The use of 3D-printed instructional materials in active learning activities within science lessons

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 351 - 367, 30.09.2025

Ozan Coşkunserçe

https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1751802

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effect of active learning activities utilizing 3D-printed instructional materials on students’ academic achievement and to explore their perceptions of these activities in science lessons. Specifically, the research focuses on the 6th-grade unit “Systems in Our Body and Health,” where 3D-printed instructional materials were produced and integrated into classroom activities. The study was structured as a “sequential mixed research design” since qualitative and quantitative data were collected one after the other. The experimental group, which received the intervention, comprised 30 students, while the control group, which underwent the conventional science lesson process, included 28 students. Students who engaged in active learning activities utilizing 3D-printed instructional materials in the science lessons demonstrated higher academic achievement compared to their peers who did not participate. In the semi-structured interviews, the experimental group students commented that the activities helped them understand the subject because 3D materials allowed them to see and touch the content from different angles.

Keywords

3D printers , 3D-printed instructional materials , science education , active learning , academic achievement

Supporting Institution

Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit

Project Number

HZP25S23

References

• AbouHashem,Y., Dayal, M., Savanah, S., & Štrkalj, G. (2015). The application of 3D printing in anatomy education, Medical Education Online, 20(1), 29847.
• Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2003). Aktif öğrenme [Active Learning]. Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları [Education World Publications].
• Adams, J. W., Paxton, L., Dawes, K., Burlak, K., Quayle, M., & McMenamin, P. G. (2015). 3D printed reproductions of orbital dissections: a novel mode of visualising anatomy for trainees in ophthalmology or optometry. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 99(9), 1162-1167. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306189
• Addy, T. M., Dube, D., & Pauze, B. (2018). How to Design a Classroom Activity that Integrates 3D Print Models with Active Learning. CourseSource. https://doi.org/10.24918/cs.2018.8
• Agrahari, R. (2016). The nature of educational reform and change: From teacher-centered to student-centered learning. Educational Quest-An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 7(2), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-7311.2016.00030.1
• Aktın, K., Karademir Coşkun, T., & Karaçalı Taze, H. (2023). The use of 3D printers in education from the perspective of social sciences teachers. Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences, 15(29), 465-489. https://doi.org/10.38155/ksbd.1171741
• Avinal, M., & Aydin, A. (2022). The Effects of activities designed with three-dimensional printing technology on science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 887-910. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.155
• Awacorach, J., Jensen, I., Lassen, I., Olanya, D. R., Zakaria, H. L., & Tabo, G. O. (2021). Exploring Transition in Higher Education: Engagement and Challenges in Moving from Teacher-Centered to Student-Centered Learning. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 113-130. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1337873.pdf
• Baepler, P., Walker, J.D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers and Education, 78, 227–236.
• Barroso, L.R., Bicer, A., Capraro, M.M., Capraro, R.M., Foran, A.L., Grant, M.R., & Rice, D. (2017). Run! Spot. Run!: vocabulary development and the evolution of STEM disciplinary language for secondary teachers. ZDM, 49(2), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0826-4
• Bialy, S. E. (2016). The 3D printing age and basic sciences education. Education in Medicine Journal, 8(4), 79-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.5959/eimj.v8i4.458
• Buehler, E., Kane, S. K., & Hurst, A. (2014). ABC and 3D: opportunities and obstacles to 3D printing in special education environments. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility, 107-114.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1998). Kovaryans analizi ( Varyans Analizi ile Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme ). Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 31(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000247
• Cheng, L., Antonenko, P. D., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2024). The impact of teachers’ pedagogical beliefs, self-efficacy, and technology value beliefs on 3D printing integration in K-12 science classrooms. Educational technology research and development, 72(1), 181-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10276-3
• Chien, Y. H. (2017). Developing a pre-engineering curriculum for 3D printing skills for high school technology education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 2941-2958. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00729a
