L. (2010). Pre-service English teachers and web 2.0: Teaching & learning literacy with digital applications. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2335–2342). San Diego, CA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/33714
97. Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS Survival Manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Milton Keynes, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
98. Pan, S. C., & Franklin, T. (2011). In-Service Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Professional Development, and Web 2.0 Tools for Integration. New Horizons in Education, 59(3), 28–40. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ955543.pdf
99. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Battelle for Kids. Retrieved from http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf
100. Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2013). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398
101. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon, 9(5).
102. Raman, A. (2014). TPACK confidence of pre-service teachers in Universiti Utara Malaysia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(22), 167–175. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n22p167
103. Reynolds, B. L., & Kao, C.-W. (2019). The effects of digital game-based instruction, teacher instruction, and direct focused written corrective feedback on the grammatical accuracy of English articles. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1617747
104. Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring Individual Characteristics Associated with Learning to Use Computers in Preservice Teacher Preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402–424. doi: 10.1080/08886504.1999.10782262
105. Saad, S., Dandashi, A., Aljaam, J. M., & Saleh, M. (2015). The multimedia-based learning system improved cognitive skills and motivation of disabled children with a very high rate. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 366-379.
106. Samur, Y. (2019). Kes Sesi: A mobile game designed to improve kindergarteners’ recognition of letter sounds. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35, 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12331
107. Sarıçoban, A., Tosuncuoğlu, İ., & Kırmızı, Ö. (2019). A technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment of pre-service EFL teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 1122–1138. doi: 10.17263/jlls.631552
108. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015). Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers’ perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers and Education, 88, 202–214. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.005
109. Schieble, M. (2010). The Not So Digital Divide: Bringing Pre-service English Teachers’ Media Literacies into Practice. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2(2), 102–112.
110. Scholz, K. (2017). Encouraging Free Play: Extramural Digital Game-Based Language Learning as a Complex Adaptive System. Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium, 34, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.29527
111. Şimşek, Ö., & Yazar, T. (2017). Investigation of teachers’ educational technology standards self-efficacy. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 7(1), 23–54. doi: 10.14527/pegegog.2017.002
112. Singh, A., & Kaur, A. (2016). Case study of touch technology used for teaching physically disabled students. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE 2015). Amritsar, India: Curran Associates, Inc. doi: 10.1109/MITE.2015.7375351
113. Şirin, E. F., & Duman, S. (2013). An investigation of educational technology standarts of physical education candidate teachers in terms of several variables. Journal of Human Sciences, 10(1), 1298-1313.
114. Sirin, S., Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., Vatanartiran, S., & Tsai, T. (2018). Digital game-based education for Syrian refugee children: Project Hope. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 13(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2017.1412551
115. So, H. J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101–116. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1183
116. So, H.-J., Choi, H., Lim, W. Y., & Xiong, Y. (2012). Little experience with ICT: Are they really the Net Generation student-teachers? Computers and Education, 59, 1234–1245. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.008
117. Solak, E., & Çakır, R. (2014). Examining Preservice EFL Teachers’ TPACK Competencies in Turkey. Journal of Educators Online, 11(2), 1–22. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1033263
118. Tachaiyaphum, N., & Hoffman, P. J. (2018). EFL Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions towards the Use of CALL in the English Language Classrooms. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 1(1), 20–31. doi: 10.34256/ajir1813
119. Tan, Y. L. L. (2018). Meaningful Gamification and Students’ Motivation: A Strategy for Scaffolding Reading Material. Online Learning, 22(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1167
120. Teo, T., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015). Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does gender matter? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 235–251. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1672
121. Tsai, C.-C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). The “third”-order barrier for technology-integration instruction: Implications for teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1057–1060. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.810
122. Tseng, J.-J., Cheng, Y., & Yeh, H.-N. (2019). How pre-service English teachers enact TPACK in the context of web-conferencing teaching: A design thinking approach. Computers and Education, 128, 171–182. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.022
123. Turel, V. (2014). Teachers’ computer self-efficacy and their use of educational technology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(4), 130–149. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1044190.pdf
124. Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators' competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12-23.
125. Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., & Bakır, E. (2019). The effect of subjective norms on preservice and in‐service teachers’ behavioural intentions to use technology: A multigroup multimodel study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2501–2519. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12834
126. Üstündağ, M. T., Güneş, E., & Bahçivan, E. (2017). Turkish Adaptation of Digital Literacy Scale and Investigating Pre-service Science Teachers’ Digital Literacy". 12, 19–29. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319097835
127. Uzun, L. (2017). Using the Second Life digital environment for FL education: A postmodern perspective. Teaching English with Technology, 17(2), 42–54. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1140664.pdf
128. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge - A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
129. Wallis, C., & Steptoe, S. (2006). How to Bring Our Schools Out of the 20th Century. Time, Vol. 168, pp. 1–6.
130. Westin, T., Männikkö Barbutiu, S., Perera, H., & Anuradha, U. (2016). Game Based Learning of Programming in Underprivileged Communities of Sri Lanka. In T. Connolly & L. Boyle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 773–780). Paisley, Scotland: Academic Conferences Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1045204&dswid=-7368
131. World Economic Forum. (2015). New Vision for Education: Unlocking the Potential of Technology. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf
132. Yang, J. C., Quadir, B., & Chen, N.-S. (2016). Effects of the Badge Mechanism on Self-Efficacy and Learning Performance in a Game-Based English Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115620433
133. Yang, S. C., & Huang, Y.-F. (2008). A study of high school English teachers’ behavior, concerns and beliefs in integrating information technology into English instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1085–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.009
134. Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., Hwang, F. K., & Lin, T. C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707–722. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12078
135. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515.