Examining of the teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Malaysia case

Fung Lan Yong; Florence Chuah; Norizan Tan; Ming Ha Lee

doi:10.5281/zenodo.15395988

Examining of the teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Malaysia case

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine attitudes toward the gifted and their education among 60 teachers in Malaysia by administering the Opinions about Gifted Individuals and Their Education online. Data were automatically transferred onto a spreadsheet and subsequently analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed no significant differences in teacher attitudes by way of age and job experience, while Mann-Whitney U test showed no significant differences in terms of gender and job status. Additionally, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, positive and negative ranks represent how data points compare to the hypothesized median (3.5 in this case). Positive ranks indicate that the data values are greater than the hypothesized median, while negative ranks denote that the data values are less than the hypothesized median. Results indicated that 18 of the items had medians that significantly differed from the test value with p < .001, while 12 had medians that significantly differed from the test value with p < .05. Overall percentages showed that teachers tend to demonstrate positive attitudes (average to high proportions) toward four dimensions of the questionnaire, including meeting the needs of the gifted and providing special services to them, social value of the gifted and their education, ability grouping, and school acceleration. Moreover, overall percentages also showed that teachers tend to demonstrate negative attitudes toward two dimensions, including objections (based on ideology and priorities in terms of the gifted and their education) and rejection (isolation of the gifted by others in the immediate environment). In light of the findings, some recommendations were made on how to foster positive teacher attitudes toward the gifted and their education.

Keywords

References

Al-Makhalid, K. A. (2012). Primary teachers’ attitudes and knowledge regarding gifted pupils and their education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [Doctoral thesis, University of Manchester]. University of Manchester Research Explorer. https://research.manchester.ac.uk/files/54524495/FULL_TEXT.PDF
Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (Eds.). (2015). A nation empowered, volume 2: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America's brightest students. University of Iowa Press.
Bégin, J., & Gagné, F. (1994a). Predictors of attitudes toward gifted education: A review of the literature and a blueprint for future research. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17(2), 161–179.
Bégin, J., & Gagné, F. (1994b). Predictors of a general attitude toward gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18(1), 74–86.
Bernstein, B. O., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2021). Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 830–845.
Berman, K. M., Schultz, R. A., & Weber, C. L. (2012). A lack of awareness and emphasis in preservice teacher training: Preconceived beliefs about the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Today, 35(1), 18–26.
Caldwell, D. W. (2012). Educating gifted students in the regular classroom: Efficacy, attitudes, and differentiation [Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Southern University]. Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/822
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. The Templeton National Report on Acceleration. Volume 2. Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535138.

