Analysis of Caribbean XR Survey Creates an XR Development Strategy as a Path to the Regional Metaverse Evolution

Abstract

XR provides benefits in innovation, competitiveness and sustainability that offset disruptions in and enhances physical reality. The Caribbean’s metaverse evolution started before the pandemic with the development of XR projects and creatives’ NFTs. The physical isolation during the Covid-19 pandemic accelerated the Caribbean’s interest in the metaverse and XR. In 2020, only 83 participants from Trinidad and Tobago entered the CARIRI AR/VR Challenge to demonstrate their XR ideas. There is a need to encourage and accelerate regional XR development. The purpose of this research is to explore Caribbean XR developers’ experiences to provide an understanding of the factors affecting their XR development. This paper addresses the question: What factors of influence will encourage the development of XR projects in the Caribbean to advance their metaverse development? Online questionnaires issued to Caribbean XR developers from July to December 2021 obtained responses from 77 participants throughout 13 regional countries. The primary data were statistically insignificant and skewed towards two countries (Jamaica and Trinidad & Tobago). Comparative and inferential analyses identified factors of influence, industry sectors, and design foci. The originality of this research is an XR development strategy that incorporates the I4.0, UX, and financial strategies. It establishes the XR project design foci (the user, the purpose and the location). The factors of influence minimum criteria and the industry sector(s) influence each design focus. An initial reference list of industry sectors is education (the preferred option), healthcare, tourism, culture, manufacturing for export, construction, entertainment, game development, agriculture, and environmental protection. The strategy’s value is in enabling content creators to design XR applications to meet consumers’ needs and increase the regional adoption of XR. The impact of the research on the Caribbean is to facilitate a path to the regional metaverse evolution. This research identified the need for a regional XR development policy.

Keywords

• Caribbean
• Metaverse
• Extended Reality (XR)
• Industry 4.0 (I4.0)
• Survey

References

1. N. Stephenson, Snow Crash, 1st ed. United States: Bantam Books (US), 1992.
2. Metaverse Standards Forum, “Evolving an Interoperable Metaverse,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://portal.metaverse-standards.org/document/dl/3321
3. M. Ball, The Metaverse: And How it Will Revolutionize Everything. New York, New York, USA: Liveright , 2022. Accessed: Jul. 07, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.amazon.com/Metaverse-How-Will-Revolutionize-Everything/dp/1324092033
4. C. Fink, “Book Review: The Metaverse, And How It Will Revolutionize Everything, By Matthew Ball,” Forbes, Jul. 06, 2022. https://www.forbes.com/sites/charliefink/2022/07/06/book-review-the-metaverse-and-how-it-will-revolutionize-everything-by-matthew-ball/ (accessed Jul. 07, 2022).
5. J. Sun, W. Gan, H.-C. Chao, and P. S. Yu, “Metaverse: Survey, Applications, Security, and Opportunities,” ACM Comput. Surv, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 35, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2210.07990.
6. L. Zhu, “The Metaverse: Concepts and Issues for Congress,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47224
7. J. Anderson and L. Rainie, “The Metaverse in 2040,” Washington, DC, USA, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/06/30/the-metaverse-in-2040/
8. J. R. Rameshwar and G. S. King, “Caribbean Metaverse Development: A Literature Review Perspective,” Journal of Metaverse, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 83–99, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jmv/issue/71114/1120470

9. J. R. Rameshwar and G. S. King, “Case Studies in Engineering and Technology Innovation in the Caribbean: A focus on EduColCom and BevCom,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering & Technology (IConETech-2020), 2020, pp. 574–584. doi: 10.47412/EBWB6632.
10. S. Mystakidis, “Metaverse,” Encyclopedia, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 486–497, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia2010031.
11. S.-M. Park and Y.-G. Kim, “A Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 4209–4251, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140175.
