Research Article

Numerical investigation of precast reinforced concrete beam–to–column joints by replaceable damper

Volume: 7 Number: 2 June 28, 2022
EN

Numerical investigation of precast reinforced concrete beam–to–column joints by replaceable damper

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the precast reinforced concrete beam-to-column joints behaviors through the replaceable damper under cyclic loading. The precast concrete specimens have been embedded with steel reinforcement and specially shaped connectors. After the application of the replaceable damper under cyclic loading, the energy dissipation part has acted very well and increased the bearing capacity of precast specimens. The precast concrete beam–to–column joints were designed and analyzed to compare with the reinforced concrete (RC) specimen. The analysis result of the loading based on the controlled displacement method has illustrated that the precast specimen model with damper has shown a greater hysteric behavior than the RC frame. the PS-1 is passed the 2.8% chord rotation approximately, which showed better performance, and higher resistance than the RC specimen. The efficiency of the PS–1 specimen with a special connection has been elaborated with the finite element method (FEM) and simulated by ABAQUS software.

Keywords

References

  1. Jaillon, L., Poon, C., & Chiang, Y. (2009). Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong. Waste Management, 29(1), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.015
  2. Yee, A. A. (2001). Social and Environmental Benefits of Precast Concrete Technology. PCI Journal, 46(3), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05012001.14.19
  3. Breccolotti, M., Gentile, S., Tommasini, M., Materazzi, A. L., Bonfigli, M. F., Pasqualini, B., Colone, V., & Gianesini, M. (2016). Beam-column joints in continuous RC frames: Comparison between cast-in-situ and precast solutions. Engineering Structures, 127, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.018
  4. Dyke, S. J., Spencer, B. F., Sain, M. K., & Carlson, J. D. (1998). An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection. Smart Materials and Structures, 7(5), 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/7/5/012
  5. M. J. N. (1988). Research Needs for Precast Seismic Structural Systems. Structural Systems Research Report No. SSRP-88/06, University of California, San Diego, CA, August.
  6. Şermet, F., Ercan, E., Hökelekli, E., Arisoy, B. (2020). Cyclic behavior of composite column-reinforced concrete beam joints. Sigma J Eng & Nat Sci 38 (3), 2020, 1427-1445.
  7. Morgen, B. G., & Kurama, Y. C. (2007). Seismic Design of Friction-Damped Precast Concrete Frame Structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(11), 1501–1511. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1501)
  8. Morgen, B. G., & Kurama, Y. C. (2004). A Friction Damper for Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Moment Frames. PCI Journal, 49(4), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07012004.112.133

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Civil Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 28, 2022

Submission Date

May 15, 2022

Acceptance Date

June 2, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 7 Number: 2

APA
Dehqan Nezhad, Y., & Naimi, S. (2022). Numerical investigation of precast reinforced concrete beam–to–column joints by replaceable damper. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, 7(2), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.47481/jscmt.1117101

Cited By