Copenhaver, R. W., & Mc Intyre, D. J. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14(3),151– 153.
Cross, T. L., Cross, J. R., & O'Reilly, C. (2018). Attitudes about gifted education among Irish educators. High Ability Studies, 29(2), 169–189.
De Boer, G. C., Minnaert, A. E., & Kamphof, G. (2013). Gifted education in the Netherlands. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(1), 133–150.
Finn., C. E., Jr (2019, July 10). Public attitudes toward gifted education: Supportive, complacent, incomplete. Thomas B. Fordham Institute. https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/commentary/public-attitudes-toward-gifted-education-supportive-complacent-incomplete.
Furnes, G. M., & Jokstad, G. S. (2023). “It may be a luxury, but not a problem”: A mixed methods study of teachers’ attitudes towards the educational needs of gifted students in Norway. Education Sciences, 13(7), 667.
Gagné, F. (2018). Attitudes toward gifted education: Retrospective and prospective update. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 60(4), 403–428.
Gagné, F., & Nadeau, L. (1991). Dimensions of attitudes toward giftedness. In A. H. Roldan (Ed.), Gifted and talented children, youth and adults: Their social perspective and culture (pp. 148–170). Trillium Press.
Hosseinkhanzadeh, A. A., Yeganeh, T., & Taher, M. (2013). Investigate attitudes of parents and teachers about educational placement of gifted students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 631-636.
Jawabreh, R., Salha, S., & Danju, İ. (2024). Teachers’ attitudes toward gifted children in pre-schools in Palestine. Power and Education, 16(3), 276–296.
Jones, E. D., & Southern, W. T. (1992). Programming, grouping, and acceleration in rural school districts: A survey of attitudes and practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 112–117.
Jung J. Y. (2014). Predictors of attitudes to gifted programs/provisions: Evidence from preservice educators. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(4), 247–258.
Jung, J. Y., & Lee, J. (2024a). Parental attitudes toward gifted students and gifted education: Attitude profiles and predictors. Journal of Intelligence, 12(5), 48.
Jung, J. Y., & Lee, J. (2024b). Teacher attitudes toward gifted students and gifted education: The typologies of attitudes and their predictors. Exceptional Children, 91(1), 74–92.
Juriševič, M. & Žerak, U. (2019). Attitudes towards gifted students and their education in the Slovenian context. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 12(4), 101–117.
Kaya, N. G., & Tortop, H. S. (2020). Attitudes and opinions of counselors about education of gifted students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 1017–1024.
Krijan, I. P., & Borić, E. (2015). Teachers’ attitudes towards gifted students and differences in attitudes regarding the years of teaching. Croatian Journal of Education: Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje,, 17(Sp. Ed. 1), 165–178.
Krijan, I. P., Jurčec, L., & Borić, E. (2015). Primary school teachers’ attitudes toward gifted students. Croatian Journal of Education, 17(3), 681–724.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820.
Laine, S., Hotulainen, R., & Tirri, K. (2019). Finnish elementary school teachers' attitudes toward gifted education. Roeper Review, 41(2), 76-87.
Lassig, C. (2009). Teachers' attitudes towards the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(2), 32–42.
Little, C. A. (2018). Teaching strategies to support the education of gifted learners. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy- Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 371–385). American Psychological Association.
Matheis, S., Kronborg, L., Schmitt, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Threat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation. Gifted and Talented International, 32(2), 134–160.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted?. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246–254.
Megay-Nespoli, K. (2001). Beliefs and attitudes of novice teachers regarding instruction of academically talented learners. Roeper Review, 23(3), 178–182.
Molapo, T. P, & Salyers, M. (2014). Parent-teacher shared commitment as a predictor for teachers’ attitudes toward gifted students and gifted education. Journal of Studies in Education, 4(1), 190–205.
Nugent, S. A., & Shaunessy, E. (2003). Using film in teacher training: Viewing the gifted through different lenses. Roeper Review, 25(3),128–134.
Ozcan, D. (2016). Predictions and attitudes towards giftedness and gifted education. International Journal of Educational Science, 15(1-2), 126–133.
Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013). When less is more: Effects of grade skipping on adult STEM productivity among mathematically precocious adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 176– 198.
Pannell, R. (2023, April 5). The importance of identifying the right sample size for business improvement. Leanscape. https://leanscape.io/the-importance-of-identifying-the-right-sample-size-for-business-improvement/
Reis-Jorge, J., Ferreira, M., Olcina-Sempere, G., & Marques, B. (2021). Perceptions of giftedness and classroom practice with gifted children – an exploratory study of primary school teachers. Qualitative Research in Education, 10(3), 291–315.
Rizza, M. G., & Morrison, W. F. (2003). Uncovering stereotypes and identifying characteristics of gifted students and students with emotional/behavioral disabilities. Roeper Review, 25(2), 73–77.
Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. RUBIKTOP. (2023, September 14). The magic number 30: Why a sample size of 30 is often considered sufficient for statistical significance. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/magic-number-30-why-sample-size-often-considered-sufficient
Smeets, K., Rohaan, E., Peijnenburg, J., Samsen-Bronsveld, E., & Bakx, A. (2023). Elementary teachers’ knowledge, attitude, and professional development needs concerning gifted students and their educational needs in the Netherlands. Gifted and Talented International, 38(2), 91–106.
Spawi, M. (2024). Nurturing gifted minds: Best practices in teaching and learning. Barnes & Noble. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/nurturing-gifted-minds-mahiz-spawi/1145675909
Teow, C. K. (2016). Attitudes of primary and secondary education teachers in Malaysia toward the gifted and gifted education [Unpublished master's thesis]. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.].
Tirri, K., & Uusikylä, K. (1994). How teachers perceive differentiation of education among the gifted and talented. Gifted and Talented International, 9(2), 69–73. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED558197.pdf
Tortop, H. S., & Kunt, K. (2013). Investigation of primary school teachers’ attitudes towards gifted education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 441–451.
Townsend, M., & Patrick, H. (1993). Academic and psychosocial apprehensions of teachers and teacher trainees toward the educational acceleration of gifted children. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 28(1), 29–41.
Troxclair, D. A. (2013). Preservice teacher attitudes toward giftedness. Roeper Review, 35(1),58–64.
Tuysuz, C., Gurbuz, M., Goncu, A., & Ugulu, I. (2023). Prospective teachers’ attitudes towards the education of gifted/talented students. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 13(2), 275–298.
Van Gerven, E. (2021). Raising the bar: The competencies of specialists in gifted education [Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit van Hasselt]. https://documentserver.uhasselt.be/handle/1942/33248
Wood, S., Portman, T. A. A., Cigrand, D. L., & Colangelo, N. (2010). School counselors’ perceptions and experience with acceleration as a program option for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3),168–178.
Yong, F. L., & Chuah, F. (2024, October 11). Fostering positive attitudes toward the gifted and their education. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fostering-positive-attitudes-toward-gifted-education-florence-chuah-qti8c

