Review

A Review on Different Analytical Techniques for Quantification of Moxidectin

Volume: 11 Number: 2 May 15, 2024
EN

A Review on Different Analytical Techniques for Quantification of Moxidectin

Abstract

Nemadectin, a macrocyclic lactone of the milbemycin class, is a fermentation by-product of the bacteria Streptomyces cyanogriseus subsp. non-Cyanogenus. Moxidectin is a semi-synthetic derivative of nemadectin. River blindness, also known as onchocerciasis, is treated with moxidectin in patients 12 years of age and older. This condition is brought on by the parasitic worm Onchocerca volvulus and is subjected to intense itching, skin conditions that are disfiguring, and impaired vision brought on by the larvae of the worm. Some of the most common internal and exterior parasites are killed by moxidectin by selectively binding to their glutamate-gated chloride ion channels. In this review article, various pieces of equipment, such as a UV spectrometer, HPLC, LC-MS, and UPLC-MS, are used to determine moxidectin as well as its related compounds. The QuEChERS method was also used in the sample preparation according to the literature survey. The report also offers an overview of the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and medication interactions of moxidectin.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

GITAM School of Pharmacy

References

  1. 1. Macedo F, Marsico E. T, Conte-Júnior C, A et al. Development and validation of a method for the determination of low-ppb levels of macrocyclic lactones in butter, using HPLC-fluorescence. Food chemistry. 2015; 179: 239–245.
  2. 2. Pimentel-Trapero D, Sonseca-Yepes A, Moreira-Romero S, et al. Determination of macrocyclic lactones in bovine liver using QuEChERS and HPLC with fluorescence detection. Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences. 2016; 166-172.
  3. 3. Cheibub A. M. S. S, Lyra E. S, Netto A. D. P. Development and validation of a method for simultaneous determination of trace levels of five macrocyclic lactones in cheese by HPLC-fluorescence after solid-liquid extraction with low-temperature partitioning. Journal of Food Chemistry. 2019; 272: 148-156.
  4. 4. Bengone-Ndong T, Mvouaka S. K, Alvinerie M, et al. A comparative kinetic study of doramectin and moxidectin in zebu gobra cattle (Bos indicus). Journal of Parasitology Research. 2013; 103(6): 1465-7. 5. Escudero E, Carceles C. M, Alvinerie M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of moxidectin and doramectin in goats. Research in Veterinary Science. 1999; 67(2):177-81.
  5. 6. Alvinerie M, Sutra J. F, Badri M, et al. Determination of moxidectin in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with automated solid-phase extraction and fluorescence detection. Journal of Chromatography B. 1995; 674; 119-124.
  6. 7. Dennis K, She-Yi W, Lawrence F, et al. Liquid chromatographic assay of ivermectin in human plasma for application to clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2006, Mar 3; 40(4): 1013-20.
  7. 8. Mercedes L, Alvarez L, Entrocasso C, Virkel G, et al. Comparative tissue pharmacokinetics and efficacy of moxidectin, abamectin, and ivermectin in lambs infected with resistant nematodes. International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance. 2013; 3: 20–27.
  8. 9. Chou H. K, Lai C. Y, Chen T. H, et al. "A multiresidue method for the determination of abamectin, doramectin, moxidectin, ivermectin, milbemycin A3, and A4 residues in bovine muscle using HPLC with fluorescence detection," Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 2004; 12(2): 146-153.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Analytical Chemistry

Journal Section

Review

Publication Date

May 15, 2024

Submission Date

February 27, 2023

Acceptance Date

January 29, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 11 Number: 2

APA
Kommu, A., & Sundararajan, R. (2024). A Review on Different Analytical Techniques for Quantification of Moxidectin. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, 11(2), 601-614. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1257065
AMA
1.Kommu A, Sundararajan R. A Review on Different Analytical Techniques for Quantification of Moxidectin. JOTCSA. 2024;11(2):601-614. doi:10.18596/jotcsa.1257065
Chicago
Kommu, Aarti, and Raja Sundararajan. 2024. “A Review on Different Analytical Techniques for Quantification of Moxidectin”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 11 (2): 601-14. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1257065.
EndNote
Kommu A, Sundararajan R (May 1, 2024) A Review on Different Analytical Techniques for Quantification of Moxidectin. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 11 2 601–614.
IEEE
[1]A. Kommu and R. Sundararajan, “A Review on Different Analytical Techniques for Quantification of Moxidectin”, JOTCSA, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 601–614, May 2024, doi: 10.18596/jotcsa.1257065.
ISNAD
Kommu, Aarti - Sundararajan, Raja. “A Review on Different Analytical Techniques for Quantification of Moxidectin”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry 11/2 (May 1, 2024): 601-614. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1257065.
JAMA
1.Kommu A, Sundararajan R. A Review on Different Analytical Techniques for Quantification of Moxidectin. JOTCSA. 2024;11:601–614.
MLA
Kommu, Aarti, and Raja Sundararajan. “A Review on Different Analytical Techniques for Quantification of Moxidectin”. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, vol. 11, no. 2, May 2024, pp. 601-14, doi:10.18596/jotcsa.1257065.
Vancouver
1.Aarti Kommu, Raja Sundararajan. A Review on Different Analytical Techniques for Quantification of Moxidectin. JOTCSA. 2024 May 1;11(2):601-14. doi:10.18596/jotcsa.1257065