12. N. G. Narin, “A Content Analysis of the Metaverse Articles,” Journal of Metaverse, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2021, Accessed: May 08, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jmv/issue/67581/1051382
13. M. Damar, “Metaverse Shape of Your Life for Future: A bibliometric snapshot,” Journal of Metaverse, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021, Accessed: May 08, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jmv/issue/67581/1051371
14. S. B. Hall and M. Baier-Lentz, “3 technologies that will shape the future of the metaverse – and the human experience,” World Economic Forum, Feb. 07, 2022. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/02/future-of-the-metaverse-vr-ar-and-brain-computer/ (accessed May 01, 2022).
15. J. D. N. Dionisio, W. G. Burns III, and R. Gilbert, “3D Virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 1–38, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1145/2480741.2480751.
16. K. G. NALBANT and S. AYDIN, “Development and Transformation in Digital Marketing and Branding with Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies Dynamics in the Metaverse Universe,” Journal of Metaverse, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–18, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.57019/jmv.1148015.
17. H. SERPİL and D. KARACA, “The Metaverse or Meta-Awareness?,” Journal of Metaverse, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.57019/jmv.1093347.
18. G. DEMİR, M. ARGAN, and H. DİNÇ, “The Age Beyond Sports: User Experience in the World of Metaverse,” Journal of Metaverse, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 19–27, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.57019/jmv.1176938.
19. L. Carroll, Through the Looking Glass: And what Alice Found There. Macmillan Children’s, 1872. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.tt/books?id=aOKruPEWBqEC
20. J. E. Stevens, “The growing reality of virtual reality,” Bioscience, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 435–439, Aug. 1995, doi: 10.2307/1312785.
21. M. Saler, “Through the Looking-Glass,” The Wall Street Journal, Jun. 05, 2015. https://www.wsj.com/articles/through-the-looking-glass-1433537885 (accessed Dec. 23, 2022).
22. G. Kao, J. Hong, M. Perusse, and W. Sheng, “The Rise and Fall of Virtual Reality,” in Turning Silicon into Gold, Apress, Berkeley, CA, 2020, pp. 133–139. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4842-5629-9_19.
23. C. Cruz-Neira, M. Fernández, and C. Portalés, “Virtual Reality and Games,” Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2018, Vol. 2, Page 8, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 8, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.3390/MTI2010008.
24. I. E. Sutherland, “The Ultimate Display,” in Proceedings of IFIP Congress Volume 65 No. 2, 1965, pp. 506–508. [Online]. Available: http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/c58e.content.pdf
25. I. E. Sutherland, “A head-mounted three dimensional display,” in Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I on - AFIPS ’68 (Fall, part I), Dec. 1968, vol. 33, no. pt 1, p. 757. doi: 10.1145/1476589.1476686.
26. P. Cipresso, I. A. C. Giglioli, M. A. Raya, and G. Riva, “The Past, Present, and Future of Virtual and Augmented Reality Research: A Network and Cluster Analysis of the Literature,” Front. Psychol., vol. 9, no. November, p. 20, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086.
27. M. Slater and M. V. Sanchez-Vives, “Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality,” Front. Robot. AI, vol. 3, no. December, p. 47, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00074.
28. B. Matthews, Z. S. See, and J. Day, “Crisis and extended realities: remote presence in the time of COVID-19,” Media Int. Aust., vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 198–209, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1329878X20967165.
29. P. Milgram and F. Kishino, “A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays,” IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. E77-D, no. 12, pp. 1321–1329, Dec. 1994, Accessed: Jan. 31, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://search.ieice.org/bin/summary.php?id=e77-d_12_1321
30. P. A. Rauschnabel, R. Felix, C. Hinsch, H. Shahab, and F. Alt, “What is XR? Towards a Framework for Augmented and Virtual Reality,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 133, p. 107289, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107289.
31. M. Vasarainen, S. Paavola, and L. Vetoshkina, “A Systematic Literature Review on Extended Reality: Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality in Working Life,” Int. J. Virtual Real., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–28, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.20870/IJVR.2021.21.2.4620.
32. J. Kipnis, “Immune system: The ‘seventh sense,’” J. Exp. Med., vol. 215, no. 2, pp. 397–398, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1084/jem.20172295.
33. S. H. Ko and J. Rogers, “Functional Materials and Devices for XR (VR/AR/MR) Applications,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 31, no. 39, p. 2106546, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1002/adfm.202106546.
