Implementing Jigsaw technique as an effective way for promoting ocean literacy among prospective geography teacher: An action research

Abstract

This study was aimed to examine the effectiveness of JIGSAW type cooperative learning models in enhancing student learning outcomes of prospective teachers in Oceanography in the Geography Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education University of Lampung, Indonesia. This learning model is expected to help students to reduce their cognitive constraints by actively training themselves to collaborate in groups with others in understanding Oceanographic concepts. The number of students involved was 35 people (21 female and 14 male). This study was a classroom action research (CAR) carried out in 2 cycles. Each cycle is a series of activities that include planning, implementing, observing, and reflecting. Data collection techniques are carried out through observation, documentation, and tests. Data analysis was performed using descriptive-quantitative techniques using the principle of normalized gain and paired sample t-test. Each cycle is a series of activities that include planning, implementing, observing, and reflecting. Data collection techniques are carried out through observation, documentation, and tests. Data analysis was performed using descriptive-quantitative techniques using the principle of normalized gain and paired sample t-test. Each cycle is a series of activities that include planning, implementing, observing, and reflecting. Data collection techniques are carried out through observation, documentation, and tests. Data analysis was performed using descriptive-quantitative techniques using the principle of normalized gain and paired sample t-test. The results show that the use of JIGSAW type cooperative learning effectively increased student involvement in learning Oceanography courses that have an impact on growing mastery for Oceanographic concepts. By focusing on giving scaffolding appropriately by lecturers through the participation of peers as "experts" it had been able to encourage students' motivation and active participation in ocean literacy.

Keywords

• Classroom Action Research
• Oceanography
• JIGSAW
• Ocean literacy

References

1. Ajie, W. T. S., Ramalis, T. R., & Liliawati, W. (2012). Penerapan Metode science literacy circles (SLC) untuk meningkatkan literasi sains dan mengembangkan karakter siswa SMP. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 1(1).
2. Aparicio-Ting, F. E., Slater, D. M., & Kurz, E. U. (2019). Inquiry-based learning (IBL) as a driver of curriculum: A staged approach. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching, 3, 44-51.
3. Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International journal of science education, 32(3), 349-377.
4. Fauville, G. (2017). Questions as indicators of ocean literacy: students' online asynchronous discussion with a marine scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 39(16), 2151-2170.
5. Fuller, I. C., & France, D. (2019). Field-based pedagogies for developing learners' independence. In Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Geography. Edward Elgar Publishing.
6. Guest, H., Lotze, H. K., & Wallace, D. (2015). Youth and the sea: Ocean literacy in Nova Scotia, Canada. Marine Policy, 58, 98-107.
7. Hager, P., Lee, A., & Reich, A. (Eds.). (2012). Practice, learning, and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media.
8. Hake, R. R. (2002, August). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization. In Physics education research conference (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1-14).

9. Hakim, L., & Sakti, N. C. (2019). Implementation of Jigsaw Type Cooperative Learning Model to Improve Economics Learning Results. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(3), 350-357.
10. Hilda, A. M., & Elly, M. J. (2019). Peningkatan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Geospasial. Jurnal SOLMA, 8(2), 258-267.
11. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and learning: theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
12. Kamaruddin, S., & Yusoff, N. M. R. N. (2019). The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Model Jigsaw and Team Games Tournament (TGT) towards Social Skills. Creative Education, 10(12), 2529-2539.
13. Kemmis, S. (2007). Participatory action research and the public sphere. In The quality of practitioner research (pp. 9-27). Brill Sense.
14. Kemmis, S. (2009). "Action Research as a Practice-Based Practice." Educational Action Research 17 (3): 463–474. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650790903093284.
15. Khoiriah, K., Jalmo, T., & Abdurrahman, A. (2016). The Effect of Multimedia-based Teaching Materials in Science Toward Students' Cognitive Improvement. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 75-82.
16. Kolloffel, B., Eysink, T. H., & de Jong, T. (2011). Comparing the effects of representational tools in collaborative and individual inquiry learning. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 6(2), 223-251.
17. Lie, A. 2007. Cooperative Learning. Jakarta: Grasindo.
18. Mettetal, G. 2001. "The What, Why and How of Classroom Action Research." Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2 (1): 6–13.
19. Noviana, A., Abdurrahman, A., Rosidin, U., & Herlina, K. Development and Validation of Collaboration and Communication Skills Assessment Instruments Based on Project-Based Learning. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 6(2), 133-146.
20. Nurulsari, N., Abdurrahman, A., & Suyatna, A. (2017). Development of soft scaffolding strategy to improve student's creative thinking ability in physics. In Journal of Physics: Conf. Series (Vol. 909, pp. 1-9). IOP Publishing.
21. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Paris, France: OECD.
22. Rositasari, R. (2001). Indonesia Menuju Manajemen Wilayah Pesisir Terintegrasi. Oseana, 26(2), 25-34.
23. Strang, C. R. A. I. G. (2008). Education for ocean literacy and sustainability: Learning from elders, listening to youth. Journal of Marine Education, 24(3), 6-10.
24. Suyatna, A. (2011). Modul 31-A Tipe Paikem: Modul Pembelajaran IPS A. Bandar Lampung: FKIP Universitas Lampung.
25. Tabiolo, J. L. (2019). Enhancing students' science achievement through Jigsaw II strategy. Journal of Science Learning, 3(1), 29-35.
26. Tan, E. X. (2020). Improving Logical Thinking Skills Through Jigsaw-Based Cooperative Learning Approach. In Preparing 21st Century Teachers for Teach Less, Learn More (TLLM) Pedagogies (pp. 162-181). IGI Global. van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2012). Promoting teacher scaffolding in small-group work: A contingency perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 193-205.
27. Vygotsky, L. (2019). Collaborative learning. Collaboration, communications, and critical thinking: A STEM-inspired path across the curriculum, 43.
28. Williams, P. J., Nguyen, N., & Mangan, J. (2017). Using technology to support science inquiry learning. JOTSE, 7(1), 26-57.
29. Yusron, E. (2005). Pemanfaatan keragaman genetik dalam pengelolaan sumberdaya hayati laut. Oseana, 30(2), 29-34