Large scale Open Educational Resources (OER) initiative in mathematics

Abstract

A team of LaGuardia Community College math faculty designed and launched the OER (Open Educational Resources) project in Spring 2017 to allow to take mathematics courses at zero or low textbook cost. Our first pilot phase started with 10 sections in Fall 2017 using three different OER platforms: Myopenmath, Webwork and Khanacademy.One out of the three platforms, Myopenmath used in phase 1 was selected to pilot 34 sections in Spring 2018. In Fall 2018, the OER team moved to a full-scale implementation on all remedial and gateway courses of 164 sections including Fundamentals of Algebra, Intro to Algebra, Elementary Algebra Co-req STEM, College Algebra and Elementary Statistics. From Fall 2017 to Spring 2018, a total of $477,182 was saved by 5,560 LaGuardia students. By Fall 2019, the project had saved a total of $1,184,329.25 on textbook costs. In addition, the pass rates for OER courses were either better or the same when compared to non-OER courses. Furthermore, the pass rate for OER Co-req STEMwas almost two times higher than the one for non-OER Co-req STEM sections.

Keywords

• Learning Equity
• Open Educational Resource
• Community College

Supporting Institution

LaGuardia Community College

References

1. Association of Community Colleges Trustees. (ACCT) (2015). Diversity, Equity & Inclusion: A checklist and implementation guide for community college boards. ashington, DC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED611029.
2. Belkharraz Idrissi, A., Cuellar, M., Funk, J., (2020). Co-Requisite Mathematics Models and Gateway Completion. Strong Start to Finish. https://strongstart.org/sites/default/files/resource- center/pdfs/SSTF-StepsToSuccess-LaGuardia%20FINAL.pdf
3. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136- 155. DOI:10.1080/14759390000200096
4. Butcher, N. (2015). A basic guide to open educational resources (OER). British Columbia, Canada: Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver and UNESCO. http://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/36
5. Clinton-Lisell, V., Legerski, E., Rhodes, B., & Gilpin, S. (2020). Open Educational Resources as tools to foster equity. In C. Ozaki & L. Parson (Eds.) Teaching & learning for social justice and equity in higher education, Volume 2. Palgrave MacMillan.
6. Clinton, V., & Khan, S. (2019). Efficacy of open textbook adoption on learning performance and course withdrawal rates: A meta-analysis. AERA Open, 5(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2332858419872212
7. Comforto, N. (2015). The teacher’s guide to Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from http://www.edudemic.com/guide-open-educational-resources.
8. Conole, G., & Brown, M. (2018). Reflecting on the Impact of the Open Education Movement. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 187-203. DeCarlo, M. P. (2019, November 7). Teaching note: Creating open textbooks for social work education.

9. Doody, O., & Doody, C. M. (2015). Conducting a pilot study: Case study of a novice researcher. British Journal of Nursing, 24(21), 1074-1078.
10. Forbes, C. T. (2013). Curriculum-dependent and curriculum-independent factors in preservice elementary teachers’ adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry-based science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9245-0
11. Grodecka, K., & Śliwowski, K. (2014). Open Educational resources mythbusting. Retrieved from http://mythbusting.oerpolicy.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ OER_Mythbusting.pdf. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
12. Hall, M., Smith, K., Boeckman, D., Ramachandran, V., & Jasin, J. (2003, October). Why do students withdraw from courses? Southern Association for Institutional Research, 01-11. San Antonio, TX.
13. Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development,64(4), 573–590.
14. Jenkins, J. J., Sánchez, L. A., Schraedley, M. A. K., Hannans, J., Navick, N., & Young, J. (2020). Textbook broke: Textbook affordability as a social justice issue. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.549.
15. LaGuardia Community College Office of Institutional Research and Advancement. 2019 Institutional Profile. Retrieved from https://www.laguardia.edu/uploadedFiles/Main_Site/Content/IT/2019-Institutional- Profile.pdf
16. Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (Dis)Course: A Distinctive Social Justice Aligned Definition of Open Education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 225–244. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2722-9684
17. Prescott, P. A., & Soeken, K. L. (1989). The potential uses of pilot work. Nursing Research, 38(1), 60.
18. OECD (2016), Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en
19. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543075002211
20. Sullivan, J. (2011). Free, Open-Source Software Advocacy as a Social Justice Movement: The Expansion of F/OSS Movement Discourse in the 21st Century. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2011.592080
21. U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund and Student Public Interest Research Groups. (USPIRG) (2014). Fixing the Broken Textbook Market. Washington, DC. http://www.uspirg.org/reports/usp/fixing-brokentextbook-market
22. Watson, C. E., Domizi, D. P., & Clouser, S. A. (2017). Student and Faculty Perceptions of OpenStax in High Enrollment Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2462
23. Wiley, D. & Hilton, JL, III. 2018. Defining OER-Enabled Pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
24. Wiley, D., & Green, C. (2012). Why openness in education? In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Game changers: Education and information technologies, pp. 81-90. N.p.: Educause. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7203.pdf.