Conference Paper

The Assessment of Turkey’s Lack of Resilience to Disasters and Hazards with IDB Indicator System

Volume: 7 Number: 13 April 30, 2021
EN

The Assessment of Turkey’s Lack of Resilience to Disasters and Hazards with IDB Indicator System

Abstract

In recent years, resilience has emerged as a guiding principle for urban development and disaster risk management. The aim of this study, human development, economic recovery and the factors that influence to reach a high level of security at every level, Turkey is to determine the level of resistance against disasters at the national and international areas of the province. The study was prepared with a semi-numerical method and the scope of the study was all provinces of our country. Although the study covers 2015-2017 periods, it was applied to all provinces of our country. LRI (Lack of Resilience Index) consists of 8 sub-factors and the index value is between 0 and 1. Classification of index values was done according to international standards as follows; between 0-0.20 as low, between 0.20-0.40 as medium, between 0.40-0.80 as high and between 0,80-1,00 as very high. Ağrı (0.71), Şırnak (0.66), Muş (0.66) and Hakkâri (0.65) provinces were the first four provinces with the highest value according to the 2015-2017 average value of LRI and Isparta (0.38), Bolu (0.38), Izmir (0.36) and Ankara (0.32) were the lowest. Moreover, while 93.83% of our provinces were in the high index category, it was seen that 6.17% is in the middle index category and we had no provinces in the low index category. As a result, it was seen that our provinces had deficiencies regarding lack of resilience, especially the average and expected schooling years, per capita national income, insurance rates of buildings and houses and the number of hospital beds.

Keywords

References

  1. Adger ,W.N., (2000). Social and ecological resilience: are they related. Progress in Human Geography 24, 3: 347-364.
  2. AFAD (Disaster and Emergency Management), (2018). Afete Dirençli Toplum: Uygulama örnekleri (Disaster Resistant Society: Application examples). Ankara: AFAD Publications.
  3. AFAD (Disaster and Emergency Management), (2018). Disaster Resistant Society: Application examples. Ankara: AFAD Publications.
  4. Beccari, B., (2016). A Comparative Analysis of Disaster Risk, Vulnerability and Resilience Composite Indicators. San Francisco: Public Library of Science (PLOS) Currents Disasters.
  5. BID (Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo), (2010a). Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (Argentina). Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
  6. BID (Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo), (2010b). Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (Bolivia). Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
  7. BID (Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo), (2010c). Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (Costa Rica). Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
  8. BID (Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo), (2010d). Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (Ecuador). Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Library and Information Studies

Journal Section

Conference Paper

Publication Date

April 30, 2021

Submission Date

October 23, 2020

Acceptance Date

December 20, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 7 Number: 13

APA
Yaprak, Ü., Şahinöz, T., & Şahinöz, S. (2021). The Assessment of Turkey’s Lack of Resilience to Disasters and Hazards with IDB Indicator System. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, 7(13), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.815337
AMA
1.Yaprak Ü, Şahinöz T, Şahinöz S. The Assessment of Turkey’s Lack of Resilience to Disasters and Hazards with IDB Indicator System. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management. 2021;7(13):61-72. doi:10.48121/jihsam.815337
Chicago
Yaprak, Ünal, Turgut Şahinöz, and Saime Şahinöz. 2021. “The Assessment of Turkey’s Lack of Resilience to Disasters and Hazards With IDB Indicator System”. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management 7 (13): 61-72. https://doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.815337.
EndNote
Yaprak Ü, Şahinöz T, Şahinöz S (April 1, 2021) The Assessment of Turkey’s Lack of Resilience to Disasters and Hazards with IDB Indicator System. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management 7 13 61–72.
IEEE
[1]Ü. Yaprak, T. Şahinöz, and S. Şahinöz, “The Assessment of Turkey’s Lack of Resilience to Disasters and Hazards with IDB Indicator System”, Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 61–72, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.48121/jihsam.815337.
ISNAD
Yaprak, Ünal - Şahinöz, Turgut - Şahinöz, Saime. “The Assessment of Turkey’s Lack of Resilience to Disasters and Hazards With IDB Indicator System”. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management 7/13 (April 1, 2021): 61-72. https://doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.815337.
JAMA
1.Yaprak Ü, Şahinöz T, Şahinöz S. The Assessment of Turkey’s Lack of Resilience to Disasters and Hazards with IDB Indicator System. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management. 2021;7:61–72.
MLA
Yaprak, Ünal, et al. “The Assessment of Turkey’s Lack of Resilience to Disasters and Hazards With IDB Indicator System”. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, vol. 7, no. 13, Apr. 2021, pp. 61-72, doi:10.48121/jihsam.815337.
Vancouver
1.Ünal Yaprak, Turgut Şahinöz, Saime Şahinöz. The Assessment of Turkey’s Lack of Resilience to Disasters and Hazards with IDB Indicator System. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management. 2021 Apr. 1;7(13):61-72. doi:10.48121/jihsam.815337