Examination of the Effect of Using Web 2.0 Tools in Environmental Education on Preschool Children's Attitudes Towards the Environment

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to examine the effects of using Web 2.0 tools in environmental education on the attitudes of preschool children towards the environment. The research used a combination of quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were collected through the “Attitudes Toward the Environment Scale: Children's Attitudes Toward the Environment Scale-Preschool Version (CATES-PV)”, and the qualitative data were collected through the "Interview Form" created by the researcher. A total of 38 children, 18 of them in the experimental group and 20 of them in the control group, aged between 60-72 month old attending a public day care center, participated in the study group of the research. One of the parents (mother or father) of the experimental group, which is the group where qualitative data were collected, participated in the research with 18 participants. Attitude towards the environment constitute dependent variable in the research. Independent variable is environments with and without Web 2.0 tools are used. In this research, two-factor ANOVA analysis for repeated measurements used for independent samples of the quantitative data obtained, descriptive analysis was applied to qualitative data. As a result of the research, a significant difference was determined between the average scores of children's attitudes towards the environment after the experimental procedure in the environment where Web 2.0 tools were used in environmental education. It was determined that the changes in the mean scores of attitudes towards the environment of the two groups before the experimental procedure were significantly higher in favor of the group in the environment where Web 2.0 tools were used in environmental education. In this study, it was concluded that the environment in which Web 2.0 tools are used in environmental education is effective in developing children's attitudes towards the environment. According to the qualitative findings, the parents in the experimental group stated that these tools made learning interesting, memorable and facilitating, provided continuity and permanence in learning, and were effective in developing correct attitudes.

Keywords

• Web 2.0 Tools
• Pre-school education
• Environmental education

References

1. Akkaya Alici, Y., (2022) Sustainability Education Integrated with E-Book for Preschool Children. Çukurova University, Institute of Social Sciences, Pre-School Education Department. Unpublished Master Thesis. Adana
2. Akın, F. & Aslan, N. (2021). Distance Education of Preschool Students in the Covid-19 pandemic: An action research. CRES JOURNAL Critical Reviews in Educational Sciences, 2(1), 8-17. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/alanyazin/issue/61604/919929.
3. Atıcı, B., & Yıldirim S., (2010) The Effect of Web 2.0 Applications on E-Learning (Web 2.0 Uygulamalarının E-Öğrenmeye Etkisi). XII. Academic Informatics Conference Proceeding. February 10-12 2020. Muğla University/Turkey. 369-374.
4. Başaran, M., & Kılınçarslan, R. (2021). The effectiveness of games designed with Web 2.0 tools in teaching primary reading and writing with distance education. Turkish Journal of Education, 6(1), 186-199.
5. Bulut, A. (2018). The Effects of Preschool Students' Habits Regarding Technology Use on Developmental Characteristics. Journal of New Approaches in Education, 1(1), 52-69 Access Address: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eyyad/issue/47266/595606
6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Experimental designs. Pre-test-post-test control group design and data analysis. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Scientific Research Methods (23. Edition). Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
8. Dere, E., Yücel, Ü. A., & Yalçınalp, S. (2016). Primary school students' views on Edmodo, an educational online social learning environment. Elementary Education Online, 15(3), 804-819.

