Online Communities of Practice: Sustainable Leadership Model

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 25 - 33, 01.01.2019

Onur Ceran Harun Bahadır

Öz

Wenger 2011 has argued that domain, community and practice should be gathered in order to create communities of practice CoP . It is believed that CoP would end as soon as the interest in learning together diminishes. Within that context, the role played by the community leader is of importance. In structural communities, which Wenger defines as the domain of CoP, the leader of the community could be chosen and assigned from the organization and be motivated through salary, authority etc. However, this is a phenomenon that is more difficult and should be solved in online CoP, which are informally structured. In this study, it is advocated that sustainable leadership element should also be added to the current elements which includes domain, community, and practice, through analyzing Wenger's framework for CoP and creating an online CoP. In addition, we also recommended the A2D cyclical model for enabling sustainable leadership in this research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

community of practice, online communities of practice, situated learning, community of practice&#039, s leadership, sustainable leadership model

Kaynakça

• Alakurt, T., & Keser, H. (2014). Sanal Uygulama Topluluğu Üyelerinin Bilgi Paylaşma Davranışlarının İncelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 13(4). http://doi.org/10.17051/io.2014.51270.
• Baran, B., & Cagiltay, K. (2010). Motivators and barriers in the development of online Communities of Practice. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 39, 79-96.
• Barnett, S., Sandra, C., Bennett, S., Iverson, D., & Bonney, A. (2013). Usefulness of a virtual community of practice and Web 2.0 tools for general practice training: experiences and expectations of general practitioner registrars and supervisors. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 19(4), 292–296.
• Bourhis, A., Dubé, L., & Jacob, R. (2005). The success of virtual communities of practice: The leadership factor. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 23–34.
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Structure and spontaneity: knowledge and organization. Managing industrial knowledge: Creation, transfer and utilization, 44–67.
• Camplin, J. C. (2011). Volunteer Leadership: Motivating Members into Action. In ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exposition. American Society of Safety Engineers.
• Cleave, S. L., & Doherty, A. (2005). Understanding volunteer and non-volunteer constraints: A mixed-method approach. In 11th Canadian Congress on Leisure Research.
• Corso, M., & Giacobbe, A. (2005). Building Communities of Practice that work: a case study based research. In The Sixth European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Capabilities (pp. 17–19).
• Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of information science, 31(6), 527–540.
• Culp III, K., Deppe, C. A., Castillo, J. X., & Wells, B. J. (1998). The GEMS Model of Volunteer Administration. Journal of Volunteer Administration, 16(4), 36–41.
• Dahlander, L., & O’Mahony, S. (2010). Progressing to the Center: Coordinating Project Work. Organization Science, 22(4), 961–979. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0571
• Dubé, L., Bourhis, A., & Jacob, R. (2006). Towards a typology of virtual communities of practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, knowledge, and management, 1(1), 69–93.
• Elliot, W., & Finsel, C. (2016). Communities of Practice (06 Jan 2016), Retrieved from http://www.ncaiprc.org/pdf/Communities_of_Practice_Paper_05_02_07_draft_watermark.pdf
• Faraj, S., Kudaravalli, S., & Wasko, M. (2015). Leading collaboration in online communities. Mis Quarterly, 39(2), 393-412.
• Gammelgaard, J. (2010). Knowledge retrieval through virtual communities of practice. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(4), 349–362.
• Gray, B. (2004). Informal Learning in an Online Community of Practice. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 20–35.
• Hara, N. (2007). Information technology support for communities of practice: How public defenders learn about winning and losing in court. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 76–87.
• Hoadley, C., Jonassen, D. H., & Land, S. M. (2012). What is a Community of Practice and How Can We Support It? In Theoretical foundations of learning environments (s. 286). Routledge.
• Hoadley, C. M., & Kilner, P. G. (2005). Using technology to transform communities of practice into knowledge-building communities. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, 25(1), 31–40.
• Jameson, J. (2008). Leadership: professional communities of leadership practice in post-compulsory education.
• Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. The internet and higher education, 4(1), 45–60.
• Kilner, P. (2004). The Con4-P Model of Learning Design for Professional Communities. In World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (C. 2004, ss. 1307–1311).
• Kilner, P. G., & Hoadley, C. (2005). Anonymity options and professional participation in an online community of practice. In T. Koschman & D. D. Suthers (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) 2005 (pp. 272–280). Taipei, Taiwan: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
• Kim, A. J. (2000). Community building on the web: Secret strategies for successful online communities. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
• Kudaravalli, S. (2014). How leaders emerge in online communities (06 Jan 2016), Retrieved from http://www.hec.edu/Knowledge/Strategy-Management/Leadership-Management/How-leaders-emerge-in-online-communities
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University press.
• Marler, L. P. (2010). A Study of the Effects of Participation in Pastoral Leeder Peer Groups. Austin Presbyterian Seminary. Retrieved from www.chalicepress.com
• McLennan, J., Birch, A., Cowlishaw, S., & Hayes, P. (2008). I quit! Leadership a satisfaction with the volunteer role: Resignations and organisational responses. In Australian Psychological Society Annual Conference, Hobart, Australia (pp. 214–219).
• Mendizabal, G. A., Solinís, R. N., & Zaballa González, I. (2013). HOBE+, a case study: a virtual community of practice to support innovation in primary care in Basque Public Health Service. BMC Family Practice, 14(1), 168–186.
• Miyamoto, M. (2015). Leadership in ITC Project Management in Japan. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 32–39.
• Ockenden, N., & Hutin, M. (2008). Volunteering to lead: a study of leadership in small, volunteer-led groups. Institute for Volunteering Research.
• o’Reilly, T. (2009). What is web 2.0. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
• Özgen, E. (2007). Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Kavramı ve Çalışan Memnuniyetine Etkisi. Dumlupınar University Journal of Ziya Gokalp Faculty of Education, (8), 1–6.
• Palabıyık, H. (2011). Gönüllülük ve Yerel Hizmetlere Gönüllü Katılım Üzerine Açıklamalar. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1).
• Roberts, J. (2006). Questioning the Place of Communities of Practice- Paper presented at OLKC-2006, Conference at the University of Warwick. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joanne_Roberts5/publication/241473436_Questioning_the_Place_of_Communities_of_Practice/links/02e7e535d0b3d8e3b1000000.pdf
• Safrit, R. D., & Schmiesing, R. (2012). Volunteer Models and Management. The Volunteer Management Handbook, 2nd ed., edited by TD Connors, 3–30.
• Snyder, W. M., Wenger, E., & Briggs, X. (2003). Communities of Practice in Government: Leveraging Knowledge for Performance. Public Manager, 32(4), 17.
• Sonnenbichler, A. C. (2010). A community membership life cycle model. Technical Report, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
• Toole, J., Galbraith, J., & Lawler, E. E. (2002). When two (or more) heads are better than one: The promise and pitfalls of shared leadership. California Management Review, 44(4), 65–83.
• United Nations. (2015). 2015- State of the World’s Volunteerism Report - Transforming Governence (s. 14/132).
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
• Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In Social learning systems and communities of practice (ss. 179–198).
• Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction.
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
• Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J. D. (2009). Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. Portland: CPsquare.
• Wenger, E., White, N., Smith, J., & Rowe, K. (2005). Technology for communities. Retrieved from http://technologyforcommunities.com/CEFRIO_Book_Chapter_v_5.2.pdf
• West-Burnham, J. (2004). Building leadership capacity: helping leaders learn. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership. Retrieved on October, 12, 2008.