A systematic review of educational suggestions on generation Z in the context of distance education

Year 2021, Volume: 4 Issue: 4 - ICETOL Special Issue, 896 - 912, 31.12.2021

Hülya Düzenli

Abstract

Gen Z stands out as a new age learner group in the context of open and distance learning. Research shows that Gen Z has different needs and expectations form their predecessors; therefore, new educational interventions are required. The purpose of this study is to examine the suggestions of the scientific articles on Gen Z to draw educational conclusions. This systematic review includes educational suggestions (n = 77) of 59 articles selected from search results on Scopus, Google Scholar and ULAKBİM. The suggestions were coded and themed. Then, percentage and frequency analyses were made with the codes obtained. The main categories that emerged were speed, motivation, content, learning environment and active learning. Highlights of these suggestion categories are: rapid delivery of student feedback under the speed category, job-oriented education under the motivation category, use of student-produced content under the content category, paying attention to updating and following the digital contents under the learning environment category, learning autonomy acquisition practices under the active learning category. These educational suggestions are thought to help researchers and educational specialists who try to understand the generational differences and especially the features of Gen Z.

Keywords

Gen Z, distance education, open and distance learning, educational suggestions, systematic review

References

• Cilliers, E. J. (2017). The challenge of teaching generation Z. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 188-198.
• Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, 17(1), 1-7.
• Gale, S. (2015). Forget Gen Y: Are You Ready for Gen Z. https://www.chieflearningofficer.com/2015/07/07/forget-gen-y-are-you-ready-for-gen-z/
• Gough, D., Oliver, S. & Thomas, J. (2017). Introducing systematic reviews. In D. Gough, S. Oliver & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd edition, pp. 1–18). London: Sage.
• Ho, E., Clarke, A., & Dougherty, I. (2015). Youth-led social change: Topics, engagement types, organizational types, strategies, and impacts. Futures, 67, (52–62). doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.006
• Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (1992). The new generation gap. Atlantic-Boston-, 270, 67-67.
• Kaptan, S. (1995). Bilimsel araştırma ve istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Rehber Yayınevi.
• Kuran, E. (2019). Z bir kuşağı anlamak. İstanbul: Can Sanat Yayınları.
• Kushnir, N., Manzhula, A., & Valko, N. (2013). New Approaches of Teaching ICT to Meet Educational Needs of Net Students Generation. In ICTERI Vol. 2013 (pp. 195-208).
• Loring, A., & Wang, J. (2021). Engaging Gen Z in professional selling: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development. N/A (N/A)
• Moore, K., & Frazier, R. S. (2017). Engineering education for generation Z. American Journal of Engineering Education (AJEE), 8(2), 111-126.
• Opriș, I., & Cenușă, V. E. (2017). Subject-spotting experimental method for gen Z. TEM Journal, 6(4), 683.
• Özsari, G., & Saykili, A. (2020). Mobile learning in Turkey: Trends, potentials and challenges. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 3(1), 108-132.
• Plitcher, J. (1994). Mannheim's sociology of generations: An undervalued legacy. British Journal of Sociology, 45 (03), 481-495.
• Prensky, M. R. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Corwin press.
• Saxena, M., & Mishra, D. K. (2021). Gamification and Gen Z in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Literature. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 17(4), 1-22.
• Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace?. California Management Review, 61(3), 5-18.
• Shatto, B., & Erwin, K. (2016). Moving on from millennials: Preparing for generation Z. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(6), 253-254.
• Somyürek, S. (2014). Öğretim sürecinde Z kuşağının dikkatini çekme: Artırılmış gerçeklik. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 4(1), 63-80.
• Vikhrova, O. (2017). On some generation Z teaching techniques and methods in higher education. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, 20(9A), 6313-6324.
• Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and social interest. The journal of individual Psychology, 71(2), 103-113.
• Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M., & Blau, M. (2017). Cross-generational analysis of information seeking behavior of smartphone users. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(6), 721-739.
• Al Amiri, N., Daradkeh, F., & Al Kaabi, A. (2019). Leadership styles and competence among generation Z Emirati nursing students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(9), 23-45.
• Alhadlaq, A., Kharrufa, A., & Olivier, P. (2019). Exploring e-mentoring: co-designing & un-platforming. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(11), 1122-1142.
• Ali, R., Jamil, N. I., Ahmad, S. N. D., Mohamed, N., & Yaacob, N. A. (2017). The impact of XRace game board as an experiential learning approach. Advanced Science Letters, 23(11), 10648-10651.
• Andheska, H., Suparno, S., Dawud, D., & Suyitno, İ. (2020). Writing motivation and the ability in writing a research proposal of generation z students based on cognitive style. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 87-104.
• Arslankara, V. B., & Ertuğrul, U. S. T. A. (2019). Lise öğrencilerinin sanal ortamlardaki güven durumları ile sanal yalnızlıklarının sanal risk algısı bağlamında incelenmesi. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5 (Special Isuue), 274-286.
• Basantes-Andrade, A., Cabezas-González, M., & Casillas-Martín, S. (2020). Digital competences relationship between gender and generation of university professors. International Journal on advanced Science, Engineering, Information Technology, 10(1), 205-211.
• Beytekin, O. F., & Doğan, M. (2019). Intergenerational conflict between generation x academicians and generation y postgraduate students in higher education. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 382-391.
• Buchman, S., & Henderson, D. (2019). Interprofessional empathy and communication competency development in healthcare professions’ curriculum through immersive virtual reality experiences. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 15, 127-130.
• Budakoğlu, I., Coşkun, Ö., & Özeke, V. (2018). Probleme dayalı öğrenme süreci: mevcut durum, sorunlar ve teknoloji destekli çözüm önerileri. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science/Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 11(4),894-921.
• Chicca, J., & Shellenbarger, T. (2018). Generation z: approaches and teaching–learning practices for nursing professional development practitioners. Journal for nurses in professional development, 34(5), 250-256.
• Cho, M., Bonn, M. A., & Han, S. J. (2018). Generation Z’s sustainable volunteering: Motivations, attitudes and job performance. Sustainability, 10(5), 1400.
• Dabija, D. C., Babut, R., Dinu, V., & Lugojan, M. I. (2017). Cross-Generational Analysis of Information Searching Based on Social Media in Romania. Transformations in Business & Economics, 16(2), 248-270.
• Deniz, L., & Tutgun-Ünal, A. (2019). Sosyal medya çağında kuşakların sosyal medya kullanımı ve değerlerine yönelik bir dizi ölçek geliştirme çalışması. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(18), 1025-1057.
• Dougherty, I., & Clarke, A. (2018). Wired for innovation: Valuing the unique innovation abilities of emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 6(5), 358-365.
• Dukut, E. M. (2019). Popularizing Indonesian scenes through picturebooks and digital animation software: a World Englishes teaching idea. Asian Englishes, 21(2), 142-157.
• Dwidienawati, D., & Gandasari, D. (2018). Understanding Indonesia’s generation Z. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3), 245-253.
• Fedock, B. (2017). Online Dissertation Chairs’ Perceptions on the Role of Reflective Mentoring Practices and Changing Student Cross-Cultural and Generational Worldviews. SAGE Open, 7(2), 1-8.
• Fedosejeva, J., Boče, A., Romanova, M., Iliško, D., & Ivanova, O. (2018). Education for sustainable development: The choice of pedagogical approaches and methods for the implementation of pedagogical tasks in the Anthropocene age. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 157-179.
• Gentina, E., Tang, T. L. P., & Dancoine, P. F. (2018). Does Gen Z's emotional intelligence promote iCheating (cheating with iPhone) yet curb iCheating through reduced nomophobia?. Computers & Education, 126, 231-247.