9. Elgün H., (2021). Teacher Opinions on the Sustainability of Online Environmental Education. Master's Thesis. Ondokuz Mayıs University Graduate School of Education.
10. Ergüney, M. (2017). İnternetin Okul Öncesi Dönemdeki Çocuklar Üzerindeki Etkileri Hakkında Bir Araştırma. Ulakbilge Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(17), 1917-1938.
11. Erol, A. (2016). Investigation of the effect of family involvement environmental education program based on project approach on 5–6-year-old children's awareness and attitudes towards the environment. Master's thesis. Pamukkale University Graduate School of Educational Sciences).
12. Grosseck, G. (2009). To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 478-482.
13. Gülay, H. (2011). Reliability and validity studies of the Turkish version of the Children's Attitudes toward the Environment Scale-Preschool Version (CATES-PV) and the analysis of children's pro-environmental behaviors according to different variables. Asian Social Science, 7(10), 229- 240.
14. Gülay-Ogelman H., & Güngör H., (2015) Investigation of Preschool Environmental Education Studies in Turkey: Investigation of Theses and Articles between 2000 and 2014: Mustafa Kemal University, Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 12(32), 180-194.
15. Gündoğdu, M. M. (2017). The Effect of Web 2.0 Technologies and Developed Cooperative Learning Environment on Secondary School Students' Academic Achievement, Reflective Thinking Skills for Problem Solving and the Level of Motivation of Secondary Learners. Master's Thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Educational Sciences.
16. Jafari, K. K. (2021). Examining the relationship between early childhood children's intelligence levels and social skills and parents' parenting and digital parenting attitudes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bursa Uludag University Institute of Educational Sciences.
17. Kahriman-Ozturk, D., Olgan, R., & Guler, T. (2012). Preschool Children's Ideas on Sustainable Development: How Preschool Children Perceive Three Pillars of Sustainability with the Regard to 7R. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(4), 2987-2995.
18. Kayış, A. N. (2022). Investigation of Preschool Children's and Preschool Teachers' Use of Digital Technologies. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey.
19. Keskin, M., & Özer K. D. (2020). Evaluation of Students' Feedback on Web-Based Distance Education During COVID-19. İzmir Katip Çelebi University Journal of Faculty of Health Sciences, 5(2), 59-67. Access address: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ikcusbfd/issue/55773/754174
20. Kılınç, S. (2015). Investigation of parents' opinions about technology use of preschool children (Master's thesis, Institute of Educational Sciences).
21. Kınık, B., Okyay, Ö., & Aydoğan, Y. (2016). Investigation of the effect of family involvement environmental education on language development in 24–36-month-old children. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 24(5), 2143-2456.
22. Konstantınıdıs, A., Theodosıadou, D. & Pappos, C. (2013). Web 2.0 Tools for Supporting Teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(4), 287-295. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/16898/176108
23. MEB (2013). Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education. General Directorate of Basic Education, Preschool Education Program, Ankara.
24. Mete F., Emre & Batıbay F. (2019). The Effect of Web 2.0 Applications on Motivation in Turkish Education: Kahoot Example. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 7(4), 1029-1047. DOI: 10.16916/aded.616756
25. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. (Sibel Balcı, Berat Ahi, çev.) Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
26. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants from On the Horizon. NCB University Press, 9(5), https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
27. Radich, J. (2013). Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Every Child, 19(4), 18-19.
28. Sayan, H. (2016). Technology use in preschool education. 21. Century Education and Society Journal of Educational Sciences and Social Research, 5(13), 67-84.
29. Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., Priddy, M. & Harbor, J. (2007) Students mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 329-330.
30. Shin, K. H. (2008). Development of Environmental Education in the Korean Kindergarten Context. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Victoria Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Retrieved from http://dspace.library.uvic.ca/handle/1828/878
31. Türker, A., & Dündar, E. (2020). Opinions of High School Teachers on Distance Education Conducted through Education Information Network (Eba) during the Covid-19 Pandemic Process. Journal of National Education, 49(1), 323-342.
32. Yazıcı, S., Ocak, & Bozkurt, M. (2021). Investigation of Educational Studies on Web 2.0 Tools. Journal of Education and Society Research, 8(2), 474-487.
33. Yıldırım, A. (1999). Basic features of qualitative research methods and their place and importance in educational research. Education and Science, 23(112), 7-17.
34. Yürek, E. (2021). Examining the views of preschool teachers and academicians on the applicability of distance education in preschool education. Master's thesis. Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf University, Graduate School of Education.
35. Wordwall (2022). Wordwall. https://wordwall.net/tr, Date of access: 18.05.2022