The Auteur Theory in cinema: a comparative analysis of global and Turkish film directors

Abstract

Cinema has always been a profound mirror reflecting the cultural, social, and political landscapes of its origin. Turkish cinema, with its rich narrative traditions and visual aesthetics, stands as a testament to this dynamic interplay. It is not merely a medium of storytelling but a vibrant canvas where history, identity, and creativity converge. In this context, the auteur theory emerges as a powerful lens through which the evolution of Turkish cinema can be explored, offering a deeper understanding of the personal signatures and creative visions that shape its most iconic works. Turkish cinema has evolved within historical, cultural, and political contexts, carving out a distinctive identity that merits closer examination. Evaluating directors as auteurs provides a robust framework for understanding this identity, emphasizing the personal vision and creative signature that distinguish their works. The auteur theory, a concept rooted in global cinema, has gained renewed prominence in Turkish cinema studies, offering a contemporary lens for exploring the evolution of its narrative and aesthetic traditions. In recent years, the academic focus on auteur theory has increased significantly, shedding light on how Turkish directors compare with their global counterparts. Directors such as Yılmaz Güney, Nuri Bilge Ceylan, and Ferzan Özpetek embody this concept through their unique cinematic languages. Güney’s socially charged realism, Ceylan’s minimalist aesthetic, and Özpetek’s intercultural narratives collectively illustrate the richness of auteur-driven creativity within Turkish cinema. By analyzing these directors, this study positions Turkish cinema within a broader global discourse, highlighting both its contributions and points of divergence. This study aims to explore the thematic depth, stylistic approaches, and cultural narratives of Turkish auteur directors, situating their work within an international framework. By bridging local and global cinematic practices, it highlights the artistic contributions of Turkish cinema and its alignment with global traditions, enhancing its recognition on the international stage.

Keywords

• Auteur Theory
• Cinema
• Creative directing
• Director
• Turkish cinema
• World cinema

References

1. Abay Yüce, B. (2019). The basic element of cinematography is editing: "the case of violent scenes in Quentin Tarantino movies. Master's Thesis. Ordu University, Ordu, Turkiye.
2. Arslan, E. (2022). Ni̇tel araştırmalarda geçerli̇li̇k ve güveni̇li̇rlik (validity and reliability in qualitative research). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 51, 395-407. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.11
3. Aşçı, G. (2021). Bir Auteur Yönetmen Olarak Ferzan Özpetek ve Sineması (As an Auteur Director Ferzan Özpetek and His Cinemas). Medya ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2, 75-89.
4. Atmacaoğlu, O. (2021). Narrative in the shadow of image: the transformation of narrative structure in cinema with the effect of digitalization. Master's Thesis. Istanbul University. Istanbul, Turkiye.
5. Aydın, K., & Hanağası, U. B. (2017). Sosyoloji ve siyasal araştırmalarda karşılaştırmalı yöntem (comparative method in sociology and political research). Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 33, 57-86.
6. Aydin, S. (2016). Analysis of gender representations in Pedro Almodovar's cinema in the context of feminist/queer film criticism. Master's Thesis. Akdeniz University. Antalya, Turkiye.
7. Ayres, J. (2010). Auteur Theory. In the Encyclopedia of Literary and Cultural Theory, M. Ryan (Ed.). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444337839.wbelctv3a005
8. Bagci-Yanat, Y. (2022). A dramaturgical analysis on Nuri Bilge Ceylan's Cinema: the case of the Ahlat Tree. International Journal of Communication and Art, 3(6), 188-205.