34. I. M. WİSNU BUANA, “Metaverse: Threat or Opportunity for Our Social World? In understanding Metaverse on sociological context,” Journal of Metaverse, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–33, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.57019/jmv.1144470.
35. E. Freeman, G. Wilson, D.-B. Vo, A. Ng, I. Politis, and S. Brewster, “Multimodal feedback in HCI: haptics, non-speech audio, and their applications,” in The Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces: Foundations, User Modeling, and Common Modality Combinations - Volume 1, ACM, 2017, pp. 277–317. doi: 10.1145/3015783.3015792.
36. G. Kailas and N. Tiwari, “Design for Immersive Experience: Role of Spatial Audio in Extended Reality Applications,” Smart Innov. Syst. Technol., vol. 222, pp. 853–863, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-0119-4_69/FIGURES/7.
37. F. Z. Kaghat, A. Azough, M. Fakhour, and M. Meknassi, “A new audio augmented reality interaction and adaptation model for museum visits,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 84, p. 106606, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106606.
38. D. Sim, Y. Baek, M. Cho, S. Park, A. S. M. Sharifuzzaman Sagar, and H. S. Kim, “Low-Latency Haptic Open Glove for Immersive Virtual Reality Interaction,” Sensors 2021, Vol. 21, Page 3682, vol. 21, no. 11, p. 3682, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/S21113682.
39. T. Romanus, S. Frish, M. Maksymenko, W. Frier, L. Corenthy, and O. Georgiou, “Mid-Air haptic bio-holograms in mixed reality,” Adjun. Proc. 2019 IEEE Int. Symp. Mix. Augment. Reality, ISMAR-Adjunct 2019, pp. 348–352, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1109/ISMAR-ADJUNCT.2019.00-14.
40. Y. Yanagida, T. Nakano, and K. Watanabe, “Towards precise spatio-temporal control of scents and air for olfactory augmented reality,” in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN), May 2019, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/ISOEN.2019.8823180.
41. M. Ho Baek Yu, M. Ku Kim, D.-W. Keum, and J.-D. Kim, “Application and Design of Scent Display Device for Head-Mounted Display,” J. Sens. Sci. Technol., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 52–57, 2019, doi: 10.5369/JSST.2019.28.1.52.
42. D. Panagiotakopoulos, G. Marentakis, R. Metzitakos, I. Deliyannis, and F. Dedes, “Digital Scent Technology: Toward the Internet of Senses and the Metaverse,” IT Prof., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 52–59, May 2022, doi: 10.1109/MITP.2022.3177292.
43. K. Karunanayaka, N. Johari, S. Hariri, H. Camelia, K. S. Bielawski, and A. D. Cheok, “New thermal taste actuation technology for future multisensory virtual reality and internet,” IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1496–1505, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794073.
44. K. Aoyama, “Galvanic taste stimulation method for virtual reality and augmented reality,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 12184 LNCS, pp. 341–349, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-50020-7_24/COVER.
45. E. Kerruish, “Arranging sensations: smell and taste in augmented and virtual reality,” Senses Soc., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 31–45, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/17458927.2018.1556952.
46. A. Hamad and B. Jia, “How Virtual Reality Technology Has Changed Our Lives: An Overview of the Current and Potential Applications and Limitations,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2022, Vol. 19, Page 11278, vol. 19, no. 18, p. 11278, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/IJERPH191811278.
47. G. S. King, J. R. Rameshwar, and C. S. Syan, “Industry 4.0 in a Small Commodity-Based Economy: A Vehicle for Stimulating Innovation,” J. Ind. Integr. Manag., vol. 05, no. 03, pp. 365–391, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1142/S242486222050013X.
48. J. Soroushian, B. Jackson, and S. Neschke, “Thinking Ahead About XR Charting a Course for Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality,” Washington DC USA, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://bipartisanpolicy.org/report/thinking-ahead-about-xr/
49. S. Barteit, L. Lanfermann, T. Bärnighausen, F. Neuhann, and C. Beiersmann, “Augmented, Mixed, and Virtual Reality-Based Head-Mounted Devices for Medical Education: Systematic Review,” JMIR Serious Games 2021;9(3)e29080 https//games.jmir.org/2021/3/e29080, vol. 9, no. 3, p. e29080, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.2196/29080.