• Chiu, P. H. P., & Cheng, S. H. (2017). Effects of active learning classrooms on student learning: a two-year empirical investigation on student perceptions and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1196475
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis fort the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
• Cohen, H. G. (1992). Two teaching strategies: Their effectiveness with students of varying cognitive abilities. School Science and Mathematics, 92(3), 126-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1992.tb12157.x
• Costello, J. P., Olivieri, L. J., Krieger, A., Thabit, O., Marshall, M. B., Yoo, S. J., Kim, P. C., Jonas, R. A., & Nath, D. S. (2014). Utilizing Three-Dimensional Printing Technology to Assess the Feasibility of High-Fidelity Synthetic Ventricular Septal Defect Models for Simulation in Medical Education, World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, 5(3), 421–426, https://doi.org/10.1177/2150135114528721
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Çoklar, A. N., & Çekirge, E. (2020). The effect of supporting 3D designs with physical materials on academic achievement, course attitude and motivation. Journal of Ahmet Kelesoglu Education Faculty, 2(2), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.38151/akef.2020.3
• Demir, E. B. K., Çaka, C., Tuğtekin, U., Demir, K., İslamoğlu, H. & Kuzu, A. (2016). The use of three dimensional printing technologies in education: practices in Turkey. Ege Journal of Education, 2(17), 481-503. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.280754
• Eisenberg, M. (2007). Pervasive fabrication: Making construction ubiquitous in education. In Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerComW'07) (pp. 193-198). IEEE.
• Fernandes, S. C., & Simoes, R. (2016). Collaborative use of different learning styles through 3D printing. In 2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
• Ford, S. & Minshall, T. (2019). Invited review article: Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education. Additive Manufacturing, 25, 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.028
• Frigon, J. Y. & Laurencelle, L. (1993). Analysis of covariance: A proposed algorithm, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053001001
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (10. ed.). Pearson.
• Güleryüz, H., Dilber, R., & Erdoğan, İ. (2019). Prospective teachers' views on 3D printer use in STEM Applications. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 5(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.31463/aicusbed.592061
• Hatch, M. (2013). The maker movement manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. McGraw Hill Professional.
• Hockings, C. (2009). Reaching the students that student‐centred learning cannot reach, British Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 83-98, https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802041640
• Horowitz, S. S., & Schultz, P. H. (2014). Printing space: Using 3D printing of digital terrain models in geosciences education and research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(1), 138-145. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-031.1
• Huang, T. C., & Lin, C. Y. (2017). From 3D modeling to 3D printing: Development of a differentiated spatial ability teaching model. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 604-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.10.005
• Jo, W., Hee I. J., Harianto, R. A., So, J. H., Lee, H., Lee, H. J., & Moon, M. (2016). Introduction of 3d printing technology in the classroom for visually ımpaired students. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 110(2), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1611000205
• Karaduman, H. (2018). Abstract to concrete & virtual to real: Three-dimensional printers from the perspective of teacher candidates. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 18 (1), 273-303. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/372300
• Karagöz, B., & Çakır, Ç. Ş. (2020). Determination of science teacher candidates' opinions about 3D printers. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(2), 303-317. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kebd/issue/67544/1051092
• Kargın, P. D., & Gül, Ş. (2021). Development of an achievement test for sixth grade body systems and health unit, Ihlara Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.729412
• Kefalis, C., Skordoulis, C., & Drigas, A. (2024). The role of 3D printing in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education in general and special schools. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 20(12). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v20i12.48931
• Khefrianti, S., Kadarohman, A., Wiji, & Praginda, W. (2024). Advantages and disadvantages of using 3D printing by science teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(8), 559–565. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.6518
• Kökhan, S. & Özcan, U. (2018). Use of 3D printers in education. Science Education Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal), 2(1), 81-85. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/624966
• Kwon, H. (2017). Effects of 3D printing and design software on students' overall performance. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 18(4), 37-42. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/181996/