9. Canby, V. (1982). “Yol,” a big, angry epic of contempory Turkey. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1982/10/06/movies/yol-a-big-angry-epic-of-contempory-turkey.html
10. Cassano, L. (2008). The indiscreet charm of diversity. The story of the other in the cinema of Ozpetek and Almodòvar. Master thesis. Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza. Italy.
11. Coskun, E., E. (2017). Currents in world cinema. Phoenix Publishing House, Ankara.
12. Calayır, S. (2022). A study on Şerif Gören and his cinema as a Turkish director within the scope of contemporary auteurs in Turkish cinema. Journal of Arts, 5(3), 177-185.
13. Çetin-Özkan, Z. (2014). The role of cinema in intercultural interaction: interculturality in the films of Ferzan Özpetek and Fatih Akın. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, Special Issue (1), 340-349.
14. Demir, A. (2022). The relationship between hollywood cinema and auteur-director: a critical look at the context of the culture industry. Mediarts Journal of Media and Art Studies, 4, 21-39.
15. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
16. Donadio, R. (2014). ‘Winter Sleep,’ a Nuri Bilge Ceylan take on Turkish life. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/23/movies/winter-sleep-a-nuri-bilge-ceylan-take-on-turkish-life.html
17. Ergün, N. (2023). Durum Çalışması (Case Study), Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri Kuram, Uygulama ve Sınırlılıklar (Qualitative Research Methods: Theory, Practice, and Limitations). Çizgi Publishing.
18. Guney, Undaunted. (2024). www.avrupasinemasi.com (2011). http://www.avrupasinemasi.com/2011/09/09/yilmaz-guney/
19. Grant, C. (2019). Becoming “Arturo Ripstein”? On Collaboration and the “Author Function” in the Transnational Film Adaptation of El lugar sin límites (1978). In: Gutiérrez Silva, M., Duno Gottberg, L. (eds) The Films of Arturo Ripstein. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22956-6_6
20. Hable con ella (2002). FilmAffinity. https://www.filmaffinity.com/es/film780724.html
21. Hill-Parks, E. E. (2010). Discourses of cinematic culture and the Hollywood director: the development of Christopher Nolan's auteur persona. Doctoral dissertation. Newcastle University. UK.
22. IMDb. (2024). Quentin Tarantino. IMDb. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000233/
23. IMDb. (2024). Nuri Bilge Ceylan. IMDb. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0149196/
24. Kıral, B. (2020). Nitel Bir Veri Analizi Yöntemi Olarak Doküman Analizi (Document Analysis as a Qualitative Data Analysis Method). Siirt Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 170-189.
25. Koçak-Özhan, D. (2012). Postmodernism in cinema. Beykent University Social Sciences Journal, 5(2), 65-87.
26. Koyuncu, M. (2017). A study on Yılmaz Güney's political cinema and Wall Film. Nişantaşı University Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 196-215
27. Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. California: Jossey-Bass.
28. Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber (Trns.ç S. Turan). Nobel Publishing.
29. McGovern, K. (2018). Ferzan Ozpetek. The American Mag. https://theamericanmag.com/ferzan-ozpetek/
30. Mohr, M. (2021). Will the real auteur please stand up! authorship and product placement in film. https://doi.org/10.32920/ryerson.14657331
31. Nuri Bilge Ceylan’ Personal Web Site (2024). https://www.nuribilgeceylan.com/bio-turkish.php
32. Organization, A. S. (2019, July 19). "The Ahlat Tree" or Nuri Bilge Ceylan's Weakest Link – Onur Keşaplı. Azizm Art Organization. Web: http://www.azizmsanat.org
33. Ozan Leymun, Ş., Odabaşı, F., & Kabakçı Yurdakul, İ. (2017). Eğitim ortamlarında durum çalışmasının önemi (the importance of case studies in educational environments). Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(3), 367-385. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/374236
34. Ozden, Victory. (2000). Basic approaches in film criticism and genre film criticism. Afa Publications, Istanbul.
35. Ferzan Ozpetek, (2006). Hammam (film). Banner - Wikipedia. Web: https://tr.wikipedia.org
36. Özdemir, N., & Öztürk, B. (2022). Tarkovsky Emulation in Nuri Bilge Ceylan's Cinema. İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 8(3), 293-314.
37. Partridge, M.C. (2023). The third cinematic aesthetics and Yılmaz Güney's "Anxiety" and "Hope" Films. Türkiye Medya Akadmeisi Dergisi, 3(5), 396-419.
38. Rodriguez Robert, Planet Terror, (2007) Web: https://tr.wikipedia.org
39. Sakınmaz, R., & Özçınar, M. (2020). Investigation of the cinematographic presentations of the characters in the cinema of Nuri Bilge Ceylan through the characters of Savcı Nusret and Sinan. Journal of Academic Social Research, 8(107), 340-360.
40. Salman, S. (2020). Antihero in postmodern cinema: an analysis of Quentin Tarantino's films. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(3), 2881-2904.
41. Sánchez-Montijano, E. (2022). Sub-state policies on immigrant transnationalism. Migraciones Publicación Del Instituto Universitario De Estudios Sobre Migraciones, 54, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.i54y2022.011
