From idea to character: A strategy for character construction and illustration in technical digital illustration training

Abstract

Character design constitutes a central component of digital illustration education, as it articulates narrative construction, aesthetic decision-making, and technical execution. However, in technical training contexts, apprentices frequently experience difficulties in developing characters with conceptual, narrative, and visual coherence. This study aims to analyze the impact of a structured character construction strategy, grounded in Project-Based Learning (PBL), on the development of creative and technical competencies in digital illustration apprentices at SENA (Colombia). The research adopts a qualitative case study design with action research components. The pedagogical intervention was implemented with 20 apprentices through four sequential stages: ideation, personality and formal structure development, analog illustration, and digital rendering. Data were collected through direct observation, student portfolios, and pre- and post-project self-assessment questionnaires. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify patterns related to creative process development, aesthetic coherence, and technical skill acquisition. Findings reveal improvements in conceptual clarity, visual coherence between initial ideas and final outcomes, and increased mastery of digital tools. Additionally, students reported higher levels of motivation, creative confidence, and intentionality in aesthetic decision-making. The results suggest that structured character construction strategies, supported by PBL and aesthetic learning principles, contribute significantly to meaningful learning in technical digital illustration education.

Keywords

• character design
• digital illustration
• project-based learning
• creative process
• arts education.

Supporting Institution

SENA, Center for Physical Activity and Culture Training, Bogotá, Colombia.

Ethical Statement

This study was conducted following ethical principles for educational research. All participants (apprentices) provided informed consent prior to participating in the project. Their identities and personal information were kept confidential, and all data collected was used solely for research purposes. The study adhered to ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects as established by SENA and relevant Colombian educational authorities.

Thanks

The author wishes to thank the apprentices of the Digital Illustration Training Program at SENA – Center for Physical Activity and Culture Training, for their commitment and creativity during the research process. Special thanks to the instructors and coordinators who supported the implementation of this pedagogical strategy.

References

1. Anggraeni, S., Sutisna, R., & Mulyadi, A. (2023). The effect of project-based learning through art performance on student learning motivation. Journal of Education and Practice, 14(5), 44–53.
2. Arnheim, R. (2004). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye (50th anniversary ed.). University of California Press.
3. Bertamini, M., Palumbo, M., Gheorghes, A., & Galatsidas, T. (2016). Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity? British Journal of Psychology, 107(1), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12131
4. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
5. Chaiyajak, W. (2020). Character design and personality: Integrating narrative into visual development. International Journal of Animation Studies, 12(1), 22–37.
6. Cornford, I., & Cross, D. (2020). Assessing creativity in design education through portfolios. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(2), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12245
7. Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.
8. Field, D. J. (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4(12), 2379–2394. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.4.002379

9. Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). Basic Books.
10. Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education: Theory, practice and rubber duckies. Higher Education, 51(2), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6386-5
11. Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2021). Metodología de la investigación [Research methodology] (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
12. Lai, J. (2021). Project-based learning in art classrooms. Journal of Arts Education, 15(3), 45–58.
13. Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010). Universal principles of design: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, and make better design decisions. Rockport Publishers.
14. Moreno Pabón, J. (2022). La autoevaluación en la enseñanza de las artes: Un enfoque metacognitivo [Self- assessment in arts education: A metacognitive approach]. Revista Colombiana de Educación Artística, 6(2), 33–48.
15. Solarski, C. (2012). Drawing basics and video game art: Classic methods for digital creatives. Watson-Guptill.
16. Taneja, R. (2021). Project-based learning in graphic design education. International Design and Arts Journal, 7(2), 33–48.
17. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.