Student Perspectives on Project Development in Coding and Robotics Courses
Abstract
This study aims to understand students' views on project development in coding and robotics courses. Focusing on student study groups in this field seeks to provide a broad view using qualitative and quantitative methods. The study group consists of students taking the coding and robotics course. A semi-structured interview form developed by the researcher was used. The data collected during the research were obtained through face-to-face personal interviews. As a data collection tool, the interview form consists of 22 questions. Within the scope of the study, open-ended questions were analyzed through content analysis, and frequency and percentage distributions were used to determine their opinions. With the findings obtained, it was tried to reveal the difficulties encountered by students in coding and robotics courses and their strategies to overcome these difficulties, the effects of the skills they gained (e.g., problem-solving, creativity, communication) on their daily lives, how students develop teamwork, cooperation skills, technology use, and computer programming skills, and the effects on students' self-confidence, motivation and learning. This study will be an essential step in understanding the impact of coding and robotics courses on students' project development processes.
Keywords
Coding, Project, Project Development, Robotic Coding
Ethical Statement
Ethics Committee approval was obtained from Gazi University for this study dated 27.12.2023 and numbered E-77082166-604.01.02-837139, Research Code No. 2023 - 1585.
References
- Abou Assi, K. (2022). The development of attentional inhibition through coding and robotics: Associating between tinkering, creating, and problem solving in a group setting. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(8), 1883-1892.
- Açıkgöz, A., & Günsel, A. (2014). Yeni ürün geliştirme projelerinde yönlendirici yönetim anlayışı, motivasyon ve inovasyon becerisi. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3(2), 33-60.
- Bers, M. U. (2018, April). Coding, playgrounds and literacy in early childhood education: The development of KIBO robotics and ScratchJr. In 2018 IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON) (pp. 2094-2102). IEEE.
- Bolat, S. (1996). Eğitim örgütlerinde iletişim: HÜ Eğitim Fakültesi uygulaması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(12).
- Çepni, S. (2011). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş. Celepler Matbaacılık.
- Demertzi, E., Voukelatos, N., Papagerasimou, Y., & Drigas, A. S. (2018). Online learning facilities to support coding and robotics courses for youth. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 8(3), 69-80.
- Dudwick, N., Kuehnast, K., Jones, V. N., & Woolcock, M. (2006). Analyzing social capital in context. A guide to using qualitative methods and data, 1, 46.
- Ekiz, D. (2013). Eğitimde araştırma yöntem ve metotlarına giriş: Nitel nicel ve eleştirel kuram metodolojileri. Anı Yayıncılık.
- Eskici, G. Y., Mercan, S., & Hakverdi, F. (2020). Robotik kavramına yönelik ortaokul öğrencilerinin zihinsel imajları. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 30-64.
- García-Carrillo, C., Greca, I. M., & Fernández-Hawrylak, M. (2021). Teacher perspectives on teaching the STEM approach to educational coding and robotics in primary education. Education Sciences, 11(2), 64.