A PROPOSAL FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMPETITION POLICY FORUM IN THE ORGANISATION OF ISLAMIC COOPERATION

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 51 - 87, 30.06.2021

Metin Toprak

Öz

In the Organization of Islamic Cooperation countries, the development of the market economy in terms of institutions and instruments is not yet mature. Turkey is among the most advanced Islamic countries in terms of both the market economy and democracy. Being a member of OECD and having long term relationships with the European Union has given Turkey a unique role model in the Islamic world. As a result of various workshops conducted by the OIC countries, Turkey is considered to be the most competitive economy and having a leading capacity to promote competition in the Islamic world.
In this study, it is envisaged to draft an organizational and functional architecture for a competition policy forum among OIC countries (Figure 1). This policy forum can be comprehensive in the context of the leading economic sectors of each country. In this study, a proposal has been developed according to the results of field research and subsequent meeting on competition law and policy for the OIC countries conducted by the Turkish competition authority.
In this way, Turkey will reinforce its benchmark status on the one hand and will create positive externality by reflecting its experiences with the Western institutions, instruments, and values to other OIC countries on the other hand. The organizational and functional architectural design developed for the policy forum is in line with the approaches of the OECD and the EU.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Islamic Competition, The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, Competition policy forum, Turkish Competition Authority

Kaynakça

• Abdelrahman, Abdelrahman Yousri. (2015). Does Islamic Banking Help in Economic Development of Muslim Countries? MPRA Paper No. 88387. 33p. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/88387/8/MPRA_paper_88387.pdf (Accessed: June 2, 2018).
• Aghion, Philippe and Griffith, Rachel. (2008). Competition and Growth: Reconciling Theory and Evidence. MIT Press: Cambridge, US. 120p.
• Alpay, Savaş, Atlamaz, Murat & Bakimli, Esat. (2011). Trade among OIC Countries: Limits of Islamic Solidarity. Insight Turkey. 13(2), 145-170.
• Aydin, Umut. (2012). Between Domestic Factors and the EU: Explaining the Emergence of the Turkish Competition Regime. The Antitrust Bulletin. 57(2), 303-335.
• Bagci, Kenan. (2016). Measuring within Diversification. The International Trade Journal. 30(3), 223–236.
• Bungenberg, Marc, et al. (2013). European Yearbook of International Economic Law. Springer. Lausanne.
• Bungenberg, Marc, et al. (2018). European Yearbook of International Economic Law. Springer. Lausanne.
• Castellacci, Fulvio. (2009). How Does Competition Affect the Relationship between Innovation and Productivity? Estimation of a CDM Model for Norway Department of International Economics. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI). MPRA Paper No. 2759. 36p.
• Çelen, Aydın, Dalgıç, Başak & Özeskici, Aybars Ilter. (2018). Measurement of the Efficiency of the Turkish Competition Authority: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 51(3), 173-204.
• COMCEC. (2011). Assessment of the OIC Member States in the Field of Competition Law and Policy. (21-22 November 2011, Istanbul). http://icdt-oic.org/RS_67/Doc/Report_of_Istanbul_Conference.pdf (Accessed: April 26, 2017).
• Dereli, Deniz D. (2015). Innovation Management in Global Competition and Competitive Advantage. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 195, 1365-1370.
• DinarStandard. (2017). State of the Global Islamic Economy Report 2016/17.
• Dresch, Aline, Collatto, Dalila C. & Lacerda, Daniel P. (2018). Theoretical Understanding Between Competitiveness and Productivity: Firm Level. Industrial Engineering. 20(2), 69-86.
• Facchini, François. (2011). Economic Freedom in Muslim Countries: An Explanation Using the Theory of Institutional Path Dependency. CES Working Papers, Documents de Travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne, 25p.
• Geradin, Damien, Reysen, Marc & Henry, David. (2011). Extraterritoriality, Comity, and Cooperation in EU Competition Law. In, Guzman, Andrew T. (Ed.). (2011). Cooperation, Comity and Competition Policy. Oxford Univ. Press. pp.21-44
• Golębiewski, Jarosław. (2011). Product Market Competition and Productivity: Evidence from the Polish Food Marketing System. Economic Science for Rural Development. 24, 50-58.
• Gomaa, Marwa M. (2014). Competition and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to MENA Countries. Topics in Middle Eastern and African Economies. 16(2), 192-213.
• Gurkaynak, Gonenc, Guner, Ayse & Yasar, Ayse Gizem. (2015). The Turkish Competition Authority's Sector Inquiries: Past and Current Sector Inquiries Reviewed. The Turkish Commercial Law Review. 1(1), 51-60.