• Hampton, D., Welsh, D., & Wiggins, A. T. (2020). Learning preferences and engagement level of generation Z nursing students. Nurse Educator, 45(3), 160-164.
• Hanz, K., & Kingsland, E. S. (2020). Fake or for real? A fake news workshop. Reference Services Review, 48(1), 91-112.
• Hernandez-Pozas, O., & Carreon-Flores, H. (2019). Teaching international business using virtual reality. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 30(2), 196-212.
• Khechine, H., & Lakhal, S. (2018). Technology as a double-edged sword: from behavior prediction without to students’ outcomes considering personal characteristics. Journal of Information Technology Education, 17, 63-102.
• Kraleva, R., Sabani, M., Kralev, V., & Kostadinova, D. (2020). An approach to designing and developing an LMS framework appropriate for young pupils. International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering, 10 (2), 1587-1598.
• Kusá, A., & Záziková, Z. (2016). Influence of the social networking website snapchat on the generation Z. European Journal of Science and Theology, 12(5), 145-154.
• Lifintsev, D., & Wellbrock, W. (2019). Cross-cultural communication in the digital age. Estudos em Comunicação, 1(28), 93-104.
• Lifintsev, D., Fleșeriu, C., & Wellbrock, W. (2019). A study of the attitude of Generation Z to cross-cultural interaction in business. Informacijos Mokslai/Information Sciences, 86 (2019), 41-55
• Matraeva, L., Vasiutina, E., Belyak, A., Solodukha, P., Bondarchuk, N., & Efimova, M. (2019). Economic Model of Generation Z Behavior. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(3), 123-123.
• Meritan, C., & Mroz, A. (2019). Impact of self‐reflection and awareness‐raising on novice French learners’ pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 52(4), 798-821.
• Mokhtar, M.M., Jamil, M. (2020). Mobile Technology Integration in the 2020s: The impact of technology leadership in the Malaysian context. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8 (1), 156-163.
• Montiel, I., Delgado-Ceballos, J., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Antolin-Lopez, R. (2020). New ways of teaching: using technology and mobile apps to educate on societal grand challenges. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 243-251.
• Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., Sánchez, J. Á. L., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students' satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141(2019), 1-18.
• Nayır, F., & Çınkır, Ş. (2017). Değişen zaman, değişen ihtiyaçlar: türkiye’de kuşaklararası eğitimin karşılaştırılması. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 19-28.
• Nuzulita, N., & Subriadi, A. P. (2020). The role of risk‐benefit and privacy analysis to understand different uses of social media by Generations X, Y, and Z in Indonesia. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, e12122.
• Ortiz, S., & Green, M. (2019). Trends and patterns of mobile learning: A study of mobile learning management system access. Turkish online journal of distance education, 20(1), 161-176.
• Pečiuliauskienė, P. (2018). The structure of interpersonal communication skills of the new generation senior school students: the case of generations X and Z. Pedagogy, 130(2), 116-130.
• Persada, S. F., Ivanovski, J., Miraja, B. A., Nadlifatin, R., Mufidah, I., Chin, J., & Redi, A. A. N. P. (2020). Investigating Generation Z’Intention to Use Learners’ Generated Content for Learning Activity: A Theory of Planned Behavior Approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(04), 179-194.
• Persada, S. F., Miraja, B. A., & Nadlifatin, R. (2019). Understanding the generation Z behavior on D-learning: A Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(05), 20-33.
• Petrovna, L.A., (2019). Cognitive Strategies of Self-Naming Among Schoolchildren (Gender Aspect). Вопросы Ономастики, 16 (4),151–167.
• Poláková, P., & Klímová, B. (2019). Mobile technology and generation z in the English language classroom—A preliminary study. Education Sciences, 9(3), 203.
• Pousson, J. M., & Myers, K. A. (2018). Ignatian pedagogy as a frame for universal design in college: meeting learning needs of generation Z. Education sciences, 8(4), 193.
• Puchkova, E. B., YuV, S., & Temnova, L. V. (2017). A study of Generation Z’s involvement in virtual reality. Psychology in Russia, 10(4), 46.
