FROM MASS CUSTOMIZATION TO PRODUCT PERSONALIZATION IN AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY: POTENTIALS OF INDUSTRY 4.0
Abstract
Purpose- Industry 4.0 involves a paradigm shift in marketing management as well as operations management. The recent literature identifies a transformation from mass customization to mass personalization. The purpose of this study is to explore the transformation addressing the Industry 4.0 concepts and recent progress in the automotive industry.
Methodology- This study is an exploratory research utilizing case study method. Interviews were carried out with one of the leading automotive brands. Data were analyzed through descriptive analysis.
Findings- The case study identifies the product decisions with a focus on customization and personalization themes. Customers’ involvement in design process is emphasized as well as customer data for a more customer-oriented strategy. The findings suggest that disruptive technologies provide a basis for mass-personalization strategy.
Conclusion- Our case study demonstrates that automotive industry is one of the leading industries that prioritize customer preferences. The customization is achieved through numerous options supported by generic architectures. Nevertheless, personalization represents a higher degree of one-to-one marketing vision. Industry 4.0 contributes to such vision with emerging technologies that facilitate collection and analysis of customer and provide more personalized experience.
Keywords
References
- Aldanondo, M., & Vareilles, E. 2008, “Configuration for mass customization: how to extend product configuration towards requirements and process configuration”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 521-535.
- Arora, N., Dreze, X., Ghose, A., Hess, J.D., Iyengar, R., Jing, B., Joshi, Y., Kumar, V., Lurie, N., Neslin, S. & Sajeesh, S. 2008, “Putting one-toone marketing to work: Personalization, customization, and choice”, Marketing Letters, vol. 19, no. 3-4, pp. 305.
- Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M., Rosenberg, M. 2014, “How Virtualization, Decentralization and Network Building Change the Manufacturing Landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective”, International Journal of Mechanical, Industrial Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 37-44.
- Da Silveira, G., Borenstein, D., Fogliatto, F. S. 2001, “Mass customization: Literature review and research directions”, International journal of production economics, 72(1), 1-13.
- Dahmus, J. B., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P., & Otto, K. N. 2001, “Modular product architecture”, Design studies, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 409-424.
- Fidel, R. 1984, “The case study method: a case study”, Library and Information Science Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 273-288.
- Fogliatto, F.S., Silveira, G. J. C., Borenstein, D. 2012, “The mass customization decade: An updated review of the literature,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 14-25.
- Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., Allamneni, S. 1999, “Modular product design: a life-cycle view”, Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 13-26.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
September 30, 2017
Submission Date
May 20, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 4 Number: 3