Aims: The rate of adrenal mass detection has increased due to the development of imaging modalities. It is vital to differentiate benign adrenal adenomas from other adrenal masses in order to establish whether an active management strategy is essential. Volumetric CT histogram analysis calculates the percentage of covered pixels in the negative attenuation region. The goal of this research was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of volume histogram analysis for adrenal tumors confirmed histopathologically as well as the ideal slice thickness for CT histogram analysis to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions with a density greater than 10 Hounsfield units (HU).
Methods: The research analyzed the CT images of 127 individuals with 136 adrenal masses that were verified histopathologically after resection (57 lipid-poor adenomas, 21 pheochromocytomas, 47 metastases, and 11 adrenocortical carcinomas). For imaging, a 40-row MDCT device (Siemens Medical Solution, Erlanger, Germany) was utilized. 1 mm and 5 mm unenhanced CT images were obtained. Two separate radiologists manually assessed the Hounsfield units (HU) of the masses. The 5th to 95th percentiles of HU values, as well as the minimum, mean, and maximum values, skewness, kurtosis, and variance, were calculated. Interobserver agreement was determined by means of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results: The HU parameters for the malignant group were all higher than those of the benign group, and the difference in the 5 mm slice thickness was more significant than the 1 mm slice thickness. The difference between HUmin (P=0.007), HUmean and HUmedian (P <0.001), 5th to 50th (P <0.001), 75th (P=0.004), 90th (P=0.016), and 95th (P=0.049) percentiles was statistically significant. The malignant group had higher skewness and kurtosis than the benign group, while the benign group had higher variance. Statistically, the disparity between the variances was significant (P=0.046). The area under the curve (AUC) of the 25th percentile of the HU value was the highest (AUC=0.932; cut-off value=15; sensitivity=90.0%; specificity=85.7%).
Conclusion: Noninvasive volumetric CT histogram analysis can detect malignant adrenal masses from benign tumors before an operation. Histogram analysis benefits from thicker slices. HUmin, HUmean, HUmedian, percentile values, and variance can identify adrenal masses.
Adenoma adrenal mass computed tomography histogram analysis pheochromocytoma
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors
Dear Editor-in-Chief, Please find enclosed our manuscript entitled, “The Efficacy of Volumetric Computed Tomography Histogram Analysis in Adrenal Masses” by Mustafa Orhan Nalbant and Ercan Inci, which we would like to submit for publication as a scientific article. Thank you for your time and assistance. Sincerely, Mustafa Orhan Nalbant
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme, Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
Bölüm | Orijinal Makale |
Yazarlar | |
Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 28 Temmuz 2023 |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Temmuz 2023 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2023 |
Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]
Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.
Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.
Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
Dergi Dizin ve Platformları
Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.
Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.