• ICDT. (2010a). Report on the Regional Seminar On “Competition Policies and Regulations in the OIC Member States: Present Status and Prospects”. 22-24 February 2010, Tunis. https://icdt-oic.org/ICDT_Page.aspx?Id_Page=893 (Accessed: June 6, 2018).
• ICDT. (2010b). Tunis Declaration. Istanbul. 5-8 October 2010. https://icdt-oic.org/ICDT_Page.aspx?Id_Page=893 (Accessed: June 6, 2018).
• ICDT. (2012). Report of the Istanbul Conference On “Needs Assessment of the OIC Member States in the Field of Competition Law and Policy”. 21-22 November 2011, Istanbul. https://icdt-oic.org/ICDT_Page.aspx?Id_Page=893 (Accessed: June 6, 2018).
• ICN. (2009). ICN Factsheet and Key Messages. https://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Factsheet2009.pdf (Accessed: June 5, 2018).
• ICN. (2016). The Future of the ICN in Its Second Decade: Final Report. Paris. 96p. https://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ICN2dDecade2016.pdf (Accessed: June 5, 2018).
• ICN. (2018). What is the ICN? https://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/about/ (Accessed: June 5, 2018).
• ICN. (2019). ICN Steering Group Members. https://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/working-groups/icn-operations/steering-group/steering-group-members/) (Accessed: April 26, 2020)
• ICN. (2020a). Members. https://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/members/ (Accessed: April 26, 2020).
• ICN. (2020b). Working Groups. https://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/working-groups/ (Accessed: April 26, 2020).
• ICN. (2020c). What is the ICN. https://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/about/ (Accessed: April 26, 2020).
• Kegels, Chantal & van der Linden, Jan. (2011). Competitiveness, Productivity, Competition and Structural Reforms: The Belgian Case. Reflets et Perspectives de la vie Économique, De Boeck Université. 3, 27-51.
• Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. (2010). Islamic Economic Thought and the Social Market Economy, 12p.
• Moen, Øystein, Tvedten, Tord & Wold, Andreas. (2018). Exploring the relationship between competition and innovation in Norwegian SMEs. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1564167.
• Noon, Hazizan, Karim, Zehadul & Uddin, Sayed. (2018). Development and Modernization of OIC Member Countries: A Study Based on Selected Indicators. Intellectual Discourse. 26(1), 229–253.
• OECD. (2008). Shaping Policies for the Future of the Internet Economy: Annexes. 85p.
• OECD. (2012). Recommendation of the OECD Council on Fighting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement. 20p.
• OECD. (2014). Experiences with Competition Assessment Report on the Implementation of the 2009 OECD Recommendation. 73p.
• OECD. (2016). Better Policies Japan: Boosting Growth and Well-being in an Ageing Society. 44p.
• OECD. (2019a). Competition Assessment Toolkit: Volumes 1-3, Principles, Guidance, Operational Manual of the 2009 OECD Recommendation.
• OECD. (2019b). Member countries. https://www.oecd.org/about/members-and-partners/ (Accessed: March 7, 2019).
• OECD. (2020). Competition Global Relations. https://www.oecd.org/fr/daf/concurrence/competitionglobalrelations.htm (Accessed: March 3, 2020).
• Ozkan, Ahmet Fatih. (2014). A New Tool in Competition Advocacy: Press Releases of the Turkish Competition Authority, Journal of Inonu University Faculty of Law. 5(2), 515-558.
• Polemis, Michael L. (2020). A Note on the Estimation of Competition-Productivity Nexus: A Panel Quantile Approach. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-020-00155-w (Accessed: June 3, 2020).
• Sokol, D. Daniel. (2011). International Antitrust Institutions. In, Guzman, Andrew T. (Ed.). (2011). Cooperation, Comity and Competition Policy. Oxford Univ. Press. pp.187-213.
• Swaine, Edward T. (2011). Cooperation, Comity, and Competition Policy: United States. In, Guzman, Andrew T. (Ed.). (2011). Cooperation, Comity and Competition Policy. Oxford Univ. Press. pp.3-20.
• Tireli, Münir, Çoşkun, Selim &, Kunduraci, Nevzat Fırat. (2013). A Comparative Analysis of Relationship between Social Indicators and Human Development Indicators in Turkey and OIC Countries. Journal of Social Policy Studies. 13(7), 61-87.
• Toprak, Metin. (1994). The Structure of Foreign Trade in Islamic Countries. Journal of Economics, Management and Finance. 104, 34-51.
• UNCTAD. (2012). Capacity-Building Extended to Young Competition Agencies: Note by the UNCTAD Secretariat. https://unctad.org/meetings/en/SessionalDocuments/ciclpd17_en.pdf? (Accessed: April 5, 2012).
• UNCTAD. (2013). Competition and Poverty Reduction: 516P. http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/competition-and-poverty-reduction2013.pdf (Accessed: April 5, 2015).
• UNCTAD. (2019). Review of Capacity-Building in and Technical Assistance on Competition and Consumer Protection Law and Policy. 12p. https://unctad.org/meetings/en/SessionalDocuments/cicplpd19_en.pdf (Accessed: April 20, 2019).
• World Bank. (2018). The Arab World Competitiveness Report 2018. 149p.