42. Sarris, A. (1962). Notes on the Auteur Theory in 1962. Leo Braudy & Marshall Cohen (Ed.), in Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings (pp. 451-454). New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Siddiqi, A.M. (2021). Analysis of architectural space and its function in the film Offret (Kurban, Tarkovsky, 1986). Master's Thesis. Konya, Turkiye.
44. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. (4. Ed). Sage.
45. Solaris (1972) IMDb. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069293/
46. Sözer, M. (2024). Web: https://www.oggusto.com
47. Sharp-Deaf, G. (2021). Tracing Giorgio Agamben in Andrei Tarkovsky's Nostalghia. ASR Journal: International Academic Social Resources Journal, 6(29), 1388-1398.
48. Stam, R. (2017). Film theory: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
49. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage. Tarantino Quentin, Death Proof, 2007 Web: https://tr.wikipedia.org
50. Terman, J. (2014). A state-level examination of bureaucratic policymaking. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(6), 708-727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014529840
51. Traveler, E. (2023). Being a stalker in a life that imposes normal: an existential and queer perspective on Tarkovsky's Stalker Movie. Sosyal Bilimler Metinleri, 2, 153-165
52. IMDb. (2024). Yilmaz Güney. IMDb. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0351566/ Truffaut, François. (1954). Une certaine tendance du cinéma français. Cahiers du Cinéma, 31, 15-29.
53. Tunc, E. (2020). Notes on the Cinema of Andrei Tarkovsky 1, Other Cinema Magazine. Web: https://www.otekisinema.com/andrey-tarkovski-sinemasi-uzerine-notlar-1/
54. Türk dizilerini dünyada 750 milyon kişi izliyor. (Hürriyet, Şubat 20, 2024). https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/
55. Ugur, U. (2017). Reflections of the Auteur Director Approach on Turkish Cinema: Demirkubuz Cinema. MANAS Journal of Social Research, 6(3), 227-241.
56. Uysal, Y. (2011). Sociology of Yılmaz Güney Cinema. International Golden Boll Cinema Congress.
57. Varol, F. (2016). Analysis of the ideological and realistic cinema language of Yılmaz Güney Cinema. Master's Thesis. Ordu University, Ordu, Turkiye.
58. Yetimova, S., & Aslan, M. (2018). A discourse analyse on nuri bilge ceylan’s film on international press’ critiques: once upon a time in anatolia. Asya Studies, 5(5), 73-86.
59. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences). Seçkin Publishing.
60. Yılmaz, H. (2020). Director's cinema books literature in Turkiye in the context of auteur cinema: a classification essay. Journal of Turkish Studies Literature, 18(36), 643-670.
61. Yılmaz, M., & Adıgüzel, E. (2017). From social problems to the world of the individual, Zeki Demirkubuz cinema. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Communication, 28, 241-272.
62. Yılmazok, Y. (2016). Laughing at falling brain fragments: violence and humor in Quentin Tarantino's Films. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Communication, 25, 179-193.
63. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Sage. (3)
64. Yurdakul, E. (2019). NBC CINEMA - Zemheri - Medium.Web: https://medium.com/zemheri/nbc-si%CC%87nemasi-3010fddfc317
65. Wanderer, J.J. (2015). Film award choices. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 33(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/027623741559471
66. Wikimedia (2014). Winter Sleep (film). Web link: Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_Sleep_(film)
67. Visual Bibliography Figure 1. Yılmaz Güney https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0351566/?ref_=ext_shr_lnk
68. Figure 2. Quentin Tarantino https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000233/mediaviewer/rm4146963200/?ref_=nm_ov_ph
69. Figure 3. Yılmaz Güney, (1981). The Road, https://tr.wikipedia.org
70. Figure 4. Quentin Tarantino, (1994). Pulp Fiction, https://tr.wikipedia.org
71. Figure 5. Quentin Tarantino, (2007). Death Proof, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_Proof
72. Figure 6. Robert Rodriguez, (2007). Planet Terror, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Terror
73. Figure 7. Nuri Bilge Ceylan https://images.app.goo.gl/vELb3S4X7HmaUS1XA
74. Figure 8. Andrei Tarkovsky https://images.app.goo.gl/aLQemgorFG1CDtYw8
75. Figure 9. Winter Sleep, (1972). Scenes from the Solaris Movies, Winter Sleep (2014) | MUBI. (1972 C.E., January 1). MUBI. https://mubi.com/tr/tr/films/winter-sleep
76. Figure 10. Nuri Bilge Ceylan, (2014). Winter Sleep, https://tr.wikipedia.org
77. Figure 11. Andrei Tarkovsky, (1972). Solaris, IMDb. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069293/
78. Figure 12. Andrei Tarkovsky, (1962). İvan’s Childhood, http://sineblog.org
79. Figure 13. Nuri Bilge Ceylan, (2018). Ahlat Tree, http://www.azizmsanat.org
80. Figure 14. Scenes from Andrei Tarkovsky, Ivan's Childhood, 1962 and The Ahlat Tree, Nuri Bilge Ceylan, 2018. Organization, A. S. (2019). "The Ahlat Tree" or Nuri Bilge Ceylan's Weakest Link – Onur Keşaplı. Azizm Art Organization. http://www.azizmsanat.org
81. Figure 15. Ferzan Özpetek, (1997). Turkish Bath, Wikimedia (1997). Hammam (film). Poster - Hammam (Film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. https://tr.wikipedia.org
82. Figure 16. Pedro Almodóvar, (2002). Talk to Her, Talk to Her (2002). Film Affinity. https://www.filmaffinity.com/es/film780724.html