• Lau, I., & Sun, Z. (2022). The role of 3D printed heart models in immediate and long-term knowledge acquisition in medical education. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 23(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2301022
• Leach, N. (2017). Size matters: Why architecture is the future of 3D printing. Architectural Design, 87(6), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2241
• Li, F., Liu, C., Song, X., Huan, Y., Gao, S. & Z. Jiang. (2017). Production of accurate skeletal models of domestic animals using three-dimensional scanning and printing technology. Anatomical sciences education, 11(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1725
• Lim, K. H. A., Loo, Z. Y., Goldie, S. J., Adams, J. W., & McMenamin, P. G. (2016). Use of 3D printed models in medical education: A randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anatomical sciences education, 9(3), 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1573
• Lipson, H. (2007). Printable 3D models for customized hands-on education. Mass Customization and Personalization (MCPC), 6. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=ed065966ded9de7862a04b9779baf2cbbaed856d
• McMenamin, P. G., Quayle, M. R., McHenry, C. R., & Adams, J. W. (2014). The production of anatomical teaching resources using three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anatomical sciences education, 7(6), 479-486. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1475
• Mertkan, Ş. (2015). Karma Araştırma Tasarımı [Blended Research Design]. Pegem Akademi [Pegem Academy].
• Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting Active Learning. Strategies for the College Classroom. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
• Murray, S. (2013). Turning students into engineers with 3D printing. Tech Directions, 73 (1), 12-14.
• Novak, E. & Wisdom, S. (2018). Effects of 3D printing project-based learning on preservice elementary teachers’ science attitudes, science content knowledge, and anxiety about teaching science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 412-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9733-5
• Özden, M. Y., & Durdu, L. (2016). Qualitative research methods for production-based studies in education, Anı.
• Park, E. L., & Choi, B. K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68(5), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9742-0
• Salter, D., Thomson, D. L., Fox, B., & Lam, J. (2013). Use and evaluation of a technology-rich experimental collaborative classroom. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.777033
• Saorin, J. L., Carbonell-Carrera, C., Cantero, J. D. L. T., Meier, C., & Aleman, D. D. (2017). Three-dimensional interpretation of sculptural heritage with digital and tangible 3D printed replicas. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(4), 161-169. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1160651.pdf
• Schelly, C., Anzalone, G., Wijnen, B. & Pearce, J. M. (2015). Open-source 3-D printing technologies for education: Bringing additive manufacturing to the classroom. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 28, 226-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2015.01.004
• Schneider, D. (2006). FAB: The coming revolution on your desktop--from personal computers to personal fabrication. American Scientist, 94(3), 284-285.
• Sitompul, L. R., Wibawa, B., & Siregar, E. (2024). Applications of 3D printing in science education. In 7th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2023) (pp. 786-797). Atlantis Press.
• Smith, C. F., Tollemache, N., Covill, D., & Johnston, M. (2018). Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D‐printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anatomical sciences education, 11(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1718
• Stice, J. (1987). Using Kolb’s learning cycle to improve student learning. Engineering Education, 77(7), 291-196.
• Wisdom, S., & Novak, E. (2019). Using 3D printing to enhance STEM teaching and learning: Recommendations for designing 3D printing projects. In Integrating 3D Printing into Teaching and Learning, 187-205.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seçkin Yayıncılık [Seçkin Publishing].
• Yıldırım, G., Yıldırım, S. & Çelik, E. (2018). A new insight – 3D printers and their instructional use: A content analysis. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 13(25), 163-184. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/498694
• Yıldırım, K., & Keşan, C. (2022). Examination of student views on the use of 3D printers in the process of learning mathematics. The Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, (53), 558-586. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1083725
• Yılmaz, M., & Algil, M. (2018). Contribution to mathematics teaching materials production and education with 3D writers. Journal of Awareness, 3(4), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.2018445554
• Zarotiadou, E., & Tsaparlis, G. (2000). Teaching lower-secondary chemistry with a Piagetian constructivist and an Ausbelian meaningful-receptive method: A longitudinal comparison. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1039/A9RP90005E