INFLUENCE OF RURAL POPULATION ON URBAN LANDSCAPE PLANNING; CASE STUDY OF BARTIN CITY CENTER AND NEARBY VILLAGES

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 90 - 97, 31.07.2019

Melih Öztürk Ali Öztürk Muhammet Savahil

Öz

Sustainable urban landscape
planning must regard the effect of the nearby rural population as well as the
urban society for the decision making on the spatial organization and
arrangement of the cities. The cities like Bartın where is immediately surrounded
by the villages, are under the pressure of the sudden incoming rural
population. In fact, the core nearby population within the 10 km distance is
approximately 26% of the total local population of Bartın central city whereas
the global nearby population within the mean 20.5 km distance slightly exceeds
that total local population. However, the core city center is not suitable for
adequately servicing public open space for such population flow; is able to
offer relatively qualified public open space for the average 1,500 persons. On
the other hand, the public open space of the global city center is to a certain
degree available for 26,250 persons. Nevertheless, the spatial composition of
the public open space within the core city center is dominated by the squares,
tea gardens and pedestrian trails while the public open space of the global
city center varies in characteristics including the cemetery yards, parks,
orchards and, especially long riverside trails. Consequently, in order to
acquire more public open spaces to meet the necessities of the prospective
additional rural population, the remaining parts of the riverside landscape
within the global city center should be introduced to serve as recreational
fields. Ultimately, urban landscape planning projects should also be extended
towards the urban periphery for sake of incorporating some of the isolated
forest patches into the urban forestry.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

urban landscape, spatial planning, urban periphery, rural population, Bartın city center and vicinity

Kaynakça

• 1. Antrop M. (2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning. 67: 9-26.
• 2. Atalay İ. (2011). Climate Atlas of Turkey. İnkılâp Bookstore Publications. 136 pages. İstanbul, Turkey.
• 3. Bollukcu P. & Cengiz Gökçe G. (2019). Revision suggestions for landscape design of Bartın City Square. Journal of Bartın Faculty of Forestry. 21(1): 97-107.
• 4. Cengiz B. (2012). Streetscape design proposals for urban ecological greenway planning in Bartın, Turkey. Journal of Bartın Faculty of Forestry. 14(Special Issue): 120-135.
• 5. Dönmez Y., Çabuk S., Öztürk M. & Gökyer E. (2016). Parking lot problem within Safranbolu urban protected site and solution alternatives. Journal of Bartın Faculty of Forestry. 18(2): 137-145.
• 6. ESRI (2016). ArcGIS Desktop 10.5. USA.
• 7. Forman R.T.T. (1995). Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. First Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
• 8. Forman R.T.T. (2016). Urban ecology principles: are urban ecology and natural area ecology really different? Landscape Ecology. 31:1653-1662.
• 9. Gökyer E., Öztürk M., Dönmez Y. & Çabuk S. (2015). Evaluation of ecotourism activities using Geographic Information Systems in mountain areas of Bartın City. İnönü University Journal of Art and Design. 5(12):25-35.
• 10. Koday S. & Çelikoğlu Ş. (2011). An example of traditional shopping site: Bartın Ladies’ Bazaar (Galla Bazaar). Atatürk University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences. 15(2): 243-262.
• 11. Konijnendijk C.C. (2008). The Forest and The City; The Cultural Landscape of Urban Woodland. Second Edition. Springer International Publishing. Switzerland.
• 12. Kroll F., Müller F., Haase D. & Fohrer N. (2012). Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy. 29: 521-535.
• 13. Marsh W.M. (2010). Landscape Planning, Environmental Applications. Fifth Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. USA. (2010).
• 14. Öztürk M. & Bolat İ. (2012). Determination of recreational urban forest patches based on spatial characteristics, Case Study: Bartın (Turkey) city center and vicinity. In: BENA (Balkan Environmental Association)-2012, Sustainable Landscape Planning and Safe Environment, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, 21-24 June 2012.
• 15. Öztürk M. & Gökyer E. (2015). Seasonal variation in light transmission and canopy gaps of deciduous roadside vegetation: Assessment within forest landscape. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science. 3(2): 1-11.
• 16. Öztürk M., Bolat İ., Gökyer E. & Kara Ö. (2017). Land use suitability classification for the actual agricultural areas within the Bartın Stream Watershed of Turkey. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences. 5(1): 30-36.
• 17. Öztürk A. (2018a). Immigration and Crises. In: Immigration Sociology (Ed. Rıdvan Şimşek). Akademisyen Bookstore, Ankara, Turkey.
• 18. Öztürk A. (2018b). Grand Crises of Social Science in Turkey (Alarm for Preference of University Department over YKS Examination: Analysis of 2018 Data). 3th International Multidisciplinary Studies Congress, October 5-6, 2018. pp. 360-365. Kiev, Ukraine.
• 19. Öztürk A. (2019). The comparison of East-Islamic Cities and Western Cities in the context of city Imajoloji. TYB Academy (Journal of Philology, Literature and Social Sciences). 26: 112-129.
• 20. Randolph J. (2004). Environmental Land Use Planning and Management. First Edition. Island Press, Washington, USA.
• 21. Sakieh Y., Salmanmahiny A., Jafarnezhad J., Mehri A., Kamyab H. & Galdavi S. (2015). Evaluating the strategy of decentralized urban land-use planning in a developing region. Land Use Policy. 48: 534-551.
• 22. Steiner F. (1999). The Living Landscape: An Ecological Approach to Landscape Planning. Second Edition. McGraw-Hill Professional Architecture. New York, USA.
• 23. PDEU-Provincial Directorate of Environment and Urbanism (Bartın Governorship) (2018). Environmental Status of Bartın Province in 2017. 131 pages. Bartın, Turkey.
• 24. TSI-Turkish Statistical Institute (2019a). Turkey in Statistics 2018. 147 pages. Publication Number: 4546, Ankara, Turkey.
• 25. TSI-Turkish Statistical Institute (2019b). Address Based Population Registration System, Statistics of 2018. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/ Date of Access: 29.06.2019.
• 26. TSMS-Turkish State Meteorological Service (2013). Daily Meteorological Data of Bartın Meteorological Station. Ankara, Turkey.
• 27. Turner M.G. & Gardner R.H. (2015). Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. Second Edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
• 28. Veal A.J. (2013). Open space planning standards in Australia: in search of origins. Australian Planner. 50(3): 224-232.
• 29. Wu J. (2014). Urban ecology and sustainability: The state-of-the-science and future directions. Landscape and Urban Planning. 125: 209-221.
• 30. Wu J., Xiang W-N. & Zhao J. (2014). Urban ecology in China: Historical developments and future directions. Landscape and Urban Planning. 125: 222-233.