Research Article

The Effect of Two Different Recovery Methods on Muscle Damage

Volume: 6 Number: 3 September 30, 2024
TR EN

The Effect of Two Different Recovery Methods on Muscle Damage

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of two different recovery methods on recovery after high-intensity training. 20 male amateur football players between the ages of 18-26 participated in the research. Creatine kinase (CK) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) blood samples were taken from the athletes under resting conditions before the muscle injury exercise protocol (EE). Cold water protocol was applied to the experimental groups, respectively, and 10 days after the end of this protocol, the hot water protocol was applied. Here, it is aimed to investigate the effects of two different recovery exercises on the same athletes on muscle injury. It was determined that there were no significant differences for the ALT variable between the measurement values of hot water and cold water application (p>0.05). It was determined that there was no significant difference at the p<0.05 level for the CK variable between the measurement values of hot water and cold water application (p>0.05). As a result, in the literature reviews, it was determined that skeletal muscle injury occurred in athletes after high-intensity exercise and competitions. It has been concluded that hot water application is a more effective method than cold water application in tolerating the injury.

Keywords

References

  1. Akgün, N. (1993). Egzersiz Fizyolojisi. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi.2(1), 48-121.
  2. Alemdaroğlu, U. (2011). Egzersiz sonrası toparlanma: Toparlanma çeşitleri ve yöntemleri. Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 3(1). https://gcris.pau.edu.tr/bitstream/11499/54296/2/sporbilimleri3-1-6.pdf
  3. Allen, D. G., Lannergren, J., & Westerblad, H. (1995). Muscle cell function during prolonged activity: cellular mechanisms of fatigue. Experimental Physiology: Translation and Integration, 80(4), 497-527. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.1995.sp003864
  4. Andersson, H. M., Raastad, T., Nilsson, J., Paulsen, G., Garthe, I. N. A., & Kadi, F. (2008). Neuromuscular fatigue and recovery in elite female soccer: effects of active recovery. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(2), 372-380. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e31815b8497
  5. Ascensão, A., Rebelo, A., Oliveira, E., Marques, F., Pereira, L., & Magalhães, J. (2008). Biochemical impact of a soccer match—analysis of oxidative stress and muscle damage markers throughout recovery. Clinical biochemistry, 41(10-11), 841-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.04.008
  6. Balık, Ö. (2021). Yüksek Yoğunluklu Egzersiz Sonrası Farklı İki Toparlanma Yönteminin Kas Hasarına Etkisi. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Van.
  7. Banfi, G., Lombardi, G., Colombini, A., & Melegati, G. (2010). Whole-body cryotherapy in athletes. Sports medicine, 40, 509-517. https://doi.org/10.2165/11531940-000000000-00000
  8. Banfi, G., Melegati, G., & Valentini, P. (2007). Effects of cold-water immersion of legs after training session on serum creatine kinase concentrations in rugby players. British journal of sports medicine, 41(5), 339-339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.033951

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Sports Training, Exercise Physiology

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

September 20, 2024

Publication Date

September 30, 2024

Submission Date

May 23, 2024

Acceptance Date

August 16, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 6 Number: 3

APA
Çakır, E. (2024). The Effect of Two Different Recovery Methods on Muscle Damage. Journal of Sport for All and Recreation, 6(3), 300-305. https://doi.org/10.56639/jsar.1488751
AMA
1.Çakır E. The Effect of Two Different Recovery Methods on Muscle Damage. JSAR. 2024;6(3):300-305. doi:10.56639/jsar.1488751
Chicago
Çakır, Ergün. 2024. “The Effect of Two Different Recovery Methods on Muscle Damage”. Journal of Sport for All and Recreation 6 (3): 300-305. https://doi.org/10.56639/jsar.1488751.
EndNote
Çakır E (September 1, 2024) The Effect of Two Different Recovery Methods on Muscle Damage. Journal of Sport for All and Recreation 6 3 300–305.
IEEE
[1]E. Çakır, “The Effect of Two Different Recovery Methods on Muscle Damage”, JSAR, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 300–305, Sept. 2024, doi: 10.56639/jsar.1488751.
ISNAD
Çakır, Ergün. “The Effect of Two Different Recovery Methods on Muscle Damage”. Journal of Sport for All and Recreation 6/3 (September 1, 2024): 300-305. https://doi.org/10.56639/jsar.1488751.
JAMA
1.Çakır E. The Effect of Two Different Recovery Methods on Muscle Damage. JSAR. 2024;6:300–305.
MLA
Çakır, Ergün. “The Effect of Two Different Recovery Methods on Muscle Damage”. Journal of Sport for All and Recreation, vol. 6, no. 3, Sept. 2024, pp. 300-5, doi:10.56639/jsar.1488751.
Vancouver
1.Ergün Çakır. The Effect of Two Different Recovery Methods on Muscle Damage. JSAR. 2024 Sep. 1;6(3):300-5. doi:10.56639/jsar.1488751

Cited By

Creative Commons Lisansı

Articles published by Journal Sports for All and Recreation is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.