Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is the determine types of abutments and frequency of using angled abutment for the cementable restorations for every teeth position and also determine the dental technicihan’s education and dental labaratory’s conditions.Material and Methods: A questionnaire was developed with two sections, applied in the dental labaratory. First section included questions about implant locations,material and type of prostheses, and also type and degree of the abutment in use. Second section included questions about dental technician’s education, experiance about implant supported prostheses and conditions of dental laboratory. Results: 159 angleded, 109 milled, 105 straight and 27 solid abutments were seen in 400 cast. Conclusion: Most frequent employed were angulated abutments in the cementable restorations. They are frequently used upper insicors region.
Keywords
References
- Akça K, İplikçioğlu H. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2001; 16(5): 722- Zampelis A, Rangert B, Heijl L. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: A two dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent, 2007; 97: 35- Eger DE, Gunsolley JC, Feldman S. Comparison of angled and standard abutments and their effect on clinical outcomes: a preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac
- Implants, 2000; 15(6): 819-23. Morand M, Irınakis T. The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla.
- Providing a rationale fort he use of short implants. J Oral Implantol, 2007; 33: 257-66. Naini RB, Nokar S, Borghei H, Alikhasi M. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three dimensional finite element analysis. Int J
- Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2011; 26: 776-81. Ten Bruggenkate CM, Sutter F, Oosterbeek HS, Schroeder A. Indications for angled implants. J Prosthet Dent, 1992; 67: 85-93. Saab XE, Griggs JA, Powers JM, Engelmeier RL. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study.
- J Prosthet Dent, 2007; 97(2): 85-92. Calletti R, Pameijer CH, Bracchetti
- G, Donath K, Persichetti G, Visani I. Histologic evaluation of osseointegrated implants restored in nonaxial functional occlusion with preangled abutments. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 1995; 15: 562-73. Tealdo T, Bevilacqua M, Pera F, Menini
- M, Ravera G, Drago C, Pera P. Immediate function with fixed implant supported maxillary dentures: a 12 month pilot study. J Prosthet Dent, 2008; 99(5): 351-60. Kao HC, Gung YW, Chung TF, Hsu
- ML. The influence of implant dayanağı angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2008; 23(4): 623-30. Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P. The use of angulated implant dayanağıs in implant dentistry: five-year clinical results of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac
- Implants, 2000; 15(6): 801-10. Fazi G, Tellini S, Vangi D, Branchi R.
Abstract
Amaç: Çalışmada, implant üstü simante restorasyonlarda kullanılan implant dayanağı çeşitlerinin,
açılı implant dayanağı kullanım sıklığının ve kullanım bölgelerinin, diş teknisyenlerinin implant üstü
restorasyonlarla ilgili eğitimi ve laboratuar şartlarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Diş laboratuarlarında uygulanmak üzere iki aşamalı bir anket oluşturulmuştur.
Anketin birinci bölümü; implantın cerrahi uygulama bölgeleri, protezin tasarımı ve materyali, ayrıca
kullanılan implant dayanağının türü ve açısına dair sorular içermektedir. Anketin ikinci kısmı ise diş
teknisyenin eğitimi, implant üstü protezler konusundaki tecrübesi, konu hakkındaki eğitimini ne şekilde
edindiği ve laboratuarın şartları ile ilgili sorular içermektedir.
Bulgular: İncelenen modellerde, 400 implant dayanağından, 159 adet açılı, 109 adet freze edilebilir,
105 adet düz ve 27 adet solid implant dayanağı kullanımı belirlenmiştir.
Sonuç: İncelenen modellerde simante restorasyon uygulamalarında açılı implant dayanağı kullanı-
mının yaygın olduğu belirlenmiştir. Açılı implant dayanağı kullanımının en yoğun olduğu bölge ise üst
kesiciler bölgesi olarak tespit edilmiştir
Keywords
References
- Akça K, İplikçioğlu H. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2001; 16(5): 722- Zampelis A, Rangert B, Heijl L. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: A two dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent, 2007; 97: 35- Eger DE, Gunsolley JC, Feldman S. Comparison of angled and standard abutments and their effect on clinical outcomes: a preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac
- Implants, 2000; 15(6): 819-23. Morand M, Irınakis T. The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla.
- Providing a rationale fort he use of short implants. J Oral Implantol, 2007; 33: 257-66. Naini RB, Nokar S, Borghei H, Alikhasi M. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three dimensional finite element analysis. Int J
- Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2011; 26: 776-81. Ten Bruggenkate CM, Sutter F, Oosterbeek HS, Schroeder A. Indications for angled implants. J Prosthet Dent, 1992; 67: 85-93. Saab XE, Griggs JA, Powers JM, Engelmeier RL. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study.
- J Prosthet Dent, 2007; 97(2): 85-92. Calletti R, Pameijer CH, Bracchetti
- G, Donath K, Persichetti G, Visani I. Histologic evaluation of osseointegrated implants restored in nonaxial functional occlusion with preangled abutments. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 1995; 15: 562-73. Tealdo T, Bevilacqua M, Pera F, Menini
- M, Ravera G, Drago C, Pera P. Immediate function with fixed implant supported maxillary dentures: a 12 month pilot study. J Prosthet Dent, 2008; 99(5): 351-60. Kao HC, Gung YW, Chung TF, Hsu
- ML. The influence of implant dayanağı angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2008; 23(4): 623-30. Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P. The use of angulated implant dayanağıs in implant dentistry: five-year clinical results of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac
- Implants, 2000; 15(6): 801-10. Fazi G, Tellini S, Vangi D, Branchi R.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | May 14, 2013 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2013 Volume: 47 Issue: 1 |
Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.