THE EFFECTS OF SYMBOLIC IMAGE DIMENSIONS ON EMPLOYER ATTRACTIVENESS IN TERMS OF EMPLOYER BRANDING CONCEPT

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4, 398 - 407, 30.12.2017

Furkan Marasli Mujdelen Ipek Yener

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.728

Öz

Purpose- Employer
branding has been subject to various studies in strategic human resource field
in order to attract high-skilled potential employees and retain existing
employees to create competitive advantage over its competitors with creating
high intellectual capital assets. Present study aims to focus on the effects of
symbolic image dimensions of employer on employer attractiveness.                

Methodology- In order to test propositions, questionnaires are
conducted on 181 last year bachelor, master and PhD students which are
considered as potential employees for organizations in Turkish universities
between the years 2016-2017. Data gathered from questionnaires are analyzed
through SPSS program. 

Findings- All the
suggested hypothesis regarding to research model are accepted and findings are
consistent with the literature.  Conclusion- Analysis results revealed
that symbolic image dimensions of employer have significant positive affect on
employer attractiveness. All three dimensions of symbolic image have
significant effect on all four dimensions of employer attractiveness. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Employer brand, employer branding, employer attractiveness, organizational attractiveness, symbolic image

Kaynakça

• Ambler, T. & Barrow, S. (1996) the employer brand. Journal of Brand Management, 4(3), pp. 185–206.
• Backhaus, K., and Tikoo, S., (2004), "Conceptualizing and researching employer branding," Career Development International, 9.5 pp. 501-517.
• Barney, J.B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 99-120
• Barrow, S., Mosley, R., (2005), The Employer Brand, Wiley, London
• Berthon, P. Ewing, M., & Hah, L. L. (2005). “Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding.” International Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 151-172
• Cable M.D., Turban D.B. (2003). The value of organizational reputation in the recruitment context: A brand-equity perspective.
• Davies, G. (2008). Employer branding and its influence on managers. European Journal of Marketing, 42(5/6), 667-681
• Ewing, M.T., Pitt, L.F., de Bussy, N.M. & Berthon, P. (2002) Employment branding in the knowledge economyInternational Journal of Advertising, 21(1), pp. 3–22.
• Jiang, T. T., Iles, P. (2011). Employer-brand equity, organizational attractiveness and talent management in the Zhejiang private sector, China // Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 6, No. 1
• Kashyap, V., & Rangnekar, S. (2014). Servant leadership, employer brand perception, trust in leaders and turnover intentions: a sequential mediation model. Review of Managerial Science, 1-25.
• Kotter, J. P. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York: Free Press.
• Lievens, F. and Highhouse, S. (2003), “The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company’s attractiveness as an employer”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 56, pp. 75-102.
• Lievens, F., Van Hoye, G., & Anseel, F. (2007). Organizational identity and employer image: Towards a unifyingframework. British Journal of Management, 18, S45– S59.
• Lievens, F. (2007). Employer branding in the Belgian Army: The importance of instrumental and symbolic beliefs forPotential applicants, actual applicants, and military employees. Human Resource Management, 46, 51 69.
• Lloyd, S. (2002) Branding from the inside out. BRW, 24(10), pp. 64–66.
• Martin R. Edwards, (2009) "An integrative review of employer branding and OB theory", Personnel Review, Vol. 39 Issue: 1, pp.5-23
• Martin, G. Beaumont, P., Doig, R., Pate, J. (2005). Branding: A New Performance Discourse for HR? // European Management Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1.
• Moroco L., Uncles M.D. (2008) Characteristics of successful employer brand, Brand Management1350-23IX Vol. 16, NO. 3, 160–175
• Rampl, L. V. (2014). How to become an employer of choice: transforming employer brand associations into employer firstchoice brands. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(13-14), 1486-1504.
• Slaughter, J.E., Zickar, M.J., Highhouse, S., & Mohr, D.C. (2004). Personality trait inferences about organizations: Development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 85–103.
• Srivastava, P and Bhatnagar, J. (2010) “Employer brand for talent acquisition; an exploration towards its measurement. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 14(1-2), 25-34.
• Sullivan, S. (1999), “The changing nature of careers: a review and research agenda”, Journal of Management, Vol. 25, pp. 457-75.
• Sullivan, J., (2002), “Crafting a Lofty Employer Brand: A Costly Proposition,” ER Daily, November, 25 (as cited in Backhaus, K., and Tikoo, S., (2004), “Conceptualising and Researching Employer Branding,” Career Development International, 9.5, pp. 501–517.
• Sullivan, J. (2004), “Eight elements of a successful employment brand”, ER Daily, 23 February,
• Van Hoye, G., Bas, T., Cromheecke, S., & Lievens, F. (2013). The instrumental and symbolic dimensions of Organisations' image as an employer: A large-scale field study on employer branding in Turkey. Applied Psychology
• Wilden, R., Gudergan, S., & Lings, I. (2010). Employer branding: strategic implications for staff recruitment. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(1-2), 56-73.