50. F. Roesner, T. Kohno, and D. Molnar, “Security and privacy for augmented reality systems,” Commun. ACM, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 88–96, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1145/2580723.2580730.
51. Y. Leng, C.-C. Chen, Q. Sun, J. Huang, and Y. Zhu, “Energy-efficient video processing for virtual reality,” in Proceedings of the 46th International Symposium on Computer Architecture, Jun. 2019, pp. 91–103. doi: 10.1145/3307650.3322264.
52. Z. Lai, Y. C. Hu, Y. Cui, L. Sun, and N. Dai, “Furion: Engineering high-qality immersive virtual reality on today’s mobile devices,” Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. Mob. Comput. Networking, MOBICOM, vol. Part F131210, pp. 409–421, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1145/3117811.3117815.
53. R. T. Azuma, “A Survey of Augmented Reality,” Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 355–385, Aug. 1997, doi: 10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355.
54. A. S. Alqahtani, L. F. Daghestani, and L. F. Ibrahim, “Environments and System Types of Virtual Reality Technology in STEM: a Survey,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 77–89, 2017, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080610.
55. PwC, “Seeing is believing How virtual reality and augmented reality are transforming business and the economy,” London, UK, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/technology/publications/assets/how-virtual-reality-and-augmented-reality.pdf
56. Ecorys, “Virtual Reality and Its Potential for Europe,” Brussels, Belgium, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/vr_ecosystem_eu_report_0.pdf
57. J. T. McGuirt et al., “Extended Reality Technologies in Nutrition Education and Behavior: Comprehensive Scoping Review and Future Directions,” Nutrients, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 2899, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/nu12092899.
58. C. Anthes, R. J. Garcia-Hernandez, M. Wiedemann, and D. Kranzlmuller, “State of the art of virtual reality technology,” in 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Mar. 2016, vol. 2016-June, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1109/AERO.2016.7500674.
59. The Khronos Group Inc, “OpenXR Overview.” https://www.khronos.org/openxr/ (accessed Sep. 10, 2020).
60. M. D. Thomas, “Intelligent Realities For Workers Using Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Beyond,” IIC J. Innov., no. March, p. 18, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.iiconsortium.org/news/joi-articles/2019-March-Intelligent-Realities-For-Workers-Using-Augmented-Reality-Virtual-Reality-and-Beyond.pdf
61. I. Rakkolainen et al., “Technologies for Multimodal Interaction in Extended Reality-A Scoping Review,” Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2021, Vol. 5, Page 81, vol. 5, no. 12, p. 81, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3390/MTI5120081.
62. S. Kuntz, R. Kulpa, and J. Royan, “The Democratization of VR-AR,” in Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018, pp. 73–122. doi: 10.1002/9781119341031.ch2.
63. C. Saharia et al., “Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding,” May 2022, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2205.11487.
64. V. Liu and L. B. Chilton, “Design Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Models,” Sep. 2021, Accessed: Jan. 05, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.06977v2
65. J. Ho et al., “Imagen Video: High Definition Video Generation with Diffusion Models,” Oct. 2022, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2210.02303.
66. B. Poole, A. Jain, J. T. Barron, and B. Mildenhall, “DreamFusion: Text-to-3D using 2D Diffusion,” Sep. 2022, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2209.14988.
67. K. Wiggers, “OpenAI releases Point-E, an AI that generates 3D models,” TechCrunch, Dec. 20, 2022. https://techcrunch.com/2022/12/20/openai-releases-point-e-an-ai-that-generates-3d-models/ (accessed Dec. 21, 2022).
68. OpenAI ChatGPT December 15 version, “XR in Post-Pandemic World.” Dec. 29, 2022. Accessed: Dec. 29, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://chat.openai.com/chat
69. OpenAI, “ChatGPT FAQ | OpenAI Help Center.” https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6783457-chatgpt-faq (accessed Dec. 29, 2022).