• Sarker, R. I., Kaplan, S., Anderson, M. K., Haustein, S., Mailer, M., & Timmermans, H. J. (2019). Obtaining transit information from users of a collaborative transit app: Platform-based and individual-related motivators. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 102(2019), 173-188.
• Schlee, R. P., Eveland, V. B., & Harich, K. R. (2020). From Millennials to Gen Z: Changes in student attitudes about group projects. Journal of Education for Business, 95(3), 139-147.
• Semenog, O., Yurchenko, A., Udovychenko, O., Kharchenko, I., & Kharchenko, S. (2019). Formation of Future Teachers’ Skills to Create and Use Visual Models of Knowledge. TEM Journal, 8(1), 275.
• Semenog, O., Yurchenko, A., Udovychenko, O., Kharchenko, I., & Kharchenko, S. (2019). Formation of Future Teachers’ Skills to Create and Use Visual Models of Knowledge. TEM Journal, 8(1), 275.
• Semenog, O., Yurchenko, A., Udovychenko, O., Kharchenko, I., & Kharchenko, S. (2019). Formation of future teachers’ skills to create and use visual models of knowledge. TEM Journal, 8(1), 275.
• Seymen, A. F. (2017). Associating the characteristics of y and z generation traits with ministry of national education 2014-2019 strategic program and TÜBİTAK vision 2023 predictions. Kent Akademisi, 10 (32), 467-489.
• Shen, Y. S., Choi, H. C., Joppe, M., & Yi, S. (2020). What motivates visitors to participate in a gamified trip? A player typology using Q methodology. Tourism Management, 78(2020), 1-15.
• Sitko-Dominik, M. (2019). Generational Membership and the Intensity of Social Media use Among Young Adults. The New Educational Review, 58, (4), 122-132
• Sriprom, C., Rungswang, A., Sukwitthayakul, C., & Chansri, N. (2019). Personality traits of thai gen z undergraduates: challenges in the efl classroom?. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 57, 165-190.
• Sugiarto, E., & Lestari, W. (2020). The Collaboration of Visual Property and Semarangan Dance: A Case Study of Student Creativity in’Generation Z’. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(12), 100-110.
• Susilo, A., Djatmika, E. T., Mintarti, S. U., & Wahyono, H. (2019). The entrepreneurial learning of generation z students in industrial revolution era 4.0 (a case study in tertiary education of yogyakarta and surakarta, indonesia). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(9), 96-113.
• Syaha, M. F. J., & Harsono, E. R. L. (2020). The Development of Motion-Graphic Media in Learning: An Advanced Use of PowerPoint in Schools for Baby Boomer, X and Y Generation Teachers. Development, 12(2).
• Temel Eginli, A., Isik, S. (2020). Generational differences in digital age a research on technology experiences of generations. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2), 3150-3154
• Thinnukool, O., & Kongchouy, N. (2017). Is facebook a suitable tool in modern world technology for active learning in as regards 21st century learning?. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(10), 173-191.
• Türker, M. S. (2019). Blog kullanımının yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğrenenlerin okumaya yönelik tutumları üzerindeki etkisi. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 9(2), 199-210.
• Vladimirovna, K. T., Jaroslav, K., Tomas, K., & Mikhaelovna, M. S. (2016). Meaningfulness of academic migrants’ education, its assessment and modeling on IT-based technologies. Экономика региона, 12(2),485-498.
• Wahab, A. N. A., Ang, M. C., Jenal, R., Mukhtar, M., Elias, N. F., Arshad, H., ... & Shukor, S. A. (2018). Mooc implementation in addressing the needs of generation Z towards discrete mathematics learning. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(21), 7030-7040.
• Wee, D. (2019). Generation Z talking: transformative experience in educational travel. Journal of Tourism Futures, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-02-2019-0019
• Yu, E. (2020). Student-Inspired Optimal Design of Online Learning for Generation Z. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1). N/A
• Zhilavskaya, I., Ivanova, T., Dubover, D., & Onuchina, K. (2016). Youth Foresight: We Will All Be Media in 2035. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), 12245-12252.
• Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M. and Blau, M. (2017). Cross-generational analysis of information seeking behavior of smartphone users. Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 69 No. 6, pp. 721-739. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-04-2017-0083