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Special Talented Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Fung Lan Yong ^*
Malaysia

Florence Chuah This is me
Malaysia

Norizan Tan This is me
Malaysia

Ming Ha Lee This is me
Malaysia

Early Pub Date

May 13, 2025

Publication Date

June 30, 2025

Submission Date

January 6, 2025

Acceptance Date

May 6, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 12 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15395988

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA95SW82XC

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Yong, F. L., Chuah, F., Tan, N., & Lee, M. H. (2025). Examining of the teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Malaysia case. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 12(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15395988

AMA

1.Yong FL, Chuah F, Tan N, Lee MH. Examining of the teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Malaysia case. JGEDC. 2025;12(1):65-78. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15395988

Chicago

Yong, Fung Lan, Florence Chuah, Norizan Tan, and Ming Ha Lee. 2025. “Examining of the Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Gifted Education: Malaysia Case”. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity 12 (1): 65-78. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15395988.

EndNote

Yong FL, Chuah F, Tan N, Lee MH (June 1, 2025) Examining of the teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Malaysia case. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity 12 1 65–78.

IEEE

[1]F. L. Yong, F. Chuah, N. Tan, and M. H. Lee, “Examining of the teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Malaysia case”, JGEDC, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 65–78, June 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15395988.

ISNAD

Yong, Fung Lan - Chuah, Florence - Tan, Norizan - Lee, Ming Ha. “Examining of the Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Gifted Education: Malaysia Case”. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity 12/1 (June 1, 2025): 65-78. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15395988.

JAMA

1.Yong FL, Chuah F, Tan N, Lee MH. Examining of the teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Malaysia case. JGEDC. 2025;12:65–78.

MLA

Yong, Fung Lan, et al. “Examining of the Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Gifted Education: Malaysia Case”. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, vol. 12, no. 1, June 2025, pp. 65-78, doi:10.5281/zenodo.15395988.

Vancouver

1.Fung Lan Yong, Florence Chuah, Norizan Tan, Ming Ha Lee. Examining of the teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Malaysia case. JGEDC. 2025 Jun. 1;12(1):65-78. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15395988