70. J. R. Rameshwar, “COVID-19 Can Create Opportunity for IoT in the Caribbean: A Necessary Digital Transformation,” IIC J. Innov., vol. November, p. 30, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.iiconsortium.org/news/joi-articles/2020_November_JoI_COVID-19_Can_Create_Opportunity_for_IoT_in_the_Caribbean.pdf
71. S. Boodan, “Inventor shows how tech can boost tourism,” Trinidad & Tobago Guardian, Feb. 20, 2021. https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/inventor-shows-how-tech-can-boost-tourism-6.2.1291815.4053b980c6 (accessed Mar. 03, 2021).
72. L. V Williams, “CARIRI launches augmented reality/virtual reality challenge,” Trinidad and Tobago Newsday, Nov. 09, 2020. https://newsday.co.tt/2020/11/09/cariri-launches-augmented-reality-virtual-reality-challenge/ (accessed Jun. 18, 2021).
73. CARIRI, “AR/VR Challenge – -changethegame,” 2020. https://www.cariri.com/Challenge/ (accessed Apr. 26, 2022).
74. L. Hanna, “In a digital world content is king!,” Jamaica Observer, Apr. 11, 2021. https://www.jamaicaobserver.com/the-agenda/in-a-digital-world-content-is-king-_218743 (accessed Mar. 23, 2022).
75. L. Hanna, “Let’s brand the metaverse with J’can NFT lifestyle?,” Jamaica Observer, Jan. 30, 2022. https://www.jamaicaobserver.com/the-agenda/let-s-brand-the-metaverse-with-j-can-nft-lifestyle-_242609 (accessed Mar. 23, 2022).
76. M. Wong, “St Vincent wants to be first island to host Carnival in the Metaverse,” Loop Caribbean News, Jan. 18, 2022. https://caribbean.loopnews.com/content/st-vincent-wants-be-first-island-host-carnival-metaverse-587786 (accessed Jan. 31, 2022).
77. A. Thurman, “Barbados to Become First Sovereign Nation With an Embassy in the Metaverse,” CoinDesk, Nov. 15, 2021. https://www.coindesk.com/business/2021/11/15/barbados-to-become-first-sovereign-nation-with-an-embassy-in-the-metaverse/ (accessed Nov. 20, 2021).
78. CTU, “THE METAVERSE: A NEW OPPORTUNITY FOR WEALTH GENERATION FOR CARIBBEAN CITIZENS.” https://ctu.int/the-metaverse-a-new-opportunity-for-wealth-generation-for-caribbean-citizens/ (accessed Feb. 02, 2022).
79. J. Loutoo, “UWI secures US$25 million technology grant,” Trinidad and Tobago Newsday, Apr. 05, 2021. https://newsday.co.tt/2021/04/05/uwi-secures-us25-million-technology-grant/ (accessed Apr. 26, 2022).
80. OAS, “OAS and Meta Partner to Train Thousands of Latin American and Caribbean Creators in Augmented Reality,” Dec. 15, 2021. https://www.oas.org/en/media_center/press_release.asp?sCodigo=E-116/21 (accessed Apr. 27, 2022).
81. K. Corion, “Virtual Reality and Pan Collides in Trinidad and Tobago,” HuffPost, Apr. 28, 2017. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/virtual-reality-and-pan-collides-in-trinidad-and-tobago_b_59038f90e4b05279d4edbbb4 (accessed May 11, 2021).
82. M. Nurse, “Region’s coconut industry to be transformed via Augmented Reality,” CARICOM Today, Jul. 17, 2018. https://today.caricom.org/2018/07/13/regons-coconut-industry-to-be-transformed-via-augmented-reality/ (accessed Jul. 29, 2020).
83. Loop Jamaica, “Photos: Next Generation Creators bring art to life,” Loop Jamaica, Apr. 10, 2018. https://jamaica.loopnews.com/content/photos-next-generation-creators-bring-art-life (accessed Sep. 19, 2021).
84. Raosoft, “Sample size calculator.” http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html (accessed Jul. 01, 2021).
