Effect of Terminal Donor Units on the Electronic and Photovoltaic Properties of Conjugated Small Molecules: A DFT/TD-DFT Study
Abstract
Isoindigo-based donor–acceptor small molecules are promising candidates for organic photovoltaic applications because of their strong electron-accepting character and tunable π-conjugated structures. In this work, seven isoindigo-based derivatives bearing phenyl, thiophene, thiophene, benzothiophene, fluorene, carbazole, phenoxazine, and julolidine terminal donor units were computationally designed and investigated using density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations. Following a benchmark study, B3PW91/6-31+G(d,p) was selected for the systematic evaluation of structural, electronic, optical, and OPV-related properties. The results indicate that donor modification mainly affects the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy, while the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) remains largely localized on the isoindigo acceptor core. Stronger donor units narrowed the electronic gap and induced bathochromic shifts in absorption, but excessive HOMO destabilization decreased the estimated open-circuit voltage from 1.28 to 0.59 V. Among the investigated molecules, the benzothiophene derivative I3 showed the most balanced OPV-related descriptor profile, with λmax = 672.55 nm, f = 1.67, LHE = 0.98, Eb = 0.36 eV, ΔLUMO = 0.64 eV, and an estimated Voc of 1.27 V. In contrast, phenoxazine and julolidine derivatives exhibited more strongly red-shifted absorption maxima at 803 and 838 nm, respectively, but their less favorable voltage-related descriptors and higher exciton binding energies reduced their overall OPV-related descriptor balance. These findings indicate that moderate donor strength is more favorable than excessive electron donation for achieving a balance among absorption, exciton dissociation, and voltage retention in isoindigo-based small-molecule OPV candidates.
Keywords
- Isoindigo Derivatives
- Donor–Acceptor Systems
- Organic Photovoltaics
- DFT/TD-DFT
- Structure-Property Relationships
Ethical Statement
Thanks
References
- 1. Rand BP, Genoe J, Heremans P, Poortmans J. Solar cells utilizing small molecular weight organic semiconductors. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl. 2007 Dec 24;15(8):659–76. Available from:
. - 2. Bai H, Wang Y, Cheng P, Wang J, Wu Y, Hou J, et al. An electron acceptor based on indacenodithiophene and 1,1-dicyanomethylene-3-indanone for fullerene-free organic solar cells. J Mater Chem A. 2015;3(5):1910–4. Available from:
. - 3. Ostroverkhova O. Organic optoelectronic materials: Mechanisms and applications. Chem Rev. 2016 Nov 23;116(22):13279–412. Available from:
. - 4. Mishra A, Bäuerle P. Small molecule organic semiconductors on the move: Promises for future solar energy technology. Angew Chemie Int Ed. 2012 Feb 27;51(9):2020–67. Available from:
. - 5. Lin Y, Li Y, Zhan X. Small molecule semiconductors for high-efficiency organic photovoltaics. Chem Soc Rev. 2012 May 15;41(11):4245–72. Available from:
. - 6. Brédas JL, Norton JE, Cornil J, Coropceanu V. Molecular understanding of organic solar cells: The challenges. Acc Chem Res. 2009 Nov 17;42(11):1691–9. Available from:
. - 7. Bureš F. Fundamental aspects of property tuning in push–pull molecules. RSC Adv. 2014 Oct 22;4(102):58826–51. Available from:
. - 8. Roncali J. Molecular engineering of the band gap of π‐conjugated systems: Facing technological applications. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2007 Sep 3;28(17):1761–75. Available from:
.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Optical Properties of Materials, Theory and Design of Materials, Physical Organic Chemistry, Computational Chemistry
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
September 5, 2026
Submission Date
May 6, 2026
Acceptance Date
August 21, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 2026 Number: 2
