Research Article

Problematic of Tourism in Adıyaman: Multidimensional Barriers with a Community Perspective

Volume: 5 Number: 1 July 30, 2020
EN

Problematic of Tourism in Adıyaman: Multidimensional Barriers with a Community Perspective

Abstract

Tourism success is an important parameter of regional development. The way a society perceives tourism and existing issues and the rate of participation in political decisions are also important factors, particularly for developing regions. In this sense, the perspective of the locals provides a significant clue for researchers and policy makers. In this study, the tourism development of Adıyaman, one of the potential tourism destination of Turkey, has been analysed through a societal perspective. 187 people have been selected through convenience sampling method under the scope of the study and they have been posed open-ended questions. The acquired data have been categorized under three sections as socio-cultural, socio-economic and geographic barriers. As a result of the study, the most significant barriers for tourism are defined as the local administration, investment, transport and promotion.

Keywords

Tourism , Community , Socio-Culture , Socio-Economy , Geography , Adıyaman

References

  1. Ahmad, A. (2013). The constraints of tourism development for a cultural heritage destination: the case of Kampong Ayer (Water Village) in Brunei Darussalam. Tourism Management Perspectives, 8: 106–113.
  2. Akama, J. S. and Kieti, D. (2007). Tourism and socio-economic development in developing countries: A case study of Mombasa Resort in Kenya. Journal of sustainable tourism, 15(6), 735-748.
  3. Akdağ, G. and Öter, Z. (2011). Assessment of world tourism from a geographical perspective and a comparative view of leading destinations in the market. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 216-224.
  4. Akinboade, O. A. and Braimoh, L. A. (2010). International tourism and economic development in South Africa: A Granger causality test. International Journal of Tourism Research, 12(2), 149-163.
  5. Andereck, K. L. and Vogt, C. A. (2000). The relationship between residents’ attitudes toward tourism and tourism development options. Journal of Travel research, 39(1), 27-36.
  6. Archer, B., Cooper, C. and Ruhanen, L. (2005). The positive and negative impacts of tourism. In W. F. Theobald (Ed.), Global tourism (3rd ed., p. 561). Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
  7. Aref, F. (2010). Barriers to Community Capacity Building for Tourism Development in Communities in Shiraz. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(3), 347-359.
  8. Avcıkurt, C. (2009). Turizm Sosyolojisi, Genel ve Yapısal Yaklaşım. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  9. Bjeljac, Ž. and Ćurčić, N. (2006). Tourism in the Serbian, Romanian and Hungarian borderline area as part of cross-border cooperation. Geographica Pannonica, (10), 73-77.
  10. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
APA
Çalışkan, C., & Yeşilyurt, H. (2020). Problematic of Tourism in Adıyaman: Multidimensional Barriers with a Community Perspective. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism, 5(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.31822/jomat.749304