85. S. Karout, H. M. J. Khojah, R. Itani, F. Jaffal, and A. El-Lakany, “Assessing the pharmaceutical care provision to suspected COVID-19 patients in community pharmacies: a simulated patient study,” BMC Heal. Serv. Res. 2022 221, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1186/S12913-022-07870-1.
86. M. M. Alam, N. Ahmad, Q. N. Naveed, A. Patel, M. Abohashrh, and M. A. Khaleel, “E-Learning Services to Achieve Sustainable Learning and Academic Performance: An Empirical Study,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 2653, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13052653.
87. A. A. Al-Subaihi, “Sample size determination. Influencing factors and calculation strategies for survey research,” Neurosci. J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 79–86, 2003, Accessed: Sep. 12, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://nsj.org.sa/content/nsj/8/2/79.full.pdf
88. A. S. Singh and M. B. Masuku, “Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview,” Int. J. Econ. Commer. Manag., vol. II, no. 11, p. 22, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ajay-Singh-51/publication/341552596_Sampling_Techniques_and_Determination_of_Sample_Size_in_Applied_Statistics_Research_An_Overview/links/5fa3e5c192851cc28696055d/Sampling-Techniques-and-Determination-of-Sample-Size-in
89. I. Etikan and O. Babatop, “A Basic Approach in Sampling Methodology and Sample Size Calculation,” MedLife Clin., vol. 1, pp. 050–054, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.medtextpublications.com/open-access/a-basic-approach-in-sampling-methodology-and-sample-size-calculation-249.pdf
90. T. S. Nanjundeswaraswamy and S. Divakar, “DETERMINATION OF SAMPLE SIZE AND SAMPLING METHODS IN APPLIED RESEARCH,” Proc. Eng. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–32, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.24874/PES03.01.003.
91. R. L. Medway and J. Fulton, “When More Gets You Less: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Concurrent Web Options on Mail Survey Response Rates,” Public Opin. Q., vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 733–746, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs047.
92. H.-Y. Hsu and S.-K. Wang, “Using Google Forms to collect and analyze data,” Sci. Scope, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 64–67, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1884841278/
93. CARIRI, “Challenge Info – AR/VR Challenge,” 2020. https://www.cariri.com/Challenge/challenge-details/ (accessed Apr. 26, 2022).
94. G. Burnett, “Bringing the metaverse to life: how I built a virtual reality for my students -- and what I’ve learnt along the way,” The Conversation, Nov. 19, 2021. https://theconversation.com/bringing-the-metaverse-to-life-how-i-built-a-virtual-reality-for-my-students-and-what-ive-learnt-along-the-way-171760 (accessed Nov. 21, 2021).
95. J. R. Rameshwar, “Transitioning to a Digital Educational Environment A Lecturer’s Perspective on Migrating to Google Classroom During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Trinidad and Tobago,” UWI Qual. Educ. Forum, vol. 25, pp. 96–119, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journals.sta.uwi.edu/qef/index.asp?action=viewArticle&articleId=8131&galleyId=6924
96. L. Bredikhina and A. Giard, “Becoming a Virtual Cutie: Digital Cross-Dressing in Japan,” Converg. Int. J. Res. into New Media Technol., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1643–1661, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1177/13548565221074812.
97. M. T. Tang, V. L. Zhu, and V. Popescu, “AlterEcho: Loose Avatar-Streamer Coupling for Expressive VTubing,” in 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Oct. 2021, pp. 128–137. doi: 10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00027.
98. A. Sheldon et al., “Putting the AR in (AR)chitecture - Integrating voice recognition and gesture control for Augmented Reality interaction to enhance design practice,” in Intelligent & Informed - Proceedings of the 24th CAADRIA Conference - Volume 1, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, 15-18 April 2019, 2019, pp. 475–484. [Online]. Available: http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/paper/caadria2019_081
99. F. Therin, “Organizational learning and innovation in high-tech small firms,” in 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the, 2003, p. 8 pp. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174262.
100. Y. Bao, X. Chen, and K. Z. Zhou, “External learning, market dynamics, and radical innovation: Evidence from China’s high-tech firms,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1226–1233, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.036.
101. I. Dabran, T. Avny, E. Singher, and H. Ben Danan, “Augmented reality speech recognition for the hearing impaired,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Antennas, Communications and Electronic Systems (COMCAS), Nov. 2017, vol. 2017-Novem, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/COMCAS.2017.8244731.
102. M. R. Mirzaei, S. Ghorshi, and M. Mortazavi, “Using augmented reality and automatic speech recognition techniques to help deaf and hard of hearing people,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., 2012, doi: 10.1145/2331714.2331720.
103. M. R. Mirzaei, S. Ghorshi, and M. Mortazavi, “Audio-visual speech recognition techniques in augmented reality environments,” Vis. Comput. 2013 303, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 245–257, May 2013, doi: 10.1007/S00371-013-0841-1.
104. M. Zhu et al., “Haptic-feedback smart glove as a creative human-machine interface (HMI) for virtual/augmented reality applications,” Sci. Adv., vol. 6, no. 19, p. eaaz8693, May 2020, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz8693.
105. P. Buń, J. Husár, and J. Kaščak, “Hand Tracking in Extended Reality Educational Applications,” pp. 317–325, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-99310-8_25.
106. T. Madeira, B. Marques, J. Alves, P. Dias, and B. S. Santos, “Exploring Annotations and Hand Tracking in Augmented Reality for Remote Collaboration,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 1269 AISC, pp. 83–89, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58282-1_14.
107. C. Khundam, V. Vorachart, P. Preeyawongsakul, W. Hosap, and F. Noël, “A Comparative Study of Interaction Time and Usability of Using Controllers and Hand Tracking in Virtual Reality Training,” Informatics 2021, Vol. 8, Page 60, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 60, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/INFORMATICS8030060.
108. A. Plopski, T. Hirzle, N. Norouzi, L. Qian, G. Bruder, and T. Langlotz, “The Eye in Extended Reality: A Survey on Gaze Interaction and Eye Tracking in Head-worn Extended Reality,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1–39, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3491207.
109. N. A. Rappa, S. Ledger, T. Teo, K. Wai Wong, B. Power, and B. Hilliard, “The use of eye tracking technology to explore learning and performance within virtual reality and mixed reality settings: a scoping review,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1338–1350, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1702560.
110. V. Clay, P. König, and S. König, “Eye Tracking in Virtual Reality,” J. Eye Mov. Res., vol. 12, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.16910/JEMR.12.1.3.
111. J. Estrella and B. Mendoza, “Voice Controlled Augmented Reality: A Comparison of Speech Recognition Tools for AR Applications,” in 2019 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Fall Conference, November 1 & 2 – The Cooper Union, 2019, p. 7. [Online]. Available: https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/bmendoza/files/2020/05/Estrella-MendozaMidAtlantic-ASEE-Fall2019.pdf
112. J. C. de A. Machado, C. N. Vasconcelos, and E. W. G. Clua, “Voice Commands Recognition For Virtual Reality Environments Using Convolutional Neural Networks,” in SBC – Proceedings XVI SBGames – Curitiba – PR – Brazil, November 2nd - 4th, 2017, 2017, pp. 634–637. [Online]. Available: https://www.sbgames.org/sbgames2017/papers/ComputacaoShort/175391.pdf
113. Compete Caribbean Partnership Facility, “REGIONAL & OECS SUBREGIONAL.” https://www.competecaribbean.org/projects/regional-oecs-subregional/ (accessed Apr. 24, 2022).
114. M. Boland, “Who’s Using AR and How Often?,” AR Insider, Apr. 18, 2022. https://arinsider.co/2022/04/18/whos-using-ar-and-how-often/ (accessed Apr. 24, 2022).
115. M. Boland, “Where is VR in Its Lifecycle?,” AR Insider, Apr. 19, 2022. https://arinsider.co/2022/04/19/where-is-vr-in-its-lifecycle/ (accessed Apr. 24, 2022).
116. IDB Lab, “Metaverse Communities Challenge,” 2022. https://convocatorias.iadb.org/en/bid-lab/metaverse-communities (accessed Dec. 27, 2022).